The Thirty-Year Genocide

Home > Other > The Thirty-Year Genocide > Page 66
The Thirty-Year Genocide Page 66

by Benny Morris


  Norwegian explorer and scientist— demanded the release of the prisoners in

  the labor battalions. He argued that the women and children who had

  reached Greece needed their men: they could not be productively resettled

  without breadwinners.449 Meanwhile, the deported men were, according to

  Bristol “treated like animals.”450

  Thousands, perhaps tens of thousands, of women and children were also

  deported inland. It began within a few days of the Turkish takeover of Smyrna.

  The Turks gathered women and children from the quay, fields, and streets,

  and “drove them off.”451 Immediately after the fire, one Christian eyewitness

  reported that “the road to Paradise was literally filled with women and children, together with older men, being led off under guard towards the interior.”452

  On September 18 Lieutenant Commander Knauss saw “the road to Dada-

  gatch [Dadaağaç] . . . filled with women and children being driven towards

  the interior.”453 Even Bristol understood that deportation to the interior

  “means certain death, either from starvation or at the hands of enraged

  Turks.”454

  One of the columns departing Smyrna numbered 4,000 at the outset. The

  survivors reaching Kayseri two months later, on November 19, numbered just

  700. Initially there had also been men in the convoy, but they had been sepa-

  rated and taken away. The deportees were given no food. Of the women, “over

  half . . . died on the road,” missionaries in Kayseri reported. Those who were

  Turks and Greeks, 1919–1924

  hospitalized “all cried for bread and suffered most terrible pain, their mouths

  were bleeding. Teeth loose, bodies covered with sores, filth and lice.” At Kay-

  seri, ten died each day; many more “are going to die,” the hospital director

  predicted.455

  It was not just Smyrna that experienced deportations. The Turks were

  determined to leave no Greeks on the seacoast.456 The New York Times re-

  ported on October 15 that the Turks had ordered all Christians out of the en-

  tirety of southwestern Anatolia—

  including towns such as Antalya and

  Makri— within seven days. Army- aged men, of course, were also deported in-

  land.457 At the end of October, some 7,000 women and children from the

  Moschonissia Islands, off Ayvalık, and the village of Yenitsarohori (Küçükköy)

  were reportedly deported inland.458

  In sum the Nationalist army, assisted by locals, destroyed a great number

  of Armenians and Greeks during September– October 1922. The systematic

  “hunt” in the residential districts of Smyrna, the round-up and massacre of

  Greek army- age men, the fires in the Christian quarters, the murder of Chris-

  tians fleeing their sanctuaries toward the dock, the shooting and burning on

  the quayside and in the waters offshore, and the travails of the deportees— all

  contributed to a massive death toll.

  Bristol, in his wonted manner, downplayed Turkish atrocities, arguing

  that reports “greatly exaggerated” the losses. He asserted an overall death

  toll of 2,000–3,000 and claimed “ there was no general massacre, and only

  killing of individuals.”459 But a host of on- the- spot witnesses described a dif-

  fer ent real ity. A British relief officer, Lieutenant Hadkinson, estimated that

  25,000 died on the night of September 13 alone when, he said, Turkish sol-

  diers and locals prevented Armenians and Greeks from reaching the dock

  from quarters engulfed by fire.460 One Smyrna notable pointed out that

  10,000–12,000 Greeks and Armenians were taken away as prisoners and

  had since “dis appeared.”461 Horton seemingly endorsed a high, and prob-

  ably exaggerated estimate of the Smyrna death toll— a hundred- thousand.462

  There is no knowing the true number. But Churchill at the time described

  Turkish actions in Smyrna as “a deliberately planned and methodically exe-

  cuted atrocity.” He put no figures to his assessment, though he was con-

  vinced that elimination of Christian life in Smyrna had “few parallels in the

  history of human crime.”463

  Mustafa Kemal and the Nationalists

  The Exodus

  Aside from the Ionian Greeks deported to the Anatolian interior, the great ma-

  jority of the inhabitants of Smyrna and its hinterlands were transported west-

  ward, to the Greek Aegean islands and the Greek mainland. In September 1921

  Hamid Bey, the Nationalist representative in Constantinople, told Bristol that

  “in the bottom of their hearts the Turks wished that these people would leave

  the country.”464 The wish was fulfilled the following year.

  In late spring 1922, as Greek arms began to falter, the Allies began to

  consider the possibility of a wholesale Christian exodus from western

  Anatolia. The British put the numbers involved at 650,000: 350,000

  from Smyrna, 136,000 from Bursa; 120,000 from Balikesir; and 44,000

  from the regions of Kütahya, Afyon- Karahisar, and Eskişehir. The Allies

  generally opposed such an exodus, which would be enormously difficult

  given the costs of transport and transitional and long- term refugee mainte-

  nance and the challenge of securing ultimate destinations.465 But circumstances

  conspired to thwart their wishes. In the end it was the Allies themselves

  who carried out the massive transfer of the western Anatolian Christians

  to Greece. Most were Greeks, but there were also tens of thousands of

  Armenians.

  Christians were already pouring out of Smyrna before the Nationalist

  forces arrived in early September. Among these emigrants was a small number

  of wealthier Smyrniot Christians and a large number of Greeks from the inte-

  rior who had descended on the city. Barnes put the number leaving before

  the Turkish reconquest at 75,000. But that left about 150,000 locals and

  100,000 refugees in the town and its suburbs.466 As the Turks approached,

  many fled the suburbs for the city center and the port. On September 9 Chris-

  tians began boarding boats.467 Among the first post- conquest departees were

  hundreds of Eu ro pean and American nationals. The Americans, with gun-

  boats in the harbor, established their forward headquarters next to the quay

  in the Smyrna Theatre. At the entrance hung an electric sign in block letters

  two feet high, reading “Le Tango de la Mort.”468

  The following days were marked by a chaotic maritime exodus against

  the backdrop of urban massacre and catastrophic conflagration. On Sep-

  tember 16 the Turks proclaimed:

  Turks and Greeks, 1919–1924

  Greeks and Armenians living in the part of the country rescued and

  cleansed by our army, and those Greeks and Armenians brought to

  Smyrna and to our coast towns by the enemy army . . . are persons

  who . . . openly joined the Greek army and have thus taken up arms

  against us, burned our cities and tortured and persecuted the innocent

  inhabitants. . . . In order not to allow these persons to join the Greek

  army again . . . those males who are between the ages of eigh teen and

  forty- five will be placed in garrisons as prisoners of war. . . . Permission

  to leave Turkey is hereby granted to all [other] Greeks and Armenians

  be they from Smyr
na or from the interior. This permission is valid until

  September 30, 1922. It is hereby declared that those, who after [that]

  date . . . are in a position of impairing the public peace and tranquility

  and the security of our military operations, will be deported [to the

  interior].

  The order also applied to “Jews of Hellenic nationality.”469

  The proclamation, Barnes wrote, “made immediate evacuation impera-

  tive.”470 Hepburn wrote ominously, “ Unless action were taken immedi-

  ately, there would be no refugee prob lem in sight within a week.”471 Western

  representatives attempted to negotiate with the Turks, but they insisted on

  the departure of all Christians, regardless of the consequences. Bristol re-

  ported Hamid Bey telling him, the Turks “preferred less prosperity to greater

  prosperity coupled with these undesirable ele ments” remaining.472

  The deadline of September 30 stuck, and masses of refugees were soon

  rushing out of Smyrna. By September 19, about 30,000 had been taken off

  by British, American, French and Italian destroyers. On September 24, Greek

  steamers escorted by Allied naval craft began shuttling between Smyrna,

  Piraeus, and Salonica.473 Many refugees were first transported to Mitylene,

  from which they were later dispersed westward.

  American officers who witnessed the scene at the embarkation gate re-

  marked on the “at times very severe” be hav ior of Turkish troops engaged in

  crowd control. According to one officer, “The force used was a leather strap,

  a cane, the butt of a rifle, or even sometimes a bayonet, and in one or two

  instances by shooting.” But the Turks were doing more than managing

  crowds. “Robbing at the gates and in the yard was rather the rule than the

  Mustafa Kemal and the Nationalists

  exception,” Lieutenant Commander Powell wrote. Occasionally, Turkish

  officers intervened, but often they looked away, and sometimes they

  participated.474

  Under Powell’s command the USS Edsall put twenty men ashore to

  “assist in patrolling and in preventing undue vio lence.” He wrote:

  As soon as the harbor gates were opened, the crowd became a mob;

  women were knocked down, were walked over, children were torn from

  their arms . . . and they were pushed through screaming and crying.

  Many lost their bundles which added to the confusion, by causing others

  to stumble over them. . . . The Turkish troops weeded out the males. . . .

  Families were broken up without regard. There were a few cases of

  shooting where men . . . were selected out and tried to escape.475

  Left behind on the quay was

  a crowd of panic- stricken women and old men, with hordes of

  children . . . carry ing all their worldly possessions. . . . The majority . . .

  had been under guard since the fire . . . exposed to robbery, outrage and

  vio lence. . . . Robbery was continuous. . . . Turkish officers . . . were as

  bad as—or worse than— their men. . . . The conduct of the police officer

  at the police barrier was very restrained, and he was on the whole most

  generous. . . . On the other hand, his subordinates and the soldiers were

  brutal. . . . The contradictory nature of the Turk’s character is exempli-

  fied by the numerous cases . . . of Turkish police and soldiers throwing

  themselves on the ground outside the gates to save a child that had fallen

  and was being trodden underfoot; five minutes later the same man would

  quite likely kick a cripple in the stomach. I myself saw an exceptionally

  brutal policeman carry a lost child up and down the jetty until he found

  the parents.476

  An American missionary recalled “Turkish soldiers carry ing the bundles of

  the refugees and assisting the sick and old people.”477 Some of the Allied shore

  parties interacted socially with Turkish soldiers and officials. HMS Curacoa

  dispatched a soccer team, which was beaten two- to- one by the Turks.478

  Turks and Greeks, 1919–1924

  By September 30 more than 190,000 Ottoman Christians, almost all Greeks,

  had been evacuated. Another 21,000 British, French, and Italian citizens and

  “protégés” had also left.479 But refugees from towns and villages in the interior

  continued streaming to the coast. Pressed by the Allies, the Turks extended the

  deadline to October 10.480 By October 9 Allied warships and steamers had

  taken some 240,000 Christians from Smyrna, Ayvalık, Çeşme, Vurla, Makri,

  and Antalya.481 The Greeks of Ayvalık apparently deci ded in early September

  to stay put, but the Turks ordered them out.482 “Infidel Smyrna” had become

  Turkish Izmir, as CUP leaders had advocated at the secret War Ministry meet-

  ings chaired by Enver Pasha in May, June, and August 1914, when the “elimi-

  nation of the non- Turkish masses” had been discussed.483

  The exodus from most of the coast was more orderly than from Smyrna.

  American officers aboard USS Lawrence remarked on the “splendid conduct

  of the Turkish military” during the evacuation of the 15,000 Greeks from

  Ayvalık on October 8–9. Civil officials, however, relieved evacuees of “money

  and jewels.”484 As in Smyrna, the Turks marched off all army- age men to the

  interior. Of the 3,000 taken, only 23 reportedly survived. The town’s Greek

  orthodox clergy were all massacred.485

  Eastern Thrace also emptied of Greeks. The Mudanya armistice mandated

  the evacuation of the Greek army from eastern Thrace and placed the terri-

  tory under Turkish rule.486 In addition, after the Greek rout, the Kemalists

  advanced northward, toward the Allied- held zone along the Dardanelles and

  Sea of Marmara, threatening Eastern Thrace. Greek civilians deci ded to leave

  with the soldiers rather than face a pos si ble Kemalist assault and further

  Turkish depredations. By October 28, 250,000 Greeks had departed

  for Western Thrace, in orderly fashion and overseen by Allied forces.487 An-

  other 70,000 left for Greece via Tekirdağ from the Bursa area.488 In Thrace

  the young Ernest Hemingway was on hand to witness “twenty miles of carts

  drawn by cows, bullocks and muddy- flanked water buffalo, with exhausted,

  staggering men, women and children, blankets over their heads, walking

  blindingly [ sic] along in the rain beside their worldly goods. . . . It is a silent pro cession. Nobody even grunts. It is all they can do to keep moving.”489

  The resettlement of the Thracian evacuees, assisted by Greek troops and

  brigands, resulted in the displacement of many Bulgarian villa gers. It was a

  rough pro cess. Some were murdered, and girls were raped. According to an

  Mustafa Kemal and the Nationalists

  American official, there was “a systematic policy of denationalization and ex-

  termination of the Bulgarians . . . applied without scruple and without any

  pity.”490 Animosity between the two peoples had been simmering for the pre-

  vious de cade, as the Bulgarians had turned against their former allies in the

  Second Balkan War, attacking Greece in June 1913.

  Back in Smyrna the new Turkish administration devoted considerable en-

  ergy to cleaning up after the fire, but also to ridding the city of the vestiges of Chris tian ity. Rumbold described the situation as “a reig
n of terror.” Remaining

  Christians and their tenants were summarily evicted.491 Churches were “sys-

  tematically razed to the ground.” Jews were allowed to stay, but the Turks

  desecrated the town’s Jewish and Christian cemeteries. At one Greek ceme-

  tery, “all graves and tombs had been violated, the lids to coffins having been

  torn off and bodies thrown about.”492 Reportedly 20 percent of the graves at

  one Armenian cemetery were opened.493 The British and Jewish cemeteries

  in the Bournabat (Bornova) quarter were desecrated. “Almost without excep-

  tion, the tombstones” in Bournabat “had been smashed and overthrown . . .

  and many defiled with the filth of human beings and animals.”494 A se nior

  British naval officer concluded, “It is impossible to believe that all this willful damage to Christian and Jewish cemeteries could have taken place without

  the knowledge of the Turkish authorities, and I consider it part of a considered

  policy.”495

  The Nationalist victory and takeover of Smyrna triggered massive demon-

  strations among the Turks of Constantinople. “A great many win dows were

  smashed” at Christian- owned homes and shops. But the Allied occupation

  troops curbed the rioting.496 Greeks nonetheless fled the capital in a panic,

  fearing that the Kemalists were about to descend on the city. “The Turk must

  massacre and burn; Smyrna was burned; therefore the same fate awaits Con-

  stantinople” Bristol wrote, accurately capturing the reasoning under lying the

  Constantinople exodus.497 He estimated that, by early December, 75,000

  Christians had left the city.498

  With the Nationalists on the doorstep of Constantinople and the straits,

  the deterioration of the Allied position in western Turkey was plain to see.

  So was the divide between the two major Eu ro pean powers. It had only

  widened since the signing of the Franco- Turkish deal over Cilicia, behind

  Britain’s back. Now the Allies were emphatically at loggerheads. Curzon

  Turks and Greeks, 1919–1924

  described a heated meeting in Paris on September 22 with French Prime

  Minister Raymond Poincaré. He “lost all command of his temper, and for a

  quarter of an hour shouted and raved at the top of his voice . . . and

 

‹ Prev