International GAAP® 2019: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards

Home > Other > International GAAP® 2019: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards > Page 460
International GAAP® 2019: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards Page 460

by International GAAP 2019 (pdf)


  contract cost assets alongside this disclosure.

  Extract 28.15: Ford Motor Company (2017) (US GAAP)

  NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS [Extract]

  NOTE 4. REVENUE [Extract]

  Automotive Segment [Extract]

  Extended Service Contracts. We sell separately-priced service contracts that extend mechanical and maintenance

  coverages beyond our base warranty agreements to vehicle owners. The separately priced service contracts range from

  12 to 120 months. We receive payment at the inception of the contract and recognize revenue over the term of the

  agreement in proportion to the costs expected to be incurred in satisfying the obligations under the contract. At

  January 1, 2017, $3.5 billion of unearned revenue associated with outstanding contracts was reported in Other

  Liabilities and deferred revenue, $1 billion of this was recognized as revenue during the year ended December 31,

  2017. At December 31, 2017, the unearned amount was $3.8 billion. We expect to recognize approximately

  $1.1 billion of the unearned amount in 2018, $1 billion in 2019, and $1.7 billion thereafter. We record a premium

  deficiency reserve to the extent we estimate the future costs associated with these contracts exceed the unrecognized

  revenue. Amounts paid to dealers to obtain these contracts are deferred and recorded as Other assets. These costs are

  amortized to expense consistent with how the related revenue is recognized. We had a balance of $232 million in

  deferred costs as of December 31, 2017, and recognized $63 million of amortization during the year ended

  December 31, 2017.

  The Board also provided a practical expedient under which an entity can decide not to

  disclose the amount of the remaining performance obligations for contracts with an

  original expected duration of less than one year or those that meet the requirements of

  the right to invoice practical expedient in paragraph B16 IFRS 15 (see paragraph 121 of

  IFRS 15). As explained in 8.2.1.A above, the right to invoice practical expedient permits

  an entity that is recognising revenue over time to recognise revenue as invoiced if the

  entity’s right to payment is an amount that corresponds directly with the value to the

  2312 Chapter 28

  customer of the entity’s performance to date. [IFRS 15.121]. For example, an entity is not

  required to make the disclosure for a three-year service contract under which it has a

  right to invoice the customer a fixed amount for each hour of service provided. If an

  entity uses this disclosure practical expedient, it is required to qualitatively disclose that

  fact. [IFRS 15.122].

  Disclosing revenue recognised from performance obligations satisfied in previous

  periods is likely to be a change in practice for most entities. Entities need to make sure

  they have appropriate systems, policies and procedures and internal controls in place

  to collect and disclose the required information.

  ASC 606 contains optional exemptions that are consistent with the optional practical

  expedients included in paragraph 121 of IFRS 15. However, ASC 606 includes additional

  optional exemptions (that IFRS 15 does not) to allow entities not to make quantitative

  disclosures about remaining performance obligations in certain cases and require

  entities that use any of the new or existing optional exemptions (previously referred to

  as practical expedients) to expand their qualitative disclosures.

  The standard provides the following examples of these required disclosures.

  [IFRS 15.IE212-IE219].

  Example 28.100: Disclosure of the transaction price allocated to the remaining

  performance obligations

  On 30 June 20X7, an entity enters into three contracts (Contracts A, B and C) with separate customers to

  provide services. Each contract has a two-year non-cancellable term. The entity considers the requirements

  in paragraphs 120-122 of IFRS 15 in determining the information in each contract to be included in the

  disclosure of the transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligations at 31 December 20X7.

  Contract A

  Cleaning services are to be provided over the next two years typically at least once per month. For services

  provided, the customer pays an hourly rate of £25.

  Because the entity bills a fixed amount for each hour of service provided, the entity has a right to invoice the

  customer in the amount that corresponds directly with the value of the entity’s performance completed to date

  in accordance with paragraph B16 of IFRS 15. Consequently, no disclosure is necessary if the entity elects to

  apply the practical expedient in paragraph 121(b) of IFRS 15.

  Contract B

  Cleaning services and lawn maintenance services are to be provided as and when needed with a maximum of

  four visits per month over the next two years. The customer pays a fixed price of £400 per month for both

  services. The entity measures its progress towards complete satisfaction of the performance obligation using

  a time-based measure.

  Revenue

  2313

  The entity discloses the amount of the transaction price that has not yet been recognised as revenue in a table

  with quantitative time bands that illustrates when the entity expects to recognise the amount as revenue. The

  information for Contract B included in the overall disclosure is as follows:

  20X8

  20X9

  Total

  £

  £

  £

  Revenue expected to be recognised on

  this contract as at 31 December 20X7

  4,800(a)

  2,400(b)

  7,200

  (a) £4,800 = £400 × 12 months.

  (b) £2,400 = £400 × 6 months.

  Contract C

  Cleaning services are to be provided as and when needed over the next two years. The customer pays fixed

  consideration of £100 per month plus a one-time variable consideration payment ranging from £0-£1,000

  corresponding to a one-time regulatory review and certification of the customer’s facility (i.e. a performance

  bonus). The entity estimates that it will be entitled to £750 of the variable consideration. On the basis of the

  entity’s assessment of the factors in paragraph 57 of IFRS 15, the entity includes its estimate of £750 of

  variable consideration in the transaction price because it is highly probable that a significant reversal in the

  amount of cumulative revenue recognised will not occur. The entity measures its progress towards complete

  satisfaction of the performance obligation using a time-based measure.

  The entity discloses the amount of the transaction price that has not yet been recognised as revenue in a table

  with quantitative time bands that illustrates when the entity expects to recognise the amount as revenue. The

  entity also includes a qualitative discussion about any significant variable consideration that is not included

  in the disclosure. The information for Contract C included in the overall disclosure is as follows:

  20X8

  20X9

  Total

  £

  £

  £

  Revenue expected to be recognised on

  1,575(a) 788(b) 2,363

  this contract as at 31 December 20X7

  (a) Transaction price = £3,150 (£100 × 24 months + £750 variable consideration) recognised evenly over

  24 months at £1,575 per year.

  (b) £1,575 ÷ 2 = £788 (i.e. for 6 months of the year)
.

  In addition, in accordance with paragraph 122 of IFRS 15, the entity discloses qualitatively that part of the

  performance bonus has been excluded from the disclosure because it was not included in the transaction price.

  That part of the performance bonus was excluded from the transaction price in accordance with the

  requirements for constraining estimates of variable consideration.

  The standard also provides an example of how an entity could make the disclosure

  required by paragraph 120(b) of IFRS 15 using qualitative information (instead of

  quantitatively, using time bands) as follows. [IFRS 15.IE220-IE221].

  2314 Chapter 28

  Example 28.101: Disclosure of the transaction price allocated to the remaining

  performance obligations – qualitative disclosure

  On 1 January 20X2, an entity enters into a contract with a customer to construct a commercial building for

  fixed consideration of €10 million. The construction of the building is a single performance obligation that

  the entity satisfies over time. As at 31 December 20X2, the entity has recognised €3.2 million of revenue.

  The entity estimates that construction will be completed in 20X3, but it is possible that the project will be

  completed in the first half of 20X4.

  At 31 December 20X2, the entity discloses the amount of the transaction price that has not yet been

  recognised as revenue in its disclosure of the transaction price allocated to the remaining performance

  obligations. The entity also discloses an explanation of when the entity expects to recognise that amount as

  revenue. The explanation can be disclosed either on a quantitative basis using time bands that are most

  appropriate for the duration of the remaining performance obligation or by providing a qualitative

  explanation. Because the entity is uncertain about the timing of revenue recognition, the entity discloses this

  information qualitatively as follows:

  ‘As at 31 December 20X2, the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to the remaining

  performance obligation is €6.8 million and the entity will recognise this revenue as the building is

  completed, which is expected to occur over the next 12-18 months.’

  11.4.1.D

  Use of the ‘backlog’ practical expedient when the criteria to use the

  ‘right to invoice’ practical expedient are not met

  If an entity determines that it has not met the criteria to use the ‘right to invoice’ practical

  expedient (e.g. because there is a substantive contractual minimum payment or a volume

  discount), can the entity still use the disclosure practical expedient under which an entity

  can decide not to disclose the amount of transaction price allocated to remaining

  performance obligations? The TRG considered this question at the July 2015 TRG meeting.

  The TRG members generally agreed that the standard is clear that an entity can only use

  the practical expedient to avoid disclosing the amount of the transaction price allocated

  to remaining performance obligations for contracts: (a) with an original expected duration

  of less than one year; or (b) that qualify for the ‘right to invoice’ practical expedient.

  [IFRS 15.121]. If a contract does not meet either of these criteria, an entity must disclose the

  information about remaining performance obligations that is required by Paragraph 120

  of IFRS 15. [IFRS 15.120]. However, under these requirements, an entity is able to

  qualitatively describe any consideration that is not included in the transaction price (e.g.

  any estimated amount of variable consideration that is constrained).

  Stakeholders had questioned whether an entity can still use this disclosure practical

  expedient if it determines that it has not met the criteria to use the right to invoice

  practical expedient (e.g. because there is a substantive contractual minimum payment

  or a volume discount).152

  11.4.2 Significant

  judgements

  The standard specifically requires disclosure of significant accounting estimates and

  judgements (and changes to those judgements) made in determining the transaction

  price, allocating the transaction price to performance obligations and determining when

  performance obligations are satisfied. [IFRS 15.123].

  Revenue

  2315

  IFRS currently has general requirements requiring disclosures about significant

  accounting estimates and judgements made by an entity. Because of the importance

  placed on revenue by users of financial statements, as noted in the Basis for Conclusions

  on IFRS 15, the Board decided to require specific disclosures about the estimates used

  and the judgements made in determining the amount and timing of revenue recognition.

  [IFRS 15.BC355]. These requirements exceed those in the general requirements for

  significant judgements and accounting estimates required by IAS 1 and discussed in

  more detail below. [IAS 1.122-133].

  11.4.2.A

  Determining the timing of satisfaction of performance obligations

  IFRS 15 requires entities to provide disclosures about the significant judgements

  made in determining the timing of satisfaction of performance obligations. The

  disclosure requirements for performance obligations that are satisfied over time

  differ from those satisfied at a point in time, but the objective is similar – to disclose

  the judgements made in determining the timing of revenue recognition. Entities must

  disclose: [IFRS 15.124]

  • the methods used to recognise revenue (e.g. a description of the output methods

  or input methods used and how those methods are applied); and

  • an explanation of why the methods used provide a faithful depiction of the transfer

  of goods or services.

  For performance obligations that are satisfied at a point in time, entities must disclose

  the significant judgements made in evaluating the point in time when the customer

  obtains control of the goods or services. [IFRS 15.125].

  When an entity has determined that a performance obligation is satisfied over time,

  IFRS 15 requires the entity to select a single revenue recognition method for each

  performance obligation that best depicts the entity’s performance in transferring the

  goods or services. Entities must disclose the method used to recognise revenue.

  For example, assume an entity enters into a contract to refurbish a multi-level building

  for a customer and the work is expected to take two years. The entity concludes that

  the promised refurbishment service is a single performance obligation satisfied over

  time and it decides to measure progress using a percentage of completion method, based

  on the costs incurred. The entity discloses the method used, how it has been applied to

  the contract and why the method selected provides a faithful depiction of the transfer

  of goods or services.

  When an entity has determined that a performance obligation is satisfied at a point in

  time, the standard requires the entity to disclose the significant judgements made in

  evaluating when the customer obtains control of the promised goods or services. For

  example, an entity needs to consider the indicators of the transfer of control listed in

  paragraph 38 of IFRS 15 to determine when control transfers and disclose the significant

  judgements made in reaching that conclusion.

  2316 Chapter 28<
br />
  In Extract 28.12 at 11.4.1.C above, Alphabet Inc. describes the methods used to

  recognise its advertising revenue over time and explains the relationship between

  the methods and the different types of advertising it provides. Ford Motor Company

  recognises revenue at a point in time in relation its vehicle, parts and accessories

  sales. Extract 28.11 at 11.4.1.C above provides a description of when control transfers

  to the customer for these sales. Raytheon Company provides qualitative information

  about the method it uses to recognise revenue over time. It explains the ‘Estimate at

  Completion (EAC)’ process in which management reviews progress and execution of

  performance obligations and discloses the impact on operating income, income from

  continuing operations and diluted earnings per share (EPS) based on this EAC

  assessment (i.e. changes in estimates). It also describes the judgement and complexity

  involved in Extract 28.16.

  Extract 28.16: Raytheon Company (2017) (US GAAP)

  NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS [Extract]

  Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies [Extract]

  Revenue Recognition [Extract]

  We generally recognize revenue over time as we perform because of continuous transfer of control to the customer.

  For U.S. government contracts, this continuous transfer of control to the customer is supported by clauses in the

  contract that allow the customer to unilaterally terminate the contract for convenience, pay us for costs incurred plus

  a reasonable profit and take control of any work in process. Similarly, for non-U.S. government contracts, the customer

  typically controls the work in process as evidenced either by contractual termination clauses or by our rights to

  payment for work performed to date plus a reasonable profit to deliver products or services that do not have an

  alternative use to the Company.

  Because of control transferring over time, revenue is recognized based on the extent of progress towards completion

  of the performance obligation. The selection of the method to measure progress towards completion requires judgment

  and is based on the nature of the products or services to be provided. We generally use the cost-to-cost measure of

 

‹ Prev