We shall surround our government with a whole world of economists. That is the reason why economic sciences form the principal subject of the teaching given to the Jews. Around us again will be a whole constellation of bankers, industrialists, capitalists and—the main thing—millionaires, because in substance everything will be settled by the question of figures. (allegedly forged Protocol No. 8)
***
Free markets are a function of supply and demand whereas capital markets are a function of credit and debt. The bankers’ ponzi-scheme—which began with the distortion of free markets in 1694 when the Bank of England began issuing debt-based paper banknotes alongside the Royal Mint’s gold and silver coins—is coming to an end. The bankers’ wildly successful and long-running scheme, dependent on the uneasy equilibrium between credit and debt, has now been irrevocably destabilized. Aggregate levels of debt are now so high that credit—no matter how cheap and available—cannot restore the balance. By purposeful misdirection, the Fed keeps its real mandate hidden. The purpose of the Federal Reserve is not full employment, price stability or even the prevention of economic crises. The real purpose of the Fed is to oversee the bankers’ diabolical and lucrative franchise of debt-based money that has promoted the unconscionable indebting of America and turned its once-free citizens into debt slaves of the few. (Darryl Robert Schoon, Kitco, 15 April, 2014)
“The establishment of a central bank is 90% of communizing a nation.” (Lenin)
We are at the parting of the ways. We have, not one or two or three, but many, established and formidable monopolies in the United States. We have, not one or two, but many, fields of endeavor into which it is difficult, if not impossible, for the independent man to enter. We have restricted credit, we have restricted opportunity, we have controlled development, and we have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated, governments in the civilized world — no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and the duress of small groups of dominant men. (Woodrow Wilson, The New Freedom, 1913, p.201)
***
Alas, modern political economies are enforced frauds. The majority refuse to see this. They have the ability to back it up with violence and disinformation. (Dr. Jeffrey Lewis, Kitco, November 20, 2014).
The entire world as it is daily reported to us is just a gigantic con. The news is a con; government is a con; the markets are a con; modern art, etc. is a con. Money is a con. Money —in all its forms patently our most frequently deliberated subject; our nagging obsession, is just a con. Money, invented merely to save people, for example, from having to exchange a sack of potatoes for a visit to the dentist, has attained an unequalled and contrived importance in itself. Money has reduced us to its slaves when we should be its masters.
We live in two parallel worlds. One which we think we know, in which “money” is taken seriously, taxes are essential to the state and debt must be redeemed, else individuals and countries risk confiscation of their property (national debt leading to IMF “bail-outs”; “austerity” and fire-sale of national assets; privatization of profit and socialization of debt; control of the nation by financial powers). The other, in which “money” is almost a joke, in which “globalised” economies, over centuries, have amassed amounts of debt so great that they cannot be paid back, yet these economies continue to create debt by generating money through their banks, ostensibly in order to maintain their national budgets, but, in fact, to keep the banks liquid. Previously, thrift and saving were laudable; careless expenditure was not. Income saved against retirement was therefore only prudent. Now that pensions are no longer keeping up with inflation, the amounts automatically confiscated from salaries over a working lifetime, to which the worker has a legal right, are unable to support his retirement. If he has saved, he may be able to support himself. But now, savings are being threatened too, so you might as well spend it all. Yet, if you do spend it all, you will be completely at the mercy of an uncaring state. A state that can afford to fight wars, but not to feed its poor.
Money degrades all mankind’s gods and turns them into goods. Money, constituted for itself, has become the common value of all things. Thus, it has robbed the whole world, the human and the natural world alike, of its intrinsic worth. Money is the entity which has estranged Man from his work and his existence, and this alien entity dominates him, and he worships it. The god of the Jews has secularized itself; it has become the world’s god. Trade is the real god of the Jews. (Karl Marx, Zur Judenfrage, p. 50)
The U.S. debt is $18 trillion (National Review Online). Yet, the U.S. continues to fund wars and proxy wars and endless meddling (called “foreign policy”) in sovereign countries across the globe. It follows that the colossal amounts of money and the ensuing debt this interference costs are insignificant, in fact, literally immaterial – except in the sense that hardware and human resources must be subsidized. For this, “money” is created, as we have heard, from nothing. Figures of debt are reported merely to maintain the fiction that debt matters at all.
If you can manufacture enough money to kill perfectly innocent foreign civilians on the other side of the planet, then surely you can manufacture enough money to run a domestic economy without debt, to pay for real education, for instance, or for functioning health services, or affordable energy, or inexpensive public transport, or any number of things people actually need—as opposed to receiving their children in body-bags. And you can pay for all these things without taxes. An independent country, with an independent central bank, can do this. A responsible government—responsible to the people— can design a custom economy for its own national needs.
Which is more important, the human race or something we call “money”? Already centuries ago, we learnt that money is created by banks “out of thin air.” That is now common knowledge. If money is created out of thin air, there is no reason why it should be so important that striving after it and what it can buy has become many people’s aim in life. There is no reason for governments to pretend to anguish over national budgets and ways to “balance” them, by imposing austerity, or levying new taxes, for instance. Legendary economists’ competing theories are just so much hot air. Taxes are the invention of a fantastical system, in which money must be confiscated from the working population, allegedly to keep economies running. Since taxes never suffice for this end, money must be borrowed and interest paid to creditors, often at usuriously high interest. A fictive system of “credit” and “debt” has been devised. At its most profitable, this system allows money to be created to enable people to kill each other in artificially instigated wars. Simply put, there is no reason why banks or the people behind them should profit from lending money as if they had a monopoly of some rarified substance.
In a Jewish world in which money rules over people, the amount of money is made to seem finite and people must be forced into debt to the money system to survive. (There are a finite number of exquisite still lifes by 16th century Dutch artist Roelant Savery, but anything more absurd or insulting than the proposition that there could be an infinite amount of little pieces of decorated paper printed with fanciful numbers, or the digitalized equivalent, would be hard to imagine.) In a world in which people rule over money, the amount of money necessary to keep all essentials running is infinite, as money is only a medium of exchange, manufactured for our convenience. In a world in which money is created for our convenience, it stands to reason that taxes are unnecessary, as are gambling in stock markets and other casinos (bonds, shares, real estate, lunatic prices for “art,” in which the object has lost all relation to its market value).
Money must be distributed in some form to enable people to buy the necessities of life. Independent national banks can distribute national currency in amounts necessary to make commonly used resources available to all and to expedite their generation and distribution, by building hydroelectric plants and railways, for
instance. All commonly used resources (air, water, energy, communication, public transport, etc.) must be public property and protected as such from appropriation and pollution. To ensure that this remains the case, responsible government must have the monopoly of such resources. Individual initiatives to provide goods or services will find their own level of reward according to society’s need for them.
Over the centuries during which “Christians have become Jews,” two primary virtues have gone by the board: the value of human life and the material and sensate self-fulfilment of the individual. If human life were genuinely considered to be of central value (for instance, according to the U.N.’s “Universal Declaration of Human Rights”), it would not be trivialized, as it has been and continues to be, in countless contrived wars and externally fabricated civil conflicts. If human fulfillment were considered a central value, the nuclear family, upbringing within same, humanistic education—in short the fostering of each individual’s intrinsic desires and capabilities, hitherto most often hidden from him -- would have acquired a vital position in the national canon. A fulfilled individual is a contented individual; fulfilled individuals make no trouble for themselves or for others.The universally observable fact that humans have trivialized themselves is undeniable, but who has misled us to the extent that we have even discarded our individual worth and desire for fulfilment?
Historian Heinrich von Treitschke’s observation is undeniably true: “The Jews are our misfortune” (Treitschke, Ein Wort über unser Judentum, 1880). If their baleful influence ceased, balance would return and conditions would improve everywhere. Why? Because the coordinated incentives to foster unrest for financial gain and political power on a global scale would disappear with them. (To neutralize nitpickers: I am obviously not suggesting that human nature would be reformed and crime wiped out, but that the insidious plot to corrupt and appropriate the whole world would be foiled.) Consequently, there would be no more lives squandered in their cause. No wars, no boom and bust, no artificial financial crises, no housing “bubbles” etc., etc. Imagine how much conditions for the average human would improve under a responsible government, with an accountable distribution of public funds; how real (as opposed to simulated) education could benefit populations everywhere, leading to the growth of responsible individuals and their progeny. If the rotten head of this ambition to destroy all that is estimable were removed, if the plan to reduce all the accumulated achievements of successive generations—all that makes the human race worthy -- to rubble and confusion, from which only they expect to emerge victorious and empowered to impose their dreary rule, were derailed, the natural order in the environment as among humans would reassert itself, if only because the overwhelming majority, of whatever region or nation, desires to live in peace and prosperity. It follows that—however gradually—the planet would settle down to some kind of communal existence.
You have not begun to appreciate the real depth of our guilt. We are intruders. We are disturbers. We are subverters. We have taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and played havoc with them. We have been at the bottom not merely of the latest great war but of nearly all your wars, not only of the Russian but of every other major revolution in your history. We have brought discord and confusion and frustration into your personal and public life. We are still doing it. No one can tell how long we shall go on doing it. Who knows what great and glorious destiny might have been yours had we left you alone? We did it solely with the irresistible might of our spirit, with ideas and propaganda. (A Real Case against the Jews, Jewish writer and Rothschild biographer, Marcus Eli Ravage, Century Magazine, January 1928, Volume 115, Number 3, pages 346-350)
Not quite. They did it with deceit, extorted money and stealthy debt; with usury-Capitalism and terroristic Communism. However, this quote makes the vital point that is at the root of my essay: how would the world look today, if Jews had not interfered in its development?
What kind of peace do I mean? What kind of peace do we seek? Not a Pax Americana enforced on the world by American weapons of war. Not the peace of the grave or the security of the slave. I am talking about genuine peace, the kind of peace that makes life on earth worth living, the kind that enables men and nations to grow and to hope and to build a better life for their children—not merely peace for Americans but peace for all men and women—not merely peace in our time but peace for all time. (President John F. Kennedy on June 10, 1963 at the American University in Washington D.C, five months before he was assassinated)
A riddle might run: what did tribune Tiberius Gracchus of the Roman Empire (133 B.C.), Julius Caesar (48 B.C.), Jesus Christ (7–2 B.C. to 30–33 A.D.), Adolf Hitler, and Presidents McKinley, Garfield, Lincoln, Jackson and Kennedy have in common? Answer: They all opposed the hegemony of usury, and paid the ultimate price for their temerity (Jackson survived). In an era of anti-national movements and of political blocs, the power of monetary emission can no longer be returned to the states; Communism will win.
They [the Marxists] maintain that only a dictatorship—their dictatorship, of course—can create the will of the people, while our answer to this is: No dictatorship can have any other aim but that of self-perpetuation, and it can beget only slavery in the people tolerating it; freedom can be created only by freedom, that is, by a universal rebellion on the part of the people and free organization of the toiling masses from the bottom up. (Mikhail Bakunin, Statism and Anarchism)
While I object to the collective disparagement of all dictatorships, the rest is undoubtedly true. Yet, herds of refugees, driven towards the still prosperous nations by cunningly instigated “civil wars,” infiltrate and destroy existing cultural cohesiveness, thus suffocating the spark of spontaneous combustion vital to a genuine, grassroots folk rebellion such as a general strike. At the moment, the only signs of a popular revolt are occasional demonstrations like “Pegida.” However, these were forbidden until they could be discredited, with the excuse that insufficient numbers of police were available to protect the demonstrators. Such a ban can be repeated at will. So it could be said that “revolution” has been cancelled on the orders of the ministry of the interior. What kind of insurrection is that? Demonstrators may well shout “We are the People!,” but a popular revolt implies the rejection of just those laws which curb citizens’ rights.
Time is running out quickly. We must act before we all become RFID-chipped slaves in a corporate state. We must recover real values. To recover real values, we must separate money as an instrument of power from money as a useful commodity.
We must act, not react. We must act collectively. Strength comes only in numbers. We must transform ourselves from consumers who amass debt into thinking individuals who build up common interests. We must close our accounts with all banks and place our savings in cooperative non-profit community institutions which will not reward or penalize depositors, nor award interest on investment, but will give each depositor equal rights. We must unanimously, simultaneously, collectively refuse to pay taxes, to redeem debt. But we must also change our behaviour, so that money itself, as a means of exchange, is replaced by barter. Above all, we must demonstrate peacefully in the thousands, in the hundreds of thousands, in the millions, even in the face of militaristic police (many state employees are sympathetic to us). We must bring the economy to a stop when and for as long as it suits us. Then, the struggle really begins. The struggle between government and the people; between “us” and “them”; the battle over freedom or submission. Between remotely-controlled politicians far removed from their respective electorates, and the vast majority of ordinary people they purport to represent.
Memo from today: Although Western Europe prides itself on having abolished the death penalty, it has been reported that the Lisbon Treaty restores it. The Council of Europe’s European Convention on Human Rights (Rome 1950) states:
SECTION I
Article 2
Everyone’s right to life shall be protected by law. No one shall be deprived o
f his life intentionally save in the execution of a sentence of a court following his conviction of a crime for which this penalty is provided by law.
Deprivation of life shall not be regarded as inflicted in contravention of this article when it results from the use of force which is no more than absolutely necessary: (a) in defence of any person from unlawful violence;
(b) in order to effect a lawful arrest or to prevent escape of a person lawfully detained;
(c) in action lawfully taken for the purpose of quelling a riot or insurrection.
The Treaty of Lisbon/Reform Treaty (2009) merely repeats this clause.
The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union states bluntly:
Article 2 -- Right to life
Everyone has the right to life.
No one shall be condemned to the death penalty or executed.
However in Protocol 6 (1983) this clause was amended to read:
Article 2 – Death penalty in time of war
“A State may make provision in its law for the death penalty in respect of acts committed in time of war or of imminent threat of war; such penalty shall be applied only in the instances laid down in the law and in accordance with its provisions. The State shall communicate to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe the relevant provisions of that law.”
Whether or not there is some contradiction between these treaties or conventions, or whether ambiguity merely serves to confuse the issue, mass protests arising from degraded economic conditions and the means to counter them are foreseen in this legislation. The gradual militarisation of national police, accompanied by joint exercises with the police of other states (“Joint-US-Polish-military-training-to-continue” Polskie Radio, 25.07.2013) and the plan to suppress insurrections by the use of foreign police forces—a time-tested strategy going back to the revolutions (“alien mercenary and criminal elements, forcing revolutions on a country not their own,” The Nameless War, Captain Ramsay, 1952—Spain 1936, Syria 2011, Ukraine 2014, etc.) —eliminates the risk of sympathy between the authorities and local populations, and indicates the direction of events and the preparedness of the anonymous powers to master them.
Tell the Truth & Shame the Devil Page 50
