Book Read Free

International GAAP® 2019: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards

Page 787

by International GAAP 2019 (pdf)


  given the fact IFRS 9 does not include an accounting solution for dynamic risk

  management, entities are permitted an accounting policy choice to continue applying

  the hedge accounting requirements of IAS 39 instead of those in IFRS 9. [IFRS 9.7.2.21].

  See 11.2 below.

  Furthermore, for a fair value hedge of the interest rate exposure of a portfolio of

  financial assets or financial liabilities (and only for such a hedge), an entity may apply

  the related hedge accounting requirements in IAS 39 instead of those in IFRS 9. This

  choice relates only to a fair value portfolio hedge as described in IAS 39 81A, 89A and

  AG114-AG132 of IAS 39 (see 11.2 below). A decision to continue to apply this IAS 39

  guidance is not part of the accounting policy choice to defer IAS 39 mentioned above.

  The chapter focuses on the hedge accounting requirements of IFRS 9. The main

  differences between hedge accounting under IFRS 9 and the hedge accounting

  requirements in IAS 39 are discussed at 14 below.

  In developing IFRS 9, the IASB decided not to carry forward any of the hedge

  accounting related Implementation Guidance that accompanied IAS 39. However the

  IASB emphasised that not carrying forward the implementation guidance did not mean

  that it had rejected the guidance. Implementation Guidance only accompanies, but is

  not part of the standard. [IFRS 9.BC6.93-95]. An entity might have relied on particular

  Implementation Guidance in IAS 39 as an interpretation of the IAS 39 hedge accounting

  guidance. In that case, the entity could also interpret the same outcome based on the

  Financial instruments: Hedge accounting 3977

  IFRS 9 hedge accounting guidance. Hence much of the Implementation Guidance in

  IAS 39 remains relevant for the application of IFRS 9.

  Accordingly, whilst this chapter predominantly focuses on the guidance included with

  IFRS 9, on occasion IAS 39 Implementation Guidance is included where this is

  considered to be relevant and helpful.

  1.4

  Objective of hedge accounting

  The objective of the IFRS 9 hedge accounting requirements is to ‘represent, in the

  financial statements, the effect of an entity’s risk management activities’. The aim of the

  objective is ‘to convey the context of hedging instruments for which hedge accounting

  is applied in order to allow insight into their purpose and effect’. [IFRS 9.6.1.1]. This is

  achieved by reducing the accounting mismatch by changing either the measurement or

  (in the case of certain firm commitments) recognition of the hedged exposure, or the

  accounting for the hedging instrument, but with some important improvements when

  compared to IAS 39.

  This is a rather broad objective that focuses on an entity’s risk management activities

  and reflects what the Board wanted to achieve with the new accounting requirements.

  However, this broad objective does not override any of the hedge accounting

  requirements, which is why the Board noted that hedge accounting is only permitted if

  all the new qualifying criteria are met (see 6 below). [IFRS 9.BC6.82].

  1.5

  Hedge accounting overview

  Given the stated objective of IFRS 9 is for hedge accounting to represent an entity’s risk

  management activities where possible, the first step in achieving hedge accounting

  under IFRS 9 is to identify the relevant risk management strategy and the objective for

  a particular hedge relationship. These form the foundations for hedge accounting under

  IFRS 9 (see 6.2 below).

  Consistent with IAS 39, the standard defines three types of hedge relationships:

  • a fair value hedge: a hedge of the exposure to changes in fair value that is

  attributable to a particular risk and could affect profit or loss;

  • a cash flow hedge: a hedge of the exposure to variability in cash flows that is

  attributable to a particular risk and could affect profit or loss; and

  • a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation. [IFRS 9.6.5.2].

  An entity may choose to designate a hedging relationship between a hedging instrument

  and a hedged item in order to achieve hedge accounting. [IFRS 9.6.1.2]. Prior to hedge

  accounting being applied, all of the following steps must have been completed:

  • identification of eligible hedged item(s) and hedging instrument(s) (see 2 and

  3 below);

  • identification of an eligible hedged risk (see 2 below);

  • ensuring that hedge relationship meets the definition of one of the permitted

  types (a fair value, cash flow or net investment hedge) (see 5 below);

  • satisfying the qualifying criteria for hedge accounting (see 6 below); and

  • formal designation of the hedge relationship (see 6.3 below).

  3978 Chapter 49

  Once these requirements are met, hedge accounting can be applied prospectively, but

  the ongoing qualifying criteria and assessments must continue to be met, otherwise

  hedge accounting will cease. (See 8 below).

  The table below summarises the application of hedge accounting for the three types of

  hedge relationships:

  Figure 49.1:

  Accounting for hedge relationships

  Hedge type

  Fair value

  Cash flow

  Net investment

  Carrying amount adjusted

  for changes in fair value

  Hedged item

  with respect to the hedged

  N/A N/A

  risk. Adjusted through

  profit or loss.

  No change to carrying

  No change to carrying

  Hedging

  amount, but effective

  amount, but effective

  N/A

  instrument

  portion of change in fair

  portion of change in fair

  value is recorded in OCI.

  value is recorded in OCI.

  Resultant

  Ineffective portion

  Ineffective portion

  Ineffective portion

  profit or loss

  As it can be seen from the above, for a fair value hedge, an adjustment is made to the

  carrying value of the hedged item to reflect the change in value of the hedged risk, with

  an offset to profit or loss for the change in value of the hedging instrument. Where the

  offset is not complete, this will result in ineffectiveness to be recorded in profit or loss

  (see 7.4 below).

  However, for both a cash flow and net investment hedge, the carrying amount of the

  hedged item, which for a cash flow hedge may not even yet be recognised, is unchanged.

  The effect of hedge accounting is to defer the effective portion of the change in value

  of the hedging instrument in other comprehensive income. Any ineffective portion will

  remain in profit or loss as ineffectiveness.

  See 7 below for more details on accounting for eligible hedges.

  2 HEDGED

  ITEMS

  2.1 General

  requirements

  The basic requirement for a hedged item is for it to be one of the following:

  • a recognised asset or liability;

  • an unrecognised firm commitment;

  • a highly probable forecast transaction; or

  • a net investment in a foreign operation.

  The hedged item must be reliably measurable and can be a single item, or a group of

  items (see 2.5 below). A hedged item can also
be a component of such an item(s) (see 2.2

  and 2.3 below). [IFRS 9.6.3.1, 6.3.2, 6.3.3].

  Financial instruments: Hedge accounting 3979

  Recognised assets and liabilities can include financial items and non-financial items such

  as inventory. Most internally-generated intangibles (e.g. for a bank, a core deposit

  intangible – see 2.6.7 below) are not recognised assets and therefore cannot be hedged

  items. However, firm commitments that are not routinely recognised as assets or

  liabilities absent the effects of hedge accounting for such items can be eligible hedged

  items, this would include loan commitments (see Chapter 41 at 3.5). [IFRS 9.6.3.1].

  The term ‘highly probable’ is not defined in IFRS 9, but is often interpreted to mean a

  much greater likelihood of happening than ‘more likely than not’. The implementation

  guidance within IAS 39 contained some guidance as to how the term highly probable

  should be applied within the context on hedge accounting, this guidance can be

  considered relevant for IFRS 9 hedge accounting. See 2.6.1 below.

  A net investment in a foreign operation is defined in paragraph 8 of IAS 21 – The Effects

  of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates – to be the amount of the reporting entity’s

  interest in the net assets of that operation (see Chapter 15 at 6).

  An aggregated exposure that is a combination of an exposure that could qualify as a

  hedged item and a derivative may be designated as a hedged item (see 2.7 below).

  [IFRS 9.6.3.4].

  Only assets, liabilities, firm commitments and forecast transactions with an external

  party qualify for hedge accounting. [IFRS 9.6.3.5]. As an exception, a hedge of the foreign

  currency risk of an intragroup monetary item qualifies for hedge accounting if that

  foreign currency risk affects consolidated profit or loss. In addition, the foreign currency

  risk of a highly probable forecast intragroup transaction would also qualify as a hedged

  item if that transaction affects consolidated profit or loss. [IFRS 9.6.3.6]. (See 4.3.2 below).

  Financial assets and liabilities need not be within the scope of IFRS 9 to qualify as

  hedged items. For example, although rights and obligations under lease agreements are

  for most purposes scoped out of IFRS 9, lease payables or finance lease receivables still

  meet the definition of a financial instrument and could therefore be hedged items in a

  hedge of interest rate or foreign currency risk. However, following the introduction of

  IFRS 16 – Leases (see Chapter 24), entities that previously hedged the full foreign

  currency risk from future forecast operating lease payments will no longer need to apply

  hedge accounting. This is because the foreign exchange risk in the hedging instrument

  will naturally offset the IAS 21 retranslation of the lease liability. However, for entities

  that did not economically hedge the full foreign currency risk arising from future

  forecast operating lease payments, there may be an additional incentive to do so, as the

  full foreign exchange risk of the lease has a more immediate impact on profit or loss

  through the IAS 21 retranslation of the lease liability than under IAS 17 – Leases.

  In the case of a financial liability containing an embedded derivative (see Chapter 42 at 4),

  if the embedded derivative is accounted for separately from the host instrument, the

  hedged item would be the host instrument or components thereof (see 2.2 and 2.3 below);

  basing it on the hybrid instrument (i.e. the instrument including the embedded derivative)

  or the cash flows from the hybrid is not permitted. This is because derivatives are only

  permitted as a hedged item as part of an eligible aggregated exposure. As an embedded

  derivatives is only accounted for separately if it is not closely related to the host instrument,

  it is unlikely to meet the criteria for an eligible aggregated exposure (see 2.7 below).

  3980 Chapter 49

  An entity may designate an item in its entirety or a component of an item as the hedged

  item in a hedging relationship. An entire item comprise all changes in the cash flows or

  fair value of an item. A component compromises less than the entire fair value change

  or cash flow variability of an item. In that case an entity may designate only the following

  types of components (including combinations) as hedged items:

  • only changes in the cash flows or fair value of an item attributable to a specific risk

  or risks (i.e. a risk component), including one sided risks (see 2.2 below);

  • one or more selected contractual cash flows; and

  • components of a nominal amount, i.e. a specified part of the amount of an item

  (see 2.3 below). [IFRS 9.6.3.7].

  The reference to one sided risks refers to an ability to designate only changes in the

  cash flows or fair value of a hedged item above or below a specified price or other

  variable. The intrinsic value of a purchased option hedging instrument (assuming that it

  has the same principal terms as the designated risk), but not its time value, reflects a one

  sided risk in a hedged item. For example, an entity can designate the variability of future

  cash flow outcomes resulting from a price increase of a forecast commodity purchase,

  without including the risk of a price decrease within the hedge relationship. Such a

  situation may arise if the entity wanted to retain the opportunity to benefit from lower

  commodities prices, but protect itself against an increase. In such a situation, only cash

  flow losses that result from an increase in the price above the specified level are

  designated. The hedged risk does not include the time value of the purchased option.

  [IFRS 9.6.3.7].

  Only the portion of cash flows or fair value of a financial instrument that are designated

  as the hedged item are subject to the hedge accounting requirements. The accounting

  for other portions that are not designated as the hedged item remains unchanged.

  The guidance also adds that to be eligible for hedge accounting, a risk component must be

  a separately identifiable component of the financial or non-financial item, and the changes

  in the cash flows or fair value of the item attributable to changes in that risk component

  must be reliably measurable. [IFRS 9.B6.3.8]. This is considered further below at 2.2.

  There is no requirement to designate a hedged item only on initial recognition.

  Designation of hedged items sometime after their initial recognition (e.g. after a previous

  hedge relationship is discontinued) is permitted, although some additional complexity

  may arise when identifying risk components (see 2.4.1 below). [IFRS 9.B6.5.28].

  2.2 Risk

  components

  2.2.1 General

  requirements

  Instead of hedging the total changes in fair values or cash flows, risk managers often

  enter into derivatives to hedge only specific risk components. Managing a specific risk

  component reflects that hedging all risks is often not economical and hence not

  desirable, or even not possible (because of a lack of suitable hedging instruments).

  If designated, the usual hedge accounting requirement apply to a risk component in the

  same way as they apply to other hedged items that are not risk components. For

  example the qualifying criteria apply, including that the hedging relationship must meet

  Financial instrument
s: Hedge accounting 3981

  the hedge effectiveness requirements, and any hedge ineffectiveness must be measured

  and recognised, albeit only with respect to the hedged risk, and not the full item.

  [IFRS 9.B6.3.11].

  IFRS 9 permits an entity to designate a risk component of a financial or non-financial

  item as the hedged item in a hedging relationship. Designation of a risk component

  means that only changes in the cash flows or fair value of the hedged item with respect

  to the designated risk are subject to the hedge accounting requirements. So instead of

  considering value changes in the hedged item with respect to all risks that are value

  drivers, only value changes in the hedged item with respect to the designated risk

  component are considered for hedge accounting purposes. This is valuable as it is

  common for entities to economically hedge a specific risk within a hedged item rather

  than its full price risk. The ability to designate risk components in a hedge relationship

  is an important step in enabling entities to achieve the IASB’s objective for hedge

  accounting, which is to ‘represent, in the financial statements, the effect of an entity’s

  risk management activities’.

  It should be noted, however, that only eligible risk components can be designated in

  hedge relationships. IFRS 9 provides guidance on this topic which is discussed in the

  sections below.

  The key requirements for designating a risk component are that risk component is less

  than the entire item (see 2.4 below), it must be a separately identifiable component of

  the item and the changes in the cash flows or fair value of the item attributable to the

  changes in that risk component must be reliably measurable. [IFRS 9.B6.3.7, B6.3.8]. A risk

  component can be contractually specified in the contract (see 2.2.2 below) but non-

  contractually specified risk components may also be eligible (see 2.2.3 below).

  [IFRS 9.B6.3.10].

  When identifying what risk components qualify for designation as a hedged item, in

  particular whether they are separately identifiable and reliably measurable, an entity

  assesses such risk components within the context of the particular market structure to

  which the risk(s) relate and in which the hedging activity takes place. [IFRS 9.B6.3.9]. This

 

‹ Prev