Slavery by Another Name

Home > Other > Slavery by Another Name > Page 41
Slavery by Another Name Page 41

by Douglas A. Blackmon


  held hundreds or thousands of black laborers. The Smith family—

  whose deadly convict farm had become the symbol of convict

  leasing's most lethal manifestations in the nineteenth century—was

  one of the county's most prominent landholders. But Reese could

  bring no charges in Lowndes County because no blacks forced into

  slavery were wil ing to risk the lives of family members or their

  own by testifying to the grand jury in Montgomery. Even a black

  grand juror from Lowndes County participated in the inquiry only

  under protest—for fear he would be kil ed upon his return home.

  But the failure of the federal investigation to reach Lowndes

  County didn't indicate there had been less slavery than federal

  agents initial y claimed. Indeed, there was vastly more. In the

  summer of 1906, W. E. B. DuBois and a team of more than a dozen

  researchers, including sociologists Monroe Work, Richard R. Wright,

  and others of the most extraordinary young black minds of the new

  century, arrived at the Calhoun School. Founded in 1892 by a

  wealthy white northern socialite, the institution operated largely on

  the industrial education principles of Booker T. Washington. But

  the Calhoun School was distinct in one regard among the many

  institutions for blacks established near the end of the nineteenth

  century— often naively and il -fated—by wealthy benefactors.

  Going beyond training black children in basic academics and

  advanced vocational skil s such as bricklaying and carpentry, the

  school's founder, a wel -bred Connecticut spinster named Charlot e

  Thorn, actual y moved to Lowndes County and eventual y

  promoted a land ownership experiment for blacks in the heart of

  what was likely the single most repressive white-power regime in

  the South. Over time, land companies established by the school

  purchased a total of more than four thousand acres of cot on land,

  encouraged local blacks to operate the farms on a quasi-communal

  basis, and ultimately resold smal er tracts of land to African

  Americans.2

  DuBois, whose di erences with Booker T Washington had not

  advanced to the complete rupture that eventual y pit ed the men

  advanced to the complete rupture that eventual y pit ed the men

  against each other as commit ed enemies, was at racted to the

  Calhoun School as a preserve in which idealistic and educated

  whites and blacks could interact freely. He also delighted in the

  e rontery the school presented to the white dominance that

  surrounded it.

  DuBois went to Lowndes County in hopes of capturing an

  unassailable, empirical y proven portrait of the penury and

  exploitation that African Americans there—and by extension most

  of the South—were forced to endure. With funding from the federal

  Bureau of Labor, the DuBois team fanned across the countryside

  carrying ten thousand copies of questionnaires containing a bat ery

  of piercing questions regarding land ownership, labor control,

  family life, education, sexual mores, morality, political activity, and

  other aspects of black life. By late fal in 1906, more than 21,000 of

  the county's black farmers had been interviewed through a cabin-to-

  cabin canvass, with researchers scrupulously recording the answers

  and compiling tables of the responses back at the school.

  Separately, two white investigators provided by the federal

  government conducted an even more discreet inquiry into the

  political operations and sexual morality of Lowndes County whites.

  To cross-reference the individual interviews, white researchers

  examined and analyzed prodigious volumes of Lowndes County

  mortgages, liens, arrests, incarcerations, and proceedings of local

  justices of the peace—al of the key instruments of government used

  by whites to contain and control blacks throughout the South.

  DuBois used the legal record and personal accounts to create

  detailed maps and tables of the county, showing between 1850 and

  1906 the evolution of economic, social, and political power and a

  chronological movement of land ownership among blacks and

  whites.3

  No social study on such a scale of research and ambition had ever

  been undertaken in the United States, certainly not one focused on

  black life and even more so never one at empted in the

  environment of overt physical danger that existed in Lowndes

  County.

  County.

  Local whites were already openly hostile toward the existence of

  the Calhoun School and its implicit chal enge to the neo-slavery

  that surrounded it. DuBois wrote later that researchers met "with the

  greeting of …shotguns in certain parts of the county"4 5 He told U.S.

  commissioner of labor Charles P. Neil that two investigators "were

  shot at and run out of one corner of the county. "

  Yet DuBois and others believed the enormity of the data and the

  impregnability of a federal y authorized analysis conducted under

  the most rigorous scienti c methodology presented an opportunity

  to smash the racial myopia and growing indi erence to conditions

  in the South of the majority of American whites. DuBois later cal ed

  the project his "best sociological work."6 7 By the end of 1906, the

  report had been completed, writ en by hand, and delivered to the

  Bureau of Labor for publication.

  The growing ubiquity for al African Americans of the dangers

  DuBois and his col eagues encountered in Lowndes County was

  underscored on September 22, 1906, when the team learned that a

  mob of as many as ten thousand whites was on the rampage in

  Atlanta. DuBois rushed aboard a train to return to his wife, Nina,

  and daughter, Yolande, who had remained in their quarters at South

  Hal on the campus of Atlanta University, where DuBois was a

  professor. He sat in vigil on the steps of the building with a

  shotgun. But white at ackers never arrived.

  By the time the riot ended, hundreds of African Americans, by

  virtual y al accounts, had been at acked on the streets of the city.

  Atlanta had never completely cooled since the performances of The

  Clansman ten months earlier. Tensions—driven by rumors of black

  ambitions for political power and open race baiting by candidates

  running for governor—had mounted over the months.

  In the weeks just before the riot, the fal of 1906, Atlanta was

  whipped into a fury by weeks of exaggerated and fabricated

  accounts published in the Atlanta Constitution and other local

  newspapers of blacks al egedly raping and insulting white women.

  A second visit to Atlanta by the touring Clansman production was

  A second visit to Atlanta by the touring Clansman production was

  being arranged—this time featuring in the cast two cousins of

  Je erson Davis, the late president of the Confederacy. Two days

  after the production began its new tour on September 20, with

  packed performances in Charleston, South Carolina, a crowd of

  whites—delirious with racial animosity—gathered in downtown

  Atlanta.

  Heeding an anonymous public cal to revive a new Ku Klux Klan, />
  a group of men gathered to discuss how to respond to the al eged

  series of sexual assaults against white women. Almost none of the

  al eged at acks were ever proven. But by late afternoon, the city's

  competitive newspapers were rol ing o extra editions to report

  even newer dubious claims of black men at acking young women.

  Just before midnight, the crowd began marauding indiscriminately

  through the city. For ve days, vigilantes, police o cers, and

  soldiers grabbed and beat African Americans, seizing them o

  sidewalks and streetcars. They broke into businesses where blacks

  were employed and crashed into homes in African American

  neighborhoods, spil ing blood everywhere they went. In some areas,

  blacks stood their ground, ghting back with guns and sts—

  spurring even more anger and a rationale for police and militia to

  join on the side of white rioters. In the end, the mobs were believed

  to have kil ed at least two dozen African Americans. Fewer than a

  half dozen whites died.8

  Three weeks after the riot in September 1906, a former U.S.

  congressman from Georgia, Wil iam H. Fleming, raised a rare voice

  against rising racial animosity. "How many causes have recently

  been cooperating in that line from the theater, the press and the

  stump to familiarize us with the disrespect for law and to arouse

  hate and contempt by the whites against the blacks?" Representative

  Fleming asked. "Chief among o enders stands a former preacher,

  Rev. Thomas Dixon, with his Clansman."9

  In Washington, federal o cials who previously had shown such

  assiduous interest in the research by DuBois—and the possibility it

  would document the widespread slavery of the South—suddenly

  would document the widespread slavery of the South—suddenly

  faltered. Tabulations that had appeared acceptable months earlier

  now looked questionable to Commissioner Neil . He signaled that

  publication of the report would no longer be immediate. Nearly a

  year after completion, it remained under review, when a new

  commissioner replaced Neil . After reading the report, W W.

  Hangar, the new head of the agency, wrote taciturnly to DuBois: "It

  would be extremely unwise to make any use whatsoever of the

  material which was gathered."10 A year later, after months of

  pushing for publication of his research, or at the very least that the

  document be returned, DuBois was informed that the study's

  conclusions "touched on political mat ers." It could not be sent to

  him because "it had been destroyed."11

  Nothing of what might have been a seminal study of black life

  survived—with one exception. Three years later, DuBois penned his

  rst novel—The Quest for the Silver Fleece—a richly descriptive

  portrayal of African Americans struggling against the strictures

  tightening against them in the North and South. The heart of the

  novel was a narrative drawn from what DuBois and his researchers

  had witnessed during their dangerous summer in Lowndes County.

  Substituting new names for the Calhoun School, the McCurdys, and

  other great white landholding families, DuBois rendered the social

  order of what he cal ed Tooms County in sharp, but unexaggerated,

  relief. The baronic family whose patriarch, Colonel Cress-wel , had

  been the county's largest slaveholder before emancipation stil

  control ed in the twentieth century fty thousand acres of prime

  cot on land and uncounted black families who lived upon it in the

  novel's account.

  In the portrait etched by DuBois, Colonel Cresswel lived in a

  sprawling mansion far from town, surrounded by endless numbers

  of broken cabins inhabited by terri ed and uneducated "tenants."

  Cresswel was intent on crushing any semblance of movement

  toward economic or political independence among those blacks.

  "Cheap cot on depends on cheap niggers," he exclaimed. No manner

  of shared interests between blacks and whites could ever be

  contemplated. "We've got whips, chain-gangs, and—mobs if need

  contemplated. "We've got whips, chain-gangs, and—mobs if need

  be…. It's the Negro …we've got to beat to his knees."

  In the county described by DuBois, black sharecroppers lived or

  died on the whim of the white men stil cal ed "master" by most.

  They begged the white men for their broken-down log cabins, for

  food and cloth to make clothes. Maturing black girls complied with

  their initiation into sexual activity when Colonel Cresswel 's son

  demanded it, because "he was our master."

  The Cresswel s and other whites "bought" and sold sharecroppers

  at wil —substituting the sale of their al eged debts for rent and

  supplies as a proxy for the sale of humans themselves. Able black

  men and their families routinely "sold" for $250 in this Lowndes

  County. Black families who resisted their sale to other whites were

  subject to brutal violence and the con scation or burning of their

  homes and possessions. Once under a labor contract to any white

  man, blacks knew they would almost certainly never be free of it.

  Disputes over the value of the cot on they raised were set led by

  local o cials control ed by the white farmers. Any man who fought

  back against overseers beating workers in the eld risked gruesome

  punishments and sale into the convict leasing system.

  Robbed of her crop, DuBois's central character, Zora, knows she

  has no recourse: "What should she do? She never thought of appeal

  to courts, for Colonel Cresswel was Justice of the Peace and his son

  was baili . Why had they stolen from her? She knew. She was now

  penniless, and in a sense helpless. She was now a peon bound to a

  master's bidding." She knew that signing a contract to work for the

  Cresswel s "would mean slavery, jail, or hounded running away."

  While hunger and the physical abuse of overseers haunted every

  day, it was jail, the chain gang, or any other contact with the

  judicial system that loomed as the greatest constant jeopardies to

  blacks. Starved and manacled squads of black men prowled the

  town square and the roads between plantations, hustled along by

  gun- and whip-toting guards—a scene hardly changed from the

  traveling slave salesmen of a half century earlier. At the slightest

  provocation, Cresswel threatened this ignominious horror to any

  uncooperative or insolent blacks. The result of any accusation by a

  uncooperative or insolent blacks. The result of any accusation by a

  white man would, almost without exception, be court-sanctioned

  ownership. Once hauled before a judge, any African American

  could be purchased by Colonel Cresswel or another white. One

  passage of DuBois's novel described the routine courthouse scene:

  "What's this nigger charged with?" demanded the Judge when the rst

  black boy was brought up before him.

  "Breaking his labor contract."

  "Any witnesses?"

  "I have the contract here," announced the sheriff. "He refuses to work."

  "A year, or one hundred dollars."

  Colonel Cresswell paid his fine, and took him in charge.12

  In October 1905,
the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Judge

  Speer's order against Georgia's county convict leasing system,13

  nding that the federal courts had no jurisdiction to dismantle the

  system of obtaining and sel ing prisoners so vividly described by

  DuBois. In January 1906, Warren Reese gave up the modest o ce

  in the Montgomery federal building from which he had waged his

  quixotic war on slavery. The White House named a new district

  at orney for central Alabama.

  Three months later, in April 1906, John W. Pace was pardoned

  for his crimes by President Roosevelt.14 The fol owing year, Fletcher

  Turner was elected to represent Tal apoosa County in the Alabama

  House of Representatives.

  XI

  NEW SOUTH RISING

  "This great corporation."

  For three years, Americans had received periodic reports on the

  slavery of Tal apoosa County. The county, with its exotic

  Choctaw Indian name meaning "pulverized rock," and the image

  of John Pace, a brutish farmer from the backcountry became the

  only enduring symbol of the peonage cases—even as hundreds and

  then thousands of other incidents emerged in parts of Alabama,

  Georgia, Florida, Mississippi, and Louisiana. Darkness was crowding

  black life in America in an ever more sinister way.

  Lost in the Alabama peonage inquiry was how the case began—

  with the report to Judge Jones of a miscarriage of justice in the

  adjacent Shelby County. Whatever misdeeds had occurred there—

  especial y the fact that Fletcher Turner's family operated a slave-

  driven quarry within the county— had been almost entirely

  forgot en. The town of Columbiana—a provincial county seat

  urgently hoping to embody the incipient gleam of the new century

  —escaped excoriation. One town nearer to Birmingham than

  Dadevil e, bustling with prosperity, new residents, and a vague

  sense of Rooseveltian modernity, Columbiana was swel ing with

  new wealth. Old one-man, one-mule mines of the nineteenth

  century—lit le more than crude horizontal pits dug into hil sides

  outside the town—were fast disappearing, replaced by giant brick

  edi ces of factories like the Siluria Cot on Mil , where white men

  and women could earn wages in regular hourly increments. They

  worked de ned shifts, rather than the meteorological clock of

  sunup to sundown that had governed farm life since the days of the

 

‹ Prev