“Never. I felt a deep sorrow for what you were suffering because of Fee. If you interpreted it as pity, well, you were wrong.”
Henry reached for my hands. “Will it hurt you to know I did believe you would be a good mother to Amelia? Because I did . . . I do. But that was only after I loved you.”
He drew me close. We were quiet for a moment, preoccupied with other things. He finally released me, but kept hold of my hand.
“Why did you help us find Lydia?”
“How could I not? I knew how strong your attachment to Felicity was. Although I believe my motives were unselfish, deep down I hoped my actions might give us a new beginning.”
“And did you come here with the idea of offering for me?”
He laughed a little. “Oh, yes. I intended to propose the day before the wedding. But then you announced your plan to become a governess, and I thought perhaps I’d misread you once again.”
“I still had unreasonable doubts about your intentions. In any case, I thought you were about to tell me you were engaged.”
“I understand,” he said. “But it did give me a scare.”
I reached up and touched his cheek. “Loving you has eased the sting of losing Fee.” I laid my head upon his shoulder, and the soft wool of his coat pressed into my face. The feel of it reminded me of the day he’d picked me up and carried me out of the river. In a minute, I heard voices in the hall, most assuredly a warning from the family that they were about to enter the room.
I started to pull away, but he held me against him. As though he thought I might disappear if he let me go. “I love you, Mary Bennet,” he said, and kissed my mouth sweetly.
We pulled apart when the door opened and our laughing relations poured into the room. “You must wait for the nuptials, Walsh!” Charles said.
“Oh, let them alone,” Elizabeth countered.
I drew him down for another kiss, folding into his embrace. For once in my life, I didn’t care what the family thought.
Acknowledgments
My deepest gratitude to my agent, Steven Chudney, for believing in this book and delivering it into the hands of Rachel Kahan and Amanda Bergeron at William Morrow. Thank you, Amanda, for your editorial insights and gentle guidance. Thanks also to the behind-the-scenes professionals who had a hand in bringing The Pursuit of Mary Bennet to publication.
Five years ago I joined the Jane Austen Society of North America (JASNA) and began attending the meetings of the Denver/Boulder chapter. The members, with their comprehensive knowledge of all things Austen, rekindled my love of the six novels and greatly enhanced my understanding of Jane Austen and her time.
Among the numerous resources about Austen, I found David M. Shapard’s The Annotated Pride and Prejudice the most essential. So many details, big and small, explained in one handy volume!
Thanks to my husband, Jim, and daughter, Katie, my loyal first readers. Katie in particular helped me find the heart of this story with her sure grasp of character. To my critique group, the Wild Folk, you nourish, encourage, and sustain my writing. I couldn’t do without you.
I often wonder what Jane Austen would make of all the sequels featuring her characters. Perhaps she would say one thing in public, and something entirely different—with a little bite to it—in a letter to her sister Cassandra. Here’s hoping she would be, if not kind in her criticism of my work, at least a bit amused.
P.S.
Insights, Interviews & More . . .
About the author
Meet Pamela Mingle
Greg Cradick
PAMELA MINGLE, a former teacher and librarian, lives in Lakewood, Colorado. She is the author of Kissing Shakespeare, a time-travel romance for young adults set in Elizabethan England (Delacorte Press, 2012). Pamela is a member of the Society of Children’s Book Writers and Illustrators, Pikes Peak Writers, Romance Writers of America, and the Jane Austen Society of North America. She and her husband are frequent visitors to the United Kingdom, where they enjoy walking and visiting historical sites.
Visit www.AuthorTracker.com for exclusive information on your favorite HarperCollins authors.
About the book
Why I Wrote The Pursuit of Mary Bennet
by Pamela Mingle
AN INTENSE LONGING for more of Jane Austen is what compels the sequel writer and reader. More of Elizabeth and Mr. Darcy, more of Elinor and Edward, more of Emma and Mr. Knightly. When Jane Austen died, tragically, at the age of forty-one, she left her work unfinished and her readers unsatisfied. With great longing, we imagine eight novels, not six. If only she’d had a chance to complete Sanditon and The Watsons. And if she’d lived to be as old as her sister and mother, she might have written many other novels.
Pride and Prejudice and the five Bennet sisters stand at the head of the parade of Austen’s memorable characters. About Elizabeth Bennet, Jane Austen said, “I must confess that I think her as delightful a character as ever appeared in print, and how I shall be able to tolerate those who do not like her, at least, I do not know.”
But a story about Mary, the most maligned Bennet sister? Perhaps I did not always like her as well as I do now. She grew on me.
Mary, of course, is overshadowed by the other sisters, as we lose ourselves in the stories of Elizabeth and Jane and Lydia. In the first few readings of Pride and Prejudice, Mary barely registers with the reader. Sometimes I wondered why Jane Austen had included her in the story at all. Though she provides a little comic relief, she’s nowhere near as fully drawn as Mr. Collins or Lady Catherine. Nor is she sympathetic, except in the Netherfield ball scene, when Mr. Bennet dismisses her playing so cruelly.
Did there need to be five daughters to prove how diligently the Bennet parents were trying for an heir? David Shapard, editor of The Annotated Pride and Prejudice, suggests that by including a fifth daughter, Austen renders each individual daughter’s financial plight more dire, further limiting their marriage prospects and giving the heroines added obstacles to overcome.
In the novel, we find Mary mentioned only about a dozen and a half times. Most often, these are not actual scenes in which she speaks. She isn’t lively or beautiful, like Elizabeth and Jane. Nor is she flirtatious or outrageous, like Kitty and Lydia. Instead, like so many middle siblings, Mary is isolated, not really a part of the camaraderie shared by the pairings of her elder and younger sisters. Left to her own devices, she tries to find her niche, but her attempts make her seem more foolish than appealing.
Aside from the novel, the many adaptations of Pride and Prejudice for television and film color our perceptions of Mary. In the 1940 movie version, she is part of the sisterly circle, but still a caricature. In the iconic 1995 version of Pride and Prejudice, the family tolerates her because she is, after all, one of them. She spouts her platitudes, and the other characters roll their eyes. The 2005 film portrays her as a young girl who is afraid of society and is always the last one to know the latest gossip shared by her sisters. At least in this version, we see her in a more sympathetic light, especially after her father humiliates her. He finds her weeping and comforts her.
So as a character, Austen leaves Mary unformed, except in the most basic way. For an author who wanted to try her hand at a sequel, this was not a shortcoming, but an opportunity. Mary was rich with possibilities. With Mary, I could begin anew and develop her into a character readers would care about.
We know that Mary lacks common sense, like her mother, and is studious, like her father. Those qualities formed the jumping-off point for my book. In the beginning, Mary’s worst traits still dominate, along with something new: a simmering anger regarding her prospects, her family’s expectations of her, and her own perception of herself. When Henry Walsh enters the picture and begins to show an interest in her, she’s thrown completely off-balance. She doesn’t know how to accept a man’s addresses, nor is she even sure she wants to.
This story, then, is about both the pursuit of Ma
ry by Henry, and Mary’s own pursuit of a future and an identity of her own.
Most of the Austen-inspired sequels are written in third person. I decided to write The Pursuit of Mary Bennet in first person, as the truest path to Mary’s heart and mind, the best way to get close to her. Just as Mary knows she can never be Jane or Elizabeth, I knew I could never write in the voice of Jane Austen. Rather, in borrowing her characters and striving to stay true to their essential natures, I’ve tried to write in the spirit of Austen.
My best hope is that Mary, through my imagining of her life after Pride and Prejudice, may turn out to be a delightful character in her own right.
Discussion Questions
What are your impressions of Mary at the beginning of the story? How would you describe her?
What has changed for the Bennet family since the end of Pride and Prejudice? For Mary in particular?
Why does Mary say she “carries a degree of anger and resentment in her chest”? Why is she more relaxed at High Tor than at home?
How would you describe Mary’s feelings toward Henry leading up to the Pennington ball? His toward her? Are her rash actions at the ball justified? Her anger and hurt feelings?
Elizabeth neatly sums up Mary’s state of mind: Mary is afraid of love, because she has always felt unloved. Do you agree with her opinion?
Henry’s proposal to Mary has certain similarities to that of Mr. Darcy’s to Elizabeth. What are they? Why does Mary refuse his offer of marriage?
After the birth of Lydia’s child, Mary returns to Longbourn. How can you explain the fact that Mary, unwed and childless, almost immediately bonds with her new niece? How does Felicity make a difference in Mary’s life?
Is Mary’s assessment of her role in caring for Felicity accurate? Does her self-recrimination remind you of any Austen heroines? If so, explain.
What happens during the stay at High Tor and Bristol to persuade Mary that Henry thinks of her only as a friend?
Describe the circumstances that allowed Mary and Henry to slowly make their way back to each other. In what way(s) did each of them have to change?
Writer and editor James Collins says that beneath the famous first line of Pride and Prejudice is this reflection: “It is a truth universally acknowledged that a single woman of small fortune must be in want of a husband.” How is this relevant to The Pursuit of Mary Bennet? Does it have relevance for women today?
Did the author remain true to Jane Austen’s portrayal of the Pride and Prejudice characters?
How does Mary’s relationship with Henry compare to Elizabeth’s with Mr. Darcy?
Read on
Pamela Mingle’s Favorite Regency Books
All of Jane Austen’s novels, especially
Pride and Prejudice, Sense and
Sensibility, Emma, and Persuasion
Jane Austen Made Me Do It, edited
by Laurel Ann Nattress
Bath Tangle, by Georgette Heyer
Arabella, by Georgette Heyer
The Bridgerton Novels, by Julia Quinn
An Assembly Such As This,
by Pamela Aidan
The Emperor’s Conspiracy,
by Michelle Diener
Also by Pamela Mingle
Kissing Shakespeare
Credits
Cover design by Mumtaz Mustafa
Cover photographs: book © by Susan Fox / Trevillion Images; mansion © by David Hughes / Shutterstock
Copyright
This book is a work of fiction. The characters, incidents, and dialogue are drawn from the author’s imagination and are not to be construed as real. Any resemblance to actual events or persons, living or dead, is entirely coincidental.
P.S.™ is a trademark of HarperCollins Publishers.
THE PURSUIT OF MARY BENNET. Copyright © 2013 by Pamela Mingle. All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. By payment of the required fees, you have been granted the nonexclusive, nontransferable right to access and read the text of this e-book on-screen. No part of this text may be reproduced, transmitted, downloaded, decompiled, reverse-engineered, or stored in or introduced into any information storage and retrieval system, in any form or by any means, whether electronic or mechanical, now known or hereinafter invented, without the express written permission of HarperCollins e-books.
FIRST EDITION
EPub Edition © DECEMBER 2013 ISBN: 9780062274250
ISBN 978-0-06-227424-3
13 14 15 16 17 OV/RRD 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
About the Publisher
Australia
HarperCollins Publishers (Australia) Pty. Ltd.
Level 13, 201 Elizabeth Street
Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia
http://www.harpercollins.com.au
Canada
HarperCollins Canada
2 Bloor Street East - 20th Floor
Toronto, ON, M4W, 1A8, Canada
http://www.harpercollins.ca
New Zealand
HarperCollins Publishers (New Zealand) Limited
P.O. Box 1
Auckland, New Zealand
http://www.harpercollins.co.nz
United Kingdom
HarperCollins Publishers Ltd.
77-85 Fulham Palace Road
London, W6 8JB, UK
http://www.harpercollins.co.uk
United States
HarperCollins Publishers Inc.
10 East 53rd Street
New York, NY 10022
http://www.harpercollins.com
The Pursuit of Mary Bennet Page 26