This overcapitalization created a frenzy of too many boats with larger capacities racing for the same limit of crab. Captains were stacking more weight on their decks than the boats were designed to carry; stability suffered, and boats and lives were lost. Accidents began to alarm officials at the Alaska Fish & Game. Boat captains determined the numbers and sizes of the pots they carried on deck. Pots, of course, are a blessing and a curse. For the deckhands and boat owners, they trap the crabs that fill our pockets with cash. But they can also kill us. Pots like the ones we carry on Time Bandit can slam against the deck with 30,000 foot-pounds of energy; we do not wear steel-toed safety shoes because the force of a falling pot is greater than the steel plate in the shoes can withstand, and the plate would cut flesh and bone like a scalpel.
On the deck, the pots swing at the end of the crane hook above the deckhands’ heads. The greater the greed, the faster the pace. The rhythm of the crew working together cannot be accelerated beyond the speed of the slowest man or the most complicated task without creating further risks. The pots can slide like runaway trains along wooden deck boards slick with ice and crab slime. In icy conditions, a loose pot can take down a crewman without warning or crush him against the rail or the wave wall or any number of steel surfaces near the deck. They can smash fingers and snap limbs in an instant of inattention and, when attached to three buoys at the end of 33-fathom “shots” of three-quarter-inch line, they possess the terrifying potential of dragging a crewman overboard down into the depths of the Bering Sea.
The enormous collective weight of the pots when stacked on the deck raises a boat’s center of gravity and thereby creates a continuing threat to the entire boat. Too much weight destabilized and sank boats during the Derby with an alarming regularity. Adding a further and even more unpredictable element of instability, in the Bering Sea ice forms in thick sheets on deck and the pots. This factor makes the difference, often, between safety and disaster. The ice can build up with alarming speed. The initial weight of ice a foot thick on the decks causes a boat like Time Bandit to push bluntly into the bow waves, and this in turn throws cascades of salt water and spray on the deck and forepeak. This spray sometimes turns to ice in the air, falling to deck in frozen drops with the rattle of marbles in a tin can. Soon, the boat turns sluggish at the wheel and refuses even to respond. With the ice weight now added to the pot weight and with the boat sluggish, one wave can capsize the boat.
When a boat is “making ice,” the crew must be prepared to hit the deck, literally, with sledgehammers, baseball bats, axes, and lengths of pipe to break up. The work is slow and hard. Frostbitten ears and hands are not uncommon. The ice is pitched overboard or shoved out a scuttle. Breaking ice is a race against time. Sometimes, keeping even with the new ice is all that a crew can do. The crew knows the importance of getting ice off the boat, and few seriously complain when I tell them to get at it.
Another hazard peculiar to crabbing boats, the crab tanks can detract immeasurably from the boats’ stability. These tanks are filled with water to keep the crabs alive until they are delivered to the processors. Pumps must continually replenish the seawater in the tanks, and if for some reason the pumps fail, the water in the tanks may slosh from one side to another and destabilize the boat. That may have happened to Cache Seel and his ninety-two-foot crabber Big Valley in January 2005, while surrounded by other crab boats seventy miles off the Pribilof Island of St. Paul’s.
The Big Valley was caught in the trough between waves twelve to fifteen feet high when without warning a twenty-eight-foot rogue wave turned the boat on its side 60 to 70 degrees. In his bunk, Seel was flipped nearly vertical; the engines quit and the generators shut down. In the pitch dark he struggled into his survival suit and went to aid another crewman crying for help. On deck another crewman deployed a life raft, which howling winds blew away. The deck tipped 90 degrees within two minutes and threw two crewmen into the icy waters with their survival suits in their hands. The boat gradually rolled and settled about two-thirds upside down. The rolling chocks, fins that run along either side of a keel from the stern forward and are normally underwater, were exposed to the air. Now a cascade of events pointed in a single direction. The other four crewmen walked along the hull as the boat rolled. Seel ended up near the stern in the water. Enough of the boat was still afloat for him to cling to a protruding fixture on the hull. But as the boat settled down farther in the water, waves broke over the hull. Seel could not see his crewmates in the dark but he could hear them yelling that the EPIRB emergency beacon had floated free. For the next hour and a half, he held on, as higher waves washed over the upturned hull. The boat sank deeper into the water, and Seel finally had to let go. For the next twenty minutes, he swam free of the boat until he saw a white strobe light beaming from a raft. After thirty minutes more swimming, he climbed into the raft to safety, vomited seawater, and waited for the Coast Guard to hoist him into a helicopter two hours later.
Inspectors later determined, based on speculation and Seel’s recollection of events, that “free surface,” which describes slack water in the boat’s compartments, was either full of water or completely empty. A pump had failed in the crab hold and the water was slack; a cutlass bearing broke and water flooded the engine room; or water poured through doors that were not secured in the rear lazarette. Water sloshed around inside the boat, and the weight moved to one side as the boat rocked with the actions of the waves in the trough. At some point the side-to-side motion grew extreme. The boat could not recover from a roll, and went over.
That was the end of Big Valley, but the sea was the killer only as an instrument of man’s stupidity. Usually this is the case, although no one wants to talk about stupidity leading to the deaths of crewmen. We are aware of the dangers we face, and we are not afraid. Most of the time, we work without a thought of drowning or freezing to death. We fishermen are not especially brave but we have a healthy capacity to deceive ourselves. Consider our rates of survival against other dangerous jobs. In 2006 the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics ranked commercial fishing in general as the work with the highest fatality rate in America with 141.7 fatalities per 100,000, almost thirty times that of an average industrial worker. And the Bureau lists Alaskan waters and in particular the Bering Sea, which has claimed 2,066 lives since records were first kept, as far more dangerous still.
But you are never the one who is going to die, until the night you wake up and men are screaming and the engine room is half full of water, and suddenly you are in the water, alarms going off, and you are in shock. You tell yourself, “I don’t believe this is happening to me.” Five minutes later, you are crab food. You cannot allow yourself ever to think you are going to be the one who dies. That is what, I suppose, keeps us sane. It is also what molds our character. A slip, a careless instant, a spasm of hand movements of the crane operator on his controls and someone on deck can die. The sea rocks and heaves the deck under our boots. Standing upright without holding on takes constant effort, and when a crewman is sorting crabs or working with buoy lines—indeed, any of the tasks on the deck—his life is at risk. Waves of water crash over the bow. The boat rolls, starboard to port, often with a heave from the stern, corkscrewing crewmen off balance and toward the rails. At any instant, a twisted ankle, an unexpected rogue wave, a slip on fish guts, a crab scuttling over the deck, or plates of ice, and a crewman can go to his death. It can happen fast. No wonder we do not grow up. If we did, we would have no choice but to quit crabbing.
We think of ourselves as neither crazy nor foolish. Other people can think that, but it is a luxury we do not acknowledge. We are men working at our chosen profession. Every fisherman knows what kills. We understand that if we enter the water unprotected, we are probably as good as dead. A crewman will be irretrievably wounded by hypothermia in four or five minutes if he is not wearing a survival suit when he enters the Bering Sea. His extremities will quickly go numb as his body struggles to protect its central core, and he will die when his
heart reaches 86 degrees Fahrenheit. We are not afraid of the sea; we are terrified of the water.
In our world of denial, we turn away from certain risks as part of the cost of crabbing. But denial is more complicated than that. Some fishermen invite their own destruction. Captain Ahab lives on the Bering Sea! Men bring about their own peril through greed, complacency, and desperation. The same stupid motives apply whether men are racing NASCAR or picking stocks and bonds. A person who is desperate for money will act stupid. Any crabber who says he has never known desperation is flat-out lying. Anything I ever did in desperation turned out wrong, like it did with the Perfect Storm guys, whom no one forced into that storm. They had lost refrigeration and chose to run for the money. And only when they were in peril did they realize that all the money in the world was not worth dying for. I should not criticize them for what they did. The stresses at sea can make fools of men. Out on the Bering, the crew on deck is looking up at me making decisions in the wheelhouse, and I see the faces of their wives and kids looking back at me too. I have to make them money, and I must bring them home alive. I may worry about drowning, dying in a ship’s fire, or from a falling pot, and making it back to port, for whatever good worrying will do, but I have to make money for my crew. On the sea, my back is to the wall. One bad season, I can borrow to make ends meet; after two bad seasons in a row, I am close to going under. Three bad, and I go directly to jail without passing go; I am back twenty years working the deck where I started. Either way, I have lost my dream. And that thought alone can lead to disaster.
At last, Alaska Fish & Game determined that something had to make crabbing safer, and in the process, they decided to give the crab fishery a new structure to sustain its health over the long term. They called their plan “rationalization.” It was not an entirely new concept, but it had never been applied to crabbing. My brother and I hate the new system as it is unfair and stacked in favor of the Alaskan natives and the giant processors. Begrudgingly, we will say that Alaska manages its fisheries fairly well. Each year, the North Pacific Council Management, which includes Alaska Fish & Game and the National Fisheries Service, accesses the crab stocks in the Bering Sea—how many are out there, how many are males, females, and juveniles. Crabs, the state reminds us fishermen correctly, are a shared resource that does not belong to us. Crabs belong to the 700,000-plus people of Alaska. The state, in setting up the new regulations for crab, assigned each boat an IFQ based on each boat’s average catch over the previous five years; the owner then was allowed either to lease his quota to another fisherman for half the profit or fish for the quota himself for full profit over an extended time.
The state arrived at each IFQ, expressed in a percentage of the total catch limit, by removing the best and worst year’s catch of each individual boat between 1998 and 2002, and averaging what remained. The state eliminated from IFQs the fishery boats with averages below a set minimum. In other words, boats had to be real crabbers and not part of the mob that went to the Derby now and then. Time Bandit received an initial IFQ of 90,000 pounds of king crab and an original IFQ of 225,000 pounds of opilio crab, less 50,000 pounds that we lease out each year.
In 2005, the first year of rationalization, we decided to sit back and just fish our own quota. We should have leased other crabbers’ quota, too. In the 2006–2007 crab season we acquired extra quota, but only so much was available. Ten percent of our catch goes automatically to the native Alaskans. If we lease quotas, we have to give 50 percent of what we catch for opilio and about 70 percent for king to the lease owners. With the new system of IFQs, we fishermen are risking our lives catching crabs for one half or one third of what it is really worth.
We need a sixth crewman—an accountant.
After rationalization, pressures on us remained, of course, in spite of the relative sanity created by the new system. Diesel fuel costs (from $1.50 per gallon in 2005 to $3.10 in 2007) created one constant pressure. With fuel costs rising, fishermen do not dawdle on the Bering. The competition still spurs the fishermen to desperate lengths, as before. Fish & Game is not quite willing to accept responsibility for accidents at sea, which remain as high as ever. Anyone can read anything in statistics, and safety looks good on paper, but from where I sit in the wheelhouse of Time Bandit, safety will always be a mixed bag. What can ever prevent pitfalls on the deck floor, the pots, the launcher, the picking hook that swings through the air, the heaving deck, the open hatches to the holds where a crewman easily can crack an ankle bone or break a leg with a single off-balance misstep or fall through the hatch twenty feet to the bottom of the fish hold? Or what safety measure will ever stop a heavy steel deck door from slamming shut on a leg with the shift of the boat in a heavy sea? Last year the deck door slammed on a crewman’s lower leg. He came up to me later and said, “I thought it was cool that my leg was still attached when I looked at it; it felt like scissors cutting it in two.”
Comparatively, crabbing has grown into a less deadly job on a still-violent and still-injurious sea. We are guaranteed to catch crabs. We know where to find them, year after year, with the use of plotters and knowledge of their migratory habits. We catch 225,000 pounds of opilio without fail under rationalization. We try not to catch a single pound more. We never catch less. And while we are given the time, we rarely take the time to soak the pots and rest the crew. Time is money. I might feel comfortable telling fishermen in port where to find crabs, whereas my lips were sealed before. That removes an element of mystery from the process and, some say, it may not qualify as fishing anymore. It’s more like catching. I disagree. We are guaranteed money under rationalization, but nothing else. Will crab fishing become nothing more than a numbers game? Must the fleet become corporate in order to survive? Probably so.
No wonder what we fear from rationalization is the future.
Alaska does not enjoy the luxury of diverse industries, like Washington and Oregon, which also are home ports for Alaskan crabbing boats. Alaska has oil on the North Slope and fishing in the Bering Sea. The oil aside, the state consists of remote communities that depend on fishing for their livelihoods. Unemployed workers cannot simply drive across town for a job at Boeing or Microsoft, as they might be able to do in Seattle. Without fishing, they have few if any real alternatives. When the oil is depleted on the Slope, the state will have to rely on fishing for employment, which means jobs on land as well as on the sea.
When Fish & Game first considered the rationalization of crabbing, they looked to stabilize the fishery over the long term. The Derby had brought jobs to places like Dutch Harbor in the short run; rationalization, by reducing the catch and the fleet, reduced the number of jobs. Before rationalization, more than 357 boats with 1,500 fished for king and opilio crabs. Dutch Harbor swung from boom to bust by the month. Boat captains and processors flew workers in. When their work was done, they flew them out. Nobody stayed for long.
Now, under rationalization, 80 boats catch their crab quotas with the help of about 400 crewmen. Workers in the canneries can be assured that their work will be steady through most of the year. The catch is delivered on an orderly schedule. The big processors have turned dorms for their workers into living quarters for men and their families. Roads are paved on Unalaska for the first time. Schools are growing, and decent public facilities have sprung up. Dutch is no longer a camp with a couple of saloons. But where does any of that leave the fishermen?
We crabbers crab with good reason. We want to know why we cannot sell our total catch to any processor who offers us the highest price. That was how it used to be. Now, we can sell only ten percent of our catch on open market. We must deliver the rest to a contracted processor who tells us what he will pay us per pound. Selling 100 percent in an open market, isn’t that the American way?
As matters stand, we fishermen receive an average of $4.20 ($3.85 in 2006) for each red king crab we take to the processor. That may not seem like much given our efforts and the risks. But we have nothing to say about the price. The wor
ld market determines that. Russian and Norwegian boats harvest crabs in the Barents Sea at a rate that is flooding the markets and driving prices down. Consumers of crab care about what they spend, of course. Crab meat is an expensive delicacy. If a consumer can buy Russian king crab at Costco for $11 or $12 a pound, why should he pay more for Alaskan king crab, even if Alaskan crab is demonstrably better processed and prepared? With the Russians and Norwegians sweeping the Barents Sea clean, our share of Bering Sea’s crab is declining on the world market. Last year, the Alaskan fleet brought in 15.5 million pounds of king crab. That quota was down about 15 percent from the year before to guarantee the health of the crab stocks. By contrast, Russia crabbers owned up to catching 33 million pounds in the Barents Sea, but they cheat on statistics. Their real catch was probably double what they reported.
We whine about price, but as long as Alaska supplies only a small percentage of the rapidly increasing volume in markets like Japan and the United States, Alaskan fishermen and processors will have little to say about the market supply and virtually nothing to say about the price of its king crab.
The state is now encouraging us crabbers to join co-ops. Time Bandit is a member of one out of its own self-interest. If we catch more crabs than the limit our IFQs allow, instead of paying a fine, or worse, dumping the crabs back into the sea, other boats in our co-op that have not yet fished can account for our excess, which they can sell without catching. The state would like us to go even further with our co-ops by joining forces with the processors in true cooperation. We are not yet ready to take that step. It will never work; as we see it, cooperation would be like putting a fox in the henhouse.
Time Bandit Page 14
