Are We Boiling Frogs?

Home > Other > Are We Boiling Frogs? > Page 33
Are We Boiling Frogs? Page 33

by Home home


  culpability has been greatly exaggerated.

  These are not concepts found only in spy novels and the

  furtive imaginations of conspiracy theorists. There are

  numerous, proven examples of intelligence agencies, the

  world over, using informants, infiltrators, assets and

  patsies.

  Nor is there any reason such tactics shouldn't be used. It

  seems prudent for intelligence and security services to use

  all means at their disposal to apprehend terrorists, uncover

  prosecutable evidence and foil plots to kill.

  However, these techniques have evidently crossed the line

  from intelligence gathering and prevention to active

  participation on many occasions. It is legitimate to ask at

  what point the security services may act as terrorists or

  facilitators of terrorist attacks. “To state the proposition” does

  not “reveal its absurdity.”

  Few suggest the security services could have been complicit

  in 7/7 and there is no proof they were. However, by denying

  269

  A Dangerous Ideology

  any consideration of the possibility, nor was there any

  chance of uncovering evidence that could have potentially

  exposed such activity. Recent history, which indicated this

  was entirely feasible, was ignored without justification.

  Sharing concerns about the actions of the security services,

  nineteen survivors requested the opportunity to cross-

  examine the intelligence agencies. Lady Justice Hallett

  denied their application. The inquests represented the last

  opportunity for the survivors and victim's families to get

  answers to their questions.

  One of the survivors of the Edgware Road blast Jacqui

  Putnam, said:

  “Our role now will be one of answering

  questions, which we will do, but our

  questions are not going to be answered.

  Once again, we have been shunted aside by

  officialdom.”

  During the inquests, Lady Hallett considered some evidence

  from the security services in closed session. This evidence

  was withheld from all but the victim's families, who were

  themselves placed under gagging orders. In her summation

  Lady Hallett stated:

  “Security Service and the police put before

  me material that was relevant to the issues,

  but which they reasonably believed could

  not be disclosed in an unredacted form

  without threatening national security.”

  Ultimately this led her to conclude:

  “The evidence I have heard does not justify

  the conclusion that any failings on the part

  of any organisation or individual caused or

  contributed to any of the deaths”

  By the end of 2011, the British Government had successfully

  fought off all calls for an independent inquiry and had

  concluded an inquest with a largely predetermined outcome.

  The inquest didn't fulfil the legal requirements of a coroner's

  inquiry and the government had gone to great legislative

  270

  A Dangerous Ideology

  lengths to severely restrict its scope. The UK state also

  presented a number of intelligence reports that were

  evidently false or inaccurate and denied legal aid to those

  who questioned their 'narrative.'

  It seemed that every time evidence came to light, the official

  account was forced into another retraction or alteration. This

  gradual unravelling of the state's story was exemplified by

  the inquests which laid bare numerous problems with the

  evidence supposedly substantiating it. In reality, the

  evidence presented appeared to bring the whole story into

  considerable doubt.

  Lady Justice Hallett's closing remarks about the absurdity of

  conspiracy theories were both historically inaccurate and

  irrational. It was the state's determination to maintain their

  own questionable conspiracy theory, and refusal to disclose

  information or investigate potential leads, that aroused and

  perpetuated public suspicion.

  ************************

  271

  A Dangerous Ideology

  Chapter 14

  Oops! Looks Like We Did It Again.

  Mohammad Junaid Babar was a key witness in both

  the fertiliser bomb plot trial, built upon evidence uncovered

  during Operation Crevice, and the trial of the three alleged

  7/7 accomplices who, despite Babar’s testimony, were found

  innocent of any involvement in the London bombings.

  From the age of two, Pakistan born Babar grew up in

  Queens, New York. He initially achieved notoriety, shortly

  after 9/11, by appearing in a number of interviews where he

  openly declared his plan to kill Americans. These interviews

  were syndicated globally by the MSM, ramping up fear of the

  threat presented by al Qaeda.

  For instance, speaking to a Canadian news team, without

  the customary face covering usually worn by Islamist

  terrorists, he said:[110]

  “I am willing to kill the American Soldiers if

  they enter into Afghanistan with their

  ground troops. I am willing to kill the

  Americans and, if the Americans use

  272

  A Dangerous Ideology

  Pakistan soil as their bases, we will kill the

  Americans here in Pakistan too.”

  Over the next few years, Babar apparently became a

  reasonably influential terrorist, though he was also

  something of a self-publicist, so some scepticism is

  warranted.

  He allegedly met with senior members of al Qaeda, such as

  its third in command Abdul Hadi. He was a logistician and al

  Qaeda fundraiser, providing them with money, weaponry

  and equipment. He smuggled arms and facilitated the

  passage of U.S, Canadian and UK extremists to al Qaeda

  training camps in Pakistan. His motivation for doing all this

  was questionable. Babar's mother had been working in the

  World Trade Center on 9/11. She escaped and thankfully

  survived. So Babar's rabid fanaticism, for the terrorist group

  who had nearly killed his mum, was surprising.

  Between 2001 and 2004, despite having been on global

  television networks making threats to kill and pledging his

  allegiance to the al Qaeda cause, Babar flew between the

  U.S, UK and Pakistan, without any problem at all. In 2004

  he flew back to the U.S. and moved back in with his parents.

  More than a month after his return, the FBI picked him up

  for 'questioning' while he was walking down the street in

  Queens, New York.

  There was no 'door kicking' raid, no terrorist last stand or

  dangerous hostage situation, no need for the bomb squad or

  indeed any guns at all. The FBI didn't even handcuff him.

  They simply asked him to accompany them. Nor did they

  throw him in a cell, or start water boarding him in the

  Guantánamo Bay detention centre. They instead took him to

  a Manhattan Hotel. A comfortable arrangement he would

  become accustomed to, throughout his ‘imprisonment.’

  Over the next few weeks, Babar not only signed a d
ocument,

  enabling the FBI to question him without the presence of a

  lawyer, but also gave them incredible detail about the al

  Qaeda networks he embedded himself within and the large

  number of terrorists he had trained. In fact, he built some of

  these networks and ran the training camps.

  273

  A Dangerous Ideology

  Babar struck a deal with U.S. prosecutors and the FBI. The

  Western MSM eagerly promoted his life story, dubbing him

  ‘the al Qaeda super grass.’[111] Between 2004 and 2010

  Babar frequently testified in courts in the U.S, UK and

  Canada, resulting in the conviction of 12 suspected terrorist.

  U.S. district judge Victor Marrero commented:

  “Mr Babar worked with the FBI and foreign

  governments to assist in investigations of

  terrorism organisations, including al Qaeda,

  and of terrorist activities such as the London

  bomb plot … As a result of Mr Babar's co-

  operation, multiple defendants were

  arrested, prosecuted, and eventually

  sentenced not just in the United States but

  in England and Canada as well.”

  Facing a possible seventy-year sentence for his terrorist

  activities, in December 2010 a New York court gave Babar a

  'time served' sentence, amounting to four and a half years,

  and released him. The court thanked him for his

  'exceptional cooperation.' For most of his time in custody

  Babar had been jetting around the world as the security

  services 'star witness,' staying in hotels rather than prison

  cells. For the last two years of his sentence he was on bail,

  living freely in the U.S. The leading international terrorist

  spent very little time behind bars.

  Documents from his trial confirmed that Mr Babar had been

  cooperating with the security services 'before his arrest' in

  2004. They didn't indicate when this cooperation began but,

  given the other unusual facets of his life as a terrorist, it

  seems fairly clear that Babar was at least an informant, and

  probable agent, infiltrating al Qaeda for the U.S. intelligence

  agencies.[112]

  During the Operation Crevice trial (the fertilizer bomb plot) it

  became apparent the police and the intelligence agencies

  had invested a considerable amount of time and manpower

  in the surveillance of Shehzad Tanweer and Mohammad

  Sidique Khan. Claims that they were 'clean skins' were

  abject nonsense.

  274

  A Dangerous Ideology

  Junaid Babar testified he had met with both Khyam and

  Khan during his frequent trips to the UK from Pakistan.

  Khan and Tanweer had been photographed, captured on

  video and tailed. Numerous vehicle checks had been run on

  the cars the men travelled in, and their meetings were often

  bugged.

  For example, Khan and Tanweer had been with a group of

  men who had met with the fertilizer plot ringleader Omar

  Khyam. After Khyam left, MI5 tailed the remaining group

  containing Khan and Tanweer. They followed them to

  Toddington Services on the M1 and captured high quality,

  colour photographs of the men, including clear images of

  both Khan and Tanweer.

  At the same time, Junaid Babar was with the FBI in the U.S.

  In April 2004, more than a year before 7/7, one of the photos

  taken at Toddington, which clearly showed Khan and

  Tanweer, was sent by MI5 to the FBI for the attention of

  Babar. There was a strong possibility that Babar would have

  recognised Khan. He claimed to have trained both Khan and

  Khyam, among others.

  In 2003 Khan allegedly flew out to a terrorist training camp

  in Malakand, North West Pakistan, which had been set up

  by Babar. Khan's training, at Barbar's camp, almost

  certainly including how to handle explosives.

  Unfortunately, the perfectly distinct image, taken at the

  services, had apparently been photocopied and sent to the

  U.S. by an idiot. Tanweer looked like a grainy, amorphous

  blob and the only part of Khan that hadn't been cropped out

  of the image was his nose. Even his own mother couldn't

  have recognised him, so perhaps Babar can be forgiven for

  not doing so himself.[113]

  When this was revealed at the inquests it prompted John

  Taylor, the father of one of the 7/7 victims to say:

  “I think they could have made a better effort.

  They could have stuck it on a Jumbo Jet and

  got it there overnight if they really wanted

  to. They could have sent it over with a

  275

  A Dangerous Ideology

  member of the security services or the

  Metropolitan Police.”

  However, in light of the Stevens Report, was it possible the

  security services had another reason to literally keep Khan

  out of the picture? Khan was also recorded in conversation

  with the Omar Khyam in Khyam's car. The men discussed

  financial 'scams' and Khan's plans to go overseas to fight

  jihad. At one point Khan asked Khyam if he was a terrorist.

  Khyam said “I'm not a terrorist but they're working through

  us.” Khan then asked “who are, there's no one higher than

  you?” [114]

  This appeared to indicate there was someone Khyam was

  taking orders from. It isn't known who this was but, during

  his subsequent trial, Khyam testified that he had trained in

  Pakistan training camps set up by the Pakistani ISI. Later he

  refused to give any further testimony. The judge in the

  Crevice trial warned Khyam that his silence could be

  interpreted as a refusal cooperate and could go against him

  in court. Khyam acknowledged this but added the ISI had

  threatened his family in Pakistan and he had no choice.

  Khan, Tanweer and Khyam were also tailed to a meeting in

  Wellingborough in the East Midlands where again they were

  heard to discuss financial fraud. MI5 believed they were

  trying to raise money to fund their training and operations

  overseas. This placed Khan and Tanweer's alleged

  'martyrdom videos' in a different light. It appeared they were

  eulogising about going to fight jihad overseas, not discussing

  a planned domestic terror attack.

  MI5 also recorded that Khan and Tanweer had attended a

  meeting in Khyam's flat in Slough. When Operation Crevice

  came to an end, following the 2004 raids that led to the

  arrest the fertilizer bomb plotters, MI5 again ran another

  vehicle check on Khan's car.

  The idea that MI5 had no knowledge of Khan or Tanweer,

  prior to the bombings, simply wasn't true. Far from being on

  the periphery of their investigation, it seems Mohammad

  Sidique Khan, at least, was of notable interest to them. Their

  claim that Khan hadn't been considered a priority appeared

  false. Yet this had been enough to convince the 2009

  276

  A Dangerous Ideology

  Intelligence Security Committee that they could not have

  done more to foil 7/7.

  Why Lady Justice Hallett maintained this opinion is

  mystifying. In additio
n to the evidence demonstrating the

  security services awareness of Khan and Tanweer, other

  information revealed at the inquest plainly suggested the

  intelligence agencies possible involvement in their

  recruitment and training.

  Martin McDaid was described at the inquest as a former

  Marine who had converted to Islam in the 1990s, changing

  his name to Abdullah McDaid. According to Hugo Keith QC,

  he had been known to West Yorkshire Police and the

  security services since at least 1998, and was suspected of

  involvement in extremism. Though, as a former soldier of the

  elite Special Boat Service (SBS)[115] and a counter-terrorism

  operative, he was probably known to the security services

  throughout his professional career, long before 1998.[116]

  McDaid had worked at an Islamist book store in Beeston,

  Leeds, called the Iqra Learning Centre. Mohammad Sidique

  Khan and Shehzad Tanweer were both volunteers at the

  shop.

  Martin Gilbertson was an IT consultant employed by the Iqra

  Learning Centre to copy Islamists leaflets and videos. In his

  inquest testimony he said:[117]

  “Martin 'Abdullah' McDaid did most of the

  talking, most of the ranting and raving; and

  as an ex-Marine, he knew about matters

  military.”

  Gilbertson, who was previously caught lying in a couple of

  media interviews, was absolutely savaged at the inquests.

  However, he wasn't the only person who thought McDaid

  was actively inciting hatred and advocating Islamist

  extremism.

  Mark Hargreaves, a youth worker, testified how it had been

  McDaid who had shown him 'hateful, deeply offensive'

  Islamist extremist pictures and videos. McDaid and another

  man, Max Gillespie, known as 'Abdul Rahman,' told

  277

  A Dangerous Ideology

  Hargreaves they were distributing the Islamist propaganda.

  When asked, Hargreaves confirmed it was McDaid who was

  'whipping up hatred.'

  In January 2001, 8 months before 9/11, West Yorkshire

  Police's Special Branch launched a surveillance operation

  called Operation Warlock.[118] They surveilled a group of

  young Muslim men on an outward bound trip to Dalehead in

  the Dudden Valley, Cumbria. They did so at the request of

  the security services. The trip was one of many organised

  and led by McDaid.

  It was alleged that this was a terrorist training camp.

  Mohammad Sidique Khan was photographed at the camp.

 

‹ Prev