38. VanderMeer ‘Corpse Mouth’, pp. 94–6.
39. VanderMeer ‘Corpse Mouth’, p. 97.
40. For information about fungi biology and reproduction, see John Webster and Roland Weber, Introduction to Fungi (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).
41. VanderMeer, ‘Corpse Mouth’, pp. 98–9.
42. Luciano and Chen, ‘Introduction’, 189.
43. Jeff VanderMeer, Annihilation (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux Books, 2014), pp. 24–5.
44. VanderMeer, Annihilation, p. 25.
45. Gry Ulstein, ‘Brave New Weird: Anthropocene Monsters in Jeff VanderMeer’s The Southern Reach’, Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies, 43/1 (March 2017), 1–96, p. 91.
46. VanderMeer, Annihilation, pp. 83, 177, 75.
47. Jeff VanderMeer, Acceptance (New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux Books, 2014), p. 183.
48. Sandilands, ‘Fear of a Queer Plant’, 421.
49. VanderMeer, ‘Corpse Mouth’, p. 99.
50. Luce Irigaray and Michael Marder, Through Vegetal Being: Two Philosophical Perspectives (New York: Columbia University Press, 2016), p. 22.
51. Irigaray and Marder, Through Vegetal Being, p. 24.
52. Anna Tsing, The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015), p. 228.
53. VanderMeer, Annihilation, p. 25.
54. Mel Y. Chen, ‘Toxic Animacies, Inanimate Affections’, GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 17/2–3 (June 2011), 265–86, p. 280.
55. H. P. Lovecraft, ‘Supernatural Horror in Literature’, The H. P. Lovecraft Archive, 20 October 2009, http://www.hplovecraft.com/writings/texts/essays/shil.aspx (last accessed 11 May 2019).
56. Neel Ahuja, ‘Intimate Atmospheres: Queer Theory in a Time of Extinction’, GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 21/2–3 (June 2015), 365–85, p. 377.
57. Ahuja, ‘Intimate Atmospheres’, 371.
58. Luciano and Chen, ‘Introduction’, 189.
59. My gratitude goes out to the editors of this volume for their especially attentive work and revision suggestions for this chapter.
10. The Botanical Ekphrastic and Ecological Relocation
1. W. J. T. Mitchell, Picture Theory (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994), p. 157.
2. Asbjørn Grønstad, ‘Ekphrasis Refigured: Writing Seeing in Siri Hustvedt’s “What I Loved”’, Mosaic: An Interdisciplinary Critical Journal, 45/3 (2012), 33–48; p. 38.
3. W. J. T. Mitchell, ‘Showing Seeing: A Critique of Visual Culture’, Journal of Visual Culture, 1/2 (2002), 165–81, p. 179.
4. James H. Wandersee and Elisabeth E. Schussler, ‘Toward a Theory of Plant Blindness’, Plant Science Bulletin, 47/1 (2001), 2–9.
5. Algernon Blackwood, ‘The Man Whom the Trees Loved’ (1912), in Chad Arment (ed.), Flora Curiosa: Cryptobotany, Mysterious Fungi, Sentient Trees, and Deadly Plants in Classic Science Fiction and Fantasy (Landisville, PA: Coachwhip Publications, 2008), p. 205.
6. Blackwood, ‘The Man Whom the Trees Loved’, p. 209.
7. Blackwood, ‘The Man Whom the Trees Loved’, pp. 209–11.
8. Blackwood, ‘The Man Whom the Trees Loved’, p. 221.
9. Blackwood, ‘The Man Whom the Trees Loved’, p. 226.
10. Blackwood, ‘The Man Whom the Trees Loved’, p. 223.
11. Blackwood, ‘The Man Whom the Trees Loved’, p. 221.
12. Jeffrey T. Nealon. Plant Theory: Biopower and Vegetable Life (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2015), p. 11.
13. Murray Krieger, ‘Ekphrasis and the Still Movement of Poetry; or, Laokoon Revisited’, in P. W. Frederick (ed.), The Poet as Critic (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1967), p. 5.
14. Benjamin J. Robertson, None of This is Normal: The Fiction of Jeff VanderMeer (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2018), p. 5.
15. Jeff VanderMeer, Annihilation (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2014), p. 23.
16. VanderMeer, Annihilation, p. 24.
17. VanderMeer, Annihilation, p. 24.
18. VanderMeer, Annihilation, p. 24, italics in original.
19. Robertson, None of This is Normal, p. 116.
20. James A. W. Heffernan, ‘Ekphrasis and Representation’, New Literary History, 22/2 (1991), 297–316, p. 312.
21. VanderMeer, Annihilation, p. 23.
22. VanderMeer, Annihilation, pp. 23–5.
23. VanderMeer, Annihilation, p. 25.
24. VanderMeer, Annihilation, p. 24.
25. VanderMeer, Annihilation, pp. 24–5.
26. James Elkins, The Object Stares Back: On the Nature of Seeing (New York: Harcourt, 1996), pp. 11–12.
27. Matthew Hall, Plants as Persons: A Philosophical Botany (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2011), p. 14.
28. Ramola D, ‘An Interview with Ursula K. Le Guin’, AWP: Association of Writers and Writing Programs (2003), https://www.awpwriter.org/magazine_media/writers_chronicle_view/2293/an_interview_with_ ursula_k._le_guin (last accessed 14 May 2019).
29. Ursula K. Le Guin, ‘The Diary of the Rose’ (1974), in Ursula K. Le Guin, The Unreal and the Real: The Selected Short Stories of Ursula K. Le Guin (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2016), pp. 99–125, p. 99.
30. Le Guin, ‘The Diary of the Rose’, p. 107
31. Le Guin, ‘The Diary of the Rose’, p. 107.
32. Le Guin, ‘The Diary of the Rose’, p. 125.
33. William Gibson, ‘Fragments of a Hologram Rose’ (1977), in William Gibson, Burning Chrome (New York: Harper Collins, 2003), pp. 37–44.
34. Gibson, ‘Fragments’, pp. 43–4.
35. George Slusser, ‘Literary MTV’, Mississippi Review, 16/2–3 (1988), 279–88, p. 279.
36. Slusser, ‘Literary MTV’, 279–80.
37. See, for one, Veronica Hollinger, ‘Cybernetic Deconstructions: Cyberpunk and Postmodernism’, Mosaic: A Journal for the Interdisciplinary Study of Literature, 23/2 (1990), pp. 29–44.
38. Neil Easterbrook, ‘Recognising Patterns: Gibson’s Hermeneutics from the Bridge Trilogy to Pattern Recognition’, in Graham J. Murphy and Sherryl Vint (eds), Beyond Cyberpunk: New Critical Perspectives (New York and London: Routledge, 2010), pp. 46–64, p. 57.
39. See, for example, Kyle Wiens, ‘Try to Dissect Apple’s New Airpods and You’ll Shed Blood’, WIRED, 21 December 2016, https://www.wired. com/2016/12/recycle-apple-airpods/ (last accessed 20 July 2017).
40. Paweł Frelik, ‘“Silhouettes of Strange Illuminated Mannequins”: Cyberpunk’s Incarnations of Light’, in Graham J. Murphy and Lars Schmeink (eds), Cyberpunk and Visual Culture (New York: Routledge, 2018), pp. 80–99, p. 94.
41. Katherine E. Bishop, ‘Ecological Recentering in William Gibson’s The Peripheral’, Polish Journal of American Studies, 12 (2018), 319–34.
42. Lance Olsen, William Gibson (San Bernardino, Ca: Borgo Press, 1992), http://www.lanceolsen.com/gibson.html (last accessed 17 July 2017).
43. Gibson, ‘Fragments’, p. 43.
44. Elyne Mitchell, Soil and Civilization (Sydney: Halsted Press, 1946), p. 4.
45. Glenn Albrecht, ‘“Solastalgia”: a New Concept in Health and Identity’, PAN: Philosophy, Activism, Nature, 3 (2005), 44–59.
46. Albrecht, ‘“Solastalgia”’, 45.
47. Gibson, ‘Fragments’, p. 40.
48. Shadi Bartsch and Jaś Elsner, ‘Eight Ways of Looking at Ekphrasis’, Classical Philology, 102/1 (2007), i–vi, p. ii.
49. Many thanks to Jerry Määttä, Scott Newton and David Higgins for their comments on earlier versions of this essay. Thanks, too, to the audience at SFRA 2018 for valuable feedback on a related presentation.
t-filter: grayscale(100%); -moz-filter: grayscale(100%); -o-filter: grayscale(100%); -ms-filter: grayscale(100%); filter: grayscale(100%); " class="sharethis-inline-share-buttons">share
Plants in Science Fiction Page 30
