Bennett, W. L., & Feldman, M. (1981). Reconstructing reality in the courtroom. London: Tavistock.
Berman, G. L., Narby, D. J., & Cutler, B. L. (1995). Effects of inconsistent statements on mock jurors’ evaluations of the eyewitness, perceptions of defendant culpability and verdicts. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 79–88.
Boccaccini, M., Gordon, T., & Brodsky, S. (2005). Witness preparation training with real and simulated criminal defendants. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 23, 659–687.
Bond, C., & Solon, M. (1999). The expert witness in court: A practical guide. London: Shaw & Sons.
Bornstein, B. H. (1999). The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? Law and Human Behavior, 23, 75–91.
Bornstein, B. H., Miller, M. K., Nemeth, R. J., Page, G. L., & Musil, S. (2005). Jurors’ reactions to jury duty: Perceptions of the system and potential stressors. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 23, 321–346.
Brennan, M. (1995). The discourse of denial: Cross-examining child victim witnesses. Special issue: Laying down the law: Discourse analysis of legal institutions. Journal of Pragmatics, 23, 71–91.
Brewer, N., Potter, R., Fisher, R. P., Bond, N., & Luszcz, M. A. (1999). Beliefs and data on the relationship between consistency and accuracy of eyewitness testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 297–313.
Bright, D. A., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2006). Gruesome evidence and emotion: Anger, blame, and jury decision-making. Law and Human Behavior Special Issue on Emotion in Legal Judgment and Decision Making, 30(2), 183–202.
Canter, D. V., Grieve, N., Nicol, C., & Benneworth, K. (2003). Narrative plausibility: The impact of sequence and anchoring. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 21, 251–267.
Carson, D. (1990). Professionals and the courts: Handbook for expert witnesses. Sussex: Venture Press.
Chenery, S., Henshaw, C., Parton, P., & Pease, K. (2001). Does CCTV evidence increase sentence severity? The Scottish Journal of Criminal Justice Studies, 7, 87–99.
Cialdini, R. B. (1993). Influence: Science and practice (3rd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
Clark, J., Boccaccini, M.T., Caillouet, B., & Chaplin, W.F. (2007). Five Factor Model personality traits, jury selection, and case outcomes in criminal and civil cases. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 641–660.
Contempt of Court Act (1981). London: HMSO.
Cooper, A., Quas, J. A., & Cleveland, K. C. (2014). The emotional child witness: Effects on juror decision making. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 32, 813–828.
Cooper, J., Bennett, E. A., & Sukel, H. L. (1996). Complex scientific testimony: How do jurors make decisions? Law and Human Behavior, 20, 379–394.
Cooper, P. (2005). Witness preparation. New Law Journal, 1753, 155.
Cooper, W. H. (1981). Ubiquitous halo. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 218–244.
Cox (1993) 14 Cr App (S) 470.
Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Dexter, H. R. (1990). Juror sensitivity to eyewitness identification evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 185–191.
Damaska, M. (1973). Evidentiary boundaries to conviction and two models of criminal procedure: a comparative study. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 121, 506.
Danet, B. (1984). Legal discourse. In T. A. van Dijk , (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (Vol. 1): The disciplines of discourse analysis (pp. 273–291). London: Academic Press.
Darbyshire, P. (2001). What can the English legal system learn from jury research published up to 2001? Retrieved from http://eprints.kingston.ac.uk/33455/3/Darbyshire-P-33455.pdf
Davies, G. M. (2003). CCTV identification in court and in the laboratory. Forensic Update, 72, 7–10.
Dezwirek-Sas, L. (1992). Empowering child witnesses for sexual abuse prosecution. In H. Dent & R. Flin (Eds.), Children as witnesses (pp. 181–200). Chichester: Wiley.
Dhami, M. K. (2004). Conditional bail decision making in the magistrates court. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 43, 27–46.
Diamond, S. S. (1997). Illuminations and shadows from jury simulations. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 561–571.
Dick, T. (2006, August 3). Court out: How slip of tongue meant justice wasn’t done. Sydney Morning Herald.
Doherty, M. J., & East, R. (1985). Bail decisions in magistrates’ courts. British Journal of Criminology, 25, 251–266.
DuCann, R. (1964). The art of the advocate. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Dumas, B. K. (2000). Jury trials: Lay jurors, pattern jury instructions and comprehension issues. Tennessee Law Review, 3, 701–742.
Drew, P. (1992). Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: The case of a trial for rape. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Social interaction in institutional settings (pp. 470–520). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eggleston, R. (1983). Evidence, proof and probability (Law in context) (2nd ed.). Butterworths Law: London.
Eisenberg, T., Hannaford-Agor, P. L., Hans, V. P., Waters, N. L., Musterman, G. T., G. Thomas, G., Schwab, S. J., & Wells, M. T. (2005). Judge-jury agreement in criminal cases: A partial replication of Kalven and Zeisel’s The American Jury. Cornell University Law School: Cornell Law Faculty Publications.
Ellison, L. (2001). The mosaic art? Cross-examination and the vulnerable witnesses. Legal Studies, 21, 353–375.
Ellison, L. (2007). Witness preparation and the prosecution of rape. Legal Studies, 27, 171–187.
Ellison, L. E., & Wheatcroft, J. M. (2010). “Could you ask me that in a different way please?” Exploring the impact of courtroom questioning and witness familiarisation on adult witness accuracy. Criminal Law Review, 11, 823–839.
Ellsworth, P.C. (1993). Some steps between attitudes and verdicts. In R. Hastie (Ed.): Inside the juror: The psychology of juror decision making (pp. 42–64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Espinoza, R. K. E., Willis-Esqueda, C., Toscano, S., & Coons, J. (2015). The impact of ethnicity, immigration status, and socioeconomic status on juror decision making. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 13, 197–216.
Evans, K. (1995). Advocacy in court: A beginner’s guide (2nd ed.). London: Blackstone.
Fariña, F., Novo, M., & Arce, R. (2003). Heuristics of anchorage in judicial decisions. Psicothema, 14, 39–46.
Fein, S., McCloskey, A. L., & Tomlinson, T. M. (1997). Can the jury disregard that information? The use of suspicion to reduce the prejudicial effects of pre-trial publicity and inadmissible testimony. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1215–1226.
Feild, H. S. (1979). Rape trials and jurors’ decisions: A psycholegal analysis of the effects of victim, defendant case characteristics. Law and Human Behavior, 3, 261–284.
Findley, J. D., & Sales, B. D. (2012). The science of attorney advocacy: How courtroom behavior affects jury decision making. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Finkel, N. J. (1995). Commonsense justice: Jurors’ notions of the law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Finkel, N. J., & Groscup, J. L. (1997). Crime prototypes, objective versus subjective culpability, and a commonsense balance. Law and Human Behavior, 21(2), 209–230.
Flood-Page, C., & Mackie, A. (1998). Sentencing practice: An examination of decisions in magistrates’ courts and the Crown Court in the mid-1990s. Home Office Research Study No. 180: HMSO.
Frumkin, L. (2007). Influences of accent and ethnic background on perceptions of eyewitness testimony. PhD Thesis. Middlesex University: London.
Gastil, J., Burkhalter, S., & Black, L. W. (2007). Do juries deliberate? A study of deliberation, individual difference, and group member satisfaction at a municipal courthouse. Small Group Research 38, 337–359.
Gilovich, T., Griffin, D. W., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.), (2001). The psychology of judgement: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Green, M.C., & Brock. T.C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701–721.
Green, M
. C., Kass, S., Carrey, J., Herzig, B., Feeney, R., & Sabini, J. (2008). Transportation across media: Repeated exposure to print and film. Media Psychology, 11(4), 512–539.
Harris, S. (1984). Questions as a mode of control in magistrates’ courts. International Journal of Society and Language, 49, 5–27.
Hale-Starr, V., & McCormick, M. (2001). Jury selection. New York: Aspenlaw.
Hans, V. P., & Vidmar, N. (1986). Judging the jury. New York: Plenum Press.
Hastie, R., Penrod, S., & Pennington, N. (1983). Inside the jury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Heuer, L., & Penrod, S. D. (1995). Jury decision-making in complex trials. In R. Bull & D. Carson (Eds.), Handbook of psychology in legal contexts (pp. 527–541). Chichester: Wiley.
Hickey, L. (1993). Presupposition under cross-examination. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 1, 89–109.
Hobbs, P. (2003). “You must say it for him”: Reformulating a witness’ testimony on cross- examination at Trial. Text, 23, 477–511.
Honess, T. M., Levi, M., & Charman, E. A. (1998). Juror competence in processing complex information: Implications from a simulation of the Maxwell trial. Criminal Law Review, 763–773.
Hope, L., Memon, A., & McGeorge, P. (2004). Understanding pre-trial publicity: Predicisional distortion of evidence by mock jurors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 10, 111–119.
Horowitz, I. A., ForsterLee, L., & Brolly, I. (1996). Effects of trial complexity on decision-making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 757–768.
Hough, M., Radford, B., Jackson, J., & Roberts, J. R. (2013). Attitudes to sentencing and trust in justice: exploring trends from the crime survey for England and Wales. Ministry of Justice Analytical Series. London: Ministry of Justice.
Huffington Post (2013). Vick Pryce trial: Dismissed jurors asked Judge 10 questions over Chris Huhne case. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/02/20/vicky-price- chris-huhne-trial-dismissed-questions_n_2725821.html.
Isenberg, D. J. (1986). Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1141–1151.
Jackson, B. (1988). Law, fact, and narrative coherence. Merseyside, UK: Deborah Charles Publications.
Jackson, J. (1996). Juror decision-making in the trial process. In G. Davies, M. McMurran, C. Wilson , & S. Lloyd-Bostock (Eds.), Psychology, law and criminal justice. International developments in research and practice (pp. 327–336). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Janis, I. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascos (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghlin Mifflin.
Kagehiro, D. K. (1990). Defining the standard to proof in jury instructions. Psychological Science, 1, 187–193.
Kalven, H., & Zeisel, H. (1966). The American jury. Boston: Little Brown and Co.
Kassin, S. M., Rigby, S., & Castillo, S. R. (1991). The accuracy-confidence correlation in eyewitness testimony: Limits and extension of the retrospective self-awareness effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 698–707
Keane, A., & Fortson, R. (2011). Leading questions: A critical analysis. Criminal Law Review, 4, 280–295.
Kebbell, M., Deprez, S., & Wagstaff, G. (2003). The direct and cross-examination of complainants and defendants in rape trials: A quantitative analysis of question type. Psychology, Crime and Law, 9, 49–59.
Kebbell, M. R., Evans, L., & Johnson, S. D. (2010). The influence of lawyers’ questions on witness accuracy, confidence and reaction times and on mock jurors interpretation of witness accuracy. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 7, 262–272.
Kebbell, M. R., & Giles, D. C. (2000). Lawyers’ questions and witness confidence: Some experimental influences of complicated lawyers’ questions on witness confidence and accuracy. The Journal of Psychology, 134, 129–139.
Kebbell, M. R., Hatton, C., Johnson, S. D., & O’Kelly, C. M. E. (2001). People with learning disabilities as witnesses in court: How questions influence answers. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 1–5.
Kebbell, M. R., Wagstaff, G. F., & Covey, A. C. (1996). The influence of item difficulty on the relationship between eyewitness confidence and accuracy. British Journal of Psychology, 87, 653–662.
Kemmelmeier, M. (2005). The effects of race and social dominance orientation in simulated juror decision-making. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 1030–1045.
Kerr, N. L. (1995). Social psychology in court: The case of prejudicial pre-trial publicity. In G. G. Brannigan & M. R. Merrens (Eds.), The social psychologists: Research adventures (pp. 247–262). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182.
Konecni, V. J., & Ebbesen, E. B. (1979). External validity of research in legal psychology. Law and Human Behavior, 3, 39–70.
Kramer, G. P., Kerr, N. L., & Carroll, J. S. (1990). Pre-trial publicity, judicial remedies, and jury bias. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 409–438.
Krupnick, M. (2006). Dyleski trial highlights jury selection difficulties. Retrieved from http://www.eastbaytimes.com/2011/05/31/scott-dyleski-seeks-to-overturn-conviction-in-lafayette- murder-implicates-victims-husband/
Latané , B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist 36, 343–356.
Latané , B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Social loafing. Psychology Today, 110, 104–106.
Leippe, M. R., Manion, A. P., & Romanczyk, A. (1992). Eyewitness persuasion: How and how well do fact finders judge the accuracy of adults’ and children’s memory reports? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 181–197.
Levenson, L. L. (2008). Courtroom demeanour: the theater of the courtroom. Minnesota Law Review, 573, 92.
Loftus, E. (1975). Leading questions and the eyewitness report. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 560–572.
Lindsay, R. C. L. (1994). Expectations of eyewitness performance: Jurors verdicts do not follow from their beliefs. In D. F. Ross, J. D. Read , & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 362–382). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lipovsky, J., & Stern, P. (1997). Preparing children for court: An interdisciplinary view. Child Maltreatment, 2, 150–163.
Lloyd-Bostock, S. (2006). The effects on lay magistrates of hearing that the defendant is of “good character”, being left to speculate, or hearing that he has a previous conviction. Criminal Law Review, 189–212.
Lloyd-Bostock, S., & Thomas, C. (1999). Decline of the Little Parliament: Juries and jury reform in England and Wales. Law and Contemporary Problems, 7, 21.
Maeder, E. M., Yamamoto, S., & Saliba, P. (2015). The influence of defendant race and victim physical attractiveness on juror decision-making in a sexual assault trial. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 21, 62–79.
Matoesian, G. (1993). Reproducing rape. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Memon, A., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2003). Psychology and law: Truthfulness, accuracy and credibility. Chichester: Wiley.
Meyers, R. A., Brashers, D. E., & Hanner, J. (2001). Majority/minority influence: Identifying argumentative patterns and predicting argument-outcome links. Journal of Communication, 50, 3–30.
Mills, C. J., & Bohannon, W. E. (1980). Juror characteristics: To what extent are they related to jury verdicts? Judicature, 1, 64.
Montgomery, J. W. (1998). The criminal standard of proof. National Law Journal, 148, 582.
Murphy, P. (1994). Evidence & advocacy (4th ed.). London: Blackstone.
Murray, K. (1997). Preparing child witnesses for court: A review of literature and research. Edinburgh: Scottish Office.
Nagle, J. E., Brodsky, S. L., & Weeter, K. (2014) Gender, smiling and witness credibility in actual trials. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 32(2), 195–206.
O’Connell, M. (2015, July 20–23). Victims as witnesses in Australia’s justice system. Presentation to the International Conference on Evidenc
e Law and Forensic Science, 5th Proceedings, pp. 32, The City of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Ogloff, J. R. P., & Vidmar, N. (1994). The impact of pre-trial publicity on jurors: A study to compare the relative effects of television and print media in a child sex abuse case. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 507–525.
Parker, H., Casburn, M., & Turnbull, D. (1981). Receiving juvenile justice: Adolescents and state care and control. Oxford: Blackwell.
Parker, H., Sumner, M., & Jarvis, G. (1989). Unmasking the magistrates: The “custody or not” decision in sentencing young offenders. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1991). A cognitive theory of juror decision-making: the Story Model. Cardoza Law Review, 13, 497.
Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1992). Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 189–206.
Perkins, D. N. (1989). Reasoning as it is and could be: An empirical perspective. In D. M. Topping, D. C. Crowell , & V. N. Kobayaski (Eds.), Thinking across cultures: The third international conference on thinking (pp. 175–194). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Perry, N., McAuliff, B., Tam, P., Claycomb, L., Dostal, C., & Flanagan, C. (1995). When lawyers question children: Is justice served? Law and Human Behavior, 19, 609–629.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Plous, S. (1993). The psychology of judgment and decision-making. New York: McGraw-Hill.
R v. Momodou [2005] W.L.R., 1, 3442.
R v. Salisbury [2005] EWCA Crim 3107.
Read, S. J. (1987). Constructing casual scenarios: A knowledge structure approach to casual reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 288–302.
Rumgay, J. (1995). Custodial decision making in a magistrates’ court. British Journal of Criminology, 35, 201–217.
Schrager, S. A. (2000). The trial lawyer’s art. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Sealy, A. P., & Cornish, W. R. (1973). Jurors and their verdicts. Modern Law Review, 36, 496.
Forensic Psychology Page 63
