Lovers of Sophia

Home > Other > Lovers of Sophia > Page 38
Lovers of Sophia Page 38

by Jason Reza Jorjani


  Mecca – which was long known by the pagan Arabs as “the Ancient

  Woman” and which was original y attended by priestesses – is an

  example of just such a stone.171 The word Ka’aba is descended from Kybala or Cybele – the Amazon mother goddess analogized with

  Artemis at Ephesus.172 This may also be the root of the word Kabbalah

  – the black art or Craft. Inside the Islamic enclosure and beneath

  the shroud that veils it, the actual Black Stone at Mecca bears an

  engraved symbol of the Moon Goddess’ vulva.173 Classical Anatolia

  was the center of the Hecate cult, and Byzantine coins symbolized

  Hecate by means of a crescent and a star. This lunar goddess symbol

  was later adopted by the invading Ottoman Turks and has ironical y

  come to be emblematic of Islam.174

  The three men in black on the road to K.’s execution stand in

  contrast to the trinities of women, such as Fraulein Burstner, the Usher’s Wife, and Leni, or the three “prematurely debauched” girls

  of the Court at Titorelli’s studio, who might grow into the roles

  played by the older Trinity of witches. K. is willing to be led off

  to the execution site; he even helps the men lead him to the site,

  which is one both of his and of their choosing. He then lies down

  voluntarily, waiting to be killed. It is noteworthy that he initial y

  makes the decision not to resist when a lady who appears to be

  Fraulein Burstner enters the square, which is a crossroads, while

  he is preparing to resist his two escorts. He leads the two men to

  follow her for a time so that “he might not forget the lesson she had

  brought into his mind.”175 K. then elaborates: “I always wanted to

  snatch at the world with twenty hands, and not for a very laudable

  motive, either. That was wrong, and am I to show now that not even

  170 Wilde,

  The Amazons in Myth and History, 100-102.

  171 Ibid., 100.

  172 Ibid., 99.

  173 Ibid.

  174 D’Este,

  Hekate, 112-113.

  175 Kafka,

  The Trial, 225.

  299

  lovers of sophia

  a year’s trial has taught me anything?”176 He maintains this resolve

  until the very last moment, when it is too late, and he raises his

  hands in protest against his decision not to resist. This is Kafka’s

  way of saying that the lack of mastery Joseph K. has over the two

  conflicting forces in him has allowed them to conspire to execute

  him with a dagger – which is one of Hecate’s sacred implements.177

  It’s being turned twice in his heart as he stares up at the two “cheek to cheek” faces of the executioners, is a symbol for his having

  perished of his unacknowledged duality. He is murdered by the light

  of the Moon, aura of Artemis and Hecate: “The moon shone down

  on everything with that simplicity and serenity which no other light

  possess.”178 Kafka repeatedly tel s us that the moon shines on K. and

  his two escorts all along the way, especial y as they cross the bridge to the outskirts of town.179 Hecate was not only the goddess of the

  crossroads, but also the divinity “of the wayside” and of the gateways at the outskirts that mark a city’s limits.180 This is the domain of stray dogs.

  Virtual y all of the animals sacrificed in the Classical world at

  large came from the four species of bovines, goats, sheep, and swine.181

  It is quite striking then, that dogs – a household pet and “man’s best friend” – were the animals sacrificed to Hecate.182 Hecate was

  accompanied by a black dog or “black bitch” and sometimes took the

  form of one herself.183 Black dogs were sacrificed to Hecate, especial y at the crossroads.184 Dogs barking or trembling were considered a

  sign of Hecate’s presence.185 Dogs were her companions, her heralds,

  176 Ibid., 226.

  177 D’Este,

  Hekate, 70.

  178 Kafka,

  The Trial, 227.

  179 Ibid., 226.

  180 D’Este,

  Hekate, 21, 29, 60.

  181 Ibid., 24.

  182 Ibid.

  183 Ibid., 74, 91.

  184 Ibid., 114, 124, 154.

  185 Ibid., 130, 154.

  300

  jason reza jorjani

  and her offerings.186 This means that like the tradesman Block who

  became “the Lawyer’s dog” (real y, Leni’s dog), even amidst (literal y) mortifying shame Joseph K. also remains a servant of the Goddess

  – one who is killed “Like a Dog!”187 The “shame” is that, unlike the

  “miserable creature” Block, he could have been more than a servant

  or sacrificial dog. Joseph K. was offered intimate companionship

  so long as he did not demand advantage or possession. Though

  he failed to do so in this life, his final thoughts betray that he has learned his lesson and might do so in the next. The novel’s enigmatic

  concluding line “it was as if the shame of it must outlive him” has to be viewed in the context of Kafka’s al usions to reincarnation, not

  only in The Trial, but also his clearer pronouncements on the matter in his Blue Octavo Notebooks.

  6. Three Paths at the Crossroads

  The first time that Kafka hints at the idea of reincarnation in The Trial is after the Student has carried the Usher’s wife off to the Examining Magistrate. Kafka writes: “how well-off K. was compared with the

  Magistrate… True, he drew no secondary income from bribes or

  percolation and could not order his attendant to pick up a woman

  and carry her to his room. But K. was perfectly willing to renounce

  these advantages, at least in this life.”188 Later on, Kafka makes another reference to the idea in the course of Joseph’s contemplation

  of whether or not to retain his lawyer. He relates to us that in one

  of the “harangues” which make him doubt the Lawyer’s efficiency,

  the latter had said that “you felt astonished to think that one single ordinary lifetime sufficed to gather all the knowledge needed for

  a fair degree of success in such a profession.”189 These hints are

  somewhat elucidated by the following passages from Kafka’s Blue

  Octavo Notebooks:

  186 Ibid., 154.

  187 Kafka,

  The Trial, 229.

  188 Ibid., 60 – emphasis mine.

  189 Ibid., 122.

  301

  lovers of sophia

  A man has free wil , and this of three kinds: first of all he was

  free when he wanted this life; now, of course, he cannot go back

  on it, for he is no longer the person who wanted it then, except

  perhaps in so far as he carries out what he then wanted, in that

  he lives. Secondly, he is free in that he can choose the pace of the

  road of this life. Thirdly, he is free in that, as the person who will sometime exist again, he has the will to make himself go through life under every condition and in this way come to himself,

  and this, what is more, on a road that, though it is a matter of

  choice, is still so very labyrinthine that there is no smallest area

  of this life that it leaves untouched. This is the trichotomy of free

  wil , but since it is simultaneously also a unity, an integer, and

  fundamental y is so completely integral, it has no room for any

  wil , free or unfree.190

  Many shades of the departed are occupied solely in licking at the

  waves of the river of deat
h because it flows from our direction

  and still has the salty taste of our seas. Then the river rears

  back in disgust, the current flows the opposite way and brings

  the dead drifting back into life. But they are happy, sing songs of thanksgiving, and stroke the indignant waters. Beyond a certain

  point there is no return. This point has to be reached. 191

  One of the first signs of the beginnings of understanding is the

  wish to die. This life appears unbearable, another unattainable.

  One is no longer ashamed of wanting to die; one asks to be moved

  from the old cell, which one hates, to a new one, which one will only in time come to hate. In this there is also a residue of belief that during the move the master will chance to come along the corridor, look at the prisoner and say: “This man is not to be locked up again.

  He is to come to me.”192

  190 Brod.,

  The Blue Octavo Notebooks, 95.

  191 Ibid., 15-16.

  192 Ibid., 88.

  302

  jason reza jorjani

  Not only do these passages establish that Kafka believed in

  reincarnation of some sort, they also gift us a key to understanding

  the metaphor of the three paths that are offered to K. by the painter

  Titorelli. The last of the passages cited above, uses the image of

  ‘imprisonment’, which is preceded by an ‘arrest’, as a metaphor for

  the embodiment of the soul by the flesh. It suggests that one body

  is exchanged for another, as one prison cell for another, until final y one may be released once and for al . There is a clear parallel between this and the path of “ostensible acquittal” described by Titorelli. The Painter explains how a definite acquittal cannot be granted by the

  Judges of the Court that K. is involved with, and that Titorelli is able to influence. Rather: “that power is reserved for the highest Court of al , which is quite inaccessible to you, to me, and to all of us. What the prospects are up there we do not know and, I may say in passing,

  do not even want to know.”193 It seems likely that the Judge of this

  unknowable “highest Court of al ” is the same figure as “the master”

  in the last of the notes cited above, who tel s the other Judges that:

  “This man is not to be locked up again. He is to come to me.” Titorelli goes on to explain the difference between this definite acquittal and

  ostensible acquittal in the following terms:

  …when you are acquitted in this [ostensible] fashion the

  charge is lifted from your shoulders for the time being, but it

  continues to hover above you and can, as soon as an order comes

  from on high, be laid upon you again….In definite acquittal

  the documents relating to the cases are said to be completely

  annulled, they simply vanish from sight, not only the charge but

  also the records of the case and even the acquittal are destroyed,

  everything is destroyed. That’s not the case with ostensible

  acquittal. The documents remain as they were, except the

  affidavit is added to them and a record of the acquittal and the

  grounds for granting it. The whole dossier continues to circulate,

  as the regular official routine demands, passing on to the higher

  Courts, being referred to the lower ones again, and thus swinging

  193 Kafka,

  The Trial, 158.

  303

  lovers of sophia

  backwards and forwards with greater or smaller oscil ations,

  longer or shorter delays. These peregrinations are incalculable.

  A detached observer might sometimes fancy that the whole case

  had been forgotten, the documents lost, and the acquittal made

  absolute. No one real y acquainted with the Court could think

  such a thing. No document is ever lost, the Court never forgets

  anything. One day – quite unexpectedly – some Judge will take

  up the documents and look at them attentively, recognize that in

  this case the charge is still valid, and order an immediate arrest.

  I have been speaking on the assumption that a long time elapses

  between the ostensible acquittal and the new arrest; that is

  possible and I have known of such cases, but it is just as possible

  for the acquitted man to go straight home from the Court and

  find officers already waiting to arrest him again. Then, of course,

  all his freedom is at an end.” “And the case begins all over again?”

  asked K. almost incredulously. “Certainly,” said the painter.194

  In light of the passages from the Blue Octavo Notebooks, one could read “ostensible acquittal” as the soul being temporarily released

  from the prison of the physical body. It may remain on the ethereal

  spiritual plane for a long time before reincarnating, or it may return almost immediately. In any case, the “documents relating to” one’s

  case, i.e. the karmic traces of one’s actions in life, are not “completely annulled” as they are if one’s soul achieves liberation from the

  transiently manifest world of multiplicity altogether. We should

  remember that definite and ostensible acquittal are two of the three paths that Titorelli proposes, and we have already suggested how these may be the three roads that are watched over by Hecate, the

  Triune “Goddess of the Crossroads.”

  It is also notable that the metaphor Kafka employs in his Blue

  Octavo Notebooks is that of being locked up. Again, one of the three implements held by Hecate is a key. Two others are a rope and a

  knife.195 (Unlike other Greek divinities, and very much like Indian

  194 Ibid., 159.

  195 D’Este,

  Hekate, 157.

  304

  jason reza jorjani

  ones, she had multiple arms to hold all of these implements, with

  her lower arms sometimes being depicted as serpentine – another,

  particularly Indian, affinity to shakti.) These original y signified her role as the Goddess of child labor, where the knife was used to

  cut the umbilical cord. In the mystery cults, however, her cutting

  of the ‘rope’ by the ‘knife’ al uded to the severing of the soul’s ties to the physical body. Thus Hecate is the goddess who presides over

  the kind of entry and exit of spirits to and from the physical world

  that is described in the first quote above from the Blue Octavo

  Notebooks. Hecate was connected to Orpheus and his mysteries, and she was central to the Orphic belief in reincarnation.196 Many of her

  devotees were vegetarians on account of the credence they gave to

  transmigration of the soul.197

  There is an essential difference between Kafka’s notion of

  reincarnation and that present within (non-tantric) Vedanta or

  (orthodox schools of) the Buddha Dharma. Kafka believes that one

  should choose not to avoid subjection to all kinds of experiences,

  whether nominal y ‘good’ or ‘evil’, but experience all of them as ful y as possible within one single lifetime. Otherwise, it is implied, one

  will have to return to the prison cel . We see this idea more clearly

  expressed in other passages of the Blue Octavo Notebooks:

  You can hold yourself back from the sufferings of the world: this

  is something you are free to do and is in accord with your nature,

  but perhaps precisely this holding back is the only suffering that

  you might be able to avoid.198

  Your will is free means: it was free when it wanted the desert,

  it is free since it can choose the path t
hat leads to crossing the

  desert, it is free since it can choose the pace, but it is also unfree since you must go through the desert, unfree since every path in

  196 Ibid., 27.

  197 Ibid., 46.

  198 Brod,

  The Blue Octavo Notebooks, 97.

  305

  lovers of sophia

  labyrinthine manner touches every foot of the desert’s surface.199

  In the struggle between yourself and the world second the world.

  One must not cheat anyone, not even the world of its victory.

  There is nothing besides a spiritual world; what we call the world

  of the senses is the Evil in the spiritual world, and what we call

  Evil is only the necessity of a moment in our eternal evolution.200

  Not shaking off the self, but consuming the self.201

  Joseph K. is guilty because there is an aspect of him that has preferred to “consume the self” rather than ‘throw it off’ as an ascetic might

  do. What he does not understand, at least with his conscious mind,

  and what Leni attempts to convey to him, is that he should not be

  trying to prove that he is ‘innocent.’ The Court and its officials,

  including the promiscuous women who hold sway over them, are

  all bathed in sin. Their aim is not to prevent a person from doing

  ‘Evil’, it is to drive a person to the spiritual depths beyond Good and Evil. In his Blue Octavo Notebooks, Kafka has this to say about binary moral oppositions:

  Evil is a radiation of human consciousness in certain transitional

  positions.202

  There can be knowledge of the diabolical, but no belief in it, for

  more of the diabolical than there is does not exist.203

  One cannot pay Evil in installments – and one always keeps on

  trying to.204

  199 Ibid., 50.

  200 Ibid., 91.

  201 Ibid., 39.

  202 Ibid., 94.

  203 Ibid., 96.

  204 Ibid., 90.

  306

  jason reza jorjani

  Evil knows of the Good, but Good does not know of Evil.205

  Evil is the starry sky of the Good.206

  The way beyond Good and Evil may be the third way proposed by

  Titorelli, the path of “indefinite postponement.” Titorelli proposes

  this option when it appears to him that “ostensible acquittal” is

  unappealing to K. He explains that in this procedure, one must

  maintain occasional contact with the Court, but the interrogations

 

‹ Prev