Book Read Free

International GAAP® 2019: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards

Page 73

by International GAAP 2019 (pdf)


  Example 6.19:

  Power through contractual arrangements ...................................... 407

  Example 6.20:

  Derivatives that create risk for an investee ..................................... 413

  Example 6.21:

  Structured entity that enters into foreign currency and

  interest rate swaps ................................................................................ 414

  Example 6.22:

  Structured entity that enters into a total return swap ................... 415

  Example 6.23:

  Structured entity that enters into a total return swap with

  the transferor ......................................................................................... 416

  Example 6.24:

  Link between power and returns is essential for control ............. 417

  Example 6.25:

  Illustration of exposure to variability of returns through

  other interests ....................................................................................... 425

  Example 6.26:

  Illustration of exposure to variability of returns through

  indirect interests ................................................................................... 427

  Example 6.27:

  Determining whether a decision-maker is a principal or

  agent (1) .................................................................................................. 428

  Example 6.28:

  Determining whether a decision-maker is a principal or

  agent (2) ................................................................................................. 428

  Example 6.29:

  Determining whether a decision-maker is a principal or

  agent (3).................................................................................................. 429

  Example 6.30:

  Determining whether a decision-maker is a principal or

  agent (4) ................................................................................................. 429

  362 Chapter

  6

  Example 6.31:

  Determining whether a decision-maker is a principal or

  agent (5) .................................................................................................. 429

  Example 6.32:

  Determining whether a decision-maker is a principal or

  agent (6) ................................................................................................. 430

  Example 6.33:

  Determining whether a decision-maker is a principal or

  agent (7) ................................................................................................... 431

  Example 6.34:

  Determining whether a bank is a principal or agent in

  relation to a securitisation ................................................................. 432

  Example 6.35:

  Control evaluation and consolidation with a de facto agent ....... 435

  Example 6.36:

  Providing seed money for a fund ..................................................... 439

  Example 6.37:

  Value of option changes from ‘in-the-money’ to ‘out-of-

  the-money’ ............................................................................................ 440

  Example 6.38:

  Structured entity reassessments ....................................................... 440

  Example 6.39:

  Investee loses money due to change in market conditions ......... 441

  Example 6.40:

  Bankruptcy filing .................................................................................. 441

  Example 6.41:

  Troubled debt restructuring ............................................................... 441

  Example 6.42:

  Control reassessment without being involved .............................. 443

  Example 6.43:

  A limited partnership that is an investment entity ......................... 453

  Example 6.44:

  Start-up high technology fund that is not an investment

  entity ...................................................................................................... 454

  Example 6.45:

  Master and feeder funds that are investment entities .................. 454

  363

  Chapter 6

  Consolidated

  financial statements

  1 INTRODUCTION

  1.1 Background

  An entity may conduct its business not only directly, but also through strategic

  investments in other entities. IFRS broadly distinguishes between three types of such

  strategic investments:

  • entities controlled by the reporting entity (subsidiaries);

  • entities or activities jointly controlled by the reporting entity and one or more third

  parties (joint arrangements); and

  • entities that, while not controlled or jointly controlled by the reporting entity, are

  subject to significant influence by it (associates).

  The first type of investment is accounted for in accordance with IFRS 10 – Consolidated

  Financial Statements.

  IFRS 10 establishes a single control model that applies to all entities, including

  ‘structured entities’ (‘special purpose entities’ and ‘variable interest entities’ under the

  previous IFRS standards and US GAAP, respectively). In addition, IFRS 10 deals with

  accounting for subsidiaries by investment entities.

  This chapter discusses the requirements of IFRS 10, principally relating to which entities

  are controlled by a parent and therefore consolidated into the financial statements

  prepared by that parent (except for certain subsidiaries of investment entities). The

  requirements of IFRS 10 dealing with consolidation procedures and non-controlling

  interests are summarised briefly at 1.3 below and dealt with more fully in Chapter 7.

  IFRS 10 contains no disclosure requirements. Instead, all disclosures required in respect

  of an entity’s interests in subsidiaries or its interests in structured entities (whether

  consolidated or unconsolidated) are contained within IFRS 12 – Disclosure of Interests

  in Other Entities. The disclosure requirements in IFRS 12 are discussed in Chapter 13.

  When management concludes that an entity does not have control of an investee, the

  requirements of IFRS 11 – Joint Arrangements – and IAS 28 – Investments in Associates

  364 Chapter

  6

  and Joint Ventures – must be considered to determine whether it has joint control or

  significant influence, respectively, over the investee. The requirements of IFRS 11 and

  IAS 28 are dealt with in Chapter 12 and Chapter 11, respectively. The diagram below

  summarises the identification and accounting for each type of investment, as well as the

  interaction between IFRS 10, IFRS 11, IFRS 12 and IAS 28.

  Figure 6.1:

  Interaction between IFRS 10, IFRS 11, IFRS 12 and IAS 28

  Does the investor

  Yes

  No

  control an entity

  by itself?

  Does the

  Account for

  Yes

  No

  investor have

  in accordance

  joint control over

  with IFRS 10

  an arrangement?

  Disclosure in

  accordance with

  IFRS 12

  Classify joint

  Does the investor

  Yes />
  No

  arrangement in

  have significant

  accordance with

  influence over

  IFRS 11

  an entity?

  Joint

  Joint

  operation

  venture

  Associate

  Account for assets,

  Account for

  Financial

  Other

  liabilities, revenue

  interest under the

  instrument

  IFRS†

  and expenses

  equity method

  Disclosures in

  Disclosures in

  Disclosures in

  accordance with

  accordance with

  accordance with

  IFRS 12 and other

  IFRS 12 and other

  IFRS 12

  relevant IFRS

  relevant IFRS

  †

  This would be the case, for example, if an entity has control over (or simply rights to) assets and obligations for liabilities, but not control of an entity. In this case, the entity would account for these assets and obligations in accordance with the relevant IFRS.

  1.2

  Development of IFRS 10

  In June 2003, the IASB added a project on consolidation to its agenda to issue a new IFRS

  to replace the consolidation requirements in IAS 27 – Consolidated and Separate Financial

  Statements (‘IAS 27 (2012)’) and SIC-12 – Consolidation – Special Purpose Entities.

  This project was added to the IASB’s agenda to deal with divergence in practice in applying

  the previous standards. In addition, there was a perceived conflict between the definitions

  of control IAS 27 (2012) and SIC-12 that led to inconsistent application and which was

  further aggravated by a lack of clear guidance as to which investees were within the scope

  of IAS 27 (2012) and which were within the scope of SIC-12. [IFRS 10.BC2-3].

  Consolidated financial statements 365

  In December 2008, the IASB published its proposals in an exposure draft, ED 10 –

  Consolidated Financial Statements. ED 10 proposed disclosure requirements for

  consolidated and unconsolidated investees. However, in its deliberation of the

  responses to those proposals, the IASB decided to combine the disclosure requirements

  for interests in subsidiaries, joint arrangements, associates and unconsolidated

  structured entities within a single comprehensive standard, IFRS 12. Accordingly,

  IFRS 10 does not include disclosure requirements. [IFRS 10.BC7]. The requirements of

  IFRS 12 are dealt with in Chapter 13.

  IFRS 10 was issued in May 2011, together with an amended version of IAS 27 with a new

  title of Separate Financial Statements and IFRS 12. In addition, as a result of its project on

  joint ventures, the IASB issued, at the same time, IFRS 11 and an amended IAS 28. These

  standards were mandatory for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013.

  In October 2012, the IASB issued Investment Entities (Amendments to IFRS 10, IFRS 12

  and IAS 27) which introduced an exception to the principle that all subsidiaries shall be

  consolidated. The amendments defined an investment entity and required a parent that

  is an investment entity to measure its investments in subsidiaries at fair value through

  profit or loss, with limited exceptions. This amendment applied for annual periods

  beginning on or after 1 January 2014 but could be adopted early. [IFRS 10.C1A-B]. The

  investment entity exception is discussed at 10 below.

  In December 2014, the IASB issued Investment Entities: Applying the Consolidation

  Exception (Amendments to IFRS 10, IFRS 12 and IAS 28) which clarifies two aspects of

  the investment entity exception. This amendment applied for annual periods beginning

  on or after 1 January 2016 but could be adopted earlier. [IFRS 10.C1D]. This amendment is

  discussed at 10 below.

  1.3 Consolidation

  procedures

  When an investor determines that it controls an investee, the investor (the parent)

  consolidates the investee (the subsidiary). The requirements of IFRS 10 relating to

  consolidation procedures, non-controlling interests and accounting for loss of control

  are dealt with in Chapter 7.

  A parent consolidates a subsidiary from the date on which the parent first obtains

  control, and continues consolidating that subsidiary until the date on which control is

  lost. IFRS 3 – Business Combinations – defines the date of acquisition, that is, the date

  on which control is first obtained. [IFRS 3.8, Appendix A]. The term ‘date of acquisition’ is

  used even if a parent gains control without acquiring an interest, or taking any action,

  as discussed at 9.3 below. IFRS 10 deals with consolidation thereafter (see Chapter 7).

  When a parent gains control of a group of assets or an entity that is not a business, such

  transactions are excluded from the scope of IFRS 3. [IFRS 3.2]. This is often the case when

  a parent gains control of a structured entity. Business combinations under common

  control are also excluded from the scope of IFRS 3, [IFRS 3.2], which means that if a

  parent gains control of a subsidiary (as defined in IFRS 10) that was previously

  controlled by an entity under common control, IFRS 3 also does not apply.

  A parent consolidates all subsidiaries and recognises non-controlling interests for any

  interests held by investors outside of the group.

  366 Chapter

  6

  1.4 Disclosure

  requirements

  IFRS 10 does not contain any disclosure requirements regarding an entity’s interests in

  subsidiaries included in the consolidated financial statements or its interests in

  structured entities (whether consolidated or unconsolidated). Such disclosure

  requirements are contained within IFRS 12.

  IFRS 12 contains all disclosure requirements related to an entity’s interests in

  subsidiaries, joint arrangements, associates and structured entities. IFRS 12 requires

  disclosure of the judgements that were made in determining whether it controls another

  entity. Even if management concludes that it does not control an entity, the information

  used to make that judgement will be transparent to users of the financial statements.

  The required disclosures should also assist users of the financial statements to make

  their own assessment of the financial impact were management to reach a different

  conclusion regarding consolidation – by providing information about certain

  unconsolidated entities. The requirements of IFRS 12 are dealt with in Chapter 13.

  2

  OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE OF IFRS 10

  2.1 Objective

  The objective of IFRS 10 is to establish principles for the presentation and preparation

  of consolidated financial statements when an entity controls one or more other entities.

  [IFRS 10.1].

  To meet this objective, the standard:

  (a) requires an entity (the parent) that controls one or more other entities (subsidiaries)

  to present consolidated financial statements;

  (b) defines the principle of control, and establishes control as the basis for consolidation;

  (c) sets out how to apply the principle of control to identify whether an investor

  controls an investee and therefore must consolidate the investee;

  (d) establishes the accounting requirements for the preparation of consolidated

&n
bsp; financial statements; and

  (e) defines an investment entity and the criteria that must be satisfied for the

  investment entity exception to be applied. [IFRS 10.2].

  This chapter deals with (a), (b), (c) and (e). The accounting requirements mentioned in

  (d) are dealt with in Chapter 7.

  IFRS 10 also states that it does not deal with the accounting requirements for business

  combinations and their effect on consolidation, including goodwill arising on a business

  combination; these are covered by IFRS 3 (see Chapter 9). [IFRS 10.3].

  2.2 Scope

  IFRS 10 requires that a parent (unless exempt or an investment entity as discussed

  below) shall present consolidated financial statements. This means that the financial

  statements of the group in which the assets, liabilities, equity, income, expenses and

  cash flows of the parent and its subsidiaries are included, should be presented as those

  Consolidated financial statements 367

  of a single economic entity. A group consists of a parent and its subsidiaries (i.e. entities

  that the parent controls). [IFRS 10.4, Appendix A].

  Under IFRS 10, an entity must assess whether it controls the other entities in which it

  has an interest (the investees) – see 3 below. This applies to all types of investees

  including corporations, partnerships, limited liability corporations, trusts, and other

  types of entities. However, there is a scope exemption for post-employment benefit

  plans or other long-term employee plans to which IAS 19 – Employee Benefits – applies

  (see 2.2.2 below). In addition, an investment entity generally does not consolidate its

  subsidiaries (see 2.2.3 below).

  IFRS 10 also provides an exemption from preparing consolidated financial statements

  for entities that are not an ultimate parent, if they meet certain criteria (see 2.2.1 below).

  2.2.1

  Exemption from preparing consolidated financial statements by an

  intermediate parent

  A parent that prepares financial statements in accordance with IFRS is exempt from

  presenting (i.e. need not present) consolidated financial statements if it meets all of the

  following conditions:

  (a) it is a wholly-owned subsidiary, or is a partially-owned subsidiary of another entity

  and all its other owners, including those not otherwise entitled to vote, have been

  informed about, and do not object to, the parent not presenting consolidated

 

‹ Prev