International GAAP® 2019: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards

Home > Other > International GAAP® 2019: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards > Page 456
International GAAP® 2019: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards Page 456

by International GAAP 2019 (pdf)

creation of a new contract. See 10.3.1.F above for further discussion.

  11.1.1.F

  Determining when an entity has an unconditional right to payment if it

  has not transferred a good or service

  The standard states in paragraph 108 of IFRS 15 that a receivable is an entity’s right to

  consideration that is unconditional. In general, we believe it may be difficult to assert that the

  entity has an unconditional right to payment when it has not transferred a good or service.

  [IFRS 15.108]. However, an entity may enter into non-cancellable contracts that provide

  unconditional rights to payment from the customer for services that the entity has not yet

  completed providing or services it will provide in the near future (e.g. amounts invoiced in

  advance related to a service or maintenance arrangement). When determining whether it is

  acceptable (or required) to recognise accounts receivable and a corresponding contract

  2290 Chapter 28

  liability, the contractual terms and specific facts and circumstances supporting the existence

  of an unconditional right to payment should be evaluated. Factors to consider include:

  • Does the entity have a contractual (or legal) right to invoice and receive payment

  from the customer for services being provided currently (and not yet completed)

  or being provided in the near future (e.g. amounts invoiced in advance related to a

  service or maintenance arrangement)?

  • Is the advance invoice consistent with the entity’s normal invoicing terms?

  • Will the entity commence performance within a relatively short time frame of the

  invoice date?

  • Is there more than one year between the advance invoice and performance?

  11.2 Other presentation considerations

  The standard also changes the presentation requirements for products expected to be

  returned and for those that contain a significant financing component. See 6.4 and 6.5.3

  above for presentation considerations related to rights of return and significant

  financing components, respectively. Also see

  10.3.3.F above for presentation

  considerations related to capitalised contract costs to obtain and fulfil a contract.

  11.2.1

  Classifying shipping and handling costs in the income statement

  Under IFRS 15, an entity needs to determine whether shipping and handling is a separate

  promised service to the customer or if they are activities to fulfil the promise to transfer

  the good (see 5.1 above). Shipping and handling activities that are performed before the

  customer obtains control of the related good will be activities to fulfil its promise to

  transfer control of the good. If shipping and handling activities are performed after a

  customer obtains control of the related good, shipping and handling is a promised

  service to the customer and an entity needs to determine whether it acts as a principal

  or an agent in providing those services.

  If an entity determines that the shipping and handling activities are related to a promised

  good or service to the customer (either the promise to transfer control of the good or

  the promise to provide shipping and handling services) and the entity is the principal

  (rather than the agent), we believe the related costs should be classified as cost of sales

  because the costs would be incurred to fulfil a revenue obligation. However, if the entity

  determines that shipping and handling is a separate promised service to the customer

  and it is acting as an agent in providing those services, the related revenue to be

  recognised for shipping and handling services would be net of the related costs.

  We believe entities need to apply judgement to determine how to classify shipping and

  handling costs when it is not related to a promised good or service to the customer. This

  is because IFRS does not specifically address how entities should classify these costs.

  While not a requirement of IFRS 15, we would encourage entities to disclose the amount

  of these costs and the line item or items on the income statement that include them, if

  they are significant.

  Revenue

  2291

  11.3 Disclosure objective and general requirements

  In response to criticism that the legacy revenue recognition disclosures are inadequate,

  the Board sought to create a comprehensive and coherent set of disclosures. As a result,

  IFRS 15 described the overall objective of the disclosures, consistent with other recent

  standards, as detailed below.

  The objective is for an entity to ‘disclose sufficient information to enable users of

  financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of

  revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers’. To achieve that

  objective, an entity is required to disclose qualitative and quantitative information about

  all of the following: [IFRS 15.110]

  (a) its contracts with customers (discussed further at 11.4.1 below);

  (b) the significant judgements, and changes in the judgements, made in applying the

  standard to those contracts (discussed further at 11.4.2 below); and

  (c) any assets recognised from the costs to obtain or fulfil a contract with a customer

  (discussed further at 11.4.3 below).

  The standard requires that an entity consider the level of detail necessary to satisfy the

  disclosure objective and how much emphasis to place on each of the various

  requirements. The level of aggregation or disaggregation of disclosures requires

  judgement. Entities are required to ensure that useful information is not obscured by

  either the inclusion of a large amount of insignificant detail or the aggregation of items

  that have substantially different characteristics. [IFRS 15.111].

  An entity does not need to disclose information in accordance with IFRS 15 if it discloses

  that information in accordance with another standard. [IFRS 15.112].

  As explained in the Basis for Conclusions, many preparers raised concerns that they

  would need to provide voluminous disclosures at a cost that may outweigh any

  potential benefits. [IFRS 15.BC327, BC331]. As summarised above, the Board clarified the

  disclosure objective and indicated that the disclosures described in the standard are

  not meant to be a checklist of minimum requirements. That is, entities do not need

  to include disclosures that are not relevant or are not material to them. In addition,

  the Board decided to require qualitative disclosures instead of tabular reconciliations

  for certain disclosures.

  Entities should review their disclosures to determine whether they have met the

  standard’s disclosure objective to enable users to understand the nature, amount, timing

  and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. For

  example, some entities may make large payments to customers that do not represent

  payment for a distinct good or service and therefore reduce the transaction price and

  affect the amount and timing of revenue recognised. Although there are no specific

  requirements in the standard to disclose balances related to consideration paid or

  payable to a customer, an entity may need to disclose qualitative and/or quantitative

  information about those arrangements to meet the objective of the IFRS 15 disclosure

  requirements in the standard if the amounts are m
aterial.

  The disclosures are required for (and as at) each annual period for which a statement of

  comprehensive income and a statement of financial position are presented.

  2292 Chapter 28

  Certain interim revenue disclosures are also required for entities preparing interim

  financial statements. When it issued IFRS 15, the IASB amended IAS 34 to require

  disclosure of disaggregated revenue information. However, none of the other annual

  disclosures are required for interim financial statements (see Chapter 37 for further

  discussion on interim financial reporting).

  11.4 Specific disclosure requirements

  11.4.1

  Contracts with customers

  The majority of the standard’s disclosures relate to an entity’s contracts with customers.

  These disclosures include disaggregation of revenue, information about contract asset

  and liability balances and information about an entity’s performance obligations. To

  provide context for the disclosures, the Board decided to require entities to disclose the

  following amounts related to contracts with customers: [IFRS 15.113, BC332]

  • Paragraph 113(a) of IFRS 15 requires an entity to disclose (or present in the

  statement of comprehensive income) the amount of revenue recognised from

  contracts with customers under IFRS 15 separately from other sources of

  revenue. For example, a large equipment manufacturer that both sells and

  leases its equipment should present (or disclose) amounts from these

  transactions separately.

  • Paragraph 113(b) of IFRS 15 also requires an entity to disclose impairment losses

  from contracts with customers separately from other impairment losses if they are

  not presented in the statement of comprehensive income separately. As noted in

  the Basis for Conclusions, the Board felt that separately disclosing the impairment

  losses on contracts with customers provides the most relevant information to users

  of financial statements. [IFRS 15.BC334].

  In the following extract, The Village Building Co. Limited presents a combined revenue

  number on the face of the statement of profit or loss which includes revenue recognised

  from contracts with customers in accordance with IFRS 15 and other revenue (e.g. rental

  income, dividends) in the same line item. It then presents customer contract revenues

  separately from other sources of revenue, in note 4.

  Extract 28.3: The Village Building Co. Limited (2017)

  CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER

  COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2017 [Extract]

  Note 2017

  2016

  $’000

  $’000

  Revenue 4

  147,826

  134,999

  Cost of sales

  5

  (107,235)

  (99,565)

  Gross profit

  40,591 35,434

  Revenue

  2293

  NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

  30 JUNE 2017 [Extract]

  NOTE 4. REVENUE [Extract]

  2017

  2016

  $’000

  $’000

  CUSTOMER CONTRACT REVENUE

  Land, house & land and units

  142,733

  134,067

  Project management fees

  19

  358

  142,752 134,425

  OTHER REVENUE

  Trading income – retail sales Big Banana

  3,532

  –

  Dividends

  21 15

  Gain on Big Banana acquisition

  623

  –

  Unrealised gain on investments

  149

  –

  Rental income

  298

  265

  Remeasurement of investment prior to business purchase

  92

  –

  Other revenue

  359

  294

  5,074 574

  Revenue 147,826

  134,999

  Ferrovial, S.A. has applied a different approach by disclosing the amounts relating to

  contracts with customers in a narrative within the notes. It does not disclose

  comparative information as it applies the modified retrospective method to adopt

  IFRS 15 (see 2.3.4 above).

  Extract 28.4: Ferrovial, S.A. (2017)

  F. NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR 2017 [Extract]

  SECTION 2: PROFIT FOR THE YEAR [Extract]

  2.1. Operating income [Extract]

  The detail of the Group’s operating income at 31 December 2017 is as follows:

  (Millions of euros)

  2017 2016

  Revenue

  12,208 10,759

  Other operating income

  (10)

  7

  Total operating income

  12,218

  10,765

  The Group’s revenue at 31 December 2017 relating to contracts with customers amounted to EUR 11,872 million (see

  Note 1.3.3.4, Revenue recognition).

  Unless required, or permitted, by another standard, IAS 1 does not permit offsetting of

  income and expenses within profit or loss or the statement of comprehensive income.

  [IAS 1.32].

  After applying the requirements for determining the transaction price in IFRS 15,

  revenue recognised by an entity may include offsets, for example, for any trade

  discounts given and volume rebates paid by the entity to its customer. Similarly, in

  the ordinary course of business, an entity may undertake other transactions that do

  not generate revenue, but are incidental to the main revenue-generating activities.

  2294 Chapter 28

  When this presentation reflects the substance of the transaction or other event, IAS 1

  permits an entity to present ‘the results of such transactions ... by netting any income

  with related expenses arising on the same transaction’. [IAS 1.34]. An example given in

  IAS 1 is the presentation of gains and losses on the disposal of non-current assets by

  deducting from the amount of consideration on disposal the carrying amount of the

  asset and related selling expenses. [IAS 1.34(a)].

  11.4.1.A

  Disaggregation of revenue

  Entities are required to disclose disaggregated revenue information to illustrate how the

  nature, amount, timing and uncertainty about revenue and cash flows are affected by

  economic factors. [IFRS 15.114]. This is the only disclosure requirement for IFRS preparers

  that is required in both an entity’s interim and annual financial statements.

  As noted above, an entity is required to separately disclose any impairment losses

  recognised in accordance with IFRS 9 on receivables or contract assets arising from

  contracts with customers. However, entities are not required to further disaggregate

  such losses for uncollectible amounts.

  While the standard does not specify precisely how revenue should be disaggregated, the

  application guidance suggests categories for entities to consider. The application

  guidance indicates that the most appropriate categories for a particular entity depend

  on its facts and circumstances, but an entity needs to consider how it disaggregates

  revenue in other communications (e.g. press releases, information regularly reviewed

  by the chief operating decision maker (e.g. chief executive officer or chief operating

  officer)) when determining
which categories are most relevant and useful. These

  categories could include, but are not limited to: [IFRS 15.B87-B89]

  • type of good or service (e.g. major product lines);

  • geographical region (e.g. country or region);

  • market or type of customer (e.g. government and non-government customers);

  • type of contract (e.g. fixed-price and time-and-materials contracts);

  • contract duration (e.g. short-term and long-term contracts);

  • timing of transfer of goods or services (e.g. revenue from goods or services

  transferred to customers at a point in time and revenue from goods or services

  transferred over time); and

  • sales channels (e.g. goods sold directly to consumers and goods sold through

  intermediaries).

  As noted in the Basis for Conclusions, the Board decided not to prescribe a specific

  characteristic of revenue as the basis for disaggregation because it intended for entities

  to make this determination based on entity-specific and/or industry-specific factors that

  are the most meaningful for their businesses. The Board acknowledged that an entity

  may need to use more than one type of category to disaggregate its revenue.

  [IFRS 15.B87, BC336].

  Revenue

  2295

  Paragraph 112 of IFRS 15 clarifies that an entity does not have to duplicate disclosures

  required by another standard. [IFRS 15.112]. For example, an entity that provides disaggregated

  revenue disclosures as part of its segment disclosures, in accordance with IFRS 8 –

  Operating Segments, does not need to separately provide disaggregated revenue disclosures

  if the segment-related disclosures are sufficient to illustrate how the nature, amount, timing

  and uncertainty about revenue and cash flows from contracts with customers are affected

  by economic factors and are presented on a basis consistent with IFRS.

  However, segment disclosures may not be sufficiently disaggregated to achieve the

  disclosure objectives of IFRS 15. The IASB noted in the Basis for Conclusions that segment

  disclosures on revenue may not always provide users of financial statements with enough

  information to help them understand the composition of revenue recognised in the period.

  [IFRS 15.BC340]. If an entity applies IFRS 8, it is required under paragraph 115 of IFRS 15 to

 

‹ Prev