Disquiet, Please!

Home > Other > Disquiet, Please! > Page 55
Disquiet, Please! Page 55

by David Remnick

“He’s crying from the circumcision,” I explained to the father on my left, significantly.

  He stared at me, and, with the hat and fringe, he looked at first very old and then, as my eye saw past the costume, very young. “He’s been circumcised already?” he said. I hadn’t known you were supposed to wait.

  Still, he grasped the gesture toward commonality. “What’s his name?”

  “Luke,” I said proudly. “Luke Auden.”

  He backed away from me, really backed away, like a Japanese extra in a Godzilla movie when the monster comes into view, looming up above the power pylons.

  I returned to the letter. It was a very nice, warm letter, from the director of the museum, explaining that the “event takes the form of a masked ball in celebration of the Purim holiday, with approximately seven hundred guests gathered for a black-tie dinner-dance at the Waldorf-Astoria.” The “highlight” was a “10–15 minute original Purimspiel–a humorous retelling of the story of Purim, Queen Esther’s rescue of the Jews in ancient Persia.” In a postscript, the director promised “to send some background information on the Biblical story of Purim.”

  Looking at the letter again, I began to realize that the Purimspieler barrel must have been thoroughly scraped before the museum people got to me, and also that, getting to me, they knew what they were getting. They had been able to deduce that, though Jewish, I was sufficiently ignorant about Jewishness to need “some background information on the Biblical story of Purim.” If they had been asking me to talk on life in France, I doubted that they would have thought to send me a map of Paris.

  “Daddy, did I tell you the new version?” Luke said, suddenly.

  “Which new version?”

  “Man goes into a restaurant, he says, ‘Waiter, waiter.’ ”

  “No,” I corrected him. “He should just say, ‘Waiter!’ It’s the guy who goes to see a doctor who says it twice: ‘Doctor, doctor!’ Just ‘Waiter!’ ” What a thing, to be a pedant of one-liners.

  “Oh. He says, ‘Waiter, what’s this fly doing in my soup?’ and the waiter, then the waiter says, ‘There was no room left in the potato salad.’ ”

  I laughed. “Of course I’m going to do it,” I said.

  “Is this going to be one of those things where you end up still skeptical but strangely exhilarated by the faith of your fathers?” Martha said. “Because if it is, I don’t want you to do it. It’s hard enough having you around morose all the time. It would be even worse if you were strangely exhilarated.”

  THE next morning, a Saturday, I took down the Book of Esther from the shelf—or, more precisely, I took down the old King James Bible, the only one I owned. It has all the words of Jesus picked out in red, as though highlighted by an earnest Galilean undergraduate. I was in charge of the kids, but I felt sure that I would have time to read. Luke was shut in the bedroom, watching Saturday-morning cartoons, struggling desperately to understand; I knew he would interrupt only occasionally, seeking clarification on some cartoon convention. Because of his time in Paris, he missed a lot of cartoon-watching, and now he is frantically trying to catch up. He gets a worried look on his face as he runs into the room and asks about what he has just seen: “Why when people go through walls in a cartoon do they leave holes exactly the same shape as them?” “Why when someone touches electricity in a cartoon do you see his whole skeleton? But only for a second?” The rules of an alternative universe, what there is to laugh at and what is just part of life, remain mysterious.

  Meanwhile, the baby, Olivia, was happily occupied at the window, dog-spotting. “Dog! Dog!” came the occasional shout. Breakfast and dinner, she will not stay in her high chair but insists on scanning the skies, or streets, like a scientist in a fifties sci-fi movie, searching for life forms she has identified as alien. She is endlessly excited, and wildly agitated whenever she spots one, which, given the density of dogs on Upper East Side streets, she does, predictably, twice a minute.

  “Good girl,” I said absently, and went back to my Bible. The story of Purim, I learned, takes place in Persia, and mostly in the court of King Ahasuerus. Ahasuerus, who reigned over a hundred and twenty-seven provinces from India to Ethiopia, has a wife, Vashti, who has a “banquet for the women” and then refuses to come when the King commands. The King overreacts, and his advisers tell him to divorce the queen and hold a beauty contest to choose a new one, which he does. He chooses a Jewish girl named Esther. Esther’s cousin, an ambitious fellow named Mordecai, then saves the King’s life by exposing a plot against him. But the King gets bored with Esther, and meanwhile his chief councillor, Haman, decides to start a pogrom against the Jews, for all the usual reasons: they are tight and clannish, and obey only themselves. He gets the King’s approval, and Mordecai, hearing of the plan, goes out in sackcloth and ashes to protest. He tells Esther that she ought to protest, too, and she says, “Well, what can I do?” “Do something,” he tells her. She gets dressed up in her best clothes and goes to the King, and the King, thinking she looks nifty, listens to her. He suddenly learns how Mordecai saved his life, and orders Haman to be hanged on the scaffold he had prepared for Mordecai. Then the Jews, about to be pogromed, massacre Haman’s followers, including all ten of Haman’s sons, who are hanged or, depending on the translation, impaled on stakes. Then everybody celebrates.

  I stopped reading. Send this up? I couldn’t even grasp it. I knew that the thing to get was Esther’s rescue of the Jews, but that seemed almost incidental to this general story of competitive massacre and counter-massacre and bride-shopping. The trouble, I realized, was not that I did not know how to read in the text but that I did not know, had never been taught, how to read past it. Like Luke with the electrified cat, I did not know what was significant and what was merely conventional—I did not know what were the impaling practices of ancient Near East culture, and what was, so to speak, the specifically Jewish point. Although all our official, school training in reading is in reading in—in reading deeply, penetrating the superficial and the apparent to get to the obscure and hidden—in truth a lot of the skill in reading classics lies in reading past them. The obsession with genetic legitimacy and virginity in Shakespeare; the acceptance of torture in Dante—these are not subjects to be absorbed but things you glide by on your way to the poetry. You have to feel confident saying, “Oh, that’s just then”—with the crucial parallel understanding that now will be then, too, that our progeny will have to learn to read past sentences like “After the peace demonstration, they stopped at Joe’s for veal scallopini,” or, perhaps, “In their joy, they conceived their fifth child,” or even, “They immunized the children.” Obviously, it was necessary to read past the impaling of Haman’s sons, the ethnic pogroms, to some larger purpose—otherwise there would not be Purimspiels and happy Purim balls—but I did not know how to do it. I saw impaled Iranians where I needed to see a fly doing the backstroke in the soup.

  I walked over to the baby at the window seat. Out the window, in the near distance, we could see a synagogue. Even now, I thought, in there people were being taught to read past the scaffold. “Dog, dog!” the baby cried, as a dog-walker came up the street, six or seven dogs on leashes held in one hand. She began to cry out in delight. So many dogs! I closed the book, and hoped glumly that a spiel, that whole leashfuls of them, would come before Purim did.

  THE next day, I decided to return to the only Jewish tradition with which I was at all confident, and that was having smoked fish at eleven o’clock on Sunday mornings. Every Sunday morning throughout my childhood, my grandfather would arrive with the spread—salty lox and unctuous sable and dry whitefish and sweet pickled salmon. Sometimes he took me with him to shop, and he always had a pained, resigned look as he ordered: “Yeah, I guess … give me some of the whitefish.” But when he got home he would be pleased. (“He has very nice stuff, Irving,” he would say to my father.) For Purimspiel purposes, I thought, I had better get into Jew training, and eat as my fathers had.

  Every Sunday morning for the
next few weeks, Luke and I went together to Sable’s, the extraordinary smoked-fish and appetizer store at Second Avenue and Seventy-eighth Street. Sable’s is the only place in my neighborhood where my grandfather would have been entirely comfortable—with the hand-lettered signs and the Dr. Brown’s and the mingled smell of pickles and herring—and yet it is owned and staffed by Asians who once worked as nova slicers at Zabar’s, on the West Side, and who walked out to claim their freedom. (I imagined them wandering, in their aprons, through Central Park for years before arriving at the promised land.) They sell Jewish food, and with the same bullying, ironic Jewish manner that I recalled from my childhood trips with my grandfather, but they do it as a thing learned.

  “They got nice stuff, anyway, Irving,” I said to Luke as we walked over.

  “Why are you calling me Irving?” he asked.

  “My grandfather always called me Irving when he took me shopping for smoked fish. He had me confused with Grandpop, I guess.”

  “Oh. Is Grandpop’s name Irving?”

  “No,” I said. “His name isn’t actually Irving, either. But your greatgrandfather could never remember what his name really was, so he called him Irving. I think he thought all small Jewish boys should be called Irving.”

  Luke wasn’t interested. “Oh,” he said. I could see he was looking inward. Then, in a rush: “Why in cartoons when someone touches electricity, after you see their whole skeleton for a second, then they go all stiff and straight up in the air and then their whole body turns black and then it turns into dust and then it crumbles while they still look out and smile as if they were feeling sick? Why?”

  I said it was just a convention, just the way cartoons are, and was meant to be funny.

  “Why is it funny?” he asked.

  We walked on in silence.

  Later that day, I sat down with a piece of paper. I had one mildly derivative comic idea, which was to adapt the Purim story to contemporary New York. Ahasuerus was Donald Trump: dumb as an ox, rich, lecherous, easily put out, and living in a gaudy apartment. So Vashti must be Ivana—that was easy—and Esther was a Russian Jewish model who had immigrated from Odessa, a beauty, but hardly aware that she was Jewish save for the convenience of immigration. Haman—what if you said that Haman … But I couldn’t focus. How was it, I wondered, that I could know nothing of all this? For the truth is that Jew is written all over me. If on my father’s side they were in wholesale food, on my mother’s side they were dark-skinned Sephardim who had stayed in Palestine—so busy squabbling that they actually missed the bus for the Diaspora. One of my maternal great-grandfathers, family lore has it, was the rabbi sent from Hebron to Lisbon at the end of the nineteenth century to call the Jews out of hiding and back into the synagogue.

  And yet, when I think about my own upbringing, the best I can say is that the most entirely Jewish thing about us was the intensity with which we celebrated Christmas: passionately, excessively, with the tallest tree and the most elaborately wrapped presents. Coming of age in the fifties, my parents, like so many young intellectuals of their generation, distanced themselves from the past as an act of deliberate emancipation. My parents were not so much in rebellion against their own past as they were in love with the idea of using the values unconsciously taken from that culture to conquer another—they went from Jewish high school to Ivy League college and fell in love with English literature. Like so many others, they ended in that queer, thriving country of the Jewish American possessor of the Christian literary heritage: they became Zionists of eighteenth-century literature, kibbutzniks of metaphysical poetry. The only Bible-related book I can recall from my childhood was in my father’s office, an academic volume called The Bible to Be Read as Literature; the joke was, of course, that in those precincts it was literature that was to be read as the Bible. (We didn’t have a Christian Christmas; we had a Dickensian Christmas.) The eradication left an imprint stronger than indoctrination could have. We had “Jew” written all over us in the form of marks from the eraser.

  What was left of overt, nameable Jewishness was the most elemental Jewish thing, and that was a style of joking. My grandfather, who ran a small grocery store in a black neighborhood, lives in my memory, apart from Sunday-morning fish, mostly in his jokes, a round of one-liners as predictable as the hands on a clock, and yet, weirdly, getting funnier by the year: “Joe Banana and his bunch? The music with appeal.” And “I used to be a boxer. In a shoe store.” And “I used to sing tenor—but they traded me in for two fives.” And “Feel stiff in the joints? Then stay out of the joints.”

  The first time I had a sense of Jewishness as a desirable state rather than as background radiation, humming in a Christian cosmos, was when I was thirteen and, turned on to the idea of New York, saw that it was made up of Jewish comedians—of jokes. I discovered the Marx Brothers and then Woody Allen. I bought a book of old comics’ routines and learned the telephone spiels of Georgie Jessel. (“Mom, why did you cook that bird? He was a valuable bird; he could speak six languages!” “Oh … he shoulda said something.”) The Ed Sullivan Show fascinated me: Corbett Monica and Norm Crosby and Jackie Vernon, and, hovering above even them, Myron Cohen, the mournful storyteller, and Henny Youngman, genuinely the funniest man, who looked exactly like my grandfather, to boot. The greatest generation. I read interviews with obscure Jewish comedians, old and young—really obscure ones, Ed Bluestone and Ben Blue—and noticed, with a rising thrill, that none of them talked about “jokes” that you “told.” Instead, they talked about “bits,” which they “did”—and killed “them” doing them. That, for me, explained everything, life and art: life was stuff that happened, art was bits you did. It was the first religion that had ever made sense.

  I came to New York to practice that faith, do bits, be a Purimspieler—only to find that that world was gone. Some time in the decade after my arrival, the Jewish comic culture dried up. The sense, so strong since the beginning of the century, that New York was naturally Jewish and, by an unforced corollary, naturally funny had gone. Of course, there were standup comics, many of them Jewish, but the particular uneasiness, the sense that talking too fast might keep you alive, the sense that you talked as a drowning man might wave his hands, the whining, high-pitched tone and the r-less accent—that had gone. Paul Reiser, Jerry Seinfeld, much as I enjoyed and even identified with them, were as settled and as American as Bob and Ray or Will Rogers. This was an event with a specific date, marked in the work of the last great New York Jew comedian. Between 1977 and Annie Hall, where being a Jewish comedian is a slightly weary and depressing obligation, to be rebelled against, and Broadway Danny Rose, just seven years later, when the black-and-white world of the comics shpritzing at the Carnegie Deli is frankly presented as a Chagall world, a folktale setting, the whole thing vanished. Even Jackie Mason, a rabbi in training and ostensibly a master of the style, was quite different; his subject, when, in the eighties, he returned from obscurity, wasn’t the unsuspected power of being a loser but the loss of power in the face of all those new immigrants.

  New York Jewish comic manners were still around, only they were no longer practiced by Jews, or were practiced by Jews as something learned rather than as something felt. What had replaced the organic culture of Jewish comedy in New York was a permanent pantomime of Jewish manners. The fly doing the backstroke in the soup was part of a kind of chicken-soup synchronized-swimming event, as ordered and regulated as an Olympic sport: Jewish New York manners were a thing anyone could imitate in order to indicate “comedy.”

  One sensed this at Sable’s, where Jewish traditions of shpritzing were carried on by non-Jews, and in television commercials, where New York taxi drivers were still represented as wise guys, even though they had not been for a generation or more. But it was true in subtler ways, too. On Seinfeld, which I had missed while living abroad but now could watch in reruns every night, everything is, at one level, shockingly Jewish, far more than Sid Caesar or Mel Brooks was ever allowed to be, with mohels a
nd brisses and whining fathers who wait all week for their copy of TV Guide—but the unstated condition is that there be absolutely no mention of the J word, while the most Jewish character, George, is given an Italian last name, Costanza. This is not because Jewishness is forbidden but because it is so obvious. Jewishness is to Seinfeld what the violin was to Henny Youngman—the prop that you used between jokes, as much for continuity as for comedy. The Jewish situations are mimed by rote, while the real energy of the jokes lies in the observation of secular middle-class manners. In the old Jewish comedies, it had been just the opposite: the manners of the middle class were mimed by rote—the suits and ties, the altered names, Jack Benny’s wife called Mary—while the energy of the jokes lay in the hidden Jewishness. (The comedy of Phil Silvers’s great Sgt. Bilko almost scandalously derives from the one thing that no one on the show is allowed to mention, which is that Bilko is a clever New York Jew dominating a kind of all-star collection of dim Gentiles.) New York Jewishness was now the conscious setup rather than the hidden punch line.

  ONE Sunday morning, Luke and I walked over to Sable’s and bought even more than usual; we were having company. But the cashier was unimpressed. He looked over our order.

  “How many people you having?” he asked.

  “Eight.”

  “From out of town?”

  “Yes.”

  He sighed. “Me, I would be ashamed to put this on the table.”

  “You would?”

  He looked at the ritualized bits of cured sable and salmon, and shrugged again—my grandfather to the life!

  “This is not worth putting on the table. I would be ashamed.”

  “What do you think I should do?”

  “Get a pound of herring salad. Pound of whitefish salad. Pound of bluefish salad.”

  I did. “Now I proud to put this on the table,” he said. “Now I no longer ashamed for you.”

  He had learned to do it at Zabar’s, I realized as I left—the permanent pantomime of Jewish manners with wings on! Though it cost me nearly a hundred dollars, it was worth it for the lesson. The combination of an Asian sense of face with a Jewish sense of guilt may be the most powerful commercial hybrid in history.

 

‹ Prev