Emily Lakdawalla

Home > Other > Emily Lakdawalla > Page 26
Emily Lakdawalla Page 26

by The Design


  sent the pre-sieve sample through the 1-millimeter pathway. CHIMRA created a single

  aliquot as described above, and then delivered it to SAM.

  5.4.4 Cleaning and thwacking

  After the first drill at Yellowknife Bay, scientists expressed a desire to use the contact science instruments (particularly APXS) to examine the drilled sample, and the rover plan-

  ners quickly developed a way to oblige them, dumping the sample in neat piles for APXS

  analysis (see Figure 3.7). If the pre-sieve material is not dumped before 150-micrometer portioning, it can end up in the 1-millimeter sample reservoir. Material dumped from there

  drops less neatly than material dumps from the scoop, because it falls off the secondary

  thwack arm around the bee trap on all sides, which tends to disperse it over a broader area.

  A tighter pile is better for APXS, because then it is more likely that the APXS field of view will contain only sample material and not “windows” of whatever material the pile was

  204 SA/SPaH: Sample Acquisition, Processing, and Handling

  Figure 5.12. A medium-grained (150-micron to 1-millimeter) aliquot in the scoop, ready for delivery to SAM. Left Mastcam photo 1228ML0036640000503705E01. NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS.

  dumped on. Pre-sieve (coarse) material is most often dumped before departing a sample

  site, while post-sieve (fine) material is usually held for longer as cached sample.

  To prepare for a new sample, CHIMRA goes through a process to make the interior as

  clean as possible. First, it dumps any remaining pre-sieve sample by opening up the scoop

  wide, then rocking and vibrating to encourage very last bit of sample that may have been

  lurking within the reservoir to exit the scoop. Then it opens the sample tunnel and

  150-micrometer sieve and uses rocking and vibration to empty all of the loose material

  from that side. At that point, it’s time for thwacking.

  During ordinary operation of the primary thwack actuator, the sample tunnel opens on

  its own for the first few degrees. After 5° of opening, a cam inside the mechanism engages

  the primary thwack arm, which holds the 150-micrometer sieve. As the sample tunnel

  continues to open, the primary thwack arm follows it, maintaining the 5° separation and

  winding a spring. Toward the end of its range of motion, continued opening of the sample

  tunnel door passes a “point of no return,” shortly after which its continued motion

  5.4 CHIMRA: Collection and Handling… 205

  disengages the latch holding the primary thwack arm to the sample tunnel. The coiled

  spring unwinds, slamming the primary thwack arm against the sample reservoir at very

  high speed, dislodging any material that may have been stuck in the holes of the sieve. The force of the thwack also dislodges material that was stuck to other interior surfaces of

  CHIMRA. CHIMRA follows a primary thwack with vibration and rocking to encourage

  any loosened material to exit out through the open scoop.

  Secondary thwack works similarly. As the secondary thwack actuator opens the scoop,

  the secondary thwack arm follows the scoop for its first 10° of motion. Then a latch

  engages, holding the secondary thwack arm in place while the scoop continues to open,

  winding a spring. As the scoop reaches the end of its range of motion, the latch disengages, and the thwack arm slams against the scoop, dislodging any material that may have been

  stuck in its sieve and grate. Further rocking and vibrating activity cleans out any powder

  dislodged by the secondary thwack.

  Note that the two thwack operations are designed to encourage material that may be

  wedged in a sieve to exit the sieve in the direction from which it arrived.

  Before and after primary and secondary thwacks, the rover uses Mastcam to examine the

  interior surfaces of CHIMRA (Figure 5.13). Table 5.1 lists Mastcam images documenting

  the interior and exterior of CHIMRA. The only times that the cameras can get a clear look at the back sides of the two sieves, or of the interiors of the sample tunnel and bee trap, are after primary and secondary thwacks. After photographing the sieves and other parts, the primary

  and secondary thwack actuators close up CHIMRA, re-engaging the latches that hold the

  thwack arms close to the CHIMRA doors, and CHIMRA is ready to accept a new sample.

  Figure 5.13. Pre-thwack (left column) and post-thwack (right column) views of the primary (top) and secondary (bottom) thwack mechanisms. Photos taken by Mastcam on sol 840.

  NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS.

  Table 5.1. Sols of Mastcam and ChemCam RMI photos documenting CHIMRA activities to sol 1800.

  Images were taken with Mastcam unless ChemCam is specified.

  ChemCam

  Pre- and

  Drill bit

  Sieve

  RMI sieve

  Scooping post-sieve volume assembly

  Turret checkout

  checkout checkout

  activity

  inspection

  checkout

  32 (all)

  576

  172 (partial) 61

  79

  128

  1321

  51 (all)

  840

  564 (focus

  64

  193

  173

  1327

  65 (all)

  1064

  test)

  66

  194

  180

  1332

  73 (all)

  1123

  578

  67

  279

  182

  1359

  81 (all)

  1133

  704

  69

  464

  229

  1361

  128 (thwackless)

  1142

  840

  70

  623

  486

  1418

  173 (thwackless)

  1293

  894

  73

  762

  581

  1419

  486 (thwackless)

  1535

  1048

  74

  884

  617

  1420

  576 & 578 (all)

  1089

  93

  922

  621

  1422

  581 (thwackless)

  1133

  411

  1061

  704

  1457

  704 (all)

  1202

  1224

  1121

  726

  1459

  781 (thwackless)

  1293

  1228

  1139

  756

  1460

  840 (all)

  1327

  1231

  1224

  759

  1464

  894 (all)

  1359

  1651

  1228*

  762

  1491

  954 (thwackless)

  1419

  1323**

  781

  1493

  1048 (all)

  1460

  1334**

  840

  1494

  1089 (all)

  1494

  1362**

  867

  1495

  1132 (thwackless)

  1425**

  881

  1533

  1133 (all)

  1465,1466***

  882

  1534

  1202 (all)

  1495,1496***

  894

  1535

  1226 (secondary thwack only)

  908

  1536

  1231 (sec
ondary thwack only)

  954

  1537

  1293 (primary thwack only)

  1048 1541

  1327 (all)

  1059 1542

  1359 (all)

  1060 1543

  1418 (thwackless)*

  1089 1757

  1419 (all)

  1116 1780

  1457 (thwackless)*

  1119

  1459 (secondary thwack only)

  1132

  1460 (all)

  1133

  1491 (thwackless)*

  1134

  1493 (secondary thwack only)

  1137

  1494 (all)

  1202

  1533 (thwackless)*

  1226

  1534 (secondary thwack only)

  1231

  1535 (all)

  1293

  Turret checkout: Photos of the interior and exterior of CHIMRA taken in initial checkout or after sample dumping. “All” indicates both primary and secondary thwacks were performed, and CHIMRA components imaged before and after each. Where only primary, only secondary, or no thwacking was performed, some components will not be visible. *After the primary thwack actuator anomaly on sol 1231, “thwackless” inspections performed after post-sieve sample dumping did not include motion of the primary thwack arm. Scooping activity includes scooping and manipulation of sample within the scoop. Pre- and post-sieve volume inspection: After sieving, the pre-sieve material (coarse fraction) is directed to the scoop for visual inspection, and the tunnel ramp cracked open to view the post-sieve material (fine fraction) in the portion box. *Sol 1228 includes inspection of a medium-size fraction). **After the problem with the primary thwack arm at Namib dune, they switched to examining both fractions in the scoop. ***Near Murray buttes, wind blew the dumped pre-sieve sample before APXS had a chance to examine it. They switched to dumping the sample and immediately performing an overnight APXS observation, following up with examination of the post-sieve sample in the morning.

  5.4 CHIMRA: Collection and Handling… 207

  5.4.5 Cached sample operations and doggie bagging

  At Rocknest it quickly became apparent that if the rover couldn’t drive while CHIMRA

  held sample, the mission could be stuck with a prolonged delay. The SAM team wanted to

  take many deliveries of sample, running their experiment in different ways each time. One

  option would be to perform many dropoffs to SAM sample tubes before driving away, a

  procedure called “doggie bagging.” Curiosity does doggie-bag samples, but not many; the

  SAM team has to strike a balance between holding options open for future analyses and

  consumption of clean sample tubes.

  The engineers came up with a workable solution: driving with cached post-sieve sam-

  ple in the stowed turret. The clamshell happens to be positioned perfectly for long-term

  sample storage (with its opening upward) when the turret is stowed. There is sufficient

  room in the clamshell for 12 cubic centimeters of sample without spilling, provided that

  the rover’s tilt does not exceed 20°. The limitations exist because sieved sample must not

  be allowed to fall onto the back side of the 150-micrometer sieve. Thwacking is a one-way

  operation designed to motivate particles out of the sieve toward the reservoir. Any particle that falls on the back of the sieve and clogs a hole would be further embedded by thwacking and likely stuck forever. After performing any cached-sample contact science with the

  arm, CHIMRA does a recovery sequence of rocking and vibrating to ensure that any sam-

  ple that may have escaped the clamshell returns to it before the arm is stowed.

  The limits for cached sample operations were developed very quickly, early in the mis-

  sion, with many time pressures on the engineering team. Cached-sample operations

  required lots of extra arm motions to move the sample to different locations depending on

  the desired orientation of the turret, always preventing the sample from falling on the back side of the sieve. Later, the engineering team developed a new set of operational rules

  called evolved cached sample operations, which they first used on Mars on sol 1064.

  While protecting the safety of the CHIMRA system, the new rules allow some sample to

  fall on the back side of the sieve, requiring fewer arm motions and therefore less energy

  and time to run. This increases the flexibility of cached-sample operations.15

  5.4.6 CHIMRA concerns and anomalies

  CHIMRA has mostly functioned as designed – quite a coup for such a complicated piece

  of equipment, the likes of which has never before been sent to another planet. There are

  two issues affecting its use: concern about its 150-micrometer sieve, and a problem with

  the primary thwack actuator.

  5.4.6.1 150-micrometer sieve edge weld separation

  Originally, three identical CHIMRA devices were built. One is now on Mars, one is on the

  testbed rover, and one was tested to failure on Earth in the Qualification Model Dirty Testbed (see section 4.7.4). After performing about 130 primary thwacks with the test unit, the edge 15 Vandi Verma, personal communication, email dated April 1, 2017

  208 SA/SPaH: Sample Acquisition, Processing, and Handling

  Figure 5.14. ChemCam RMI inspection of the 150-micrometer sieve performed on sol 1048.

  NASA/JPL-Caltech/CNES/CNRS/LANL/IRAP/IAS/LPGN/mosaic by William Rapin.

  welds that hold the 150-micrometer sieve onto the primary thwack arm began to pop apart,

  creating a gap through which larger particles could leak into the sieved sample. 16

  To prevent the degradation of the edge welds on the flight unit of the 150-micron sieve,

  engineers now command primary thwacks only when preparing for a new sample. After

  some primary thwacks, they use ChemCam to perform a detailed inspection of the edge

  welds and the sieve, including angling the sieve to direct a specular reflection at the cameras in order to search for any deformation (Figure 5.14). Table 5.1 lists all sols on which

  ChemCam inspection of the sieve was performed.

  5.4.6.2 Drill sample cross-contamination

  Transfer of material from drill to CHIMRA was originally intended to be done with some

  drill percussion. Following the sol 911 drill percussion anomaly (section 5.3.4.2), engi-

  neers developed a method to perform sample transfer with limited percussion. However,

  16 Dan Limonadi, personal communication, email dated February 2, 2013

  5.5 DRT: Dust Removal Tool 209

  continued testing suggested that this new method did not empty the drill sample chamber

  as effectively as before, increasing the risk that sample material from a previous site might cross-contaminate a new sample. Indeed, CheMin results suggest Buckskin sample cross-contaminated the Big Sky sample, although there could be other explanations (section

  9.4.4). Engineers experimented with a new non-percussion sample transfer method on

  Mars on sols 1460 and 1494 to reduce cross-contamination risk.17

  5.4.6.3 Primary thwack actuator anomaly

  On sol 1231, during routine sample processing, the primary thwack arm stalled. After sieving, Curiosity typically cracks open the primary thwack arm to peek into the portion box to estimate how much sample is inside. This time, it stalled after opening only 1°. Cautious testing since then has seen the actuator operate fairly normally without stalling. (They tested cautiously because if the primary thwack arm were to fail in a wide-open position, it would no longer be possible to sieve a fine fraction, making it difficult to prepare samples for delivery to CheMin.) Testing included extra imaging of primary thwack arm motion on sols 1237–1243.

  Engineers have reduced use of the primary thwack arm in order to
avoid faults. They no

  longer crack open the primary thwack arm to inspect the post-sieved sample. Since

  Lubango (drilled sol 1324), they drill, inspect the pre-sieve (coarse) fraction of the sample in the scoop, immediately dump this fraction, transfer the post-sieve (fine) fraction to the scoop, and visually inspect it there, thereby shifting the workload to the secondary thwack actuator rather than the primary thwack actuator.

  5.5 DRT: DUST REMOVAL TOOL

  The dust removal tool is a brush for cleaning rock surfaces before they are studied with

  MAHLI, APXS, or Mastcam’s narrowband filters. It consists of two wire brushes, driven

  by a single motor (Figure 5.15). 18 When Curiosity landed, functions related to the use of the brush had not yet been tested on Earth, so its first use was on sol 150. Initially, rover planners inspected the brush only after brush operations. On sol 291, following the third

  brushing operation, at Cumberland, they discovered that one set of bristles was bent

  (Figure 5.15, middle row), leading to concern that the bent wire bundle could wrap around the brush’s central spindle during brush operations. The mission halted use of the brush

  and began a period of extensive Earth testing. The brush was not cleared for use on Mars

  until arrival at the next drill site, Windjana, and didn’t see routine use until arrival at Pahrump Hills. Since then, they have imaged the brush both before and after each operation, and no further degradation in the brush bristles has been observed (Figure 5.15, bottom row). Table 5.2 lists all brush sites up to sol 1514.

  17 Ashwin Vasavada, personal communication, email dated November 17, 2017

  18 There is no published paper about the DRT hardware. Information in this section comes from a paper mentioning the DRT software by Kim (2013) and personal communication with Ashwin

  Vasavada (email dated February 9, 2017).

  210 SA/SPaH: Sample Acquisition, Processing, and Handling

  Figure 5.15. Condition of the dust removal tool (DRT) over time, as seen in standard right Mastcam engineering support imagery. Top row: after its first use on sol 150. Middle row: after the third use, at Cumberland, when one wire bristle was discovered to be bent. Bottom row: after more than 50 uses, on sol 1416, at Chibia. NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS.

  The motor speed can be changed during a single brush operation, and the robotic arm

  can be moved while the brush is running to sweep an elongated area. If Curiosity were to

  hold the brush in one position during use, the brushing action would leave an unbrushed

 

‹ Prev