Dr. Chester Pierce, a Professor of Educational Psychiatry at Harvard, said:
Every child in America entering school at the age of five is insane because he comes to school with certain allegiances toward our Founding Fathers, toward his parents, toward our elected officials, toward a belief in a supernatural being, and toward the sovereignty of this nation as a separate entity. It’s up to you, teachers, to make all these sick children well by creating the international child of the future. (1973 International Education Seminar)
Should today’s children be uncooperative, they may, for instance, be classified as ADHD prone and given regular doses of Ritalin. “In the United States every tenth boy among ten year-olds already swallows an ADHD medication on a daily basis. With an increasing tendency.” (Blech, Jörg: Schwermut ohne Scham. In: Der Spiegel, Nr. 6/6.2.12, p. 127).
Yet Leon Eisenberg, the “father of ADHD” confessed in 2013, seven months before his death, that “ADHD is a prime example of a fictitious disease.”
During the past two decades, child psychiatry has already provoked three fads-- a tripling of Attention Deficit Disorder, a more than twenty-times increase in Autistic Disorder, and a forty-times increase in childhood Bipolar Disorder.
***
Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder: DSM 5 (Diagnosis and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, released May 18, 2013) will turn temper tantrums into a mental disorder. Normal grief will become Major Depressive Disorder, thus medicalizing and trivializing our expectable and necessary emotional reactions to the loss of a loved one. The everyday forgetting characteristic of old age will now be misdiagnosed as Minor Neurocognitive Disorder. Etc., etc. (Allen Frances, former Chairman, DSM-IV Task Force Psychology Today, December 2, 2012)
***
Education should aim at destroying free will so that pupils thus schooled, will be incapable throughout the rest of their lives of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished. . . . Influences of the home are obstructive; and in order to condition students, verses set to music and repeatedly intoned are very effective. . . . It is for a future scientist to make these maxims precise and to discover exactly how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black. When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for more than one generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen. (Charlotte Iserbyt quotes Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science on Society, Columbia U. Press, 1951)
While free will is being destroyed and open minds closed by the suppression of an education based primarily on the liberal arts, emphasizing the development of intellectual abilities as opposed to the acquisition of professional skills, World ORT, “the world’s largest Jewish education and vocational training non-governmental organisation, with past and present activities in more than 100 countries” strives “to give Jewish children all over the world access to cutting-edge education.” (www.ort.org)
The conditioning of modern American society began with John Dewey, a psychologist, a Fabian Socialist and the “Father of Progressive Education.” Dewey used the psychology developed in Leipzig by Wilhelm Wundt, and believed that through a stimulus-response approach (like Pavlov) students could be conditioned for a new social order. (Dennis Cuddy, Ph.D. “The Conditioning of America,” The Christian News, New Haven, Mo., December 11, 1989)
The Great War provided the necessary disjunction upon which to construct a revised history.
After the war the Carnegie Endowment trustees reasoned if they could get control of education in the United States, they would be able to prevent a return to the way of life as it had been prior to the war; and they recruited the Rockefeller Foundation to assist in such a monumental task. (Charlotte Iserbyt, writer and speaker, served as Senior Policy Advisor in the Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI), U.S. Department of Education)
***
Among the basic studies consulted by Rockefeller-funded scientists and others interested in social control at the beginning of this century were those of the official Prussian state psychologist Wilhelm Maximilian Wundt, professor of psychology at the University of Heidelberg. It’s fascinating that Wundt’s grandfather is mentioned in the Illuminati Provincial Report from Utica (Heidelberg) of September 1782, as being the member known as “Raphael.”
During the period before Wundt’s ascendancy in the field, psychology was considered to be, simply enough, the study of the soul or mind (psyche). Wundt was to change all that, defining and propagandizing for the materialistic viewpoint that would inform the work of successors like Pavlov, Skinner, and Watson.
Wundt took a chair in philosophy at the University of Leipzig in 1875, establishing the world’s first psychological laboratory, creating the psychological journal Philosophical Studies, and redefining psychology for this century. Wundt stated with characteristic modesty, “The work which I here present to the public is an attempt to mark out a new domain in science.” Wundt was to remain at the University of Leipzig until his death in 1920.
Wundt’s doctrine might be characterized as science meets the Hegelian Sturm und Drang. One of the primary underpinnings of the New World Order is that its strategy for world conquest originates in the philosophy of Hegel. Hegel was a professor of philosophy at the University of Berlin, and his works formed the basis for both Marxist dialectical materialism and fascist Statism.
Hegel’s stated belief was that Man is subordinate to the State, and only finds fulfillment in obedience to the diktats of the State. As he said, “The State is the absolute reality and the individual himself has objective existence, truth and morality only in his capacity as a member of the State.”
This philosophy can be and has been used for the justification of any number of atrocities committed upon the human race, and provides an unexamined sub-stratum to the philosophies of many politicians today. If only the omelette (the State) is important, what does it matter if we lose a few million eggs (humans) in the process of cooking up the dish?
Hegel was the originator of the theory of the “dialectic,” the idea that conflict determines history. According to Hegel, a force (thesis) dictates its own opposing force (antithesis). These forces in conflict result in the creation of a third force: a synthesis. Out of this synthesis the process begins again. Marx later revised the theory of the dialectic, insisting that only material events were relevant, and that the dialectic was inherent in matter, thus divorcing the idea from metaphysics, at least to his own satisfaction.
From the theory of the dialectic comes the realization that the creation of conflicts can create determined outcomes, or syntheses. Those who promote the New World Order, again and again, are seen to be using the theory of the Hegelian dialectic to bring it about. They are manipulating events, creating conflicts, creating wars, and destroying the lives of untold millions in the bargain. The New World Order is the desired synthesis of the controlling forces operant in the world today. (Jim Keith, “Taking the ‘Psyche’ out of Psychology,” in Mind Control, World Control, 1997)
Sigmund Freud (Sigismund Schlomo Freud), another “pseudoscientist” (Karl Popper) and the inventor of “psychoanalysis” and father of the “sexual revolution”—in short, the Jew who profited from the discovery that people would pay to reveal their most intimate secrets--was a 19th century link in the chain of social conditioning.
From the beginning, psychoanalysis in the Frankfurt School was conceived in terms of a reinterpretation of Freud and Marx. (The Frankfurt School and Critical Theory)
Freudo-Marxism is a loose designation of several forms of critical theory that attempt to synthesize the philosophy and critique of political economy of Karl Marx with the psychoanalytic theory of Sigmund Freud. The beginnings of Freudo-Marxist theorizing took place in the 1920s in Germany and the Soviet Union. The Soviet philosopher V. Yurinets and the Freudian analyst Siegfried Bernfeld both discussed the topic. The Soviet linguist Valentin Voloshinov,
a member of the Bakhtin circle, began a Marxist critique of psychoanalysis in his 1925 article “Beyond the Social,” which he developed more substantially in his book Freudianism: A Marxist Critique (1927). In 1929 Dialectical Materialism and Psychoanalysis by Wilhelm Reich was published, both in German and in Russian in the bilingual communist theory journal Unter dem Banner des Marxismus. (Wikipedia)
The conclusion is clear: Illuminism and Freemasonry are uninterruptedly linked to Marxism and Jewry:
All Illuminati are freemasons but far from all freemasons are Illuminati, (Professors Cosandey and Renner, testimonies, Munich, April 1785.)
***
Masonry is a Jewish institution, whose history, degrees, charges, passwords and explanations are Jewish from end to end. (Dr. Isaac Wise, The Israelite of America, August 3, 1866)
***
The technical language, symbolism and rites of Freemasonry are full of Jewish ideas and terms . . . In the Scottish Rite, the dates on official documents are given according to the era and months of the Jewish calendar, and use is made of the Hebraic alphabet. (Jewish Encyclopedia, 1903, Vol. 5, p. 503)
***
The Grand Lodge Masonry of the present day is wholly Jewish. (Richard Carlisle, Manual of Freemasonry)
***
The most important duty of the Freemason must be to glorify the Jewish Race, which has preserved the unchanged divine standard of wisdom. You must rely upon the Jewish race to dissolve all frontiers. (Le Symbolism, July, 1928)
***
Masonry is based on Judaism. Eliminate the teachings of Judaism from the Masonic ritual and what is left? (The Jewish Tribune, New York, Oct. 28, 1927)
***
In the eighteenth century freemasonry became expressive of a militant policy of enlightenment, as in the case of the Illuminati, who were the forerunners of the revolution... (Leon Trotsky (1879-1940), My life: an attempt at an autobiography, New York, Pathfinder Press, Inc., 1970. xxxvii, 602 p)
***
These leaders are those called “blue Masons,” whilst so-called “red masonry” is reserved to a very small number of people, mostly Jews, who, fully aware of the goals, direct all the great mass of those who are more or less “enlightened” in the things of the Masonic organization. These leaders stay in the shadows and they always act secretly, making opposition impossible. They are the ones who plan the advance of the work. Out of their “workshops” came the French Revolution, the whole series of revolutions from 1789 to 1815, and the World War ... (The Writings of Fr. M. Kolbe (1894-1941), Ed. Citta di vita, 1978 Vol. 3, p. 604).
***
In addition, it is a matter of notorious public knowledge that it is the Jews who control Socialism and who currently govern in Bolshevik Russia (op. cit. p.52).
In The Origin and Progress of the World Revolution, published in 1921, Nesta Webster wrote: “What mysteries of iniquity would be revealed if the Jew, like the mole, did not make a point of working in the dark! Jews have never been more Jews than when we tried to make them men and citizens.”
The three revolutions that fundamentally destroyed the organic development of Europe were the English, the French and the Russian Revolutions. They culminated in three regicidal dictatorships. Republics are more easily influenced than monarchies. (“Joshua called to all the men of Israel...Come near, put your feet upon the necks of these kings. And they came near, and put their feet upon the necks of them...And afterward Joshua smote them, and slew them, and hanged them on five trees: and they were hanging on the trees until the evening.” Joshua 10; 24, 26)
No revolution (likewise no war) occurs as a result of a spontaneous popular expression; it must be organized and financed. Thus, they were all early examples of “coercive diplomacy,” followed by “regime change.” As a result of these three revolutions, first England, then France, then America was successively brought under the yoke of debt, as Jewish central banks were established in each country.
The “English” Revolution: Edward I had expelled the Jews in 1290; they found a willing creature and hireling in Oliver Cromwell. In 1643, Jewish bankers based in Amsterdam funded a rabble which repeatedly threatened the City of London and Parliament. “They were said to amount to ten thousand . . . with war-like weapons. It was a militia for insurgency at all seasons, and might be depended upon for any work of destruction at the cheapest rate . . . as these sallied forth with daggers and bludgeons (from the city) the inference is obvious that this train of explosion must have been long laid.” (Isaac D’Israeli, father of Benjamin Disraeli)
On June 16th, 1647 O.C. (i.e. Olivier Cromwell) writes to Ebenezer Pratt of the Mulheim Synagogue in Amsterdam:
In return for financial support will advocate admission of Jews to England. This however impossible while Charles living. Charles cannot be executed without trial, adequate grounds for which do not at present exist. Therefore advise that Charles be assassinated, but will have nothing to do with arrangements for procuring an assassin, though willing to help in his escape.
In reply to this dispatch the records show Ebenezer Pratt wrote a letter dated July 12th, 1647 addressed to Oliver Cromwell:
Will grant financial aid as soon as Charles removed, and Jews admitted. Assassination too dangerous. Charles should be given an opportunity to escape. His recapture will then make trial and execution possible. The support will be liberal, but useless to discuss terms until trial commences.
Fernandez Carvajal, another Amsterdam-based Jew and subsequently the first “endenizened” English Jew, was the chief contractor of Cromwell’s New Model Army. After the battle of Naseby (June 1645), Charles retired to Holmby House, whence he was seized by Cromwell’s troops and carried off to Hampton Court. In 1647, Charles escaped to Carisbrooke Castle on the Isle of Wight, mistakenly supposing that the islanders would protect him. He made three unsuccessful escape attempts from Carisbrooke. Eventually, he was returned to London to stand trial. Cromwell was told “The King can be tried by no court.” Despite “purging” the parliament of all those who might show favour to the king, no English lawyer could be found to draw up a charge against him, but a Dutch-English Jew carried out the task and Charles I was executed –for “high treason”--in January, 1649. There was no formal decision to allow the readmission of Jews, but from 1656 their presence was openly tolerated.
The Stuart line was reinstituted under Charles II and James II, but in 1688 James II was overthrown by means of an invasion financed by the same Amsterdam Jews who had financed Cromwell.
They installed William III and his “Dutch” mob: “Hark, hark, the dogs do bark; the beggars are coming to town, some in rags and some in jags , and one in a velvet gown”--William (nursery rhyme of the period)
William of Orange was a Dutch “Stadtholder,” literally “place-keeper,” at best, a provincial governor. In the Middle Ages, Stadtholders were appointed by feudal lords to represent them in their absence. So, in order to force the readmission of Jews into, and expedite their financial sabotage of, the country, the Jews promoted first a mercenary (Cromwell), then, eventually, a “place-keeper,” as rulers of England.
William III is reported to have been assisted in his ascent to the English throne by a loan of 2,000,000 guilders from Antonio Lopez Suasso and later Baron Avernes de Gras. William’s reign brought about a closer connection between the predominantly Sephardic communities of London and Amsterdam; this aided in the transfer of the European finance centre from the Dutch capital to the English capital. (Wikipedia)
The “French” Revolution: The “capture during an escape” ploy was repeated at Varennes in 1791, during the luckless Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette’s attempt to elude the revolutionaries. Propaganda against Marie-Antoinette was spread by means of the infamous “necklace” plot, whereby the “foreign” queen was rumoured to have ordered a diamond necklace costing 1.6 million livres. Louis had defaulted on the French crown debts. He also supported the North American Revolutionaries who were struggling for their independence from Britain. Ind
ependence from Britain would have allowed the American colonials to evade English taxes and debt, and was therefore an act in defiance of the Jews who controlled the English exchequer. Hence the pressing need to organize an attack on the French king. Eventually, the financial powers settled on Napoleon, as the new strong man who would guarantee stability. In return, Napoleon agreed to found the Bank of France. Later, he expressed forceful views: “Nous devons considérer les Juifs non seulement comme une race distincte, mais encore comme un people étranger. Ce serait une humiliation trop grande pour la nation d’être gouvernée par la race la plus basse du monde.” (Conseil d’Etat, 6 April 1806) “We must look at the Jews not only as a distinct race, but as aliens. It would be too great a humiliation for the nation to be ruled by the basest race on earth.” (There are numerous similar estimations going back as far as the Romans.)
It is important to distinguish between these two races of Jews [the Ashkenazi and the Sephardim] in discussing the question of Jewish emancipation at the time of the Revolution. For whilst the Sephardim had shown themselves good citizens and were therefore subject to no persecutions, the Ashkenazim by their extortionate usury and oppressions had made themselves detested by the people, so that rigorous laws were enforced to restrain their rapacity. The discussions that raged in the National Assembly on the subject of the Jewish question related therefore mainly to the Jews of Alsace. (Nesta Webster Secret Societies and Subversive Movements, p. 258)
***
The biblical Hebrew terms for interest are neshekh, literally meaning a bite, and marbit/tarbit, which specifically refers to the gain by the creditor. (Jewish Encyclopedia, Wikipedia).
***
This was not the consuming bite of a lion, but the poisonous nip of a serpent. Usury does not all at once destroy a man or nation with, as it were, a bloody gulp. Rather, it slowly, sometimes nearly imperceptibly, subverts the victim’s constitution until he cannot prevent the fatal consequences even though he knows what is coming. (S.C. Mooney, Usury Destroyer of Nations, 1988, p. 23)
Tell the Truth & Shame the Devil Page 25
