Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance

Home > Nonfiction > Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance > Page 23
Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance Page 23

by Robert M. Pirsig


  When I wake up again he’s still crying. There’s nowhere for either of us to go. Nothing to do but face up to the existing situation, but I really don’t know what the existing situation is.

  “Chris”, I say finally.

  He doesn’t answer.

  “Chris”, I repeat.

  Still no answer. He finally says, belligerently, “What?”

  “I was going to say, Chris, that you don’t have to prove anything to me. Do you understand that?”

  A real flash of terror hits his face. He jerks his head away violently.

  I say, “You don’t understand what I mean by that, do you?”

  He continues to look away and doesn’t answer. The wind moans through the pines.

  I just don’t know. I just don’t know what it is. It isn’t just YMCA egotism that’s making him this upset. Some minor thing reflects badly on him and it’s the end of the world. When he tries to do something and doesn’t get it just right he blows up or goes into tears.

  I settle back in the grass and rest again. Maybe it’s not having answers that’s defeating both of us. I don’t want to go ahead because it doesn’t look like any answers ahead. None behind either. Just lateral drift. That’s what it is between me and him. Lateral drift, waiting for something.

  Later I hear him prowl at the knapsack. I roll over and see him glaring at me. “Where’s the cheese?” he says. The tone’s still belligerent.

  But I’m not going to give in to it. “Help yourself”, I say. “I’m not waiting on you.”

  He digs around and finds some cheese and crackers. I give him my hunting knife to spread the cheese with. “I think what I’m going to do, Chris, is put all the heavy stuff in my pack and the light stuff in yours. That way I won’t have to go back and forth with both packs.”

  He agrees to this and his mood improves. It seems to have solved something for him.

  My pack must be about forty or forty-five pounds now, and after we’ve climbed for a while an equilibrium establishes itself at about one breath for each step.

  We come to a rough grade and it changes to two breaths per step. At one bank it goes to four breaths per step. Huge steps, almost vertical, hanging on to roots and branches. I feel stupid because I should have planned my way around this. The aspen staves come in handy now, and Chris takes some interest in the use of his. The packs made you top heavy and the sticks are good insurance against toppling over. You plant one foot, plant the staff, then SWING on it, up, and take three breaths, then plant the next foot, plant the staff and SWING up.

  I don’t know if I’ve got any more Chautauqua left in me today. My head gets fuzzy about this time in the afternoon — maybe I can establish just one overview and let it go for today.

  Way back long ago when we first set out on this strange voyage I talked about how John and Sylvia seemed to be running from some mysterious death force that seemed to them to be embodied in technology, and that there were many others like them. I talked for a while about how some of the people involved in technology seemed to be avoiding it too. An underlying reason for this trouble was that they saw it from a kind of “groovy dimension” that was concerned with the immediate surface of things whereas I was concerned with the underlying form. I called John’s style romantic, mine classic. His was, in the argot of the sixties, “hip”, mine was “square.” Then we started going into this square world to see what made it tick. Data, classifications, hierarchies, cause-and-effect and analysis were discussed, and somewhere along there was some talk about a handful of sand, the world of which we’re conscious, taken from the endless landscape of awareness around us. I said a process of discrimination goes to work on this handful of sand and divides it into parts. Classical, square understanding is concerned with the piles of sand and the nature of the grains and the basis for sorting and interrelating them.

  Phædrus’ refusal to define Quality, in terms of this analogy, was an attempt to break the grip of the classical sandsifting mode of understanding and find a point of common understanding between the classic and romantic worlds. Quality, the cleavage term between hip and square, seemed to be it. Both worlds used the term. Both knew what it was. It was just that the romantic left it alone and appreciated it for what it was and the classic tried to turn it into a set of intellectual building blocks for other purposes. Now, with the definition blocked, the classic mind was forced to view Quality as the romantic did, undistorted by thought structures.

  I’m making a big thing out of all this, these classical-romantic differences, but Phædrus didn’t.

  He wasn’t really interested in any kind of fusion of differences between these two worlds. He was after something else… his ghost. In the pursuit of this ghost he went on to wider meanings of Quality which drew him further and further to his end. I differ from him in that I’ve no intention of going on to that end. He just passed through this territory and opened it up. I intend to stay and cultivate it and see if I can get something to grow.

  I think that the referent of a term that can split a world into hip and square, classic and romantic, technological and humanistic, is an entity that can unite a world already split along these lines into one. A real understanding of Quality doesn’t just serve the System, or even beat it or even escape it. A real understanding of Quality captures the System, tames it, and puts it to work for one’s own personal use, while leaving one completely free to fulfill his inner destiny.

  Now that we’re up high on one side of the canyon we can see back and down and across to the other side. It’s as steep there as it is here… a dark mat of greenish-black pines going up to a high ridge. We can measure our progress by sighting against it at what seems like a horizontal angle.

  That’s all the Quality talk for today, I guess, thank goodness. I don’t mind the Quality, it’s just that all the classical talk about it isn’t Quality. Quality is just the focal point around which a lot of intellectual furniture is getting rearranged.

  We stop for a break and look down below. Chris’s spirits seem to be better now, but I’m afraid it’s the ego thing again.

  “Look how far we’ve come”, he says.

  “We’ve got a lot farther to go.”

  Later on Chris shouts to hear his echo, and throws rocks down to see where they fall. He’s starting to get almost cocky, so I step up the equilibrium to where I breathe at a good swift rate, about one-and-a-half times our former speed. This sobers him somewhat and we keep on climbing.

  By about three in the afternoon my legs start to get rubbery and it’s time to stop. I’m not in very good shape. If you go on after that rubbery feeling you start to pull muscles and the next day is agony.

  We come to a flat spot, a large knoll protruding from the side of the mountain. I tell Chris this is it for today. He seems satisfied and cheerful; maybe some progress has been made with him after all.

  I’m ready for a nap, but clouds have formed in the canyon that appear ready to drop rain. They’ve filled in the canyon so that we can’t see the bottom and can just barely see the ridge on the other side.

  I break open the packs and get the tent halves out, Army ponchos, and snap them together. I take a rope and tie it between the two trees, then throw the shelter halves over it. I cut some stakes out of shrubs with the machete, and pound them in, then dig a small trench with the flat end of the machete around the tent to drain away any rainwater. We’ve just got everything inside when the first rain comes down.

  Chris is in high spirits about the rain. We lie on our backs on the sleeping bags and watch the rain come down and hear its popping sound on the tent. The forest has a misty appearance and we both become contemplative and watch the leaves of the shrubs jolt when struck by raindrops and jolt a little ourselves when a clash of thunder comes down but feel happy that we’re dry when everything around us is wet.

  After a while I reach into my pack for the paperback by Thoreau, find it and have to strain a little to read it to Chris in the grey rainy light. I guess I’ve exp
lained that we’ve done this with other books in the past, advanced books that he wouldn’t normally understand. What happens is I read a sentence, he comes up with a long series of questions about it and then, when he’s satisfied, I read the next sentence.

  We do this with Thoreau for a while, but after half an hour I see to my surprise and disappointment that Thoreau isn’t coming through. Chris is restless and so am I. The language structure is wrong for the mountain forest we’re in. At least that’s my feeling. The book seems tame and cloistered, something I’d never have thought of Thoreau, but there it is. He’s talking to another situation, another time, just discovering the evils of technology rather than discovering the solution. He isn’t talking to us. Reluctantly I put the book away again and we’re both silent and meditative. It’s just Chris and me and the forest and the rain. No books can guide us anymore.

  Pans we’ve set outside the tent begin to fill up with rainwater, and later, when we have enough, we pour it all together in a pot and add some cubes of chicken bouillon and heat it over a small Sterno stove. Like any food or drink after a hard climb in the mountains, it tastes good.

  Chris says, “I like camping with you better than with the Sutherlands.”

  “The circumstances are different”, I say.

  When the bouillon is gone I get out a can of pork and beans and empty it into the pot. It takes a long time to heat up, but we’re in no hurry.

  “It smells good”, Chris says.

  The rain has stopped and just occasional drops pat down on the tent.

  “I think tomorrow’ll be sunny”, I say.

  We pass the pot of pork and beans back and forth, eating from opposite sides.

  “Dad, what do you think about all the time? You’re always thinking all the time.”

  “Ohhhhhh — all kinds of things.”

  “What about?”

  “Oh, about the rain, and about troubles that can happen and about things in general.”

  “What things?”

  “Oh, about what it’s going to be like for you when you grow up.”

  He’s interested. “What’s it going to be like?”

  But there’s a slight ego gleam in his eyes as he asks this and the answer as a result comes out masked. “I don’t know”, I say, “it’s just what I think about.”

  “Do you think we’ll get to the top of this canyon by tomorrow?”

  “Oh yes, we’re not far from the top.”

  “In the morning?”

  “I think so.”

  Later he is asleep, and a damp night wind comes down from the ridge causing a sighing sound from the pines. The silhouettes of the treetops move gently with the wind. They yield and then return, then with a sigh yield and return again, restless from forces that are not part of their nature. The wind causes a flutter of one side of the tent. I get up and peg it down, then walk on the damp spongy grass of the knoll for a while, then crawl back into the tent and wait for sleep.

  19

  A mat of sunlit pine needles by my face slowly tells me where I am and helps dispel a dream.

  In the dream I was standing in a white-painted room looking at a glass door. On the other side was Chris and his brother and mother. Chris was waving at me from the other side of the door and his brother was smiling, but his mother had tears in her eyes. Then I saw that Chris’s smile was fixed and artificial and actually there was deep fear.

  I moved toward the door and his smile became better. He motioned for me to open it. I was about to open it, but then didn’t. His fear came back but I turned and walked away.

  It’s a dream that has occurred often before. Its meaning is obvious and fits some thoughts of last night. He’s trying to relate to me and is afraid he never will. Things are getting clearer up here.

  Beyond the flap of the tent now the needles on the ground send vapors of mist up toward the sun. The air feels moist and cool, and while Chris still sleeps I get out of the tent carefully, stand up and stretch.

  My legs and back are stiff but not painful. I do calisthenics for a few minutes to loosen them up, then sprint from the knoll into the pines. That feels better.

  The pine odor is heavy and moist this morning. I squat and look down at the morning mists in the canyon below.

  Later I return to the tent where a noise indicates that Chris is awake, and when I look inside I see his face stare around silently. He’s a slow waker and it’ll be five minutes before his mind warms up to the point where he can speak. Now he squints into the light.

  “Good morning”, I say.

  No answer. A few raindrops fall down from the pines.

  “Did you sleep well?”

  “No.”

  “That’s too bad.”

  “How come you’re up so early?” he asks.

  “It’s not early.”

  “What time is it?”

  “Nine o’clock”, I say.

  “I bet we didn’t go to sleep until three.”

  Three? If he stayed awake he’s going to pay for it today.

  “Well, I got to sleep”, I say.

  He looks at me strangely. “You kept me awake.”

  “Me?”

  “Talking.”

  “In my sleep, you mean.”

  “No, about the mountain ”

  Something is odd here. “I don’t know anything about a mountain, Chris.”

  “Well, you talked all night about it. You said at the top of the mountain we’d see everything. You said you were going to meet me there.”

  I think he’s been dreaming. “How could I meet you there when I’m already with you?”

  “I don’t know. You said it.” He looks upset. “You sounded like you were drunk or something.”

  He’s still half asleep. I’d better let him wake up peacefully. But I’m thirsty and remember I left the canteen behind, thinking we’d find enough water as we traveled. Dumb. There’ll be no breakfast now until we’re up over the ridge and far enough down to the other side where we can find a spring. “We’d better pack up and go”, I say, “if we’re going to get some water for breakfast.” It’s already warm out and probably will be hot this afternoon.

  The tent comes down easily and I’m pleased to see that everything stayed dry. In a half-hour we’re packed. Now except for beaten-down grass the area looks as if no one had been here.

  We still have a lot of climbing to do, but on the trail we discover it’s easier than yesterday. We’re getting to the rounded upper portion of the ridge and the slope isn’t as steep. It looks as though the pines have never been cut here. All direct light is shut out from the forest floor and there’s no underbrush at all. Just a springy floor of needles that’s open and spacious and easy hiking.

  Time to get on with the Chautauqua and the second wave of crystallization, the metaphysical one.

  This was brought about in response to Phædrus’ wild meanderings about Quality when the English faculty at Bozeman, informed of their squareness, presented him with a reasonable question: “Does this undefined ‘quality’ of yours exist in the things we observe?” they asked. “Or is it subjective, existing only in the observer?” It was a simple, normal enough question, and there was no hurry for an answer.

  Hah. There was no need for hurry. It was a finisher-offer, a knockdown question, a haymaker, a Saturday-night special… the kind you don’t recover from.

  Because if Quality exists in the object, then you must explain just why scientific instruments are unable to detect it. You must suggest instruments that will detect it, or live with the explanation that instruments don’t detect it because your whole Quality concept, to put it politely, is a large pile of nonsense.

  On the other hand, if Quality is subjective, existing only in the observer, then this Quality that you make so much of is just a fancy name for whatever you like.

  What Phædrus had been presented with by the faculty of the English department of Montana State College was an ancient logical construct known as a dilemma. A dilemma, which
is Greek for “two premises”, has been likened to the front end of an angry and charging bull.

  If he accepted the premise that Quality was objective, he was impaled on one horn of the dilemma. If he accepted the other premise that Quality was subjective, he was impaled on the other horn. Either Quality is objective or subjective, therefore he was impaled no matter how he answered.

  He noticed that from a number of faculty members he was receiving some good-natured smiles.

  Phædrus, however, because of his training in logic, was aware that every dilemma affords not two but three classic refutations, and he also knew of a few that weren’t so classic, so he smiled back. He could take the left horn and refute the idea that objectivity implied scientific detectability. Or, he could take the right horn, and refute the idea that subjectivity implies “anything you like.” Or he could go between the horns and deny that subjectivity and objectivity are the only choices. You may be sure he tested out all three.

  In addition to these three classical logical refutations there are some illogical, “rhetorical” ones. Phædrus, being a rhetorician, had these available too.

  One may throw sand in the bull’s eyes. He had already done this with his statement that lack of knowledge of what Quality is constitutes incompetence. It’s an old rule of logic that the competence of a speaker has no relevance to the truth of what he says, and so talk of incompetence was pure sand. The world’s biggest fool can say the sun is shining, but that doesn’t make it dark out. Socrates, that ancient enemy of rhetorical argument, would have sent Phædrus flying for this one, saying, “Yes, I accept your premise that I’m incompetent on the matter of Quality. Now please show an incompetent old man what Quality is. Otherwise, how am I to improve?” Phædrus would have been allowed to stew around for a few minutes, and then been flattened with questions that proved he didn’t know what Quality was either and was, by his own standards, incompetent.

 

‹ Prev