Tuesday the Rabbi Saw Red

Home > Other > Tuesday the Rabbi Saw Red > Page 15
Tuesday the Rabbi Saw Red Page 15

by Harry Kemelman


  “I don’t know,” said Ames soberly. He shifted unhappily in his seat, then decided to make one last try. “Let’s just say, as a kind of exercise in logic, that Dr. Lagrange is absolutely on target.”

  “All right, then I’ll tell you what follows,” said Rogers. “Lagrange says death occurred sometime between two-ten and two-forty? Let’s call it half-past two. Now that means that Hendryx didn’t go back to his apartment, but stayed there in his office. And that means that he was dead even before the committee came in to see the dean. And that means that someone had to come into his office, go around behind his desk, reach up somehow to where that statue is resting on the top shelf, and pull it down. Who can reach that top shelf? That’s an old building there, with eleven-or twelve-foot ceilings. Our mysterious assailant would have to hop up on one of the lower shelves, maybe hang on with one hand while he grabbed at the statue with the other. And all the while Hendryx just sits there? He doesn’t ask what the guy is doing?”

  “What if he were asleep? What if he dozed off?”

  “Then how did the person get into the office?” challenged Rogers. “It’s locked.”

  “The door could have been open. I mean, the latch might not have caught when the rabbi left.”

  “Possibly, but just barely.”

  “And if the murderer had a long stick with a curved handle, like a cane, for example,” said Ames, “then he could just hook the statue and pull it down.”

  “Sure, Brad. And then?”

  “And then what?”

  “And then how do you figure the pipe and the hassock and the open book in Hendryx’s apartment?”

  “Well, it’s possible that the cleaning woman fibbed about that,” said Ames. “Naturally, she’d want to get out as early as she could. And if she thought Hendryx wasn’t likely to come back and check on her, she might have skimped and not done a thorough job.”

  “Then why didn’t she say so?”

  “Well, all I know is that if it was my cleaning woman she wouldn’t want to say. They have a kind of professional pride.”

  “So question her again,” said Rogers good-naturedly. “If you can make her change her story, I’ll reconsider Lagrange’s finding on the time of death.”

  CHAPTER

  TWENTY-NINE

  At class reunions and other nostalgic get-togethers, the name of Bradford Ames always was good for intensive discussion.

  “You saw Brad Ames? What’s he doing now? Still assistant district attorney? It just goes to show how money can mess up a man’s career.” Karl Fisher, like the three friends he was lunching with at his club, was in his early fifties. They were all prosperous.

  “How do you mean?”

  “Well, the rest of us, when we got out of law school we were all running around looking for a job,” said Fisher. “And you know how many law firms were hiring and what they were paying in those days! So you opened an office of your own with the loan of a couple of hundred bucks from your father or your wife’s father for some secondhand furniture and a Corpus Juris Cyc.”

  “When I got out,” said Gordon Atwell, “I shared an office with six other guys, and let me tell you, we had to scratch between the seven of us to pay the one secretary her wages every week. And believe me, there was no chance of her getting rich on what we paid her.”

  “Right,” said Fisher. “But we persisted, and gradually things got a little better, and after a while, lo and behold! we were making a living. And then it got to be a good living. And by the time we were in our forties, some of us had big practices, and some of us had become judges, and some had gone into politics and were in the legislature, and some got to be chief counsels for large corporations. I mean, most of us made good. Some of us awfully good.

  “But that’s because we all had to scratch. But when you’re an Ames, and money doesn’t mean anything, you don’t think the same way. And your family doesn’t think the same way, so you’re not subject to the same kind of pressure we were. We had to go where the dough was. And we had to get cracking right away. Now I was interested in criminal law, but luckily I decided that I couldn’t afford to practice it, or else I might’ve found myself working for the mob like Bob Schenk or more likely defending two-bit criminals whose widowed mothers had to mortgage the old homestead to pay my retainer. So I’ve been practicing real estate law, and as you guys know we’ve got a pretty sizeable outfit and I’m doing all right.

  “Now Brad Ames was interested in criminal law, too. But for him it was no problem. His family got him a job as assistant district attorney for the county, and he’s been there ever since. He not only practices criminal law, but he doesn’t have to worry about bleeding some poor bastard’s life savings for his fee, or worry that maybe the money he’s paying him with is the money he stole, which is why he needs a lawyer in the first place.

  “Of course, the salary of assistant district attorney isn’t anything much. None of us could live on it, at least not the way we’re accustomed to live. But to Brad Ames, it’s just cigarette money anyway. He has no wife and there’s no pressure from his family to keep scratching.”

  “Maybe,” said Gordon Atwell, who looked younger than the others, “and then again, maybe there’s a more personal reason.”

  “What do you mean by that?” asked Fisher.

  “Well, you know the way Ames looks—that round head on the fat torso and the way he grins and chuckles all the time like some idiot—”

  “Some idiot!” Andrew Howard laughed. He had a general practice and was the only one who engaged in criminal law. “You forgotten he made Law Review?”

  “I didn’t say he was an idiot; I said he looked like an idiot. What I mean is he doesn’t make the sort of impression that’s apt to inspire confidence in a client.” Atwell looked to Fisher for support.

  “Don’t let any of that fool you,” said Howard. “Maybe it’s a kind of nervousness, but let me tell you, he can turn it off when he wants to. And when he does, watch out! I appeared against him once on a rape case. My client was a clean-cut young fellow, very cool and very much at ease. I had to put him on the stand, but I figured it would be all right, that he’d be able to handle himself. He told his story well, and I could see he was making a good impression on the jury. Then Brad Ames started to cross-examine. He asked his questions, and they were good-natured. You know what I mean? No pressure. And that manner of his. He looked like a grinning buddha. And always with that little giggle as though it was some kind of joke. Pretty soon my client was relaxed and grinning, too. It was a regular tea party between them. Every once in a while Ames would slip in a question that wasn’t according to Hoyle and my client would answer before I could object. The judge, Judge Lukens it was, would order it stricken, but the jury had already heard it. It went on like that for almost an hour, all nice and friendly. And then suddenly, Brad’s face tightens up and suddenly—goodbye, buddha. He holds up the girl’s dress so the jury could see how it was ripped. ‘And is this the way she took off her dress?’ he asks. My client began to stutter and stammer, and right then and there I knew he was a goner.”

  “Oh, I don’t deny he’s good,” said Fisher. “But it’s still no sort of career—assistant district attorney. If he really had any drive, he would have got out of the D.A.’s office after a few years and used it as a stepping stone to private practice in criminal law, like Clyde Bell, or Amos Mahew.”

  “I don’t agree,” said Sam Curley, who had been silent until now. “I’ve had dealings with Brad off and on over the years. Our firm doesn’t handle criminal business as such, but every now and then one of our clients, or some relative of a client, gets into trouble and they expect us to act for them. If it’s anything serious, of course we’d farm it out to a Clyde Bell or somebody like that. But a lot of times, we’ll handle it ourselves. About two or three years ago, I had a case and Brad was acting for the Commonwealth. It was during the summer and when I called Brad about it, he invited me to come down to their family place in Barnard’s Crossing
for the weekend. They got quite a place on the Point and the weather was nice and we did a bit of sailing. Well, Sunday his older brother Stuart came down for dinner—”

  “The judge?”

  “That’s right. Well, after dinner, we were sitting on this great big verandah they have, overlooking the water, with this telescope mounted near the railing so you can look at any boat in the harbor and see who’s aboard, and a pitcher of Tom Collins right there on the table. It was nice. And we were just talking the way you do after a good dinner, and the judge says, half-joking, something to the effect when was Brad going to realize his potential and perform the duties that were expected of him. And do you know what he meant? He meant that it was Brad’s duty as an Ames to serve society and the country, to his fullest capacity.

  “Now, ordinary people don’t talk that way because—well, because they don’t think that way. I mean, normal people might say when are you going to realize your potential and be a big shot? If you’re so smart, why aren’t you rich? That kind of thing. But Stuart Ames wasn’t thinking of that He was thinking that his brother had a duty to society that he wasn’t fulfilling. He actually thought that way. And the funny thing was that Brad felt the same way, too. So he started to tell about his job, half-kidding at first like his brother, but really in dead earnest just the way his brother was. I’ll never forget it to this day. He said, ‘District attorneys come and go. The better they are, the quicker they go, too, because it’s just a stepping stone for them to the next office. But assistant D.A.’s they stay on. Now somebody’s got to train those D.A.’s, and I guess a lot of it falls to me, mostly because I’ve been around so long.’”

  “I hadn’t thought of that, but I can see how it could be true,” said Andrew Howard.

  “Then he went on to point out that it was the assistants in the D.A.’s office that run the whole shebang. They decide who is going to stand trial and who is going to get a second chance. Not the judge, mind you, not the defense counsel, and not even the D.A., but the assistant D.A. He’s the one who decides to prosecute or not. He’s the one who makes the deals. Well, you know, he made out a good case. I know I was convinced and I’m pretty sure his brother was. And it gave me a new slant on him. I’ve been thinking all along, like you, that he was doing it as a kind of hobby: that he liked criminal law and since he could afford to practice it at this level, he was indulging himself. But by the end of that afternoon, I saw him as a kind of top sergeant who does all the work and makes all the decisions, but let the lieutenant or the captain give the actual order and get the credit. What keeps the whole legal apparatus of the city running is not the judges and the defense counsel or even the cops, but the lowly assistant D.A.”

  Bradford Ames unhappily stared after the departing district attorney and tried to decide what to do. In his own mind, Rogers had already tried the four students and found them guilty—of what? Of being radicals, of using bad language, of following a life-style he did not approve of, and for all those reasons he was determined to keep them in jail as long as he could, all the weeks and months to the day of the trial. It was those four daughters of his that were warping his judgment, Ames decided, and thanked God that he was a bachelor.

  Of course, once the case reached trial, the medical examiner’s report would have to come out and there would be a directed acquittal on the murder charge, however it would go with them on the arson charge. But in the meantime, the students would have remained in jail all that time. There was also the danger of a judicial backlash; if the case came up before a prima donna like Judge Harris, for example, he would have plenty to say about the suppression of evidence by the district attorney. He wondered at his chiefs blindness to the political implications and then remembered wryly that he probably was aware of them and assumed his constituency would not mind in the least if he stretched the law a bit to keep these young radicals out of circulation.

  Normally, a hint to the defense attorney would take care of the matter, but each of the four defendants was being represented by a different attorney, all of whom were strangers to Ames. The O’Brien boy had retained a young lawyer who had just passed the bar exam; Allworth had someone furnished by one of the radical black organizations; and the girl, Judy Ballantine, whose father was well off, was being represented by a firm of New York lawyers. Only Paul Goodman, the attorney for the Selzer boy, seemed a possibility, but even he was an unknown quantity since he practiced largely in Essex County, not Suffolk. Still, Ames thought he might get a line on him, and if he measured up, risk it.

  From his years of summering in Barnard’s Crossing, Ames had got to know its chief of police. He called him at home that evening. “Hugh Lanigan? This is Bradford Ames.”

  “Oh yes, Mr. Ames. How are you?”

  “Look, do you know a lawyer in your town, name of Paul Goodman?”

  “Yes, I know Mr. Goodman.”

  “He’s acting for Abner Selzer. That’s the boy who—”

  “Yes, I know, sir.”

  Ames sensed the caution at the other end of the line and hastened to reassure Lanigan. “I’m not planning any skullduggery. At least not against him or his client. In fact I’m trying to help him out a little, but it’s pretty confidential and I’d like to know the sort of man Goodman is.”

  “Well,” Lanigan began doubtfully, “I don’t know that I can tell you much. He’s the lawyer for the temple here, and he’s appeared before the board of selectmen a couple of times on zoning matters, usually. I guess he’s well enough thought of.”

  “What kind of man is he?” Ames began to suspect he may have made a mistake in approaching Hugh Lanigan. “Is he accessible? A reasonable man? You know what I mean?”

  “Look,” said Lanigan, “I got an idea. Why don’t you call the rabbi of the temple here, Rabbi Small. Now he’s a good man, and bright. Ask him about Mr. Goodman. This Goodman is a sort of vestryman of the temple, one of their board of directors, so the rabbi would know all about him.”

  The rabbi? Of course! He could tell the rabbi and thus transmit the information to Goodman at one remove. And if the rabbi was adroit, Ames’ name need never come into the picture.

  He thanked the police chief, hung up, and immediately called Rabbi Small. He identified himself and explained that he wanted to discuss the case with him.

  “Certainly,” said the rabbi. “I have a class tomorrow from nine to ten. I could come to your office any time after that.”

  Ames hesitated. He felt a certain reluctance in having the rabbi seek him out when it was he who was going to ask a favor. So he said, “Why don’t I meet you outside your classroom at ten, Rabbi?”

  CHAPTER

  THIRTY

  The bell rang, and the rabbi dismissed his class. He gathered up his books and papers and left the room. In the corridor, just outside the door, a plump middle-aged man was standing.

  “Bradford Ames, Rabbi. I hope I’m not putting you to any inconvenience.”

  “Not at all. My office is just down the hall.”

  As the rabbi inserted his key, Ames asked, “The office is kept locked all the time?”

  “All offices. This one has a door-closer which shuts it automatically.”

  Ames looked about him curiously. “And that’s the desk where Hendryx was sitting?”

  “That’s right.”

  “And the bust?”

  “Was on the top shelf just above.”

  They sat down, the rabbi in the swivel chair, Ames across the desk, silent as his eyes roamed around the room. As he continued to maintain his silence, David Small asked politely, “Do you have any other questions?”

  Ames chuckled. “I didn’t really come here to question you, Rabbi. I suppose that’s what I implied over the phone, but it’s more that I want to tell you something.”

  “All right.”

  “I’m sure you know the nature of the charges against the four students?”

  The rabbi nodded. “I think so. Arson and felony murder?”

  “That’
s right. Setting off a bomb is arson, which is a felony. It’s our assumption that the explosion caused the statue to fall on Professor Hendryx and kill him. That makes it a felony murder which is first degree murder.”

  “I understand.”

  “And since in this state there’s no bail for first degree murder, we’ve got the students sitting in jail waiting for arraignment before the grand jury. If they find a true bill, they’ll remain in jail until they go to trial.”

  “Yes, I know that.”

  “What do you think of it?” Ames asked unexpectedly.

  It caught the rabbi by surprise. “I don’t understand. Does it make any difference what I think?”

  “No, I suppose not, but I’d like to know anyway.”

  The rabbi smiled. “It’s not really much of a coincidence, but only yesterday I was doing some research in the Talmud for a sermon and I came across a passage which bore on a somewhat similar problem.”

  “Talmud? Oh, that’s one of your religious books, I believe.”

  “It’s actually our book of law. And the passage was not concerned with murder, but with the law of bailment and the responsibility of the bailee.”

  “You mean this Talmud deals with civil law?”

  “Oh yes,” said the rabbi. “And criminal law, and religious law—all the laws by which we were governed. We don’t separate them in our religion. Well, this case involved a loss by accidental damage and there was evidence of negligence on the part of the bailee. The question concerned his liability. One rabbi held, as a general governing principle, that if negligence in the beginning results in damage in the end, even by accident, then the bailee is liable.”

  “Well, that’s the point of view we take.”

  “But another rabbi held that the basic principle should be different. Even though the beginning may be negligence, if the damage results by accident he is not liable.”

  “And how was the case finally decided?” asked Ames, interested in spite of himself.

 

‹ Prev