Seven Demon Stories from Medieval Japan

Home > Other > Seven Demon Stories from Medieval Japan > Page 4
Seven Demon Stories from Medieval Japan Page 4

by Noriko T. Reider

Power). Therefore his subjugations of demons and bandits are superior to

  any human beings” (Yokoyama and Matsumoto 3: 137). Raikō was chosen

  to be a demon conqueror because he was essentially a divine Wisdom King.

  Admiration for Raikō becomes more prominent in the Suntory version

  of the Shuten Dōji story, created in the early sixteenth century. The Suntory

  text describes Raikō as “a descendant of the Seiwa Genji and the leader of

  warriors. His power is superior to [that of] any human beings and his physi-

  cal prowess is without equal—more that Hankai (Fan K’uai). He is endowed

  with supernatural power. His eyes are sharp, and he could see through things

  like things in his hand” (“Shuten Dōji-e jō, chū, ge” 176 [1904]: supplement

  3; emphasis added). Here, Raikō is endowed with supernatural power, just as

  Sonpi bunmyaku states. The tales and historical records seem to feed each other.

  According to the picture scrolls of Ōeyama ekotoba, not only Raikō but

  also his shitennō are manifestations of the Buddhist Four Guardian Kings—

  Tsuna is Tamonten (Vaisravana, the Guardian of the North), Kintoki is

  Jikokuten (Dhrtarasta, the Guardian of the East), Sadamitsu is Zōchōten

  (Virudhaka, the Guardian of the South), and Suetake is Kōmokuten

  (Virupaksa, the Guardian of the West); therefore, theoretically speaking,

  they should have supernatural power and be superior to other human

  20

  Part I: Samurai

  beings. But an important difference is that Raikō is a descendant of the

  Seiwa Genji and the leader of warriors, whereas the rest are not.

  Raikō as a Direct Descendant of the Seiwa Genji clan

  The Seiwa Genji clan was the most powerful and successful military lineage

  of Minamoto. The clan was founded by Minamoto no Tsunemoto (?–961,

  commander-in-chief of the Defense of the North). As a son of Prince

  Sadazumi (873?–916), the sixth prince of Emperor Seiwa (reign 858–76),

  Tsunemoto was given the surname Minamoto. Minamoto no Mitsunaka,

  Raikō’s father, was the eldest son of Tsunemoto, and Raikō, the eldest son

  of Mitsunaka, was a direct descendant of the Seiwa Genji clan.

  Many famous warriors such as Minamoto no Yoritomo (1147–99),

  the founder of Kamakura shogunate, and Ashikaga Takauji (1305–58), the

  founder of Ashikaga shogunate, belong to the Seiwa Genji clan (Tōin 3:

  252, 296). Also, Tokugawa Ieyasu (1542–1616), the founder of Tokugawa

  shogunate, claimed to belong to this lineage (see Tōin 3: 248–49).

  From the closing statement of the Shuten Dōji story praising Raikō,

  Ayusawa Hisashi conjectures that the story was perhaps created primarily

  to extol Raikō for the eldest son lineage of Minamoto warriors ( Genji no

  chakuryū) (Ayusawa 118–19).

  Actually, Yoritomo and Ashikaga Takauji were directly descended

  from Yorinobu, commander-in-chief of the Defense of the North and the

  third son of Mitsunaka, rather than Raikō. As Raikō was the founder of

  Settsu Genji within the Seiwa Genji clan, Yorinobu was the founder of the

  Kawachi Genji branch of the Seiwa Genji. Yorinobu’s activity base was in

  the capital, but he extended his influence to the east. With internal discord

  and as a result of the Heiji Disturbance in 1160, the Kawachi Genji was

  eliminated from the center of politics in Kyoto by the late twelfth century.

  When Minamoto no Yoritomo became the founder of the Kamakura sho-

  gunate, however, the Kawachi Genji branch became the major line of the

  Seiwa Genji of Minamoto. While Raikō’s line called Settsu Genji produced

  Minamoto no Yorimasa (1104–80), a driving force in the rebellion against

  Heike power and a great-great-grandson of Raikō, also known for slaying

  the monstrous bird called nue,15 Yorimasa did not have the military influence

  or the base in the east that Yoritomo did.

  Indeed, the major line of the military family of Minamoto was the

  Kawachi Genji line. Later, when the Yoritomo line opened the shogunate

  in Kamakura, Yoritomo foregrounded the concept of eldest son lineage

  of Minamoto to strengthen his and his household’s position among all

  warriors. Yoritomo traced his ancestors, which began with Yorinobu, to

  Drunken Demon

  21

  Yoriyoshi, Yoshiie, Tameyoshi, and Yoshitomo, his father. The high status

  of the main eldest son line of Minamoto on the military side was born out

  of Yoritomo’s political maneuver.

  Minamoto no Mitsunaka, Raikō and Yorinobu’s father, who had built

  the base for the Minamoto power, was greatly worshipped as the ances-

  tor of the Ashikaga shogunate during the Muromachi period. It was dur-

  ing that same period that the legend of Shuten Dōji was created (Motoki

  iv). In 1472 the title junior second rank was conferred posthumously on

  Mitsunaka. Motoki conjectures that among the ancestors of the Ashikaga

  clan, rather than the warriors with close connections to the eastern prov-

  inces such as Yorinobu, Yoriyoshi, and Yoshiie, Mitsunaka was considered

  more suitable as the founder of the Ashikaga clan and was a subject of wor-

  ship because he guarded the court in the capital and had a distinct graveyard

  (temple) (Motoki 198). Also, Takahashi Masaaki offers an interesting inter-

  pretation as to why Raikō was chosen as the conqueror of the demons at

  Mt. Ōe. The name Raikō 頼光 is a homonym of Raikō 雷公, the thunder

  god; Raikō is associated with a thunder god, and the frightening effects of

  thunder and lightning were often required to eliminate similarly terrifying

  demons (Takahashi, Shuten Dōji no tanjō 34–35, 58–62).

  At present, the Tokugawa shogunate’s claim for the Seiwa Genji clan

  is considered highly doubtful, but during the Edo period (1600–1867) the

  creation of Kan’ei shoke kakeizu-den (Genealogy of the Lords of the Kan’ei,

  1643), which linked the Tokugawa genealogy to that of the Minamoto clan,

  greatly helped heighten interest in the latter’s ancestors (Itagaki 1: 439).

  Minamoto no Mitsunaka was so idealized that it is said that Tokugawa

  Yorinobu (1602–71), the founder of the Kii branch of the Tokugawa,

  ordered in his will that his tombstone be placed beside that of Mitsunaka

  in the inner sanctuary of Mt. Kōya (Itagaki 1: 422, 439). Further, in 1692,

  during the reign of the fifth shogun, Tokugawa Tsunayoshi (1646–1709),

  Mitsunaka received the highest rank, senior first rank.

  Minobe Shigekatsu writes that the Shuten Dōji story was able to keep its

  status by legitimatizing the Seiwa Genji clan’s claim to have ruled Japan and

  exalting the Tokugawa shogunate for the Tokugawa family, which claimed

  to be descended from the Seiwa Genji. Therein lies the conceptual back-

  ground for the thriving production of Shuten Dōji’s folding screens and

  picture scrolls during the Edo period (Minobe and Minobe 148). The image

  of Raikō had been superimposed on that of the Tokugawa shogun, who

  claimed to be the head of the Minamoto clan. In other words, admiration

  for Raikō as a brave warrior and conqueror of supernatural creatures meant

  admiration for the Tokugawa shogunate. The theme of Shuten Dōji—that

  22

  Part I: S
amurai

  of courageous good conquering evil, reinforced by the image of the shogu-

  nate eliminating its enemies—was welcomed by all.16

  Fujiwara no hōshō (or Yasumasa)

  In the picture scrolls of Ōeyama ekotoba, Fujiwara no Hōshō (958–1036) is

  paired with Raikō in the demon-conquering mission, though Raikō is clearly

  portrayed as the preeminent one.17 It should be noted in the translation that

  the court first gives the task of conquering the demons to four warriors:

  Hōshō, Taira no Muneyori (or Chirai, ?–1011), Minamoto no Yorinobu (or

  Raishin, Raikō’s younger brother), and Taira no Korehira (or Ikō, ?–?). They

  decline the court’s request, saying that it is not possible to engage in a battle

  with demons, as they are invisible. Then the command goes to Raikō and—

  again—Hōshō. It is strange that Hōshō, who earlier declined the request,

  is summoned to the palace again and this time accepts it with Raikō. This

  could be an authorial (or narrator’s) mistake, or Hōshō may have indeed

  been called again because he was so worthy. Hōshō had become part of

  a set of four superior warriors by the middle of the thirteenth century.

  The eleventh story of chapter 3 of Jikkinshō (Stories Selected to Illustrate

  the Ten Maxims, ca. 1252) states, “Yorinobu (Raishin), Yasumasa (Hōshō),

  Korehira (Ikō), and Muneyori (Chirai) are four superb warriors,” and “if

  they fought each other, surely none would remain alive” (Asami 3: 136).

  Perhaps the writer of the picture scrolls used the four eminent warriors,

  wishing to reflect the reputation of the days of Emperor Ichijō’s reign and

  also to contrast Raikō’s loyalty to the emperor when he accepted the impe-

  rial command at once.

  Hōshō was born to Fujiwara no Munetada (mid-Heian period, ?–?) and

  a daughter of Prince Genmei (mid-Heian period, ?–?). His wife was Izumi

  Shikibu (976?–1036?), a famous poet of the mid-Heian period18 and the

  contemporary of Akazome Emon and Lady Murasaki, the author of Genji

  monogatari (The Tale of Genji); these ladies served Empress Shōshi (988–

  1074), the eldest daughter of Fujiwara no Michinaga.

  Hōshō was of blue-blood aristocratic stock. He was a descendant

  of Fujiwara no Kosemaro (?–764), the Fujiwara family’s southern line.

  His grandfather was Fujiwara no Motokata (888–953), whose daughter,

  Sukehime (926–67), was the mother of Emperor Murakami’s (926–67) first

  son, Prince Hirohira (950–71). Prince Hirohira failed to become crown

  prince because Consort Anshi (927–64), the eldest daughter of Fujiwara

  no Morosuke (908–60)—Fujiwara’s northern family and Motokata’s rival—

  gave birth to Prince Norihira (950–1011), Emperor Murakami’s second

  Drunken Demon

  23

  son and the future Emperor Reizei.19 Motokata died in despair, as he

  failed to become the grandfather of the future emperor, and he was said

  to have become a vengeful spirit. Fujiwara no Morosuke was Michinaga’s

  grandfather and Consort Anshi was Michinaga’s aunt, just as Fujiwara no

  Motokata was Hōshō’s grandfather and Sukehime was Hōshō’s aunt. If

  Prince Hirohira had become crown prince, Hōshō might have flourished

  as Michinaga did.

  According to Sonpi bunmyaku, Hōshō was a poet and a brave warrior,

  and he excelled in military strategy. Hōshō became the governor of Hizen,

  Yamato, Tango, and Settsu Provinces. His final official rank was senior

  fourth rank, lower grade (Tōin 2: 423). He was also appointed to the posi-

  tion of provisional captain of the Imperial Stables of the Right and served

  the household of Fujiwara no Michinaga and his eldest son, Yorimichi.

  Altogether, his résumé is very similar to Raikō’s. As time passed, however,

  the status of Hōshō in combatting the oni steadily declined. In the Suntory

  version of the Shuten Dōji story, the court summons only Raikō, and Raikō

  asks Hōshō to join him. In the most circulated booklet versions of the early

  Edo period, Hōshō becomes one of Raikō’s warriors. How could this be?

  In short, Hōshō was not from a military household like Raikō was, nor

  did he have descendants who would advocate his lineage. A setsuwa story

  from Konjaku monogatarishū describes the courageous Hōshō subjugating a

  notorious robber named Hakamadare.20 The narrative ends with a mixed

  comment. While praising Hōshō as a man of valor, it notes that his house-

  hold did not prosper because he behaved like a warrior even though he was

  not from a military family:

  Yasumasa was not a warrior by family tradition because he was a son of

  Munetada. Yet he was not the least inferior to anyone who was a warrior by

  family tradition. He had a strong mind, was quick with his hands, and had

  tremendous strength. He was also subtle in thinking and plotting. So even

  the imperial court did not feel insecure in employing him in the way of the

  warrior. As a result, the whole world greatly feared him and felt intimidated

  by him. Some people said he didn’t have any offspring because he behaved

  like a warrior though [he was] not from a military house. (Sato 33)

  Sonpi bunmyaku lists Kaihan as Hōshō’s son. Beside Kaihan’s name is

  a comment that he had been honored with military skills and strategy, but

  there is no record of any descendants (Tōin 2: 423).

  A bushi, or samurai, was socially distinguished by his professional mili-

  tary skills and his lineage; his family trade had always been martial arts.

  Those households were called tsuwamono no ie (household of samurai),

  24

  Part I: Samurai

  bugei no ie (household of martial skills), or buki no ie (household of arms)

  (Takahashi, Bushi no seiritsu bushizō no sōshutsu 16). Those from a “house-

  hold of samurai” were the descendants of persons such as Minamoto no

  Tsunemoto and Taira no Sadamori, who rendered meritorious service at the

  Revolts of Masakado and Sumitomo (Kimura 20–21).21 Even though one

  excelled in military prowess as Hōshō did, one was not acknowledged as a

  martial expert or professional unless he was born to such a household; it

  was a hereditary profession.

  The right pedigree was (and still is) essential; the Japanese generally take

  lineage seriously. This can be surmised when one recalls that until recently

  many Japanese considered themselves superior because the Japanese impe-

  rial household was bansei ikkei (one dynastic, unbroken imperial line). As

  Ben-Ami Shillony has written, “The belief that Japan is basically different

  from other countries because its royal house has never changed is almost

  as old as the dynasty itself. Throughout the ages this assertion has provided

  the Japanese with considerable pride” (Shillony 5). He continues, “There

  are families and institutions in the world which have enjoyed longer survival

  spans . . . but [they are] not hereditary” (Shillony 1–2).

  During early medieval times, Jien (1155–1225), a Buddhist monk, poet,

  and Japanese historian, stated that “as a custom of Japan, it has been decided

  since the divine age the only person of imperial lineage is allowed to become

&
nbsp; an Emperor” (Jien, Gukanshō 328–29). Jien, who attempted to analyze the

  events of Japanese history (and his dreams), believed that the Seiwa Genji

  would bring peace to Japan and that it was the inevitable course of history

  for the military class to rule Japan. He wrote in his Gukanshō (Jottings of a

  Fool, 1220) that the loss of the Imperial Sword—one of the three Imperial

  Regalia of Japan22—when it sank to the bottom of the sea at the end of

  the Genpei War,23 symbolized the emergence of military shoguns who pro-

  tected Japan in place of the lost Imperial Sword (Jien, Gukanshō 265). For

  the influential warriors in the eastern provinces, Minamoto no Yoritomo’s

  raising an army against the Heike meant a revival of noble birth. Yoritomo,

  the founder of the Kamakura shogunate, had the pedigree the warriors

  trusted (Kimura 23; Noguchi 173).

  Hōshō did not have a military pedigree, though his ancestors had a

  chance. Hōshō’s ancestors had a base on Kazusa (present-day Chiba pre-

  fecture), so when Masakado’s Revolt occurred in 939, his grandfather, the

  aforementioned Fujiwara no Motokata, was actually first chosen to be the

  commander-in-chief. But because he made an unreasonable request to

  the court administration, according to Gōdanshō (The Ōe Conversations,

  ca. 1104–8),24 the appointment was canceled (Noguchi 26). Had Motokata

  Drunken Demon

  25

  participated in the suppression of the revolt, his household would have

  become a military household. Equally important, Hōshō was not blessed

  with descendants who distinguished themselves in battles or with a sto-

  ryteller who would raise his lineage high, as may have been the case for

  Watanabe no Tsuna (explained in the next section).

  In the scrolls of Ōeyama ekotoba, Hōshō takes one retainer with him. He

  is Kiyohara no Munenobu (?–1017), who holds a position of Dazai shōgen

  (junior secretary of the Dazaifu office in Kyushu). This is also a historical

  fact. In the entry of the eleventh day of the third month of 1017 of Midō

  kanpakuki (Diary of Fujiwara no Michinaga), Michinaga recorded the death

  of Munenobu and noted that he was Hōshō’s retainer. Munenobu was killed

  by a group of people who followed Minamoto no Yorichika (Yoshinaka,

  Manjū’s second son, ?–?).25 As Hōshō’s status diminished in ensuing Shuten

 

‹ Prev