Fifteen
He lies every day in luxury. I lie, very occasionally, in the House of Commons—or at least I distribute the truth a little unevenly. It gives me a much better idea of where my vulnerable parts are located.
A long time ago, at a point lost in the mists of time, an incident took place during a war fought in Canada between the British and the French. At least, it was probably in Canada, although it could have taken place at almost any point on the globe where the two fiercely imperialist nations challenged each other, if indeed it took place at all. According to the reports two armies, one British and the other French, marched up opposite sides of the same hill, discovering unexpected confrontation on the brow. Heavily packed ranks of infantrymen faced each other, readying themselves for battle, hastily preparing their muskets in a deadly race to shed first blood.
But the troops were led by officers who were also gentlemen. The English officer, seeing his counterpart but a few feet away, was quick to see the demands of courtesy and, taking off his hat with a low sweep, invited the French to shoot first.
The Frenchman could be no less gallant than his English enemy and, with a still deeper bow, offered: “No, sir. I insist. After you.”
At which the English infantrymen fired and blew the French apart.
Prime Minister’s Question Time in the House of Commons is much like that confrontation in Canada. All MPs are addressed as “honorable” and all in trousers as “gentlemen,” even by their fiercest enemy. They are drawn up facing each other in ranks only two sword lengths apart and, in spite of the apparent purpose of asking questions and seeking information, the real intent is to leave as many of your opponents’ bodies as you can manage bleeding on the floor of the Chamber. But there are two crucial differences with the confrontation on the hilltop. It is the one who strikes second, the Prime Minister with the last word, who normally has the advantage. And MPs on all sides have learned the lesson that the midst of battle is no place for being a gentleman.
The news of the dispute over the King’s speech hit the newspapers on the last full day of business before the Christmas recess. There was little seasonal goodwill to be found anywhere as His Majesty’s Loyal Opposition sensed its first good opportunity of testing the mettle of the new Prime Minister. At three fifteen p.m., the hour appointed for the Prime Minister to take questions, the Chamber of the House of Commons was packed. Opposition benches were strewn with copies of that morning’s newspapers and their graphic front-page headlines. During the course of the previous night editors had worked hard to outbid each other, and headlines such as “A Right Royal Rumpus” had given way to “King’s Draft Daft Says PM,” eventually becoming simply “King of Cardboard City.” It was all richly amusing and luridly speculative.
The Leader of the Opposition, Cordon McKillin, rose to put his question amid a rustle of expectation on all sides. Like Urquhart he had been born north of the border but there the resemblance ceased. He was considerably younger, his waistline thicker, his hair darker, his politics more ideological, and his accent much broader. He was not noted for his charm but had a barrister’s mind, which made his words always precise, and he had spent the morning with his advisers wondering how best to circumvent the rules of the House, which forbid any controversial mention of the Royal Family. How to raise the topic of the King’s speech, without touching on the King?
He was smiling as he reached out to lean on the polished Wooden Dispatch Box that separated him from his adversary by less than six feet. “Will the Prime Minister tell us whether he agrees”—he looked theatrically at his notes—“it is time to recognize that more people than ever are disaffected in our society, and that the growing sense of division is a matter for grave concern?”
Everyone recognized the direct quote from the King’s forbidden draft.
“Since the question is a very simple one, which even he should be able to understand, a simple yes or no will suffice.” Very simple indeed. No room for wriggling away from this one.
He sat down amid a chorus of approval from his own backbenchers and a waving of newspaper headlines. When Urquhart rose from his seat to respond he, too, wore an easy smile, but some thought they saw a distinct reddening of his ears. No wriggling. The only sensible course of action was direct avoidance, not to risk a cacophony of questions about the King’s views, yet he didn’t like to be seen running away from it. But what else could he do?
“As the Right Honorable Gentleman is aware, it is not the custom of this House to discuss matters relating to the Monarch, and I do not intend to make it my custom to comment on leaked documents.”
He sat down, and as he did so a roar of mock anger arose from the benches in front of him. The bastards were enjoying this one. The Opposition Leader was already back on his feet, his smile broader still.
“The Prime Minister must have thought I asked a different question. I don’t recall mentioning His Majesty. It is entirely a matter between him and the Palace if the Prime Minister chooses to censor and cut to ribbons His Majesty’s remarks. I wouldn’t dream of raising such matters in this place.” A howl of mockery was hurled toward Urquhart from along the Opposition benches. Beneath her long judicial wig Madam Speaker shook her head in disapproval at such obvious circumvention of the rules of the House, but decided not to intervene. “So can the Prime Minister get back to the question actually asked, rather than the one he wishes had been asked, and give a straight question a straight answer?”
Opposition MPs were pointing fingers at Urquhart, trying to get under his skin. “He’s chicken, running away!” exclaimed one. “Can’t face up to it,” said another. “Happy Christmas, Francis,” mocked a third. Most simply rocked back and forth on the leather benches in delight at the Prime Minister’s discomfort. Urquhart glanced at the Speaker, hoping she might slap down such conduct and with it the entire discussion, but she had suddenly found something of great interest to study on her Order Paper. Urquhart was on his own.
“The purpose of the question is clear. My answer remains the same.”
There was pandemonium now as the Opposition Leader rose for the third time. He leaned with one elbow on the Dispatch Box for many long moments without speaking, savoring the state of passion of his audience, waiting for the din to die, enjoying the sight of Urquhart impaled on his hook.
“I have no way of knowing what passed between the Prime Minister and the Palace. I know only what I read in the newspapers”—he waved a copy of the Sun for the benefit of the television cameras—“and I have long ceased to believe anything I read there. But the question is simple. Such concerns about the growth of division within our society are shared by millions of ordinary people, whether or not they are held by those, shall we say, somewhat less than ordinary. But if the Prime Minister is having trouble with the question, let me rephrase it. Does he agree”—McKillin glanced down, a copy of the Chronicle now in his hand—“with the sentiment that we cannot rest content while tens of thousands of our fellow citizens sleep rough on our streets, through no fault of their own? Does he accept that in a truly United Kingdom the sense of belonging of unemployed crofters in the Scottish Highlands is just as vital as that of homeowners in the southern suburbs? Would he support the view that it is a sign for concern rather than congratulation if more people drive our streets in Rolls-Royces while the disabled in their wheelchairs are left in the gutters, still unable to catch a Number 57 bus?” Everyone recognized the words that had been hijacked from the censored speech. “And if he doesn’t like those questions, I’ve got lots more.”
They were baiting Urquhart now. They didn’t want answers, just blood, and in parliamentary terms they were getting it. Yet Urquhart knew that once he responded to any point concerning the King’s speech he would lose all control of the matter, that he would be open to attack without restraint.
“I will not be drawn. Particularly by a pack of jackals.” From the Government backbenches, which had
grown increasingly quiet during the exchanges, came a growl of support. This was more like the exchanges they were used to handling, and insults began to fly freely across the Chamber as Urquhart continued, shouting to make himself heard above the din. “Before he takes his pretense of interest in the plight of the homeless and unemployed too far, perhaps the Right Honorable Gentleman should have a word with his trade union paymasters and tell them to stop pushing through inflationary pay claims that only force decent citizens out of their jobs and out of their homes.” The roar was almost deafening. “He greets the problems of others with all the relish of a grave digger!”
It was an adept attempt at self-preservation. The insults had at last dragged attention away from the question and a tide of protest swept across the Chamber, creating waves of heaving arms and invective that crashed like surf on either side. The Opposition Leader was back on his feet for a fourth attempt but Madam Speaker, conscious that perhaps she should have done more to curtail the questioning and protect the Prime Minister, decided that enough was enough and handed the floor over to Tony Marples, a prison officer elected to represent the marginal constituency of Dagenham at the last election who regarded himself as a savior of “the ordinary chap” and who made no secret of his ambition to get a Ministerial job. He wouldn’t get one, of course, not simply because he probably wouldn’t last long in the House nor because he was homosexual, but because an estranged boyfriend had recently retaliated by wrecking the MP’s Westminster flat before being carted away by the police. Disaffected lovers had dragged down many finer men than Marples, and no Prime Minister was going to give him the chance to follow in their footsteps, no matter how well trodden. But in Madam Speaker’s eyes his ambition made Marples just the man to lob the PM an easy ball to hit and so provide the House with an opportunity to regain its composure.
“Wouldn’t the Prime Minister agree with me,” Marples began in strong Cockney tones; he hadn’t prepared a question in advance, but he thought he knew how to help his beleaguered leader, “that this Party stands second to none in its respect for the institutions of this country, and in particular in its respect, love, and devotion to our wonderful Royals?”
He paused for a second. Once on his feet he was suddenly uncertain how to finish. He coughed, hesitated, too long, exposing a gap like a chink in medieval armor. The Opposition lunged. Interventions were hurled at him from across the Chamber, throwing him even further off stride until his mind jammed in second and stalled. His jaw sagged and his eyes grew wide with the terror of those who wake from a dream to find that nightmare has become reality and they are naked in a public place. “Our wonderful Royals,” he was left repeating, ever more feebly.
It was left to an Opposition MP to deliver the final blow, putting him out of his misery with a stage whisper that carried to all parts of the House.
“Particularly our queens!”
Even many on Marples’s own side failed to restrain their smug grins. Marples saw an Opposition member blow a silent kiss of mockery in his direction, his confidence drained from him for all to see, and he sank miserably back into his seat as the Opposition once more reached a state of euphoria.
Urquhart closed his eyes in despair. He had hoped he’d staunched the flow of blood; now he would need a tourniquet. He thought he would apply it to Marples’s neck.
Sixteen
A king cannot shop for his principles at the supermarket. How can he bleed for the people in monogrammed slippers?
The King was standing, as was his custom, near the window of his sitting room. He was toying self-consciously with the crested signet ring on his left hand, and made no move toward Urquhart. The Prime Minister had been kept waiting outside for a period not actually discourteous but noticeably longer than usual; now he was forced to pace across the full length of the room before the King extended his hand. Once again Urquhart was surprised at the limp handshake, remarkable for someone who took such pride in his physical fitness. A sign of inner weakness? Or an occupational injury? At the King’s silent direction they sat in the two chairs by the fireplace.
“Your Majesty, we must put an end to this open sore.”
“I do so agree, Prime Minister.”
The informality of their earlier meetings had been replaced by an almost theatrical precision, like two chess players taking patient turns with the pieces. They sat just a few feet apart, knees together, waiting for the other to begin. Eventually Urquhart was forced to make his move.
“I must ask that this never happens again. Such material emanating from the Palace makes my task impossible. And if the leak came from a Palace servant, then he should be disciplined as an example to others for the future—”
“Confound your insolence!”
“I beg—?”
“You come here to impugn my integrity, to suggest that I or one of my staff leaked these wretched documents!”
“You don’t for one moment think that I leaked them, not for all the damage they have done…”
“That, Mr. Urquhart, is politics, which is your game and not mine. Downing Street is notorious for leaking documents when it serves their purpose. I am not in that game!”
The King’s head was thrust forward, his balding temples glowing with indignation and the bony bridge of his long and much broken nose showing prominently, like a bull about to charge. The limp handshake had been deceptive. Urquhart couldn’t fail to mistake the sincerity of the other man’s anger, and knew he had misjudged the situation. He flushed and swallowed hard.
“I…apologize, sir. I can assure you I played no part in the leaking of these documents, and I had assumed that, perhaps, a Palace servant…? I misconstrued.” The knuckles of his tightly clenched hands were cracking with frustration, while the King snorted through his nose several times, banging a hand down upon his right knee as if to expend his anger and to regain control of his temper. They both sat silent for several moments, gathering their wits.
“Sir, I am at a loss as to which devil is responsible for the leak and our misunderstanding.”
“Prime Minister, I am well aware of my constitutional duties and restraints. I have made a deep study of them. Open warfare with my Prime Minister is not within my prerogative and it is not my desire. Such a course of action can only be damaging, perhaps disastrous, for us both.”
“The damage has already been inflicted for the Government. After this afternoon’s Question Time, I have no doubt that tomorrow’s newspapers will be full of coverage supporting what they believe to be your view and attacking what they will describe as an insensitive and heavy-handed Government. They will say it is censorship.”
The King smiled grimly at Urquhart’s recognition of the balance of popular sentiment.
“Such coverage will only do us both harm, sir. Drive a wedge between us, expose those parts of our Constitution best left in the privacy of darkness. It would be a grave error.”
“On whose part?”
“On all our parts. We must do whatever we can to avoid that.” Urquhart left the statement hanging in the air while he tried to judge the other man’s reaction, but all he could see was the continuing puffiness of exasperation around the eyes. “We must try to prevent the newspapers ruining our relationship.”
“Well, what do you expect that I can do? I didn’t start this public row, you know.”
Urquhart took a deep breath to blunt the edge of his tongue. “I know, sir. I know you didn’t start it. But you can stop it.”
“Me? How?”
“You can stop it, or at least minimize the damage, here from the Palace. Your press secretary must phone round the editors’ offices this evening to tell them that there is no dispute between us.”
The King nodded as he considered the proposal. “Maintain the constitutional fiction that the King and his Government are as one, eh?”
“Precisely. And he must suggest that the press leaks have gotten i
t wrong, that the draft does not represent your views. Perhaps implying that it was prepared for you by some adviser or other?”
“Deny my words?”
“Deny that there is any difference between us.”
“Let me be clear about this. You want me to disown my own beliefs.” A pause. “You want me to lie.”
“It’s more a smoothing over the cracks. Repairing the damage…”
“Damage I did not cause. I have said nothing in public to dispute your position and I shall not. My views are entirely private.”
“They are not private when they are spread all over the front pages of the newspapers!” Urquhart could not control his exasperation; winning this argument was crucial.
“That is your problem, not mine. I discussed my ideas only with a small circle of my own family, around the dinner table. No Palace servants. No journalists. Certainly no politicians.”
“Then you did discuss it.”
“In private. As I must, if my advice to my Government is to be of any use.”
“There are some types of advice the Government can do without. We are elected to run this country, after all.”
“Mr. Urquhart!” The blue eyes were ablaze with indignation, his hands white as they gripped the arm of his chair. “May I remind you that you have not been elected as Prime Minister, not by the people. You have no mandate. Until the next election you are no better than a constitutional caretaker. Meanwhile I am the Monarch with the right accorded by tradition and all the constitutional law books ever damn well written to be consulted by you and to offer advice.”
“In private.”
“There is no constitutional duty on me to lie publicly to save the Government’s skin.”
The House of Cards Complete Trilogy Page 43
