Indo-European Mythology and Religion

Home > Other > Indo-European Mythology and Religion > Page 2
Indo-European Mythology and Religion Page 2

by Alexander Jacob


  10 See

  Interpreter Bible, I:560.

  13

  indo-european mythology and religion

  Iranians are represented in Herodotus as worshipping the

  “circle of heaven” (Ahura, from Ashur/Anshar – circle

  of heaven) as well as the heavenly bodies. The Iranians

  discussed by Herodotus, however, did not build temples

  or worship statuary representations of their deities

  (I,131), and this emphasises their ancient affiliation with

  the Scythians, whereas the Mitanni – and the Hittite-

  Hurrians, however, were certainly not averse to such

  representations. Besides, the Iranian rituals are described

  by Herodotus as not involving fire, even though the later

  Zoroastrian religion—like the Indic—is indeed typified

  by its worship of fire, Atar. This suggests that the later

  Iranians must have come into contact in the south with

  the Purūrava Ailas [Elamites/Hurrians], who, as we shall

  see,11 derived their worship of fire from the Gandharvas

  who are related to the settlers of the Bactro-Margiana

  Archaeological Complex in Afghanistan.12

  The earliest historical branch of the Indo-Āryans is

  manifest in the 16th century B.C. in northern Mesopotamia,

  in the kingdom of the Mitanni. The original home of the

  Mitanni remains uncertain. The Mitanni themselves may

  be identifiable with the Medes, and, as Herodotus (VII,69)

  reveals, the Medes were once universal y called Arians.

  The Medes may have been related to the proto-Iranians,

  since several Median words are traceable in Old Persian.

  The Mitanni kings have Sanskritic names distinguished

  by their charioteering affiliation, and this expertise is

  reflected also in the names (Keres-aspa, Pourus-aspa)

  of the Iranian branch of the Āryan family, as well as in

  the extraordinary prestige ascribed to the horse by the

  Indo-Āryans in their sacred rituals. The close relation

  between the Indo-Āryans and Iranians and the Scythians

  is confirmed by the veneration of the horse among the

  11 See p.96.

  12 See p.72.

  14

  alexander jacob

  Scythians reported by Herodotus (IV,61). However, the

  Mitanni exhibit an adherence to a Vedic (and not to the

  later Zoroastrian Avestan) form of religion, along with a

  worship of Hurrian deities, thus establishing the relative

  lateness of the Zoroastrian religion.

  The sons of Gamer, in the biblical Table of Nations,

  include Ashkenaz (the Scythians, who are eastern,

  shatem-language speaking Japhetites), Riphath

  (Paphlagonians, according to Josephus) and Thokarmah

  (Phrygians, according to Josephus, or Armenians,

  according to Hippolytus of Rome).13 The Celts and the

  Scythians are closely associated, as is indicated by Strabo

  (XI,7,2), who states that the Greek authors called all the

  northern populations Scythians or Celtoscythians. Also,

  Asclepiades of Thrace (4 th c. B.C.) refers to the legendary

  king Boreas as a king of the Celts while in other authors

  he appears as a king of the Scythians, even though

  the Scythians are younger than the Cimmerians. The

  Scythians are located by Herodotus north of the Black

  Sea in close proximity to the Cimmerians. According to

  Herodotus (IV,3), the Scythians considered themselves as

  the “youngest of all nations”. However, the wide territory

  of the Scythians extended through Russia to Central Asia.

  The Scythians are also closely associated with the Indo-

  Iranians with whom they shared an eastern “shatem”

  Āryan language and much of their religious practices.

  The predominance of the Iranian language in the regions

  inhabited by Cimmerians and Scythians, that is, from the

  Danube to the Dnieper, is evidenced also by the names

  of the Danube, Dnieper, and Dniester, which employ

  the Avestan term “danu” for river. Indeed, this area

  corresponds to that inhabited by the Slavs and we may

  13 That the name may denote the Armenians is made probable by

  the fact that their ancestor is called Tcorghom (see A.E. Redgate, The Armenians, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1998, p.14).

  15

  indo-european mythology and religion

  reasonably consider the Scythians as the forebears of the

  latter.

  Herodotus’ account of the Scythians (IV,59) however

  suggests that they did not possess much sophistication

  in their religious rituals. Darius I (522-486 B.C.) himself

  refers to the Sakas as “unruly” and not devoted to Ahura

  Mazda. Herodotus’ account of the religious customs of

  the Scythians (IV,59) indeed reveals their sharp focus on

  martial life, since they apparently did not set up altars

  or statues to any god except Ares, god of war. Eliade’s

  researches also point to a very rudimentary practical

  application of the spiritual bases of the cosmological

  religion of the ancient Near East to quasi-shamanistic

  rituals. This also explains their ancient designation as

  “hoamavarga”, or “soma-drinking”, Scythians.

  Indeed all the Āryan peoples may be traced back

  ultimately to the Hut Grave and Catacomb Grave

  cultures of the Ukraine (ca. 2800 B.C.) and, earlier, to the

  Yamnaya Culture (fourth millennium B.C.), also north

  of the Black Sea. But it is interesting to note that both

  the Indians and the Avestan Iranians seem original y

  to have been nomadic peoples akin to the Scythians, as

  is attested by the language of the Old Avesta, wherein

  the cosmos is viewed as an enormous tent. However,

  there may have been other waves of Indo-Āryans that

  settled in the Bactria-Margiana Archaeological Complex

  [situated in present-day Afghanistan and Turkmenistan]

  around 2200–1700 B.C. and the Gandhara region

  [around Peshawar] around 1700 B.C., for these seem to

  have followed a religion based on fire-rituals. Elaborate

  fire altars are evident in the ruins of the BMAC complex

  which correspond to the Āryan fire-sacrifices. The

  temples also contain rooms with “all the necessary

  apparatus for the preparation of drinks extracted from

  16

  alexander jacob

  poppy, hemp and ephedra” that may have been used for

  the soma-rituals.14

  When we investigate the crucial issue of the

  institution of fire-rituals among the Indo-Āryans, we

  should remember that neither the earliest Iranians, nor

  the Mitanni Indo-Āryans, nor the Scythians give any

  evidence of such fire-worship. In the Purānas, Purūravas,

  the early Aila [Elamite?] king, is said to have obtained

  sacrificial fire from the “Gandharvas”, who also taught

  him the constitution of the three sacred fires of the

  Āryans. This suggests that the early Hurrians of Elam and

  the earliest Iranians did not worship fire and learnt it from

  a later wave of Āryans. However, even the Gandharvas

  are included among the Aila [Elamite?] dynasties in the

  Purānas, which suggests that they to
o were a northern

  and eastern branch of proto-Hurrians identifiable with the

  Japhetic.

  ***

  As for the western “centum” Aryans, even though

  the Cimmerians or Celts, represented by Gamer, are

  considered the first-born of Japheth, the earliest historical

  evidence of a “centum” language is from Anatolia,

  among the Hittites. The so-called Hittites were, unlike

  the native Hatti, Āryans. But they, like the Cimmerian

  Japhetites (as well as the Semites and Hamites) do not

  provide archaeological evidence of any fire-rituals in their

  religious worship. The Hittite kingdom also shows a strong

  neo-Hurrian cultural influence from the fifteenth century

  B.C. and many of the Hittite queens bear Hurrian names,

  just as in the case of the Mitanni. The Hittite religion is

  14 See J.P. Mallory and V.H. Mair, The Tarim Mummies: Ancient China and the Mystery of the Earliest Peoples from the West, London: Thames and Hudson, 2008, p.262.

  17

  indo-european mythology and religion

  ful y Sumero-Hurrian but has particular affinities with the

  Mitanni and Indo-Āryan as wel .

  Greeks most probably arrived in the Hel adic region

  around 2200 B.C. from Anatolia, though it is possible that

  Japhetic tribes from the shores of the Black Sea moved

  overland to Greece as wel . The pre-Greek Minoan culture

  of Crete, however, was instrumental in developing the

  Linear A script (before 1700 B.C.) which preceded the

  Āryan Mycenean Linear B (1300 B.C.). And just as the

  Cretan script is at the base of the Mycenean, so too their

  religion is continued unchanged by the later immigrants.

  It is not surprising thus that the Cretan Zeus, who is

  identifiable with Dionysus, is called Zagreus, which

  suggests an origin of the deity in the Zagros mountains of

  western Iran.

  Farther west, one of the oldest branches of the

  Germanic peoples is called the Alemanni. According

  to Snorri Sturluson, the author of the Prose Edda, the

  Germans first derived their religion from Anatolians

  who moved into Europe. The first Anatolian (one of the

  “Aesir” [Asuras]) who migrated into Germany is said to be

  “Voden” or “Odin”, the god of Wind [the original Germanic

  form, Wotan, is clearly related to the Indo-Iranian Wāta,

  a form of the wind-god, Vāyu]. Odin, however, is said to

  be a distant descendant of “Tror” or “Thor”,15 the son of a

  Trojan king called Mennon or Munon [=Manu?] who had

  married a daughter of King Priam. Thor himself is said to

  have first wandered to Thrace and then to other parts of

  the world. We will note that Thrace is also the source of

  the Dionysiac cult.

  Odin’s three sons, Vegdeg, Beldeg (Baldur) and

  Sigi ruled over East Germany, Westphalia, and France,

  respectively. Further expeditions took Odin to Denmark,

  15 Cf. Ch.VII.

  18

  alexander jacob

  Sweden, and Norway, whereby he succeeded in spreading

  the “language of Asia” all over Europe. We see therefore

  the centrality of Anatolia as the land whence most of

  the western Indo-European cultures were derived, even

  though the Celtic Cimmerians were largely located north

  of the Black Sea.

  According to Tacitus, Mannus [cognate with the Indic

  Manu] was the ancestor of the Germanic race, and he

  had three sons represented by the Ingaevones (the north

  Germans including the Scandinavians and the ancestors

  of the Anglo-Saxons), Herminones (the West Germans

  including the Goths, Burgundians and Lombardians)

  and Istaevones (the Low Germans, Franks, Dutch and

  Belgians). The first Germanic tribe to have crossed the

  Rhine and ousted the indigenous Celts were the Tungri (a

  Belgic tribe), whose other name, Germani, was used for

  all the tribes.

  The chief god of the Germans is said by Tacitus to

  be the creator god Tuisto [from Tvashtr/Tvoreshtar/

  Tartarus], though Ingvi, another name for Freyr, must

  have been the god of the Ingaevones just as Hermin, a

  name for Wotan, must have been the chief deity of the

  Herminones, while Istae remains obscure.

  ***

  As regards the cosmological and philosophical insights

  that inform the ancient religions, it is likely that they

  were developed first through yogic meditation, as the

  Brahmānda Purāna I,i,3,8, for instance, declares. It is

  significant that, in the Mahabhārata, Shalyaparva, 44,

  Skanda or Muruga, the Dionysiac god of the Dravidians,

  is described as being endowed with yogic powers while

  his father Shiva is in Mahābhārata, Anushāsanaparva, 14,

  19

  indo-european mythology and religion

  addressed as the “soul of yoga” and the object of all yogic

  meditation. Since it is most likely that the Noachidian

  people were proto-Dravidian/proto-Hurrian, it is probable

  that this profound yogic knowledge of the universe is

  characteristic of it.

  The religion of the ancients was based on a spiritual

  vision of the formation of the cosmos.16 After the cosmic

  deluge which marks the end of the first cosmic age (kalpa),

  the Divine Soul, Ātman, within the cosmic ocean (the

  Abyss) gradual y recreates the cosmos assuming the form

  of an Ideal Macroanthropos, or Cosmic Man. The breath

  or life-force (Vāyu/Wotan) of the cosmic Man first unites

  with matter (Earth) to form a closely united complex of

  Heaven (the substance of the Purusha) and Earth. But the

  temporal aspect (Kāla, Chronos) of the rapidly moving

  breath or wind also separates the two elements, an event

  represented as a castration of the Purusha. The semen that

  fal s from the castrated phal us impregnates the Purusha

  himself with a Cosmic Egg from which emerge the

  manifest cosmos comprised, again, of Earthly substance

  and Heavenly light (Brahman). This luminous Brahman is

  also represented anthropomorphical y as a Cosmic Man.

  However, this light, again represented in

  anthropomorphic form, continues to possess a stormy

  quality which is a persistence of Chronos in the manifest

  cosmos. This force, represented as Zeus/Seth/Ganesha,

  shatters the light and forces it to descend to the lower

  regions of Earth, where it lies moribund as, for instance,

  Osiris. However, the same storm-force has, in its assault

  on the manifest light, swallowed the divine phal us and it

  eventual y revives the moribund light in the underworld

  with its potency. Separating the substance of Earth, into

  which the cosmic light has sunk, into the earthly regions

  16 For a more elaborate study of the cosmology of the ancient Indo-Europeans see A. Jacob, Ātman. 20

  alexander jacob

  and heaven of our universe, it emerges through the cleft

  between the two into the mid-region of the stars as a

  universal Tree of Life, or Phal us. The seed of this newly

  formed universe is then emitted within our galaxy, first as

&nbs
p; the moon, and then the solar force final y emerges above

  the top of the Tree (Phal us) as the sun.

  The process of developing life on earth is supervised by

  the seventh Manu of our age whom we have encountered

  as the King of Drāvida. This Manu is responsible for

  the continuance of mankind on the earth as well as

  for its spiritual evolution. In this task, he is assisted by

  seven sages, who represent the wisdom and culture of

  enlightened man. The brāhmans derive their ancestry

  from these seven sages and so we see that the Brāhmanical

  religion is indeed the oldest and one original y marked by

  yogic spiritual elevation.

  Since we have identified the proto-Indo-Europeans

  as proto-Hurrians or proto-Dravidians, we may pause

  to consider what the earliest form of their religion may

  have been. We have noted that the Cimmerians are the

  most ancient of the Japhetic Aryans and we know that

  their priests were called Druids, so it is possible that the

  Druids are indeed descendants of the proto-Dravidians

  themselves. The phonetic similarity of “Druid” to

  “Drāvida” is obvious.17 In classical texts, the name of the

  Druids appears mostly in a plural form, as “druidai“ (Gk.)

  or “druidae“ or “druides“ (Lt.).18 In Irish, “drai“ or “druí“

  is the singular form of a word meaning “wise man“, of

  which “draod“ or “druid“ is the plural. The association of

  the Druids with the Greek word for “oak“, first made by

  Pliny ( Historia Naturalis XVI,95), is probably a later one due to the importance of tree-worship among the ancient

  17 In ancient Indo-European ‘v’ is typical y pronounced ‘u’.

  18 See S. Piggott, Prehistoric India to 1000 B.C. , London: Cassel , 1962, p.89.

  21

  indo-european mythology and religion

  Druids, as well as amongst most of the ancient Indo-

  European peoples, since the sacred tree serves as a symbol

  of the divine phal us representing the life of the universe.

  The Druids seem to have been the priests of the

  Cimmerian Celts, especial y in Gaul and Britain. Since

  there is no evidence of them in other Celtic territories

  such as the Danube, Cisalpine and Transalpine Gaul it is

  possible that they are themselves of non-Celtic origin.19

  However, among the Gauls, the Druids, along with the

  “equites”, constituted the higher “castes”. Piggott believed

 

‹ Prev