Indo-European Mythology and Religion

Home > Other > Indo-European Mythology and Religion > Page 5
Indo-European Mythology and Religion Page 5

by Alexander Jacob


  sounds, throughout the world. I swear it by the

  Tallquist, Akkadische Götterepitheta (Studia Orientalia 7), Helsinki, 1938, p.422. For Ninurta as the solar force, see p.49.

  70 Tr. L. Cagni, The Poem of Erra, Malibu, CA: Undena Publications, 1977, p.32.

  71 See Apollodorus, Library, I,7,2. 39

  indo-european mythology and religion

  infernal streams, that glide below the earth through

  the Stygian groves. All means should first be tried,

  but the incurable flesh must be excised by the knife,

  so that the healthy part is not infected. Mine are the

  demigods, the wild spirits, nymphs, fauns and satyrs,

  and sylvan deities of the hil s. Since we have not yet

  thought them worth a place in heaven let us at least

  allow them to live in safety in the lands we have given

  them.

  Manu of the Sun

  The course of the sun’s emergence in our universe

  coincides with that of the first Man, who is called Manu

  Vaivasvata, or Manu of the Sun (Vivasvant). This primal

  man is of interest in a study of the flood since it is he who

  is said to preserve the life of the universe in a boat that is

  at once a solar barque, as in Egypt, and an ark that carries

  the seeds of universal life through the flood to safety atop

  a mountain (from whence the sun too will arise). Manu is

  thus the divine ancestor of the race that is to inhabit the

  universe. As a personification of enlightened humanity

  the role of a Manu is to maintain the cosmic order at the

  time of the creation of the universe ( BP VIII,14,3).

  Manu Vaivasvata is also called Shraddhādeva

  ( BP VIII,13,1) and is the seventh Manu of our kalpa

  ( BP VIII,13, there being fourteen Manus in all in each

  kalpa.72 The seventh manvantara of the Varāha Kalpa is

  thus called Vaivasvata (of Vivasvant, the sun) Manvantara

  ( BP VII,8; VIII,7,12,18), or the Age of Manu of the

  Sun. Since each manvantara has a duration of around

  317,000,000 years ( BP III,11,24), life on earth must have 72 The names of the first six Manus of this kalpa are Swāyambhuva, 40

  alexander jacob

  begun more than 1,902,000,000 years after the inception

  of the Varāha Kalpa.

  The incarnation of the Lord as the Fish, Matsya,

  which transfers Vaivasvata (or Shraddhādeva) Manu

  from his celestial origin to Earth occurs early during this

  manvantara. For, according to the BP, this manvantara

  is marked by six cosmic avatārs from that of the Fish,

  Matsya, to the dwarf sun, Vāmana, who is the last of the

  solar Ādityas ( BP I,3,15-19). The avatars following Matsya are the tortoise Kūrma (which helps bear the mountain

  Mandāra73 on its back while the latter is being used as a

  ladle to churn the cosmic ocean with for the elicitation

  of the nectar of immortality), the seductress Mohini, and

  the man-lion, Narasimha. There are six further, human

  incarnations of the deity after that of Vāmana, from Bhrgu

  to the Buddha, the last coinciding with the Kali Yuga of

  our manvantara.

  Though Manu is differentiated in RV from Yama, who

  is considered to be another son of the sun, Vivasvant,74

  Yama bears the same epithet of “Shraddhādeva”75 which

  Manu also does in BP. So it is likely that we are dealing with the same figure, especial y since the flood hero of the

  Avesta is also called Yima.76 Manu’s “half-brother” (or alter ego), Yama is said to be the ruler of the lower heavens,

  according to RV I,35,6, and the sun and moon themselves

  are located in the mid-region between Heaven and Earth.

  Svarochisha, Uttama, Tāmasa, Raivata, Chākshusha ( BP VIII,1).

  73 The Mandāra mountain is one of the four mountains surrounding the central Mt. Meru, the other three being Merumandāra, Supārshva, and Kumuda (see BP V,16,11).

  74 In

  RV X, 10ff, Vivasvant engenders the first “man”, Yama, as well as Yama’s twin sister and wife, Yami, by mating with a daughter of Tvastr.

  75 See

  The HW II:615.

  76 See p.51.

  41

  indo-european mythology and religion

  In the Shiva Purāna, the sage Mārkandeya substitutes

  for Manu. When Mārkandeya appeals to the Lord for a

  refuge in the boundless ocean, “the ocean of mundane

  existence”, the Lord points out to him the holy heavenly

  river Narmada (a form of Pārvathi, Shiva’s consort

  corresponding to the Egyptian Mehet-Ouret), on the

  banks of which Mārkandeya along with other sages

  practices penance. Narmada also represents the flood

  which bears the sun. Narmada assumes for this solar

  birth the form of a cow with golden horns, a shape we

  have encounter in the Egyptian representation of the

  flood Mehet Ouret, or Hathor, as the bearer of Horus,

  the sun, between her horns. At the same time, Narmada

  represents Earth, the material universe, itself. This is in

  consonance with her role as the consort of Shiva, who is

  the counterpart of the Egyptian Geb [Earth] and Chronos/

  Time.77 The transformation of the elemental universal

  matter of Earth into a Cow that yields nourishment to the

  various forms of life in the manifest universe is related in

  the BP IV,17ff. And this transformation is a repetition of that which occurred within the Cosmic Egg itself at the

  moment of the impregnation of the cosmic streams with

  the seminal ‘water’ or seed of the supreme deity.78

  Mārkandeya is saved from the cataclysm by seeking

  refuge in Narmada’s “flanks”, for this cow’s milk is said to

  be “ambrosial”, just as Aditi’s is, since it contains the divine

  “soma” [seed]. The result of Mārkandeya’s imbibing of

  Narmada’s milk is that “Divine vital energy” … “streamed

  through [him]” so that Mārkandeya “was able to breast

  the raging sea”. As he is dragged along by the cow, whose

  “tail” he holds, for thousands of ages, Mārkandeya catches

  a glimpse of the Purusha “asleep”79 in the cosmic ocean.

  77 See A. Jacob, Ātman, Ch.XI.

  78 See p.31.

  79 Or moribund, in Osirian mythological terms.

  42

  alexander jacob

  There is also an intimate connection between Hathor and

  the Tree of Life, which springs up from the waters of the

  abyss, just as there is between Aditi and Indra in the Vedas,

  and Narmada is a form of Aditi as well as Pārvathi. Both

  Hathor and Aditi represent the basis of universal creation

  after the periodic destruction of the cosmos, and the Tree

  of Life is the form of the material universe itself which

  arises from the abyss through the divine seed represented

  by Indra/Ninurta/Marduk.

  It is clear that Mārkandeya is a form of the solar force

  itself, and we may conclude that Manu, whom he replaces,

  is, as the “son” of the sun, equal y one. Both Manu and

  Mārkandeya are thus ‘superhuman’ solar figures that are

  considered ancestors of the human race.

  ***

  We may now consider some special aspects of the

  flood story of Manu that may require elucidation. In

  the
Shatapatha Brāhmana Manu80 is warned of the deluge

  by a fish (representing Vishnu/Prajāpati in his piscine

  Matsya avatār). Manu saves himself in a ship which is

  tied to the “horn” of the fish81 and is borne by the latter

  to the heights of “the northern mountain”, which, not

  being specified as a Himalayan one, may well be the

  80 The ancient Germans too considered the ancestor of the Germanic people to be ‘Mannus’, according to Tacitus, Germania, Sec.2.

  81 See

  SB I,viii,1,5. It is hard to determine what the “horn” of the fish might be (unless it were a sword-fish). On the other hand, we may recall the image of Re emerging as the sun by holding on to the horns of the Cow Mehet-Ouret. The Indic imagery may be a hybrid transformation of the Egyptian. This impression is reinforced by the fact that Manu’s daughter, Ida, who in SB I,viii,1,11-12 is said to characterise “cattle”, is, in TS I,7,1 and II,6,7, represented as a cow produced by Mitra-Varuna.

  We shall see below that Ida is the same as Narmada.

  43

  indo-european mythology and religion

  Ararat of the Armenians mentioned in Genesis 8:4.82

  In the Mahābhārata, the divine identity of the fish is

  revealed to be that of Prajāpati/Brahman (the name of

  the supreme god in his luminous, creative aspect), since

  the fish declares to the “seven sages”—who, unlike in

  the SB version of the story, accompany Manu in the ship

  —“I am Brahma, lord of progeny [Prajāpati] … I in the

  form of a fish have delivered you from this peril”.83 The

  fish goes on to state that Manu should create all creatures

  including “gods, asuras, and men and all the worlds and

  what moves and what does not move [i.e. animal and

  vegetable life].”

  In the Matsya Purāna, too, the fish that saves Manu is

  said to be a form of the supreme lord, Janārdana (Vishnu),

  while the rope that Manu ties between the fish’s “horn”

  and the boat is the serpent, Vasuki, identifiable with

  the serpent of the Abyss, Sesha.84 We note here again a

  similarity also between the Ship of Life and the Tree of

  Life since both bear the serpent at one end and both bear

  the seeds of universal life as well as the solar force – the

  latter represented by Manu himself as well as by the sun

  that arises atop the branches of the Tree.85 Besides, the

  Ship of Life containing the seeds of life of the universe

  comes to rest atop a mountain, and the sun too appears

  atop the phallic, mountain-like, Tree of Life.

  ***

  In the Dravidian Cikalittala Purānam of

  Arunāchalakkavirayar, we get further glimpses into the

  82 See p.9.

  83 Mbh II, 187, 2ff. (cited S. Shastri, op.cit., p.9); cf. H. Usener, op.cit., p.28ff.

  84 See S. Shastri, op.cit., p.28.

  85 See A. Jacob, Ātman, Ch.XXIII. 44

  alexander jacob

  nature of the ship of life. The divine personages who

  survive the flood are said to be Siva himself and his wife

  Uma. The boat which saves Siva and his wife are considered

  as being symbolic of the sacred sound “Om” itself, while

  the resting place of the boat is a “shrine” which stands as

  firm as “Dharma”.86 We may remember also that Ziusudra

  is blessed, at the end of the deluge, with immortality in the

  sacred land of “Dilmun”. The original form of Dilmun may

  well have been “Dharman” and represented the perfect

  holiness that this concept signifies in Vedic religion.87

  Dilmun is also identified with the sacred “mountain”

  from which the light of the universe arises and which is

  the terrestrial source of the “me’s”.88 This suggests that the

  phallic ‘mountain’ and ‘tree’ of life are identical.

  The mountain atop which the boat comes to rest is

  also considered to be situated at the centre or navel of

  the universe. For the concept that the sanctuary is to

  be found atop a mountain at the navel or centre of the

  universe is to be found in Jewish (and later Muslim)

  theologians as wel ,89 who no doubt derived it from

  Babylon. The mountain and navel clearly represent the

  phallic deity Shiva and his consort Pārvathi (representing

  86 See D. Shulman, ‘The Tamil Flood Myths and the Cankam

  Legend’, Journal of Tamil Studies, 14 (1978), 10.31.

  87 It is unlikely that Dilmun original y had anything to do with the little island of Bahrain which later came to be identified with it.

  88 The Sumerian ‘me’ corresponds to the Vedic ‘rta’, which are

  principles of the divine ordering of Nature. ‘Mey’ is also the

  Tamil word for “just” (see K. Mutturayan, “Sumer: Tamil of the

  First Cankam”, Journal of Tamil Studies, 8 (1975), p.51). Cf. also Y.

  Rosengarten, Sumer et le sacré, Paris: Editions E. de Broccard, 1977, p.56. The epithet “great “mountain” of the pure me’s” is applied to other sacred Mesopotamian lands, such as Aratta and Sumer, as well ( ibid. , pp.54ff.).

  89 See A. Wensinck, “The Ideas of the Western Semites concerning the Navel of the Earth”, Verhandelingen der Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen, XVII (1916), no.1, pp.15f, 19ff, 40.

  45

  indo-european mythology and religion

  the cosmic vulva), so that they together constitute the

  entire emergent universe.

  In the Vedic literature Indra, infused with the potency

  of Soma, swel s into a universal Tree of Life through which

  the sun emerges. In order to release the sun, however,

  Indra has (in the vala myth, RV 10.67,1-12) to first free the

  “cows” from the “vala”, a rocky enclosure in which they are

  hidden by the evil Panis. The “cows” symbolise the radiant

  solar energy, since RV I,164,3 suggests that this is the

  secret name of the rays of the dawn.90 In RV X,108,5, the

  “cows” are described as “flying around to the ends of the

  sky”. The Panis themselves are described in BP V,24,30 as serpentine, Asuric creations of Diti and Danu and inhabit

  Rasātala, the sixth of the seven subterranean regions of

  the material universe bordering on the last, called Pātāla,

  below which lies the serpent Sesha. The Panis are thus

  related to Sesha/Vrtra. “Vala”, significantly, is the same

  term that is, as we shall see, used in the Avesta (“vara”)

  for the ark which bears Yima during the flood which

  accompanies the birth of the sun.

  David Shulman has pointed out that the creation

  stories in the Dravidian versions emphasise the

  importance of the shrine as the centre of the universe

  and seat of the renewed creation after the deluge.91 Shiva

  interestingly names this shrine “the root of the universe”,

  which is situated on a hill rather like the primordial hill

  from which the light of the cosmos arises in Egypt. The

  shrine, therefore, is the foundation of the universe itself.

  In the related Dravidian accounts of the deluge which

  engulfed the sacred city of Madurai, the latter city serves

  as an analogue of the shrine whence the universe emerges.

  In these stories, the flood is said to have been caused by

  90 H.P. Schmidt, Brhaspati und Indra, Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, 1968, p.222.


  91 See D. Shulman, op.cit.

  46

  alexander jacob

  Varuna [Enki] at the instigation of Indra.92 The flood

  caused by Varuna, Lord of the Underworld, precedes the

  formation of the new sun. Shiva is the god who protects

  the city Madurai from the flood, no doubt that it may

  serve as the sacred foundation of our universe. The shrine

  atop the mountain is secure (as also is the sacred city of

  Madurai) from any destructive flood which may well up

  from the netherworld, Pātāla.93

  The Mahābhārata also includes the crucial detail

  missing in SB, that Manu was instructed to carry on

  board the boat “seed of every sort”. That the seed that is

  preserved during the cosmic deluge is indeed the divine

  seed which informs all life in the universe is made clear in

  the Dravidian accounts of the flood, which state that Shiva

  instructed Brahman/Prajapati to safeguard in a golden pot

  (a substitute for the boat) the Vedas and other scriptures

  along with the seed of creation.94 After the flood, the

  pot comes to rest at a sacred spot and Shiva reappears

  to release the contents of the pot and thus initiate the

  terrestrial creation.95

  92 See the Tiruvilai of Paranjoti, 12, 18, 19 (see D. Shulman, op.cit.).

  93 The spire (gopurum) of the Hindu temple represents this mountain while the sanctum is dark and mysterious as the Apsu/Abyss whence the universe and its light emerge.

  94 The common Vedic notion that the Vedas precede the actual

  creation of the universe is copied in the Hebrew rabbinical literature which maintains that there are seven things created before the world:

  “the Tora, conversion, the Garden of Eden, Gehenna, the divine

  Throne, the Sanctuary, the name of the Messiah” (see A. Wensinck, op.

  cit. , p.17). This confirms the cohabitation of Indic and Hebrew peoples in the Near East and dates back perhaps to the contacts in the 17th c.

  B.C. between the Hurrian-Mitanni and the Habiru who served as their mercenaries (see B. Landsberger in J. Bottero, op.cit., p.160; cf. M.

  Salvini, “Un royaume hourrite en Mésopotamie du Nord à l’époque de Hattušili I”, in M. Lebeau (ed.), About Subartu: Studies devoted to Upper Mesopotamia (Subartu IV,1), Turnhout: Brepols, 1998, p.307).

  95 D. Shulman, op.cit.

  47

  indo-european mythology and religion

  The curious passage in Atrahasis, III,20, where Ea

 

‹ Prev