International GAAP® 2019: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards

Home > Other > International GAAP® 2019: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards > Page 233
International GAAP® 2019: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards Page 233

by International GAAP 2019 (pdf)

IFRIC Update, March 2010, Staff Paper 14 IAS 27 (2007), Consolidated and Separate

  (Agenda reference

  13), Determining the

  Financial Statements, IASB, 2007 Bound

  functional currency of an investment holding

  Volume, para. 30.

  company, IASB, January 2010 and Staff Paper

  15 For example, IAS

  27, Separate Financial

  (Agenda reference

  4A), Determining the

  Statements, IASB, paras.

  16(b)(iii) and

  functional currency of an investment holding

  17(b)(iii), IFRS

  3, Business Combinations,

  company, IASB, March 2010.

  IASB, para. B63(e) and IFRS 10, Consolidated

  3

  IFRIC Update, November 2014.

  Financial Statements, IASB, para. 23.

  4

  IFRIC Update, June 2018.

  16 IFRIC Update, September 2010, p.2.

  5 Staff Paper (Agenda reference

  2), IAS 21 –

  17

  Staff Paper (Agenda reference

  7D), CTA

  Extreme long-term lack of exchangeability, IASB,

  Recycling in IAS

  27R Transactions, IASB,

  June 2018 and 22nd Extract from EECS’s

  March 2010 and Staff Paper (Agenda

  database of enforcement decisions, ESMA,

  reference 11), Repayment of investment/CTA,

  April 2018, Decision Ref. EECS/0118-09.

  IASB, July 2010, paras. 10(a) and 11.

  6

  IFRIC Update, June 2018.

  18 IFRIC Update, September 2010, p.2.

  7

  Exposure Draft of Revised IAS 21, IASB, May

  19 IFRIC Update, July 2009.

  2002, para. 14.

  20 IFRIC Update, January 2016.

  8

  IAS

  12

  (2007),

  Income Taxes, 2007 Bound 21 IFRIC Update, November 2014 and IFRIC

  Volume, IASB, para. 78.

  Update, June 2018.

  9 In this context, IAS 21 does not actually refer to

  22 Staff Paper (Agenda reference

  16), Foreign

  those requirements relating to the treatment of

  exchange restrictions and hyperinflation, IASB,

  exchange differences arising from the translation

  July 2014.

  process. However, we believe that any resulting

  23 IASB Update, May 2016.

  exchange differences should be recognised as

  24 IFRIC Update, June 2018.

  discussed at 5.3 above.

  1175

  Chapter 16

  Hyperinflation

  1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 1177

  1.1

  Background ........................................................................................................... 1177

  1.2 Hyperinflationary

  economies

  ...........................................................................

  1178

  1.3 Restatement

  approach

  ........................................................................................

  1178

  2 THE REQUIREMENTS OF IAS 29 ................................................................ 1179

  2.1

  The context of IAS 29 ......................................................................................... 1179

  2.2 Scope

  ..................................................................................................................... 1180

  2.3 Definition

  of

  hyperinflation

  ..............................................................................

  1180

  2.4

  The IAS 29 restatement process ....................................................................... 1181

  3 SELECTION OF A GENERAL PRICE INDEX ................................................... 1181

  3.1

  Selecting a general price index ......................................................................... 1181

  3.2

  General price index not available for all periods ......................................... 1182

  4 ANALYSIS AND RESTATEMENT OF THE STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL

  POSITION ...................................................................................................... 1182

  4.1

  Monetary and non-monetary items ................................................................ 1183

  4.1.1

  Monetary or non-monetary distinction ......................................... 1183

  4.1.2 Monetary

  items

  ...................................................................................

  1185

  4.1.3

  Non-monetary items carried at current cost ................................ 1186

  4.1.4

  Non-monetary items carried at historical cost ............................. 1186

  4.2

  Inventories ........................................................................................................... 1188

  4.3

  Restatement of associates, joint ventures and subsidiaries ........................ 1189

  4.4

  Calculation of deferred taxation ...................................................................... 1190

  5 RESTATEMENT OF THE STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY ............... 1192

  6 RESTATEMENT OF THE STATEMENT OF PROFIT AND LOSS AND

  OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ............................................................. 1193

  6.1

  Restatement of interest and exchange differences ...................................... 1195

  1176 Chapter 16

  6.2

  Calculation of the gain or loss on the net monetary position .................... 1195

  6.3

  Measurement of reclassification adjustments within equity ..................... 1196

  7 RESTATEMENT OF THE STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS ............................ 1198

  8 RESTATEMENT OF COMPARATIVE FIGURES ............................................. 1199

  9 INTERIM REPORTING .................................................................................. 1199

  10 TRANSITION................................................................................................. 1199

  10.1 Economies becoming hyperinflationary ........................................................ 1199

  10.2 Economies ceasing to be hyperinflationary .................................................. 1201

  10.3 Economies exiting severe hyperinflation ...................................................... 1203

  11 TRANSLATION TO A DIFFERENT PRESENTATION CURRENCY ................ 1203

  12 DISCLOSURES.............................................................................................. 1204

  List of examples

  Example 16.1:

  Accounting for hyperinflation under IAS 29 .................................. 1179

  Example 16.2:

  Restatement of property, plant and equipment ............................ 1187

  Example 16.3:

  Borrowing costs and net realisable value adjustments ............... 1188

  Example 16.4:

  Restatement of deferred taxation ................................................... 1190

  Example 16.5:

  Restatement of equity ........................................................................ 1193

  Example 16.6:

  Restatement of historical cost statement of profit
and loss

  and other comprehensive income .................................................. 1194

  Example 16.7:

  Measurement of reclassification adjustments ................................ 1197

  Example 16.8:

  Economies ceasing to be hyperinflationary in an interim

  period ....................................................................................................1202

  1177

  Chapter 16

  Hyperinflation

  1 INTRODUCTION

  1.1 Background

  Accounting standards are applied on the assumption that the value of money (the unit

  of measurement) is constant over time, which normally is an acceptable practical

  assumption. However, when the effect of inflation on the value of money is no longer

  negligible, the usefulness of historical cost based financial reporting is often significantly

  reduced. High rates of inflation give rise to a number of problems for entities that

  prepare their financial statements on a historical cost basis, for example:

  • historical cost figures expressed in terms of monetary units do not show the ‘value

  to the business’ of assets;

  • holding gains on non-monetary assets that are reported as operating profits do not

  represent real economic gains;

  • financial information presented for the current period is not comparable with that

  presented for the prior periods; and

  • ‘real’ capital can be reduced because profits reported do not take account of the

  higher replacement costs of resources used in the period. Therefore, if calculating a

  nominal ‘return on capital’ based on profit, and not distinguishing this properly from

  a real ‘return of capital’, the erosion of capital may go unnoticed in the financial

  statements. This is the underlying point in the concept of capital maintenance.

  The IASB’s The Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting discusses the concept

  of capital maintenance, which raises the issue of how an entity defines capital. In

  general terms, an entity maintains its capital if it has as much capital at the end of the

  period as it had at the beginning, the issue being how this evaluation is measured. Whilst

  there are different concepts of capital maintenance, IFRS is ultimately based on the

  financial capital maintenance concept.

  Under the financial capital maintenance concept, the capital of the entity will be

  maintained if the financial amount of net assets at the end of a period is at least equal to

  the financial amount of net assets at the beginning of that period, excluding contributions

  from and distributions to owners during the period. [CF(2010) 4.59(a)]. To facilitate the

  1178 Chapter 16

  evaluation of capital maintenance in a hyperinflationary environment, IAS 29 – Financial

  Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies – was adopted in April 2001.

  The IASB and IFRS Interpretations Committee (Interpretations Committee) have only

  since addressed the subject of hyperinflation to clarify the provisions of the standard.

  In 2005, IFRIC 7 – Applying the Restatement Approach under IAS 29 Financial

  Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies – was issued to provide guidance on

  applying IAS 29 in the reporting period in which an entity’s functional currency first

  becomes hyperinflationary (see 10.1 below). In 2010 the IASB issued an amendment to

  IFRS 1 – First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards – for

  countries that exit severe hyperinflation (see 10.3 below).

  1.2 Hyperinflationary

  economies

  For entities used to working in economies with low inflation it is easy to overlook that

  there are countries where inflation is a major economic concern. In some of these

  countries, inflation has reached such levels that (1) the local currency is no longer a useful

  measure of value in the economy and (2) the general population may prefer not to hold

  its wealth in the local currency. Instead, they hold their wealth in a stable foreign currency

  or non-monetary assets. Such a condition is often referred to as hyperinflation.

  There are several characteristics that need to be considered under IFRS to determine

  whether hyperinflation exists. The IASB does not monitor inflation rates in specific

  jurisdictions, nor conclude on the applicability of the characteristics to these

  jurisdictions. Conversely, under US GAAP hyperinflation is clearly defined and deemed

  to exist when the cumulative rate of inflation over a three-year period exceeds 100%.

  For the purposes of reporting under US accounting standards, the International

  Practices Task Force (IPTF), a task force of the SEC Regulations Committee, monitors

  the inflation status of different countries.

  As the IPTF’s criteria are similar to those used under IFRS, this provides a useful guide

  for entities reporting under IFRS. However, it should be noted that hyperinflation

  accounting may need to be applied earlier under IFRS than US accounting standards as

  IAS 29 applies from the beginning of the reporting period in which hyperinflation is

  identified and the IPTF usually only meet in May and November each year. Minutes of

  these meetings are publicly available.1

  In practice, few countries are considered hyperinflationary by the IPTF. For the

  purposes of IAS 29, the same countries are usually considered hyperinflationary, but

  where the assessment of the characteristics is unclear, consensus is at times facilitated

  by local regulators and professional bodies.

  1.3 Restatement

  approach

  The problems of historical cost based financial reporting may reach such a magnitude

  under hyperinflationary circumstances that financial reporting in the hyperinflationary

  currency is no longer useful. Therefore, a solution is needed to allow meaningful

  financial reporting by entities that operate in these hyperinflationary economies.

  IAS 29 requires a restatement approach, whereby financial information recorded in the

  hyperinflationary currency is adjusted by applying a general price index and expressed

  Hyperinflation

  1179

  in the measuring unit current at the end of the reporting period (i.e. the accounting value

  is adjusted for a factor of current purchasing power). This process aims to improve

  comparability between periods by restating financial information for changes in the

  purchasing power of money.

  2

  THE REQUIREMENTS OF IAS 29

  2.1

  The context of IAS 29

  The underlying premise of IAS 29 is that ‘reporting of operating results and financial

  position in the local [hyperinflationary] currency without restatement is not useful’.

  [IAS 29.2]. The standard’s approach is therefore to require that:

  (a) the financial statements of an entity whose functional currency is the currency of

  a hyperinflationary economy shall be stated in terms of the measuring unit current

  at the end of the reporting period;

  (b) the corresponding figures for the previous period required by IAS 1 – Presentation

  of Financial Statements – and any information in respect of earlier periods shall

  also be stated in terms of the measuring unit current at the end of the reporting

  period; and

  (c) the gain or loss on the net monetary posit
ion shall be included in profit or loss and

  separately disclosed. [IAS 29.8-9].

  IAS 29 requires amounts recorded in the statement of financial position, not already

  expressed in terms of the measuring unit current at the end of the reporting period, to

  be restated in terms of the current measuring unit at the end of the reporting period, by

  applying a general price index. [IAS 29.11]. The example below illustrates how this would

  apply to the statement of financial position of an entity:

  Example 16.1: Accounting for hyperinflation under IAS 29

  An entity that operates in a hyperinflationary economy is required under IAS 29 to restate all non-monetary

  items in its statement of financial position to the measuring unit current at the end of the reporting period by

  applying a general price index as follows:

  Before

  Historical

  Year-end

  After

  restatement

  general price

  general price

  restatement

  (HC)

  index*

  index

  (HC)

  Plant and equipment 225

  150

  600

  900

  Inventory

  250

  500

  600

  300

  Cash 100

  100

  Total assets

  575

  1,300

  Accounts payable

  180

  180

  Long-term debt 250

  250

  Equity **

  145

  870

  575

  1,300

  * General price index at the date of purchase

  ** The restatement of equity is not illustrated here, but discussed at 5 below.

  1180 Chapter 16

  The simplified example above already raises a number of questions, such as:

  • Which items are monetary and which are non-monetary?

  • How does the entity select the appropriate general price index?

  • What was the general price index when the assets were acquired?

  The standard provides guidance on the restatement to the measuring unit current at the

  end of the reporting period, but concedes that the consistent application of these

  inflation accounting procedures and judgements from period to period is more

  important than the precise accuracy of the resulting amounts included in the restated

 

‹ Prev