The Satanic Bible

Home > Other > The Satanic Bible > Page 15
The Satanic Bible Page 15

by Michael A Aquino


  Universal 1940s’ horror classics, candles and torches

  were outflickered only by the glowing brazier of

  blue/black flame in front of the nude “living altar”,

  spookygloomy crescendos were interrupted

  occasionally by Lovecraftian litanies and perhaps a

  spasmodically-sparking Jacob’s Ladder, Tesla coil,

  or van de Graaf generator for a touch of Mad Lab

  - 168 -

  tech. You might sit next to a witch or warlock, or

  perhaps an upconjured dæmon from the Pit. The

  crash of a Tibetan gong was loud enough to wake the

  dead, but it didn’t matter since they’d been invited

  too.

  b. “... I’m a Man of

  Wealth and Taste.”

  But it would be grievously misleading to

  assume that Satan didn’t have his more æsthetic

  ambitions. In Abraham Merritt’s Seven Footprints

  to Satan, his terrestrial avatar reflects::

  Call it - amusement. It is for amusement

  that I exist. It is for that alone that I remain upon a

  world in which, when all is said and done,

  amusement in some form or guise is the one great

  aim of all, the only thing that makes life upon it

  tolerable.

  My aim is, therefore, you perceive, a simple

  one. But what is it that amuses me?

  Three things.

  I am a great playwright, the greatest that has

  ever lived, since my plays are real.

  I set the scenes for my little single acts, my

  farces and comedies, dramas and tragedies, my

  epics. I direct the actors.

  I am the sole audience that can see every

  action, hear every line of my plays from beginning

  to end.Sometimes what began as a farce turns into

  high tragedy, tragedies become farces, a one-act

  diversion develops into an epic, governments fall,

  the mighty topple from their pedestals, the lowly

  are exalted.

  Some people live their lives for chess. I play

  my chess with living chessmen, and I play a score

  of games at once in all corners of the world.

  All this amuses me.

  - 169 -

  Furthermore, in my character as Prince of

  Darkness, which I perceive that you do not wholly

  admit, my art puts me on a par with that other

  super-dramatist, my ancient and Celestial

  adversary known according to the dominant local

  creed as Jehovah. Nay, it places me higher - since I

  rewrite his script. This also amuses me.

  The second? I am a lover of beauty. It is,

  indeed, the one thing that can arouse in me what

  may be called - emotion.

  It happens now and then that man with his

  mind and eyes and heart and hands makes visible

  and manifest some thing which bears that stamp

  of creative perfection the monopoly of which

  tradition ascribes to the same Celestial adversary I

  have named.

  It may be a painting, a statue, a carved bit of

  wood, a crystal, a vase, a fabric - any one of ten

  thousand things.

  But in it is that essence of beauty humanity

  calls divine and for which, in its blundering way, it

  is always seeking - as it is amusement.

  The best of these things I make from time to

  time my own.

  But - I will not have them come to me except

  by my own way. Here enters the third element -

  the gamble, the game.

  Collector of souls and beauty I am. Gambler

  am I, too, and as supreme in that as in my

  collecting. It is the unknown quantity, the risk,

  that sharpens the edge of my enjoyment of my

  plays. It is what gives the final zest to my -

  acquirements.

  And I am a generous opponent. The stakes

  t h o s e w h o p l a y w i t h m e m a y w i n a r e

  immeasurably greater than any I could win from

  them. But play with me - they must!87

  87 Merritt, Abraham, Seven Footprints to Satan. Boni &

  Liveright, 1928.

  - 170 -

  c.

  From Hedonism to Hellfire

  Alexandrian Greek Hellenistic Hedonism (the

  pursuit of pleasure for its own sake) and

  Epicureanism88 were atheistic, so it was not until the

  European Age of Reason and Enlightenment that

  the Devil became fashionable as patron of the

  British Hellfire Clubs, the most sensationally sordid

  being Sir Francis Dashwood’s Order of Medmenham

  Franciscans. 89

  In 1966 Anton Szandor LaVey founded the

  Church of Satan in San Francisco, raising Satanism

  to the respectability of a formal social religion. 90

  3. Tolkien Melkor

  N o t a l l o f t h e P r i n c e o f D a r k n e s s ’

  interpretations come from antiquity. In his Lord of

  the Rings and Silmarillion, J.R.R. Tolkien

  reintroduces him as the Vala (= ArchAngel) Melkor,

  whose contrast to God (Eru Ilúvatar) and the OU

  Valar echoes Satan’s against El. 91

  88 Epicureanism was a philosophy of hedonistic ethics that

  considered calmness untroubled by mental or emotional

  disquiet the highest good, held intellectual pleasures superior

  to others, and advocated the renunciation of momentary

  gratification in favor of more permanent pleasures.

  89 Cf. Eric Towers, Dashwood: The Man and the Myth

  (London: Crucible, 1986), which offers evidence that

  Dashwood’s “occult” activities consisted largely of revels in

  honor of Apollo & Bacchus with no overtly “Satanic” element.

  90 For a detailed, documentary history of the Church, see

  Michael Aquino, The Church of Satan (2 volumes) (8th

  Edition). San Francisco: Barony of Rachane, 2013.

  91 Not too surprising, since Tolkien was personally a Roman

  Catholic.

  - 171 -

  Curiously both Melkor and his Maia (= Angel)

  Sauron are rarely seen or heard from in Tolkien’s

  epics - possibly because, like Prometheus or Lucifer,

  what they have to say to mankind is too dangerous.

  We learn of it only in the forbidden Morlindalë,

  wherein Sauron recalls Melkor’s statements to him

  at Utumno:

  “Alone of the Valar I question the purpose

  and will of Eru Ilúvatar,” Melkor answered. “Alone

  of the Valar do I exist apart from him, hence can

  do so.“And so I tell you this: He is not cruel, any

  more than he is benevolent. He is a force of

  indifference and hazard in this universe, and what

  appears here upon Arda is the result of that and no

  more. “That is the truth and the curse of this

  world: that it is bereft of purpose. It is merely here,

  and it continues as its patterns, and accident, and

  the force of contesting wills press it. Finally, as all

  energy upon it is drawn inexorably out into the

  cosmos from whence it was fashioned, it will fade,

  grow cold, and go out.”

  “How then can you, who see this, endure it,

  O Melkor?” I asked. “Why linger in this terrible

  place? Why do you not return to the great spaces

  beyond, that such sad troubles dwindle
to

  nothingness in the distance?”

  The Vala stood then, took my arm, and bade

  me keep silence. Back through the halls and

  caverns of Utumno he guided me, the Orcs and

  other strange beings bowing to him as we passed.

  Finally we stood at the Gate of Utumno,

  looking out over the starlit sky of Endor. He swept

  his hand across it that I should attend, then spoke

  again:“O Sauron, if Endor has no purpose, it is I -

  we - who can give it.

  “If untended it knows only struggle and

  death, we can teach it pleasure and rest, if only a

  little, despite them.

  - 172 -

  “If it would by itself only slowly decline, we

  can see it marshal its energies to rise now in

  power, then in artistry, and still again in love.

  “Each of these may be bought only by its

  opposite, so its misfortunes shall also grow and

  ebb in currents and waves.

  “But from all of this we shall raise its

  creatures beyond themselves as fashioned by Eru

  Ilúvatar and the Valar; and some of them, perhaps,

  beyond the Ainur themselves.”

  Again Melkor turned to me, and in the

  darkness his eyes burned into mine that I was no

  longer of a certain where Sauron ended and

  Melkor began. Now his voice seemed to flow

  through and around me.

  “You, Sauron, shall learn more from me than

  any Maia has of any Vala. But a time may come

  when Melkor shall no longer be, yet you shall

  remain, to preserve this wisdom, and indeed to

  uplift it beyond the Maiar, perhaps beyond even

  the Valar.

  “In these journeys shall you know ecstasy

  unequaled in Endor, and anger and pain to shatter

  and mock it.

  “But this does Melkor promise you, that

  none shall live with your intensity, with your

  perception of all thoughts and wills, and most of

  all with your Eye.” 92

  An Ardan Age later, the Númenorean (=

  Atlantean) council of King Ar-Pharazôn confronted

  Sauron concerning the Valar’s denunciation of

  Melkor as “evil”. Responded the Maia:

  “Evil is Melkor, evil am I his Maia,” said

  Sauron, “only if that same fire that burns now

  within each of you is evil.

  “Melkor’s evil was his awareness of isolation

  from all else about him, and his wish and will to

  act with that perfect freedom.

  92 Sauron, The Second Scroll, Morlindalë. San Francisco:

  Barony of Rachane, 2003.

  - 173 -

  “For that and that alone was he feared and

  rejected by the other Valar; for that also I sought

  him and swore myself to him.

  “And now, in the High Men of Númenor, I

  see it once again awakened: this time in creatures

  born of Arda rather than of the spaces beyond it.

  “That is what the Valar will soon know. That

  is why they will seek to destroy Númenor as they

  did Utumno, Angband, and Thangorodrim, leaving

  only lesser, unawakened Men in Middle-earth to

  remain their vassals.

  “Ar-Pharazôn, my Lords, I need not argue

  this truth, only utter it; each of you sees it as

  clearly, as inescapably for himself.” 93

  Neither Melkor nor Sauron survived the Third

  Age. As the Blue Wizard Pallando wrote:

  But I saw also that the magic had

  gone from Arda. It was now only an ordinary

  world, populated by ordinary beings, Men and

  animal. Never again upon it would there be a place

  for Rings of Power. 94

  93 King Angmar, The Fifth Scroll, Morlindalë, op.cit.

  94 Pallando the Blue, The Ninth Scroll, Morlindalë, op.cit.

  - 174 -

  - 175 -

  12: Humancarnation

  A. Definidentity

  The function of any religion is to explain the

  existence of Man as a species of life intellectually

  more versatile than other animals, but still

  significantly limited by the NL constraints of his

  physical body. 95

  Physics explains Man scientifically, e.g. as a

  phenomenon completely within the OU and

  functioning according to NL.

  Metaphysics includes physics, but adds an

  additional aspect of reality beyond OU/NL: the

  existence and influence of external/superior forces

  and/or intelligences.

  1.

  Physics

  What distinguishes a religious explanation

  from a scientific one is that the latter assumes Man

  to be “just another animal”, hence completely

  definable within the NL properties of the OU.

  95 Herein “Man” include both genders.

  - 176 -

  Summarily Man is a machine, a mechanism,

  whose functioning is the product of matter/energy

  interactivity and sensory stimulus/response.

  “Consciousness” is nothing more than an

  electrochemical brain-illusion, and “individual will”

  may be incidentally discretionary but is for the most

  part mechanism-need predictable.

  “Life” is a temporary metabolic synchronicity

  of the cells constituting a body.

  When this collaboration ceases because of NL

  entropy, the sudden disruption of the same package

  is called “death”, and the illusion of “personality”

  simultaneously and permanently disappears.

  OU science doesn’t consider itself competent to

  rule on the existence or activity of discrete

  intelligences external/superior to the OU & its NL,

  e.g. “god/s”. Some scientists maintain that on the

  assumption that nothing can or does exist beyond

  the OU/NL, this de facto proves the nonexistence of

  “god/s”.

  2. Metaphysics

  A metaphysical explanation of Man may pr

  may be a “religion”. While that term is

  characteristically vague, it is used here to indicate a

  metaphysical reality in which gods exist and

  intercommunicate with humanity.

  Alternatively a metaphysical reality may

  consist of abstract/impersonal principles or forces,

  most familiarly analogous to the Pythagorean/

  Platonic “Theory of the Forms”.

  The importance of metaphysics is that it adds a

  significance to humans, both individually and

  collectively, beyond mere survival and reproduction.

  - 177 -

  In ancient Egypt the higher-evolutionary

  potential of man was described by the hieroglyphic

  term Xeper. In later Classical Greece the term was

  telos. Both connote a “higher purpose” which, while

  energized and refined to the level of divinity, is not

  standardized or predestined; it is more an

  affirmation of potential.

  B. Manimal

  1.

  Conventional Religion

  Judaism and its Christianity & Islam variants

  require faith-belief in a metaphysical reality, but

  confine metaphysical presence to the one god El,

  along with any “angels” and/or “dæmons” he

  creates.

  E
l’s relationship with Man is strictly master/

  slave, with the purpose of Man having nothing to do

  with his evolutionary advancement; his function is

  simply and strictly obedience.

  Indeed the point of the Garden of Eden episode

  in the “Old Testament” is that a Xeper/telos attempt

  by Man is the most heinous “sin” possible, resulting

  not only in extreme punishment of Adam & Eve but

  of all their descendants: the entire human race. El

  indeed establishes that he is a “jealous god”!

  While despite El’s efforts to prevent it - such as

  the Great Flood and Tower of Babel - civilization has

  advanced to OU-scientific sophistication in the

  identification and codification of NL, the same

  cannot be said of metaphysics. Much of it,

  particularly as involves the mass of humanity,

  remains under the heel of institutional Judaism/

  Christianity/Islam. Straying beyond their ideological

  doctrines may be ignored in a few more liberal

  - 178 -

  countries as long as it is deemed frivolous and

  unthreatening - as in “New Age”, Wicca, Neopagan,

  Native-American, etc. practices - but otherwise will

  be suppressed as deliberately and ruthlessly as

  society permits. In his Aristos John Fowles observed

  with glacial candor:

  Intelligent Athenians of the fifth century

  knew their gods were metaphors, personifications

  of forces and principles. There are many signs that

  the athenianization of Christianity has begun.

  The second coming of Christ will be the

  realization that Jesus of Nazareth was supremely

  human, not supremely divine; but this will be to

  relegate him to the ranks of the philosophers and

  to reduce the vast apparatus of ritual, church, and

  priesthood to an empty shell.

  The Christian churches, contrary to the

  philosophy of Jesus himself, have frequently made

  their own continuance their chief preoccupation.

  They have fostered poverty, or indifference to it;

  they have forced people to look beyond life; they

  have abused the childish concept of hell and hell-

  fire; they have supported reactionary temporal

  powers; they have condemned countless innocent

  pleasures and bred centuries of bigotry; they have

  set themselves up as refuges and too often taken

  good care that outside their doors refuge shall be

  needed.

  Things are better now; but we have not

 

‹ Prev