Was there truly a God who loved His children as Sophia claimed? If so, how could this God allow a man the burden of such an injustice, the memories of love taken away, the fears of what might happen to those left behind?
In his pain, Vitas wondered if he should fall to his knees.
If he should pray as Sophia had tried to teach him to pray.
If he should let go of his determination to control his own life and place his soul in the hands of a greater power.
But did he really have a soul? Was there one true God who would hear his prayers?
Vitas groaned in his anguish. He wanted the peace that he knew Sophia had. He wanted to believe. But could not. He’d never been emptier, never been filled with so much despair.
Clouds slipped away from the moon again. He looked for the hills of Rome, but the ship had traveled too far.
That’s when Vitas noticed he was being watched. Instinctively, he slipped his hood over his head. His face was too easily remembered; if anyone connected his bruised face with the man who was going to die in the arena for him, Nero might discover that Vitas was still alive.
From within the shadow of his hood, Vitas looked closer. At the front of the deck, the moonlight clearly showed the silhouette of a man seated on coils of thick rope, the shadow of a motionless figure.
Vitas hardly cared. He was a bruised mixture of hope and hopelessness, of resolve and helplessness, of anger and fear.
“I heard you cry out,” the man said.
“Whatever you heard,” Vitas said, “it is my business. Not yours.” Roman men—especially Roman soldiers—did not share their pain. His lips cracked open as he spoke, and Vitas tasted blood.
“Of course,” the man said from the coil of rope.
Vitas stared past the man, hoping for one last glimpse of the hills of the city.
“It seems we are on the same journey,” the man said. “Perhaps you can tell me the ship’s destination.”
“If you knew how and why I was on this ship, you’d know that you are asking the wrong person.” Vitas licked away the blood from his lips, trying unsuccessfully to moisten them. He could not escape the stirrings of curiosity. “And unless you were put on this ship as a captive, you’re a fool if you didn’t bother to find out before it sailed.”
“I’ve been called a fool before,” the man said, his face in shadow. “But in this case, at least, it is a false accusation.” He raised his hands to show they were bound and that the rope was tied to the railing.
The man was a captive.
Because the man didn’t ask for help, Vitas decided to move closer. “Who are you?” he asked. “Why are you here?”
“I’m on this ship,” the man answered, “apparently because a friend believed I would be safer here than in Rome.”
Vitas asked the natural question. “Why would you be in danger?”
“All of us marked by the Lamb are hated by those marked by the Beast.”
Marked?
In the moon’s light, Vitas looked more closely at the man. He saw no slave brand on the man’s right hand or forehead. Yet there was something familiar about him. The man’s gray hair . . .
“You’re not a slave,” Vitas said. Where had he seen this man?
“I would guess that if you want to know what I mean, enough time together lies ahead of us. Because if you are on this ship, perhaps you, too, are fleeing the Beast.”
Vitas began to untie the rope from the man’s wrists. “Who are you?” he asked again.
The man spoke with such certainty, it was uncanny. “I remember your voice. You’ve been sent to me again.”
“Sent?” Vitas struggled to comprehend.
“With my God,” the man said, still laughing as if appreciative of an irony, “there are no coincidences.”
It came to Vitas. Where he’d seen the man before. “I know who you are!” Vitas said. “That night. When the earthquake struck. You were among the four who faced the beast . . .”
Clouds covered the moon again. Vitas heard the reply come out of near total darkness.
“Yes,” the man answered. “I was one of the captives you set free. I am John, son of Zebedee.”
Afterword
The Last Disciple presents an alternative to the Left Behind understanding of end-times events based on a methodology called Exegetical Eschatology (E2). I coined the phrase Exegetical Eschatology to underscore the fact that above all else I am deeply committed to a proper method of biblical interpretation rather than to any particular model of eschatology. Put another way, the plain and proper reading of a biblical passage must always take precedence over a particular eschatological presupposition or paradigm.
For example, the pretribulational rapture model featured in the Left Behind series interprets Revelation 13 in a strictly literal fashion. Thus, Antichrist dies and resurrects himself physically in order to vindicate his claim to be god. The following passage from The Indwelling, volume 7 of the Left Behind series, communicates the point:
Carpathia catapulted himself to a standing position in the narrow end of his own coffin. He turned triumphantly to face the crowd, and David noticed makeup, putty, surgical staples, and stitches in the box where Nicolae’s head had lain.
Standing there before now deathly silence, Nicolae looked as if he had just stepped out of his closet where a valet had helped him into a crisp suit. Shoes gleaming, laces taut, socks smooth, suit unwrinkled, tie hanging just so, he stood broad-shouldered, fresh-faced, shaven, hair in place, no pallor. Fortunato and the seven were on their knees, hiding their faces, sobbing aloud.
Nicolae raised his hands to shoulder height and said loudly enough for everyone to hear, without aid of a microphone, “Peace. Be still.” With that the clouds ascended and vanished, and the sun reappeared in all its brilliance and heat. People squinted and covered their eyes.
“Peace be unto you,” he said. “My peace I give you. Please stand.” He paused while everyone rose, eyes still locked on him, bodies rigid with fear. “Let not your hearts be troubled. Believe in me.”
Murmuring began. David heard people marveling that he was not using a microphone, but neither was he raising his voice. And yet everyone could hear.
It was as if Carpathia read their minds. “You marvel that I speak directly to your hearts without amplification, yet you saw me raise myself from the dead. Who but the most high god has power over death? Who but god controls the earth and sky?” (The Indwelling, 366–67).
In sharp contrast, The Last Disciple series exegetes Revelation 13 in light of the whole of Scripture. Thus, Satan can parody the work of Christ through “all kinds of counterfeit miracles, signs and wonders” (2 Thessalonians 2:9), but he cannot literally do what Christ did—namely, raise himself from the dead.
What is at stake here is nothing less than the deity and resurrection of Christ. In a Christian worldview, only God has the power to raise the dead. If Antichrist could “raise [himself] from the dead” and control “the earth and sky,” Christianity would lose the basis for believing that Christ’s resurrection vindicates His claim to deity. Further, if Satan possesses the creative power of God, this would subvert the post-resurrection appearances of Christ in that Satan could have masqueraded as the resurrected Christ. Moreover, the notion that Satan can perform acts that are indistinguishable from genuine miracles suggests a dualistic worldview in which God and Satan are equal powers competing for dominance.
The point here is not to call into question the orthodoxy of the Left Behind authors. We are committed to the same goals: reading the Bible for all its worth and inspiring hope in the Second Coming of Christ. Collegial debate in the interest of truth, however, is essential to the health of the church, while we adhere to the Christian maxim: “In essentials, unity; in nonessentials, liberty; in all things, charity.” We must debate this issue, but we need not divide over it. The point is to demonstrate the dangers inherent in the interpretive method they and other dispensationalists employ.
S
uch dangers are not solely theological. Placing the Beast in the twenty-first instead of the first century poses historical difficulties as well. For example, the apostle John tells his first-century audience that with “wisdom” and “insight” they can “calculate the number of the Beast, for it is man’s number. His number is 666” (Revelation 13:18). No amount of wisdom and insight would have given them the ability to figure out the number of a Nicolae Carpathia character in the twenty-first century.
Furthermore, while Daniel was instructed to seal up prophecy because the time of fulfillment was in the far future (Daniel 8:26; 12:4, 9; cf. 9:24), John was told not to seal up his prophecy because its fulfillment was fore future (Revelation 22:10). John’s repeated use of such words and phrases as soon and the time is near demonstrate conclusively that John could not have had the twenty-first century in mind.
Finally, the horror of the Great Tribulation included not only the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple but the persecution of the apostles and prophets who penned the Scriptures and formed the foundation of the Christian church of which Christ Himself was the chief cornerstone. Thus, the Great Tribulation instigated by Nero is the antitype for every type and tribulation that follows before we experience the reality of our own resurrection at the Second Coming of Christ.
For these and a host of other reasons The Last Disciple series places the Great Tribulation precisely where it belongs, in a first-century milieu in which “the last disciple” comforts believers in the throes of the mother of all persecutions.
Discussion Questions
What was your understanding of Revelation before reading this novel? How has that changed?
Many characters face severe persecution. What are their various reactions? What does persecution look like in the world today, and how should Christians respond to it?
What is most important to Vitas? How does he maintain his integrity amid so much depravity and corruption?
What’s your impression of the religious and political leaders of Jerusalem in this novel? Do these two interests ever come into conflict? Discuss the difficulties or the benefits of individuals who hold both leadership roles at the same time.
Sophia and Vitas don’t share the same faith. What’s your impression of their decision to marry despite their differences?
What is it about the Christians that makes Nero feel threatened?
Would you describe Damian as a person of integrity? Why or why not?
How does our culture compare to life in ancient Rome? Do you see any similarities? What are the differences? How should Christians engage with the societies in which they live?
Read John 3:19-21 in the Bible. Which characters in the novel fit the descriptions in these verses?
Other Books by the Authors
Other Books by Hank Hanegraaff
Has God Spoken? Memorable Proofs of the Bible’s Divine Inspiration
The Apocalypse Code: Find Out What the Bible Really Says About the End Times and Why It Matters Today
The Creation Answer Book
The Complete Bible Answer Book—Collector’s Edition
The Bible Answer Book, Volume 1
The Bible Answer Book, Volume 2
The Bible Answer Book for Students
Christianity in Crisis
Christianity in Crisis: 21st Century
Counterfeit Revival
The Legacy Study Bible
The Heart of Christmas
The Da Vinci Code: Fact or Fiction (coauthored with Paul L. Maier)
The Face that Demonstrates the Farce of Evolution
Fatal Flaws: What Evolutionists Don’t Want You to Know
The Millennium Bug Debugged
The Prayer of Jesus: Secrets to Real Intimacy with God
The Covering: God’s Plan to Protect You from Evil
The Covering—Student Edition (coauthored with Jay Strack)
Resurrection
The Third Day
Other Books by Sigmund Brouwer
Novels
The Weeping Chamber
Out of the Shadows
Crown of Thorns
The Lies of Saints
Degrees of Guilt—Tyrone’s Story
Fuse of Armageddon (coauthored with Hank Hanegraaff)
The Leper
Pony Express Christmas
Wings of Dawn
Double Helix
Blood Ties
Evening Star
Silver Moon
Sun Dance
Thunder Voice
Broken Angel
Flight of Shadows
The Canary List
The Orphan King
Nonfiction
Rock & Roll Literacy
Who Made the Moon
Kids’ Books
Bug’s Eye View series
The Little Spider, a Christmas picture book
Watch Out for Joel series
CyberQuest
Accidental Detective series
Sports Mystery series
Lightning on Ice series
Short Cuts
Robot Wars series
The Winds of Light
Christian Research Institute
The Christian Research Institute (CRI) exists to provide Christians worldwide with carefully researched information and well-reasoned answers that encourage them in their faith and equip them to intelligently represent it to people influenced by ideas and teachings that assault or undermine orthodox, biblical Christianity. In carrying out this mission, CRI’s strategy is expressed in the acronym EQUIP.
The E in EQUIP represents the word essentials. CRI is committed to the maxim “In essentials unity, in nonessentials liberty, and in all things charity.”
The Q in EQUIP represents the word questions. In addition to focusing on essentials, CRI answers people’s questions regarding cults, culture, and Christianity.
The U in EQUIP represents the word user-friendly. As much as possible, CRI is committed to taking complex issues and making them understandable and accessible to the lay Christian.
The I in EQUIP represents the word integrity. Recall Paul’s admonition: “Watch your life and doctrine closely. Persevere in them, because if you do, you will save both yourself and your hearers” (1 Timothy 4:16).
The P in EQUIP represents the word para-church. CRI is deeply committed to the local church as the God-ordained vehicle for equipping, evangelism, and education.
Contact Christian Research Institute:
By Mail:
Christian Research Institute
P.O. Box 8500
Charlotte, NC 28271-8500
In Canada:
CRI Canada
56051 Airways P.O.
Calgary, Alberta T2E 8K5
By Phone:
U.S.: 888-7000-CRI (700-0274)
Canada: 800-665-5851
On the Internet:
www.equip.org
On the Broadcast:
To contact the Bible Answer Man broadcast with your questions, call toll free in the U.S. and Canada, 888-ASK HANK (275-4265).
For a list of stations airing the Bible Answer Man or to listen to the broadcast via the Internet, log on to our Web site at www.equip.org.
The Last Disciple Page 40
