International GAAP® 2019: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards

Home > Other > International GAAP® 2019: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards > Page 180
International GAAP® 2019: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards Page 180

by International GAAP 2019 (pdf)

Extract 13.7: Glencore plc (2017)

  Notes to the financial statements [extract]

  9. Investments in associates, joint ventures and other investments [extract]

  Aggregate information of associates that are not individually material:

  US$ million

  2017

  2016

  The Group’s share of income/(loss)

  121

  (122)

  The Group’s share of other comprehensive income

  99

  –

  The Group’s share of total comprehensive income/(loss)

  220

  (122)

  Aggregate carrying value of the Group’s interests

  2,651

  1,847

  5.2

  Risks associated with interests in joint ventures and associates

  An entity must disclose:

  (a) commitments that it has relating to its joint ventures separately from the amount

  of other commitments; and

  (b) contingent liabilities (as defined in IAS 37) relating to its interests in joint ventures

  or associates (including its share of contingent liabilities incurred jointly with other

  investors with joint control of, or significant influence over, the joint ventures and

  associates) separately from the amount of other contingent liabilities.

  Disclosure of interests in other entities 913

  5.2.1

  Disclosure of commitments relating to joint ventures

  IAS 24 – Related Party Disclosures – already requires aggregate commitments relating

  to joint ventures to be disclosed separately from other commitments. [IAS 24.18-19].

  IFRS 12 clarifies that the commitments required to be disclosed under IAS 24 include

  an entity’s share of commitments made jointly with other investors with joint control of

  a joint venture. Commitments are those that may give rise to a future outflow of cash or

  other resources. [IFRS 12.B18].

  IFRS 12 provides the following illustrative but not exhaustive examples of the type of

  unrecognised commitments that should be disclosed under IAS 24:

  (a) unrecognised commitments to contribute funding or resources as a result of,

  for example:

  (i) the constitution or acquisition agreements of a joint venture (that, for

  example, require an entity to contribute funds over a specific period);

  (ii) capital intensive projects undertaken by a joint venture;

  (iii) unconditional purchase obligations, comprising procurement of equipment,

  inventory or services that an entity is committed to purchasing from, or on

  behalf of, a joint venture;

  (iv) unrecognised commitments to provide loans or other financial support to a

  joint venture;

  (v) unrecognised commitments to contribute resources to a joint venture, such

  as assets or services;

  (vi) other non-cancellable unrecognised commitments relating to a joint venture;

  and

  (b) unrecognised commitments to acquire another party’s ownership interest (or a

  portion of that ownership interest) in a joint venture if a particular event occurs or

  does not occur in the future. [IFRS 12.B19].

  There is no requirement to disclose these commitments at individual joint venture

  level. However, IAS 24 requires disclosure of information about those transactions

  and outstanding balances, including commitments, necessary for users to

  understand the potential effect of the relationship on the financial statements.

  [IAS 24.18]. This implies that there should be separate disclosure of different types of

  significant commitments. IAS 24 does not require the names of any joint ventures

  to be disclosed.

  914 Chapter

  13

  5.2.2

  Disclosure of contingent liabilities relating to joint ventures and

  associates

  IFRS 12 requires separate disclosure of contingent liabilities relating to an entity’s

  interests in joint ventures and associates from the amount of other contingent liabilities.

  IAS 37 defines a contingent liability as an obligation that derives from an entity’s

  actions where:

  (a) by an established pattern of past practice, published policies or a sufficiently

  specific current statement, the entity has indicated to other parties that it will

  accept certain responsibilities; and

  (b) as a result, the entity has created a valid expectation on the part of those other

  parties that it will discharge those responsibilities. [IAS 37.10].

  IAS 37 requires disclosure, for each class of contingent liability at the end of a reporting

  period, a brief description of the nature of the contingent liability and, where practicable:

  (a) an estimate of its financial effect, measured under the requirements of the standard;

  (b) an indication of the uncertainties relating to the amount or timing of any outflow; and

  (c) the possibility of any reimbursement. [IAS 37.86].

  IAS 37 further defines what is intended by ‘class’ and the circumstances in which

  aggregation of disclosures of contingent liabilities is appropriate.

  Further detail on contingent liabilities is contained at Chapter 27.

  6

  DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED

  STRUCTURED ENTITIES

  An entity must disclose information that enables users of its financial statements:

  (a) to understand the nature and extent of its interests in unconsolidated structured

  entities; and

  (b) to evaluate the nature of, and changes to, the risks associated with its interests in

  unconsolidated structured entities. [IFRS 12.24].

  These disclosures are not required by an investment entity for an unconsolidated

  structured entity that it controls and for which it presents the disclosures required at 4.6

  above. [IFRS 12.25A].

  Disclosure requirements in respect of risks associated with interests in consolidated

  structured entities are discussed at 4.4 above.

  As discussed at 2.2.2.D above, these disclosures also apply to interests in joint ventures

  and associates that are also structured entities, in addition to the disclosure required at 5

  above for joint ventures and associates.

  The information required by (a) and (b) above includes information about an entity’s

  exposure to risk from involvement that it had with unconsolidated structured entities in

  previous periods (e.g. sponsoring the structured entity) even if the entity no longer has

  any contractual involvement with the structured entity at the reporting date. [IFRS 12.25].

  Disclosure of interests in other entities 915

  It is likely that some of the disclosure requirements for unconsolidated structured

  entities will overlap with those of IFRS 7, since many interests in unconsolidated

  structured entities will be financial assets within the scope of IFRS 7. However, the IASB

  considers that what is different is that the IFRS 12 disclosures describe an entity’s risk

  exposures, but IFRS 7 requires disclosures about risks associated with financial

  instruments. IFRS 12 adopts a different perspective and requires an entity to disclose its

  exposure to risks from its interest in a structured entity. [IFRS 12.BC72].

  The IASB believes that information from both perspectives assists users of financial

  statements in their analysis of an entity’s exposure to risk – the disclosures in IFRS 7 by

  identifying those financial instruments that crea
te risk and the disclosures in IFRS 12 by

  providing, when relevant, information about:

  • the extent of an entity’s transactions with structured entities;

  • concentrations of risk that arise from the nature of the entities with which the

  entity has transactions; and

  • particular transactions that expose the entity to risk. [IFRS 12.BC73].

  The IASB was also persuaded by information received from users of financial

  statements in the US who had been using the disclosures required by US GAAP for

  variable interest entities in their analysis. According to the IASB, those users confirmed

  that the new disclosures provided them with information that was not presently

  available to them, but which they regarded as important for a thorough understanding

  of an entity’s exposure to risk. Many of those users referred also to the global financial

  crisis and emphasised that a better understanding of an entity’s interests in

  unconsolidated structured entities might have helped to identify earlier the extent of

  risks to which entities were exposed. Accordingly, those users stated that the new risk

  disclosures had significantly improved the quality of financial reporting and strongly

  encouraged the IASB to require similar disclosures for IFRS preparers. [IFRS 12.BC75-76].

  No disclosure is required of ‘significant’ interests in individual unconsolidated structured

  entities. The IASB decided against adding this requirement because of the overriding

  concept in IFRSs that an entity would be required to disclose only information that is

  material as defined and described in the Conceptual Framework and because the word

  ‘significant’ is not defined in IFRS. [IFRS 12.BC79]. However, as discussed at 6.2.1 below,

  disclosures of aggregate interests by statement of financial position line item are required.

  The IASB decided to retain the wider definition of ‘interest in’ (i.e. an entity’s

  involvement with another entity, whether contractual or non-contractual, that

  exposes the entity to variability of returns from the performance of the other entity)

  which was originally proposed in ED 10, rather than a narrower definition. In making

  this decision, the IASB was convinced by comments received from US preparers,

  auditors and users about their experience with the US GAAP requirements to

  disclose information about involvement with variable interest entities. US preparers

  and accountants also noted that both the aggregation guidance and the requirement

  that an entity should determine, in the light of facts and circumstances, how much

  detail it must give to satisfy the disclosure requirements, provide sufficient flexibility

  for preparers. Consequently, the IASB decided to include in IFRS 12 the

  requirement to consider the level of detail necessary to meet the disclosure

  916 Chapter

  13

  objectives, and to include aggregation principles and guidance to assist preparers

  when determining what level of detail is appropriate. [IFRS 12.BC80-81].

  The IASB also decided that the objective of its risk disclosures for structured entities is

  that an entity should provide information about its exposure to risk associated with

  interests in structured entities, regardless of whether that risk arises from having an

  existing interest in the entity or from being involved with the entity in previous periods.

  Therefore the IASB decided to define an interest in a structured entity as contractual or

  non-contractual involvement that exposes the entity to variability of returns. In

  addition, the IASB decided to state explicitly that the disclosures about an entity’s

  exposure to risk should include risk that arises from previous involvement with a

  structured entity, even if an entity no longer has any contractual involvement with the

  structured entity at the end of the reporting period. [IFRS 12.BC110].

  6.1

  Disclosure of the nature of interests in unconsolidated

  structured entities

  6.1.1

  Disclosure of the nature, purpose, size, activities and financing of

  structured entities

  An entity must disclose qualitative and quantitative information about its interests in

  unconsolidated structured entities, including, but not limited to, the nature, purpose,

  size and activities of the structured entity and how the structured entity is financed.

  [IFRS 12.26].

  The IASB concluded that this requirement should provide users with sufficient

  information about the assets held by structured entities and the funding of those assets

  without requiring specific disclosures of the assets of unconsolidated structured entities

  in which the entity has an interest in all circumstances. If relevant to an assessment of

  its exposure to risk, an entity would be required to provide additional information about

  the assets and funding of structured entities. [IFRS 12.BC96].

  6.1.1.A

  Nature and purpose

  Examples of the nature and purpose of a structured entity might include:

  • to manage balance sheet exposure and risk, including securitisation of assets;

  • to provide investors with a synthetic exposure to debt and equity instruments such

  as credit linked notes and equity linked notes;

  • to provide investors with a variety of investment opportunities through managed

  investment strategies; and

  • to obtain and facilitate funding.

  Old Mutual plc discloses the nature, purpose and type of interest in unconsolidated

  structured entities in a tabular format as follows:

  Extract 13.8: Old Mutual plc (2017)

  Notes to the consolidated financial statements [extract]

  I:

  Interests in subsidiaries, associates and joint arrangements [extract]

  I3: Structured

  entities [extract]

  (a)

  Group’s involvement in structured entities [extract]

  Disclosure of interests in other entities 917

  The table below summarises the types of structured entities the Group does not consolidate, but may have an

  interest in:

  Interest held by the

  Type of structured entity

  Nature

  Purpose

  Group

  – Securitisation

  vehicles –

  Finance the Group’s

  – Generate:

  –

  Investment in senior

  for loans and advances

  own assets through

  –

  Funding for the

  and junior notes

  the issue of notes to

  Group’s lending

  issued by the

  investors

  activities

  vehicles

  – Margin

  through

  sale of assets to

  investors

  – Fees

  for

  loan

  servicing

  – Investment funds

  –

  Manage client funds

  – Generate fees from

  –

  Investments in units

  through the

  managing assets on

  issued by the fund

  investment in assets

  behalf of third-party

  investors

  – Securitisation

  vehicles – Finance

  third

  party

  – G
enerate fees from

  –

  Interest in these

  for third-party

  receivables and are

  arranging the

  vehicles is through

  receivables

  financed through loans

  structure. Interest

  notes that are traded

  from third party note

  income may be earned

  in the market

  holders and bank

  on the notes held by

  borrowing

  the Group

  – Security vehicles

  –

  Hold and realise

  – These entities seek to

  – Ownership

  interest

  assets as a result of

  protect the collateral

  will be in proportion

  the default of a client

  of the Group on the

  of the lending. At

  default of a loan

  31 December 2017,

  the Group held no

  value in security

  vehicles

  – Clients

  investment

  – Hold

  client

  – Generates various

  – None

  entities

  investment assets

  sources of income for

  the Group

  – Black

  Economic

  – Fund

  the

  acquisition – Generates interest on

  –

  Loans to BEE

  Empowerment (BEE)

  of shares by a BEE

  the funding provided

  schemes

  funding

  partner

  6.1.1.B Size

  The requirement to disclose the size of a structured entity would most likely be met by

  providing information about the total value of the assets of the entity. However, the

  Basis for Conclusions states that IFRS 12 does not require specific disclosure of the

  reported assets of unconsolidated structured entities in which the entity has an interest

  in all circumstances. [IFRS 12.BC96]. This would seem to suggest that measures of size other

  than asset fair values would be acceptable, including (for example) the notional value of

  securities issued by structured entities.

  918 Chapter

  13

  6.1.1.C Activities

  When disclosing the activities of a structured entity, these activities should include the

 

‹ Prev