The Temple of Set II

Home > Other > The Temple of Set II > Page 8
The Temple of Set II Page 8

by Michael A Aquino


  Grun, Bernard, The Timetables of History. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1975.

  Jerome, St., “Taceo de philosophis, astronomis, astrologis, quorum scientia mortalibus utilissima est, et in tres

  partes scinditur. to dogma thnmeqodon, thn empeirian. Ad minores artes veniam,” in the Prologus galeatus to

  the Bible, 1590.

  Piankoff, Alexandre (Ed.), The Tomb of Ramesses VI. New York: Bollingen Foundation, 1954.

  Plato, The Collected Dialogues of Plato. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1961.

  Russell, Bertrand, A History of Western Philosophy. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1945.

  Schure’, Edouard, The Ancient Mysteries of Delphi: Pythagoras. Blauvelt, New York: Rudolf Steiner Publications,

  1971.

  Stanley, Thomas, The History of Philosophy. Los Angeles: Philosophical Research Society, 1970 [Photofacsimile of

  the Ninth Section of the 1687 edition, London].

  Thorson, Thomas L., Plato: Totalitarian or Democrat? Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1963.

  Tompkins, Peter, Secrets of the Great Pyramid. New York: Harper and Row, 1971.

  Whitrow, G.J., The Nature of Time. London: Thames and Hudson Ltd., 1972.

  Winspear, Alban D., The Genesis of Plato’s Thought. New York: S.A. Russell, 1940.

  - 33 -

  A2: The Book of Coming Forth by Night

  The Book

  of

  Coming Forth

  by

  Night

  - 34 -

  The Equinox has succumbed to my Solstice, and I, Set, am revealed in

  my Majesty.

  The time of the Purification is past. The fate of my Gifted race rests in

  balance, and I shall not recant my Word, spoken to my High Priest

  MehenPetTha in old Khem and now again to you. Proclaim the

  nineteen Parts of the Word, and vanquish thus the feeble and corrupt

  Keys of Enoch, which were but a shadow of my true Word and now

  are an affront to me.

  I am the ageless Intelligence of this Universe. I created HarWer that I

  might define my Self. All other gods of all other times and nations

  have been created by men. This you know from the first Part of my

  Word, and from my manifest semblance, which alone is not of Earth.

  Known as the Hebrew Satan, I chose to bring forth a Magus,

  according to the fashion of my Word. He was charged to form a

  Church of Satan, that I might easily touch the minds of men in this

  image they had cast for me.

  In the fifth year of the Church of Satan, I gave to this Magus my

  Diabolicon, that he might know the truth of my ancient Gift to

  mankind, clothed though it might be in the myths of the Hebrews.

  Even you, who delivered the Diabolicon from Asia, did not know it for

  what it was. But he that I had fashioned a Magus knew, and he

  thought often of the Diabolicon as he guided the Church of Satan.

  Upon the ninth Solstice, therefore, I destroyed my pact with Anton

  Szandor LaVey, and I raised him to the Will of a Daimon, unbounded

  by the material dimensions. And so I thought to honor him beyond

  other men. But it may have been this act of mine that ordained his fall.

  Were I my Self to displace the Cosmic Inertia, I should be forced to

  become a new measure of consistency. I would cease to be One, for I

  should become All.

  To make of man a Daimon, then, may be to break his Self- reference

  to the bounds in which his semblance must exist.

  - 35 -

  I cannot undo the hurt that has come of this, but I shall restore to

  Anton Szandor LaVey his human aspect and his degree of Magus in

  my Order. Thus all may understand that he is dearly held by me, and

  that the end of the Church of Satan is not a thing of shame to him.

  But a new Aeon is now to begin, and the work of Anton Szandor

  LaVey is done. Let him be at ease, for no other man has ever seen

  with his eyes.

  In April of the common year 1904, I came forth in Africa as my

  Opposite Self and brought into being an Aeon to end the horrors of

  the stasis of the death-gods of men. This new Aeon was a Purification,

  to prepare men for that which would follow it.

  And Aleister Crowley received the Book of the Law, and my Opposite

  Self declared him Magus of the Aeon.

  But HarWer, my Opposite Self, is a strange and fitful presence. I, Set,

  am my Self distinct from the Order of the Cosmos, yet am ordered in

  and of my Self. HarWer I was when I was once part of the Cosmos and

  could achieve identity only by becoming what the Cosmic order was

  not. By HarWer I cancelled the imbalance, leaving a Void in which true

  Creation could take form as Set.

  But, as I have said, I cannot destroy the Cosmic Inertia without having

  to assume its place. And so HarWer must exist while Set exists.

  The Aeon of HarWer endured until the Equinox of the common year

  1966, when HarWer and Set were fused as one composite being. And

  so commenced the time of Set- HarWer - known as the Age of Satan -

  which was to bridge the expiring Aeon of HarWer and the

  forthcoming Aeon of Set.

  Truth there was in the words of my Opposite Self, but a truth ever

  tinged with the inconsistency and irrationality of which I have spoken.

  And so the Book of the Law was confusion to all who came upon it,

  and the creative brilliance of the Magus Aleister Crowley was ever

  flawed by mindless destructiveness. He himself could never understand

  this, for he perceived HarWer as a unified Self. And so he was

  perplexed by a mystery he could not identify.

  - 36 -

  And I, Set, spoke too in the Book of the Law - “Aye! listen to the

  numbers and the words -

  - “What meaneth this, o prophet? Thou knowest not; nor shalt thou

  know ever. There cometh one to follow thee: he shall expound it.”

  And many of the Aeon of HarWer sought to read this but could not.

  Nor could the Magus himself, though he guessed rightly at its

  simplicity. It was said that every number is infinite - hence each

  number or sum of joined numbers became merely the corresponding

  letter.

  Even so the sequence remained unknown - and so, after its issue, to

  me as well. For, while I may pass free of the boundaries of time,

  memory of the future cannot exist.

  Now it has come to pass, and the Book of the Law is laid bare -

  Destined First Century heir - Aquino - breaking Keys by doctrines

  Anton LaVey - great Magus of reconsecration coming Year Xeper -

  founding his rightful Priesthood - Set - true origin Volume AL.”

  Michael Aquino, you are become Magus V° of the Aeon of Set.

  I, Set, am come again to my friends among mankind - Let my great

  nobles be brought to me.

  In Khem I remain no longer, for I am forgotten there, and my house at

  PaMat-et is dust. I shall roam this world, and I shall come to those who

  seek me.

  Magus of my Aeon - Manifest the Will of Set.

  Reconsecrate my Temple and my Order in the true name of Set. No

  longer will I accept the bastard title of a Hebrew fiend.

  - 37 -

  When I came first to this world, I gave to you my great pentagram,

  timeless measure of beauty through proportion. And it was shown

  inverse, that creation and change be exalted
above rest and

  preservation.

  With the years my pentagram was corrupted, yet time has not the

  power to destroy it.

  Its position was restored by the Church of Satan, but its essence was

  dimmed with a Moorish name, and the perverse letters of the Hebrews,

  and the goat of decadent Khar. During the Age of Satan I allowed this

  curious corruption, for it was meant to do me honor as I was then

  perceived.

  But this is now my Aeon, and my pentagram is again to be pure in its

  splendor. Cast aside the corruptions, that the pentagram of Set may

  shine forth. Let all who seek me be never without it, openly and with

  pride, for by it I shall know them.

  Let the one who aspires to my knowledge be called by the name

  Setian.

  I seek my Elect and none other, for mankind now hastens toward an

  annihilation which none but the Elect may hope to avoid. And alone I

  cannot preserve my Elect, but I would teach them and strengthen

  their Will against the coming peril, that they and their blood may

  endure. To do this I must give further of my own Essence to my Elect,

  and, should they fail, the Majesty of Set shall fade and be ended.

  Behold, it is I who call you, because you are the guardians of the

  Aeon of Set, zealous in what you do.

  The Satanist thought to approach Satan through ritual. Now let the

  Setian shun all recitation, for the text of another is an affront to the

  Self. Speak rather to me as to a friend, gently and without fear, and I

  shall hear as a friend. Do not bend your knee nor drop your eye, for

  such things were not done in my house at PaMat-et. But speak to me

  at night, for the sky then becomes an entrance and not a barrier. And

  those who call me the Prince of Darkness do me no dishonor.

  - 38 -

  The Setian need conjure neither curse nor kindness from me, for by

  the magic of my great pentagram I shall see with his eyes. And then

  the strength that is mine shall be the strength of the Setian, and

  against the Will of Set no creature of the Universe may stand. And I

  think not of those who think not of me.

  The years of the Aeon of HarWer were confused, and I do not wish

  to think of them save as curiosities. But I wish to remember the

  Church of Satan and the Magus of that Age. Therefore let the years

  of my Aeon be counted from the conception of the Church of Satan.

  And now, having looked upon the past with affection and reverence,

  we shall turn our gaze to the times before us. Think carefully of the

  Word of Set, for it is given in witness to my Bond.

  Behold, O West, I have established my Aeon. I punish the enemies who

  are in it, placed in the Place of Destruction. I deliver them to the

  examiners from whose guard there is no escape. Lo, I pass near to

  thee, I pass near to thee!

  Affix now my image as it was given to you, so that all who read of

  these matters may now look upon the likeness of Set.

  The Word of the Aeon of Set is

  - 39 -

  A3: The Book of Coming Forth by Night - Analysis and Commentary

  - by Michael A. Aquino VI°

  The Ides of March XL ÆS

  Introduction

  From 1966 to 1975 CE there existed in the United States of America a most singular organization known as the

  Church of Satan. Founded by Anton Szandor LaVey in the city of San Francisco, it espoused the social doctrine of

  “Indulgence”, challenging all creeds, cultures, and codes that seek virtue through abstinence from the pleasures of

  mortal existence.

  In its formative years the Church of Satan took an essentially metaphorical approach towards the being from

  whom it took its name. “Satan” was a term representing, it was thought, simply the principle of carnality. Such

  rituals and ceremonies as the Church first celebrated, therefore, were conceived as illustrative, inspirational, and

  allegorical. That, at least, is the way it all began.

  “When he is called,” Eliphas Levi once observed, “the Devil comes and is seen.” And in that prosaic statement

  lies a truth whose implications challenge the rational constructs of the most exacting intellects. The one common

  feature to all the gods of all the nations of history, it may be said, is that they do not come and are not seen.

  Satan, however, did come to the Church of Satan - first as the faintest of atmospheres in its ceremonies, and

  ultimately as a metaphysical presence whose expression of being was awesome, exhilarating - the very fire of life to

  those who took his name as a part of their own and called themselves Satanists.

  The full history of the Church of Satan is documented in The Church of Satan, which account culminates on the

  North Solstice of the Satanic Year Ten, the evening of June 21-22, 1975. For the Church of Satan had fallen in ruins,

  Anton LaVey having corrupted the Priesthood; and it seemed to me, at that time Magister Templi IV° and successor

  by default to the Satanic High Priesthood, that only direct intervention by the Prince of Darkness himself could

  provide us with a basis for a viable raison d’être.

  Alone that night I called upon him, and he came forth - through a sequence of realizations within my mind that,

  in a few short hours, I recorded in written text as The Book of Coming Forth by Night.

  In its most immediate sense this text brought the Church of Satan to a final, dignified terminus, superseding it

  with a new initiatory institution - the Temple of Set - whose history to date may be found in its various

  administrative papers, newsletters, and the Jeweled Tablets of Set. Yet the Book of Coming Forth by Night was to

  prove a far deeper and richer mine, as again and again I strove to explore its depths. My first comment - a single

  page - was written on the morning of June 23, 1975. Over the following decades gradually-expanding ones were to

  follow, and finally this one.

  Since 1975 the Temple of Set has attained a far richer awareness of its identity. I myself grew to comprehend the

  full meaning of the Word whereby I came into being as a Magus V°. In doing so I aided others to attune their

  magical wills to ever more powerful sources of energy and inspiration that had lain dormant within them. Having

  fulfilled that which was set forth for me to do upon the Earth as a Magus, I myself came into being on the Ides of

  March XIV as an Ipsissimus VI°.

  This, then, is an examination of the Book of Coming Forth by Night from a VI° perspective, encompassing the

  key magical texts of two Æons and their intervening Age. The Book of Coming Forth by Night is no longer just a call

  to arms and a charge to the fellowship of the Prince of Darkness; it is a principle which has woven itself into the

  fabric of existence so thoroughly that it has become an immortal element of mankind’s higher potential. It remains

  for those who seek the path to that towards which it shows the way to train themselves and refine their states of

  being until this Grail appears in its truth before them. This commentary is a foretaste of the elixir of the Grail; it is to

  say that Xeper is also no mere illusion - it too comes and is seen.

  To what extent does the text lend itself to objective interpretation? At first reading it is both straightforward and

  unambiguous. Many of the words and phrases, however, are evidently used in an emphatically precise or unique

  sense.
A magician and philosopher will consider them with corresponding care. Moreover the Book of Coming Forth

  by Night is not simply a compendium of abstract generalizations; its appearance was keyed to specific

  circumstances, and many of its passages address them. Thus background information is important, particularly for

  those unfamiliar with the events and subjects in question.

  While the Book of Coming Forth by Night is sufficiently integral to be read and considered as a whole, its

  statements are best treated in sequence. Hence I begin as the text itself began: with its name.

  Xeper.

  - 40 -

  The Book of Coming Forth by Night (title)

  In hieroglyphics this would be Sat Per Em Kerh. It is an evident negation of the name of the Book of

  Coming Forth by Day, the Osirian funerary text that is popularly known as the Egyptian Book of the Dead.

  Persons unfamiliar with the ancient Egyptian culture often assume that the Egyptian religion, like those

  of later Mediterranean civilizations, consisted of a single, integrated pantheon of anthropomorphic gods

  and goddesses. It is rather the case that the earliest Egyptian god-figures were provincial, being patrons of

  individual cities and districts ( Nomes). Nor, despite their famous human/beast composite appearances,

  were they mere “supernatural persons” after the Greek, Mesopotamian, or Roman fashion. While popular

  stories were woven about them - presumably for popular consumption - the hieroglyphic treatment of these

  entities suggests that they actually represented various aspects of existence - the “Forms” or “First

  Principles” discussed by Pythagoras and Plato in a more abstract manner.

  The hieroglyphic term for “god” is neter, of which Sir E.A. Wallis Budge remarks:

  This word has been translated “godlike”, “holy”, “divine”, “sacred”, “power”, “strength”, “force”,

  “strong”, “fortify”, “mighty”, “protect”; but it is quite impossible to be certain that any word which

  we may use represents the meaning of neter, because no one knows exactly what idea the ancient

  Egyptians attached to the word. The truth is that the exact meaning of neter was lost at a very early

  period of Egyptian history, and even the Coptic does not help us to recover it. 28

 

‹ Prev