Medical Catastrophe

Home > Other > Medical Catastrophe > Page 9
Medical Catastrophe Page 9

by Ronald W Dworkin


  celed out my book smarts and extended educational experience, making

  for a rough parity between us. In fact, this judgment is sometimes reasonable. The doctor, no matter what stage he or she is at, must have the tact, openness, and confidence to decide.

  In this case, I refused to budge. The nurse anesthetist stormed off. In

  the distance I saw her huddle with the three other nurses. A howl of scorn arose from the small assembly. I knew they were talking about me.

  I began to feel uneasy. After all, I was new at the hospital. And it was

  four against one. When they walked toward me I felt that my nurse

  anesthetist had unleashed an angry mob.

  They crowded around me. One nurse declared, “This is silly. We

  could be waiting an hour for that rep to call.” A second nurse demanded,

  “What makes you think you can just shut everything down?” The other

  two nurses nodded their heads in agreement.

  I knew why the nurses were pushing me. Just as some doctors are

  impatient and want to go home, so are some nurses. The case was sched-

  uled to start at 3 PM. The nurses ended their shifts at 4 PM. If the case start was delayed and the anesthetic induction and surgical prep were still going on at 4 PM, the nurses would have to stay longer to finish those

  activities before a new team could relieve them. They didn’t want to stay.

  They wanted to leave exactly at 4 PM.

  The assembly exerted a strange mental force on me. It started to hyp-

  notize me, upset my equilibrium; there was no obvious reason for me to

  submit to it, and yet I could only keep from submitting to it by offering tremendous inward resistance. A doctor fighting another doctor is a low-intensity battle compared to a doctor fighting a nurse. A doctor may incur

  W H E N N O O N E I S I N C O M M A N D

  5 9

  the wrath of another doctor, but he or she will see that other doctor only sporadically, making any workplace tension intermittent. In addition, the fight remains at the level of two combatants. But a doctor and a nurse see each other every day. When they fight, the resulting tension becomes

  constant and unremitting. Word of the fight soon gets around, and some-

  times other nurses join the battle to defend their colleague. Their collective derision can transform the doctor’s life into a living hell—a hell

  perpetrated in countless ways, often small and insidious, and turning the doctor into a paranoid nervous wreck. At every turn he thinks the nurses

  are out to get him. A nurse delays his case—they’re after me (even if the nurse didn’t do it intentionally). A nurse fails to carry out his order—

  they’re after me (even if the nurse forgot the order). A nurse pretends not to hear him—they’re after me (even if the nurse really didn’t hear the

  doctor). The doctor grows so unsettled that he or she can barely make it

  through the day.

  I kept up a bold front. I calmly told the nurses that we had to wait until we gathered all the necessary information. But I also knew well enough

  how many times before I had yielded in like circumstances, and experi-

  ence indicated that the future would resemble the past.

  The nurses badgered me until my innate predisposition to hedge led

  me to say that we would wait ten more minutes, and that if we hadn’t

  heard back from either the patient’s cardiologist or the pacemaker compa-

  ny rep by then, they could bring the patient into the operating room.

  After ten minutes there was still no call. The nurses started to bring the patient into the room, but my courage had returned. I said no. The exchange grew more heated. “But you said—” declared a broken-hearted

  nurse, in a tone of reproach. “I’m sorry, but that’s how it has to be,” I replied. She kept pushing. In the end I snapped at her and called her a

  “silly goose.” The nurse fell silent, went to make a phone call, and then sat down to wait.

  Within three minutes, BSN, MSN was down in the holding area,

  standing directly in front of me and looking very angry. She was a large

  and imposing person, wearing a long white lab coat.

  “Young man, did you call one of my nurses a ‘goose’?” she blared.

  My little assembly of nurses gathered round. Feelings of detestation

  and horror mingled with satisfaction. This was what was wanted, it

  seemed. It felt as though they wanted to make me feel like a boor, rather than the knowledgeable professional I was. If I were a respected doctor,

  6 0

  C H A P T E R 4

  they would have to contend with me. But I had used the hated g-word.

  The role of archfiend in this grim drama now belonged to me. And if

  BSN, MSN could produce in such a spectacular manner evidence of

  boorishness in me, some of which didn’t even need proving (given what I

  had said), then clearly it followed that this assembly of nurses should

  reject all my recommendations in regard to the patient, who should be

  brought into the operating room forthwith.

  There was a stir of anxiety. The assembly sensed this was the big

  moment: this was the moment when I would either seize the leading role

  or be put in my place for good.

  Still smarting over my nurse having told me a few days before to go

  suck an egg, I refused to cave.

  “Did I call the nurse a goose? I’m not sure. Maybe I just said she was

  something like a goose,” I replied with heavy sarcasm.

  “Now you listen here—” BSN, MSN said before stopping herself and

  proceeding in a more pedantic tone of voice. “Now listen, young man, our

  job is to take care of patients. We’re a team. Do you understand? We all

  want what’s best for the patient. To work as a team we must treat each

  other with respect.”

  I told the chief nurse that I understood her concerns, but I also ex-

  plained my concerns regarding the pacemaker and the pushback I’d been

  getting from her nurses.

  BSN, MSN winked at the nurses, feeling herself to be on firmer foot-

  ing. “Waiting so long for this rep to call does seem unreasonable. I think we should at least start the case,” she declared with confidence. It was

  now five against one.

  “Well, I think differently. And I’m the doctor, so I’m in charge,” I

  replied firmly.

  “In charge of me?” she asked, her suspicions flaming up again.

  “In this situation I am,” I said.

  BSN, MSN stood still for a few moments in silence. “I’m not subordi-

  nate to you, young man,” she harshly interjected.

  “Then who are you subordinate to?” I asked.

  “I am subordinate to the hospital president and to the board. You’re in

  a department. I run a department. We’re equal. Don’t forget that,” she

  answered angrily.

  A phone call from the pacemaker company representative interrupted

  the standoff. The rep said the patient’s pacemaker was a standard one, not

  W H E N N O O N E I S I N C O M M A N D

  6 1

  a sequential one. It did not have to be reprogrammed after magnet place-

  ment. The battery was fresh. The nurses felt vindicated. My concerns had

  been for nothing, although we could not have known this before the

  phone call. But the nurses didn’t see it that way. They already had a claim on me for my name-calling; now, to their minds, their judgment on medical matters had proved superior to mine.

  BSN, MSN joined in the triumph, smiling even while her eyes still

  blazed furiously.
Pointing her forefinger at the syringe in my shirt pocket, she said, “That’s an unlabeled syringe, doctor. You know the rules. All

  syringes must be labeled.” She was determined to drive the point home

  that we were on equal footing, that each of us could take turns ordering

  the other, that she was watching me carefully and was prepared for any

  eventuality, and that it would be unwise for me to come into conflict with her again.

  The nurses brought the patient into the operating room. I started the

  case by myself, my nurse anesthetist having left for the day. I placed the monitors on the patient and gave her some intravenous sedation. Two

  operating room nurses hoisted the patient’s legs into stirrups. Both were new to the case. During the hand-off the departing nurses had spent

  longer than usual telling the new nurses about the patient—and the reason for our delay. The four nurses had whispered quietly to each other, with

  one of them glancing in my direction every few seconds. Although we

  had entered the operating room on my terms, I knew I had not regained

  my old position, as if there had never been a quarrel.

  The gynecologist started the D and C. When I asked one of the nurses

  if she could get me some warm blankets to put across the patient’s chest, she promptly did so. Then she left the room to start another case across

  the hall. I noticed that the bag of saline connected to the patient’s intravenous was almost empty. Because I had to hold the sleeping patient’s chin

  to assist her breathing, I asked the remaining nurse to grab a fresh bag

  from the cabinet for me. The nurse acted as if she could neither see nor

  hear me. I dropped the patient’s chin and got the bag myself.

  I understood everything. It was the struggle between doctor and

  nurse—who would dominate whom? Nothing was fixed, everything was

  fluid and precarious, the outcome of the struggle unclear. I hoped that my

  6 2

  C H A P T E R 4

  decision to get the saline on my own, to be the bigger person, would

  appease the nurse’s pride enough to smooth things over. I was wrong.

  Every time I asked her for help, she would project an air of disinterest or sometimes pretend not to hear; when she did pay attention, she looked at

  me derisively. Still, I carefully avoided pushing things into a state of open conflict, for I knew that when a doctor fights a nurse, the loss is great, while the gain is dubious.

  Toward the end of the case, my semiconscious patient began to experi-

  ence pain. I gave her additional intravenous sedation, but she continued to moan. I didn’t want to put her completely to sleep, with a breathing tube, because her anatomy suggested she would be a difficult intubation. Putting her to sleep without a breathing tube, however, risked aspiration,

  because of her diabetes. It was a difficult situation, and an embarrassing one for an anesthesiologist, whose job is to eliminate pain. The prudent

  course, I decided, was to continue with small doses of intravenous seda-

  tion, including a drug called Versed, which causes antegrade amnesia

  (meaning a patient fails to consolidate into memory events going for-

  ward). Although the patient might still express pain, unconsciousness

  would prevent her from being aware of her pain, while Versed would

  keep her from remembering her pain.

  Nevertheless, a moaning patient looks bad. The nurse came over and

  demanded that I put the patient to sleep. I tried to explain to her my

  thinking while simultaneously watching the monitors and injecting more

  drugs. She stared at me angrily. When the patient moaned again, the nurse repeated her demand, looking at me as if I were an unfeeling brute. The

  duel had to end. “Listen, when I want your opinion, I’ll ask for it,” I

  snapped. Then I looked away.

  The gynecologist decided that uterine bleeding failed to explain the

  patient’s anemia. There was no reason to proceed to laparoscopy. Then he

  performed one more pelvic exam. He suddenly exclaimed that he felt an

  ovarian mass in the patient for the first time. He wanted to move forward with laparoscopy after all. I was surprised—and a little suspicious. I

  asked him why he had suddenly detected a mass now. He replied that

  anesthesia often allows for a more accurate exam, as it relaxes a patient’s muscles. Seemed reasonable. Still, in the back of my mind I wondered if

  he had just wanted an excuse to perform a laparoscopy, to gain practice,

  as laparoscopy was a relatively new procedure in those days. I asked him

  W H E N N O O N E I S I N C O M M A N D

  6 3

  what he was hoping to find. He quietly replied, “We’re just going to take a little look around.”

  I intubated the patient after some struggle. A technician came in to

  assist the surgeon. He was a young man with no more than a high school

  education. But he knew how to work the laparoscope better than any

  doctor did, as he had been trained to assist physicians on this particular surgery, and only this surgery.

  The gynecologist fumbled with the laparoscopic equipment, failing to

  pierce the patient’s abdominal wall with the needle that fills the abdominal cavity with air. He pushed too little because he feared that pushing too hard might cause the needle to puncture a major blood vessel. The technician did it for him. Once the gynecologist was inside the cavity, he moved the organs around with a long stick, causing some bleeding that short

  bursts of cautery stemmed. I stood ready to apply the magnet to the

  pacemaker, but it wasn’t needed.

  The gynecologist inspected the ovary that he thought had a mass. He

  wasn’t sure if there was a mass, and he hesitated over what to do. He

  looked at the technician, who sensed his opinion was desired. The techni-

  cian said he had seen similar situations before. Those surgeons who had

  dissected down further often regretted it, he noted. He recommended

  coming out of the abdomen and doing a more complete workup with

  noninvasive radiography. The technician then remained silent for a min-

  ute, and the gynecologist remained silent also. But the latter’s eyes were as active as ever. He looked at the monitor that held a picture of the

  patient’s ovary; then he allowed his eyes to settle on the surgical site. He seemed uneasy. Finally, he decided to take the technician’s advice and

  end the surgery.

  It was an odd moment. This young man had appeared unexpectedly,

  from out of the blue, and determined the direction of the case. He was

  practicing medicine. There was nothing of the doctor about him—neither

  the surgeon’s knowledge of anatomy nor my knowledge of physiology.

  He was an instrument. He carried out the will of others. But because he

  had performed the same activity over and over again, he had gone from

  being an instrument to being someone able to help, advise, and decide on

  a particular case. If that is the definition of a doctor, then he had become a doctor.

  The reader may think I am devaluing what this young man had to

  offer. In fact, it’s just the opposite. He had added real value. As an

  6 4

  C H A P T E R 4

  accomplished technician, he may even represent the future of medicine.

  Instead, my doubts are about the doctors. If a technician with vast experience doing a particular procedure can outperform a doctor doing that

  procedure, then what value does the doctor add? What important contri-

  bution does the doctor make? What is dis
tinctive about being a doctor?

  Perhaps nothing, I thought to myself as I wheeled the patient back to the recovery room.

  Several days later, I drove downtown to a hotel for a medical confer-

  ence on “team medicine.” Attendance was compulsory for doctors,

  nurses, and surgical staff from the region’s major hospitals, with multiple sections convening on different dates to accommodate people’s schedules. The conference’s purpose was to move doctors and nurses, now

  called “providers,” toward a more democratic approach to decision mak-

  ing. In the future, at least in the ideal, nurses would offer advice and

  input, doctors would listen carefully, and the health care “team” would

  make decisions instead of doctors acting unilaterally.

  When I walked into the large conference room, I saw faces that I

  recognized, looking bored or sullen. Unlike most medical meetings,

  where people go to enjoy themselves, to meet friends, and to be simulta-

  neously instructed and entertained, this meeting was strictly business. On the podium sat three nurses whom I did not recognize, along with BSN,

  MSN. I took a seat in the back.

  One of the nurses went up to the lectern and spoke generally about the

  meeting’s purpose. She talked about the importance of helping the patient and working together to do so. She said we should treat our patients the

  way we would want our family members to be treated. Her words seemed

  unnecessary, as no one in the room—doctor, nurse, or technician—

  thought otherwise. The whole speech conveyed a sense of emptiness and

  thinness. Afterward a few people clapped.

  Our first activity was designed to “break down barriers,” but its real

  purpose was to destroy the traditional chain of command. Doctors,

  nurses, and orderlies were randomly divided into groups, each group

  containing a sampling of all three. A group’s job was to grab some Legos

  from a large bin in the center of the room, return to home base, and build a tower with them. The group that built the highest tower at the end of

 

‹ Prev