by John Hamer
Dr. Bardocz also said that for the next ten years, Arpad’s life became unbearable. His work, not just the recent work he had done with GM food, but all of his past research going back 36 years was totally discredited. He was as a result, unable to obtain any sort of position anywhere in the world and all the stress he suffered culminated in him having a stroke in late 2008, severely affecting his health and his life.
Scientists who tell the truth revealed by their genuine research projects are really not at all welcome in the world of our Elite masters. The truth about most issues, not just health is far too dangerous to their position of power to be allowed out in the open and if it should accidentally leak out then a huge, no expense spared propaganda machine immediately cuts-in to discredit the source and cover-up or eliminate the process by which it was leaked. This can take the form of anything from a simple lie at one extreme, to mass-murder at the other. Either way, it is never a problem.
These silent killers are deadly, and do not discriminate. They target babies, the elderly, teenagers, young adults, middle-aged housewives, and businessmen alike. They poison livestock, pets and wildlife and the people behind them deny complicity in the carnage. These killers are the seemingly beneficial, killing fields of genetically modified (GMO) crops and the people behind them are the US and other Western governments, the Rockefellers, Monsanto, Dow, DuPont, Syngenta and Bayer Crop Science.
Eugenics is a dirty word, yet particularly applicable to America’s GMO killing fields and their inception. In 1974 Henry Kissinger drafted the controversial NSSM-200, called “the foundational document on population control issued by the United States government.”
“According to NSSM-200, elements of the implementation of population control programs could include the legalization of abortion; financial incentives for countries to increase their abortion, sterilization and contraception-use rates; indoctrination of children; mandatory population control, and coercion of other forms, such as withholding disaster and food aid unless an LDC implements population control programs. NSSM-200 also specifically declared that the United States was to cover up its population control activities and avoid charges of imperialism by inducing the United Nations and various non-governmental organizations to do its dirty work.” Human Life International, 2008
In 1970, Henry Kissinger also said, “Control oil and you control nations; control food and you control the people.”
How do you control food? By consolidating agricultural interests into what was to be termed agribusiness, creating genetically modified organisms out of heritage seeds with funding from the Rockefeller Foundation, patenting the new seeds and making sure that these new seeds are force-fed to US farmers as well as the rest of the world. By holding the patents on these seeds and requiring farmers to purchase new seeds every year, the control is complete. Also, by controlling how these GMO seeds are created, other more sinister uses come to mind. But firstly it is necessary to convince the world of your good intentions. This is accomplished through lies, deception and a modicum of controlled media manipulation. By promising farmers that this technology was safe and would result in increased yields at less cost, they were more than happy to comply. The fact that in most cases this claim was false had yet to be proven by the innocent farmers that believed the lie and by the time independent studies started revealing that GMO is harmful, it was too late, and agri-business was on its way to fulfilling its purpose. That is to make as much money as possible by spreading GMO seeds as far as possible and thus gaining control of the population via food.
“In what should amount to a wildly imaginative narrative created by an overzealous science fiction aficionado, the following agencies, their connections, and past actions are real, none-the-less.
Imagine, if you will, a world in which health sciences, disease control, cancer research, bio-weapons research, vaccine development, biotechnology, food and agriculture, national defence, and chemical companies all work together under the military. Then imagine if you will that a certain chemical company under the guise of a life sciences operation, produces an herbicide/defoliant for military use so destructive and highly toxic that contact with it causes cancer, diabetes and birth defects. And then that same chemical/life sciences company partners with a funding corporation whose team members include the ex-partner of the inventor of the world’s first completely synthetic organism, which was recently unleashed in the ocean and has since turned its ever-hungry sights on human flesh. Then imagine that same company with a monopoly on our food supply…
Sound like an episode out of the Twilight Zone or Dr. Who? Well, it’s not. It’s history, and it’s documented.” Barbara H Peterson, Farm Wars, June 2011.
High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS)
Another product found in much of our processed foods is HFCS which has been added since the early 1970s. In effect a corn-based sweetener, this product is largely responsible for the high incidence of Diabetes type 2 prevalent in much of Western society today. Today, food companies use HFCS, a mixture of fructose and glucose, because it is inexpensive, easy to transport and keeps foods moist. And because HFCS is so sweet, it is also cost effective for companies to use small quantities of HFCS in place of other more expensive sweeteners or flavourings.
For these reasons, HFCS isn’t going away any time soon. If HFCS is one of the first ingredients listed on a food label, my advice would be to not eat it.
HFCS is a highly refined, artificial product. It is created through an intricate process that transforms cornstarch into a thick, clear liquid. White sugar and HFCS are not the same. Industry advocates for corn growers say that they are the same, but nutritional science studies say that there is a big difference between the two. They say that HFCS is definitely ‘worse than sugar’.
This manufactured fructose is sweeter than sugar in an unhealthy way, and is digested differently in a bad way. Research has shown that HFCS goes directly to the liver, releasing enzymes that instruct the body to then store fat. This may elevate triglyceride (fat in blood) levels and elevate cholesterol levels. This fake fructose slows fat burning and causes weight gain. Other research indicates that it does not stimulate insulin production, which usually creates a sense of being full, therefore, people are artificially induced to eat much more than they should. Indications also are that the important chromium levels are lowered by this sweetener which contributes to diabetes type 2.
So we have another product that would seem to be harmful in many ways that is allowed indiscriminately into our foodstuffs. Why are we not warned? Why are we not informed about it so that we can make healthy lifestyle choices for ourselves and our families? Once again it would appear to be that profit comes before health. It also says to me that the people in control of our food and thus our health are deliberately deceiving us into disease and obesity for the sake of their own bank balances.
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG)
MSG is an amino acid that affects every organ in the body. There is much evidence also that as with HFCS, MSG is also similarly responsible in large part for the huge epidemic of obesity and diabetes type 2 that the western world is currently undergoing.
It appears in a vast range of processed, tinned and packaged foods from supermarkets and can often be added separately to food in restaurants, cafeterias and institutes such as hospitals and care homes as a ‘flavour enhancer’. So in effect we are not safe from it anywhere.
Staggeringly, it is not compulsory for manufacturers of food to specify the exact quantities of MSG that are contained in their products despite the fact that a single 12 gram dose of MSG has been found to be lethal to a 2kg rat, whilst much smaller doses have been shown to cause massive brain damage. Additionally it is now allowed for MSG to be sprayed on to crops and it can also become airborne as a result of this activity.
Study after scientific study has shown MSG to be capable of damaging a multitude of organs and soft tissues and also artificially enhance appetites in a variety of subjects, leading in turn as a by-prod
uct of this, to obesity. In other experimental studies using rodents, the food additive has been successfully used to generate diabetes on a large scale.
Perhaps more worryingly, MSG has been proved to pass through the placenta of rodents into the unborn foetus, the implications of this fact for humans, being quite startling. Human foetal development has also been shown to be jeopardised by high quantities of MSG in other studies.
“Children undergoing perinatal brain injury often suffer from the dramatic consequences of this misfortune for the rest of their lives. Despite the severe clinical and socio-economic significance, no effective clinical strategies have yet been developed to counteract this condition. This review describes the pathophysiological mechanisms that are implicated in perinatal brain injury. These include the acute breakdown of neuronal membrane potential followed by the release of excitatory amino acids such as glutamate and aspartate. Glutamate binds to post-synaptically located glutamate receptors that regulate calcium channels. The resulting calcium influx activates proteases, lipases and endonucleases which in turn destroy the cellular skeleton. Clinical studies have shown that intrauterine infection increases the risk of periventricular white matter damage especially in the immature foetus. This damage may be mediated by cardiovascular effects of endotoxins.” From the scientific paper, ‘Perinatal brain damage from patho-physiology to prevention’. Jensen A, Garnier Y, Middelanis J, Berger R. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 22nd September 2003
There are few chemicals that we as a people are exposed to that have as many far reaching physiological effects on living beings as does Monosodium Glutamate. MSG directly causes obesity, diabetes, triggers epilepsy, destroys eye tissues and is toxic to many organs. Considering that MSG’s only reported role in food is that of ‘flavour enhancer’ is that use worth the risk of the myriad of physical ailments associated with it? Does the public really want to be tricked into eating more food and faster by a food additive?
MSG is entering our bodies in record amounts with absolutely no limits. The studies outlined in this report often use a smaller proportional dosage than the average child may ingest daily.
Consider the children of the world who eat MSG in their school cafeterias, hospitals, restaurants and homes. They deserve foods free of added MSG, a substance so toxic that research scientists use it purposely to trigger diabetes, obesity and epileptic convulsions in animals. Perhaps we will see a reduction in obesity, diabetes and other diseases once the excess MSG threat to our health has been removed. We can stop the slow, deliberate poisoning of mankind for profits if we all act together.
If you try an Internet search for MSG, be prepared to be bombarded with lies and propaganda. There are literally thousands of websites out there trying to fool you into believing that it really is harmless.
Fluoride
Perhaps the most deadly of all the poisons we are deliberately and deceptively being forced to ingest, Fluoride also comes complete with the biggest hype of these toxins by far.
There is actually no such chemical name as Fluoride. The name stems from the gas ‘Fluorine’ and from the use of this gas in various different industries, such as Aluminium smelting and the nuclear industry, toxic by-products containing fluorine molecules are created. One example of this is Sodium Fluoride which is the most common and is a hazardous waste by-product of aluminium production. Used for a long time as rat and cockroach poison, it is also an ingredient of anaesthetics and psychiatric drugs as well as deadly Sarin nerve gas.
As we all know, fluoride is used in 99.9% of all proprietary toothpastes and is present in the drinking water (tap and bottled) of much of the first world. Advertised and promoted as protecting teeth, it is unfortunately much, much more sinister than that. Historically, this substance was quite expensive for the worlds' premier chemical companies to dispose of, but in the 1950s and 60s, Alcoa and the entire aluminium industry, with a vast abundance of the toxic waste, somehow sold the FDA and the US government on the insane (but highly profitable) idea of buying this poison at a 20,000% mark-up and then injecting it into our water supply as well as into the world's toothpastes and dental products.
Consider also that when Sodium Fluoride is injected into our drinking water, its level is approximately 1 part-per-million but since we only drink ½ of one percent of the total water supply, the hazardous chemical and the chemical industry not only has a free hazardous waste disposal system, but we have also paid them for the privilege!
You may or may not know or indeed wish to know that Fluoride was used by the Nazis in World War 2 as an intellect suppressant in their many detention camps and also as a way of making the inmates docile and compliant.
Independent scientific evidence over the past sixty plus years has shown that sodium fluoride shortens our life span, promotes various cancers and mental disturbances and most importantly, reduces intelligence and makes humans docile, unquestioning and subservient. There is also increasing evidence that aluminium in the brain is a causative factor in Alzheimer's Disease, and evidence points towards the fact that it has the ability to 'trick' the blood-brain barrier by imitating the hydrogen ion thus allowing this deadly chemical, access to brain tissue.
Honest scientists with no ulterior motive who have attempted to ‘whistle-blow’ on sodium fluoride's mega-bucks propaganda campaign have consistently been given a large dose of professional 'black-listing' in return and thus their valid points disputing the current vested interests never have received the recognition they deserve in the national press. ‘Just follow the money’ as the saying goes, to find the source and you will find prominent, Elite families to be the major influence in this absolutely scandalous situation.
In 1952 a slick PR campaign rammed the concept of 'fluoridation' through Public Health departments and various dental organisations worldwide. This slick campaign was far from the objective, scientific, stringently researched programme that it should have been. But as with all these situations, where money is concerned – and billions upon billions of pounds of it in this case – there were no barriers to be seen. It has continued in this same vein right up to the present day and now Sodium Fluoride use has now become the ubiquitous, de facto standard.
“There is a tremendous amount of emotional, highly unscientific ‘know-it-all’ emotions attached to the topic of 'sodium fluoride' usage - but I personally have yet to find even ONE objective, double-blind study that even remotely links sodium fluoride to healthy teeth at ANY AGE. Instead, I hear and read such blather as ‘9 out of 10 DENTISTS recommend fluoride toothpaste’ etc. etc. etc. Let me reiterate: truly independent (unattached to moneyed vested interest groups) scientists who've spent a large portion of their lives studying and working with this subject have been hit with a surprising amount of unfair character assassinations from strong vested-interest groups who reap grand profits from the public's ignorance as well as from their illnesses.
Do you have diabetes and/or kidney disease? There are reportedly more than 11 million Americans with diabetes. If it is true that diabetics drink more liquids than other people, then according to the Physician’s Desk Reference these 11 million people are at much higher risk drinking fluoridated water because they will receive a much deadlier dose because of their need for higher than normal water consumption. Kidney disease, by definition, lowers the efficiency of the kidneys, which of course is the primary means in which fluoride (or any other toxic chemical) is eliminated from the body. Does it not make sense that these people shouldn't drink fluoridated water at all? Cases are on record (Annapolis, Maryland, 1979) where ill kidney patients on dialysis machines died because they ingested relatively small amounts of SODIUM FLUORIDE from unwittingly drinking the 'fluoridated' city water supply? Will adequate warnings be given to people with weak kidneys, or will the real cause of such deaths be 'covered up' in the name of 'domestic tranquillity'?” A. True Ott, August 2000
It is also worth contemplating the fact that in the USA, all toothpaste tubes / packs come with a warning as stand
ard. ‘Warning – harmful or fatal if ingested. If swallowed, please consult a doctor immediately’. Bit of a clue as to its capabilities there I would have thought. How often have you accidentally or absent-mindedly swallowed a toothbrush-full of toothpaste? More importantly, your children and grandchildren love the taste of their special toothpastes with flavour calculated to make them want to brush their teeth more often. How many times might they have swallowed a toothbrush-full over the years and what pernicious harm must it be doing to their immature little bodies?
So once again we have a situation where vested interests spend millions, rake in favours or provide financial incentives to get their way and in doing so guarantee themselves billionaire status many times over. And it gets even worse;
