Cyberpunk

Home > Other > Cyberpunk > Page 17
Cyberpunk Page 17

by Victoria Blake


  works better that way.

  So: we need a compelling character. In fact, we need two characters. One for

  the early-adoption contingent who appreciates technical sweetness, and the

  other who is our potential mass-market household user. To put a human face

  on them right away, I would suggest we call them “Al” and “Zelda.”

  Al is a young man with disposable income who lives in a rather complex

  household. (Perhaps he inherited it.) Al’s not really at ease with his

  situation as it stands—all those heirlooms, antiques, expensive furniture,

  kitchenware, lawn-care devices— it’s all just a little out of his control.

  Given Al’s modern education, Al sees a laptop or desktop as his natural

  means of control over a complex situation. Al wants his things together

  and neat, and accessible, and searchable, and orderly—just the way they

  are on his computer screen.

  But what Al really needs is an understanding, experienced, high-tech

  housekeeper. That’s where “Zelda” comes into the story. Zelda’s in today’s

  65+ demographic, elderly but very vigorous, with some life-extension health

  issues. Zelda has smart pill-bottles that remind her of all her times and her

  dosages. She’s got cognitive blood-brain inhalers, and smart orthopedic

  shoes. Zelda wears the customary, elder-demographic, biomaintenance wrist-

  monitor. So I see Zelda as very up to speed with biomedical tech—so that her

  innate late-adapter conservatism has a weak spot that we might exploit. Is

  this approach working for the Team?

  From: Coordinator

  To: Design Team

  Subject: All right!!

  The Social Anthropologist knows just what we want: specificity. We’re

  building a technology designed for these two characters—who are they, what

  140

  USER-CENTRIC

  do they need? How can we exceed their consumer expectations, make them

  go “Wow”?

  And one other little thing—I’m not the “Leader.” It’s nice of Susan to say

  that, but my proper title is “Coordinator,” and the new CEO insists on that

  across all divisions.

  From: Graphics Gal

  To: Design Team

  Subject: My Turn

  Okay, well, maybe it’s just me, but I’m getting a kind of vibe from this guy

  “Albert.” I’m thinking he’s maybe, like, a hunter? Because I see him as, like,

  outdoors a lot? More than you’d think for a geek, anyway. Okay?

  From: Engineer

  To: Design Team

  Subject: Story Time

  Okay, I can play that way, too. “Albert Huddleston.” He’s the quiet type,

  good with his hands. Not a big talker. Doesn’t read much. Not a ladies’ man.

  But he’s great at home repair. He’s got the big house, and he’s out in the big

  yard a lot of the time, with big trees, maybe a garden. A deer rifle wouldn’t

  scare him. He could tie trout flies, if he were in the mood.

  From: Marketer

  To: Design Team

  Subject: The Consumables within Al’s Demographic

  141

  BRUCE STERLING

  A bow saw, an extendible pruner. Closet full of extreme-sports equipment

  from college that he can’t bear to get rid of.

  From: Graphics Gal

  To: Design Team

  Subject: What Is Albert really like?

  So he’s, like, maybe, a Cognition Science major with a minor in environmental

  issues?

  From: Marketer

  To: Design Team

  Subject: [none]

  Albert’s not smart enough to be a “Cognition Science major.”

  From: Legal Expert

  To: Design Team

  Subject: So-Called Cognition Science

  In a lot of schools, “Cognition Science” is just the Philosophy Department in

  drag.

  From: Team Coordinator

  To: Design Team

  Subject: Brainstorming

  142

  USER-CENTRIC

  It’s great to see you pitching in, Legal Expert, but let’s not get too critical while the big, loose ideas are still flowing.

  From: Legal Expert

  To: Design Team

  Subject: Critical Legal Implications

  Well, excuse me for living. Forgive me for pointing out the obvious, but there are massive legal issues with this proposed technology. We’re talking about embedding hundreds of fingernail-sized radio-chirping MEMS chips that emit real-time data on the location and the condition of everything you own. That’s a potential

  Orwell situation. It could violate every digital-privacy statute on the books.

  Let’s just suppose that you walk out with some guy’s chip-infested fountain

  pen. You don’t even know the thing’s bugged. So if the plaintiff’s got enough

  bandwidth and big enough receivers, he can map you and all your movements,

  for as long as you carry the thing.

  Legal issues must come first in the design process. It’s not prudent to tack on anti-liability safeguards somewhere down at the far end of the assembly line.

  From: Engineer

  To: Design Team

  Subject: Correction

  We don’t use “assembly lines.” Those went out with the twentieth century.

  From: Marketer

  To: Design Team

  Subject: Getting Sued

  143

  BRUCE STERLING

  Wait a minute. Isn’t product liability exactly what blew us out of the water

  with the ultrasonic cleanser?

  From: The Social Anthropologist

  To: Design Team

  Subject: The Issues We Face As a Group

  There are plenty of major issues here, no one’s denying that. In terms of the

  story, though, I’m very intrigued with the Legal Expert’s views. There seems

  to be an unexamined assumption that a household control technology is

  necessarily “private.”

  But what if it’s just the opposite? If Al has the location and condition of all his possessions cybernetically tracked and tagged in real time, maybe Al is freed from worrying about all his stuff. Why should Al fret about his possessions anymore?

  We’ve made them permanently safe. Why shouldn’t Al loan the lawnmower to

  his neighbor? The neighbor can’t lose the lawnmower, He can’t sell it, because

  Al’s embedded MEMS monitors just won’t allow that behavior. (continued)

  So now Al can be far more generous to his neighbor. Instead of being miserly

  and geeky “labeling everything he possesses,” obsessed with privacy, Al turns

  out to be an open-handed, open-hearted, very popular guy. He doesn’t even

  need locks on his doors! Everything Al has is automatically theft-proof —

  thanks to us. He has big house parties, fearlessly showing off his home and his possessions. Everything that was once a personal burden to Al becomes a

  benefit to the neighborhood community. What was once Al’s weakness and

  anxiety is now a source of emotional strength and community esteem.

  From: Team Coordinator

  To: Design Team

  144

  USER-CENTRIC

  Subject: Wow

  Right! That’s it. That’s what we’re looking for. That’s the “Wow” factor.

  From: Graphics Gal

  To: Design Team

  Subject: Re: Wow

  So here’s how Al meets Zelda. Cause she’s, like, living next door? And there’s

  a bunch of Al’s dinner plates in her house, kinda “borrowed”? Some
one

  breaks a plate, there’s an immediate screen prompt, Al rushes over.

  From: Legal Expert

  To: Design Team

  Subject: Domestic Disputes

  Someone threw a plate at Zelda. Zelda owns the home next door, and her son

  and daughter-in-law are living in it. But Zelda sold the home because she

  needs to finance her rejuvenation treatments. It’s a basic cross-generational

  equity issue. Happens all the time nowadays, with the boom in life extension.

  Granny Zelda comes home from the clinic looking 35. She’s mortgaged the

  family wealth, and now the next generation can’t afford to have kids.

  Daughter-in-law freaked because dear old mom suddenly looks better than

  she does. It’s a soap-opera eruption of passion, resentment, and greed. Makes

  a child-custody case look like a traffic ticket.

  From: Engineer

  To: Design Team

  Subject: Implications

  145

  BRUCE STERLING

  Great. So listen. Zelda sells her house and moves in with Al. He’s a nice guy,

  rescuing her from her family. She brings all her own stuff into Al’s house—60

  years’ worth of tchotchkes. No problem. Thanks to us. Because Al and Zelda

  are getting everything out of her packing boxes and tagging it all with MEMS

  tags. Possessions are mixed up physically—and yet they’re totally separate,

  virtually. With MEMS, unskilled labor can enter the house with handheld

  trackers, separate and re-pack everything in a few hours, tops. Al and Zelda

  never lose track of who belongs to what—that’s a benefit we’re supplying.

  They can live together in a new kind of way.

  From: Graphics Gal

  To: Design Team

  Subject: A&Z Living Together

  Okay, so Zelda’s in the house cooking, right? Now Al can get to that yardwork

  he’s been putting off. There’s like squirrels and raccoons and out there, and

  they’re getting in the attic? Only now Al’s got some cybernetic live-traps, like the MuscleGel MistNet from our Outdoor Products Division. Al catches the

  raccoon, and he plants a MEMS chip under the animal’s skin. Now he always

  knows where the raccoon is! It’s like, Al hears this spooky noise in the attic, he goes up in the attic with his handheld, it’s like, “Okay Rocky, I know it’s you!

  And I know exactly where you’re hiding. Get the hell out of my insulation.”

  From: Legal Expert

  To: Design Team

  Subject: Tagging Raccoons

  Interesting. If Al really does track and catalog a raccoon, that makes the

  raccoon a property improvement. If Al wants to sell the house, he’s got a

  market advantage. After all, Al’s property comes with big trees—that’s obvious, 146

  USER-CENTRIC

  that’s a given—but now it also comes with a legally verifiable raccoon.

  From: Engineer

  To: Design Team

  Subject: Squirrels

  They’re no longer vermin. The squirrels in the trees, I mean. They’re a wholly

  owned property asset.

  From: Team Coordinator

  To: Design Team

  Subject: This Is Real Progress, People

  I’m with this approach! See, we never would have thought of the raccoon

  angle if we’d concentrated on the product as a product. But of course Al is

  moving his control chips out of the house, into his lawn, and eventually into

  the whole neighborhood. Raccoons wander around all the time. So do domestic

  dogs and cats. But that’s not a bug in our tracking technology—that’s a feature.

  Al’s cat has got a MEMS tag on its collar. Al can tag every cat’s collar in the neighborhood and run it as a neighborhood service off his web page. When

  you’re calling Kitty in for supper, you just e-mail Kitty’s collar.

  From: Programmer

  To: Design Team

  Subject: [no subject]

  AWESOME! I am so with this! I got 8 cats myself, I want this product! I can

  smell the future here! And it smells like a winner!!

  147

  BRUCE STERLING

  From: Engineer

  To: Design Team

  Subject: Current Chip Technology

  That subcutaneous ID chip is a proven technology. They’ve been doing that

  for lab rats for years now. I could have a patent-free working model out of our Sunnyvale fab plant in 48 hours, tops.

  The only problem Al faces is repeater technology, so he can cover the

  neighborhood with his radio locators. But a repeater net is a system

  administration issue. That’s a classic, tie-in, service-provision opportunity.

  We’re talking long-term contracts here, and a big buyer lock-in factor.

  From: Marketer

  To: Design Team

  Subject: Buyer Lock-In Factor

  That is hot! Of course! It’s about consumer stickiness through market-

  segmentation upgrades. You’ve got the bottom-level, introductory,

  Household-Only tagging model. Then the mid-level Neighborhood model.

  Then, on to the Gold and Platinum service levels, with 24-hour tech support!

  Al can saturate the whole suburb. Maybe even the whole city! It’s totally

  open-ended. We supply as many tags and as much monitoring and connectivity

  as the guy can pay for. The only limit is the size of his wallet!

  From: Team Coordinator

  To: Social Anthropologist

  Subject: ***Private Message***

  148

  USER-CENTRIC

  Susan, look at ’em go! I can’t believe the storytelling approach works so well.

  Last week they were hanging around the lab with long faces, preparing their

  resumés and e-mailing headhunters.

  To: Team Coordinator

  From: The Social Anthropologist

  Subject: Re: ***Private Message***

  Fred, people have been telling each other stories since we were hominids

  around campfires in Africa. It’s a very basic human cognition thing, really.

  From: Team Coordinator

  To: Social Anthropologist

  Subject: **Private Message Again**

  We've gotta hit, Susan. I can feel it. I need a drink after all this, don’t you?

  Let’s celebrate. On my tab, okay? We’ll make a night of it.

  From: The Social Anthropologist

  To: Team Coordinator

  Subject: Our Relationship

  Fred, I’m not going to deny there’s chemistry between us. But I really have to

  question whether that’s appropriate business behavior.

  From: Team Coordinator

  To: Social Anthropologist

  149

  BRUCE STERLING

  Subject: ***Private Message***

  We’re grown-ups, Susan. We’ve both been around the block a few times.

  Come on, you don’t have to be this way.

  From: The Social Anthropologist

  To: Team Coordinator

  Subject: Re: ***Private Message***

  Fred, it’s not like this upsets me professionally—I mean, not in that oh-so-

  proper way. I’m a trained anthropologist. They train us to understand how

  societies work—not how to make people happy. I’m being very objective

  about this situation. I don’t hold it against you. I know that I’m relationship poison, Fred. I’ve never made a man happy in my whole life.

  From: Team Coordinator

  To: Social Anthropologist

  Subject: **Very Private Message**

  Please don’t be that way, Susan. That “you a
nd me” business, I mean. I

  thought we’d progressed past that by now. We could just have a friendly

  cocktail down at Les Deux Magots. This story isn’t about “you and me.”

  From: The Social Anthropologist

  To: Team Coordinator

  Subject: Your Unacceptable Answer

  Then whose story is it, Fred? If this isn’t our story, then whose story is it?

  150

  USER-CENTRIC

  Albert’s mouth was dry. His head was swimming. He really had to knock it off

  with those cognition enhancers—especially after 8:00 P.M. The smart drugs

  had been a major help in college—all those French philosophy texts, my

  God, Kant 301, that wasn’t the kind of text that a guy could breeze through

  without serious neurochemical assistance—but he’d overdone it. Now he ate

  the pills just to keep up with the dyslexia syndrome—and the pills made him

  so, well, verbal. Lots of voices inside the head. Voices in the darkness. Bits

  and pieces arguing. Weird debates. A head full of yakking chemical drama.

  Another ripping snore came out of Hazel. Hazel had the shape of a zaftig

  1940s swimsuit model, and the ear-nose-and-throat lining of a 67-year-old

  crone. And what the hell was it with those hundred-year-old F. Scott

  Fitzgerald novels? Those pink ballet slippers. And the insistence on calling

  herself “Zelda.”

  Huddleston pulled himself quietly out of the bed. He lurched into the

  master bathroom, which alertly switched itself on as he entered. His hair was

  snow white, his face a road map of hard wear. The epidermal mask was tearing

  loose a bit, down at the shaving line at the base of his neck. He was a 25-year-old man who went out on hot dates with his own roommate. He posed as

  Zelda’s fictional “70-year-old escort.” When they were out in clubs and

  restaurants, he always passed as Zelda’s sugar daddy.

  That was the way the two of them had finally clicked as a couple, somehow.

  The way to make the relationship work out. Al had become a stranger in his

  own life.

  Al now knew straight-out, intimately, what it really meant to be old. Al

  knew how to pass for old. Because his girlfriend was old. He watched forms

  of media that were demographically targeted for old people, with their

  deafened ears, cloudy eyes, permanent dyspepsia, and fading grip strength.

  Al was technologically jet-lagged out of the entire normal human aging

  process. He could visit “his 70s” the way you might buy a ticket and visit

  “France.”

 

‹ Prev