Miles moved on to another portion of the tape; he asked Baden if Dr. Rieders had told a joke during the course of the Skwira autopsy.
“He told a lot of things that he thought were jokes in the course of that autopsy to lighten things up.”
Miles then asked the judge if he could play another section of the videotape. Ponsor indicated that he was going to end the day’s proceedings after the jury got a chance to see the tape.
Before they broke after watching the video tape, Ponsor agreed to let Miles pose a few more questions to Dr. Baden.
“You didn’t tell Dr. Rieders that . . . he should find what is there and not what people what him to find, did you?” Miles asked.
“One, I didn’t have to tell him that; and, two, there was nothing that we wanted him to find. We wanted to know if there was or wasn’t epinephrine or its breakdown products present, and Dr. Rieders knows that. He doesn’t make things up.”
On February 8, Miles continued his cross-examination of Dr. Michael Baden, delivering a diatribe regarding Kenny Cutting’s condition at the time of his death. However, Baden fired back a series of answers that emphasized that Cutting could not have died from anything else besides sudden cardiac death.
After noting that Baden had written a book, Miles got into Baden’s reason for becoming a forensic pathologist.
“And the reason you became a forensic pathologist, sir, was because you like the public side of it, is that correct?”
“No, that’s not the reason for it.”
“Didn’t you say, sir, in your book that you like the public side of being a forensic pathologist . . . ?”
“Yes, that’s not the reason I became a . . . but in my early youth . . . I found that very exciting.”
“And you liked the reporters and the television cameras?”
“At the time, yes. We’re talking about 1965! I’ve outgrown that phase.”
For the next thirty minutes, Miles questioned Baden about a medical examiner’s bias toward the establishment he or she works for, and concluded by asking Baden how much he had charged the government for the work he had done in the Gilbert case—about eighteen thousand dollars thus far.
Ariane Vuono had a few questions on redirect examination, getting Baden to reaffirm his opinion that each victim had died from one cause of death: epinephrine poisoning.
After Baden stepped down from the stand, the government rested its case.
CHAPTER 91
On November 17, 2000, David Hoose had told Judge Ponsor that he wasn’t sure his client was going to testify. Under federal law, defense attorneys can call their client to the stand at any time during a trial. But here they were nearly three months later, after the prosecution had called fifty-two witnesses, and Gilbert’s defense team was ready to present its case. But a quick look at its witness list revealed that Hoose still hadn’t decided whether Gilbert would take the stand. With all that going on in the courtroom the past few months, many were speculating that it was the only chance the former VA nurse had left.
When Judge Ponsor turned the trial over to the defense on Tuesday, February 8, 2001, the first thing David Hoose did was file a motion to acquit Gilbert on all charges.
Judge Ponsor denied the request.
The defense’s first witness, Dr. Thomas Aretz, the director of cardiovascular pathology at Massachusetts General Hospital, took the stand and repeatedly disputed prior testimony by government witnesses who had claimed the veterans died of epinephrine poisoning.
Under cross-examination by Ariane Vuono, however, Aretz contradicted himself, telling the jury that a determination of death by epinephrine poisoning is complicated science.
“That makes epinephrine a pretty good poisoning [then], doesn’t it, doctor?” Vuono asked.
“I can’t answer that.”
On Friday, Dell Levy, the policy and procedure inspector from the HCI in Washington, DC, was among three witnesses called. Hoose questioned Levy about her preliminary investigation and how she initially noted that, in her early opinion, no crimes had been committed. Using reports, medical records and interviews she had conducted with some forty VAMC employees, Hoose made it clear to the jury that Levy never viewed the deaths as suspicious.
But under cross-examination, Vuono got Levy to admit that her job was to generate a “clinical”—not a “criminal”—report, and that her first draft was rewritten by her supervisors, who, she said, removed incriminating information.
Late in the afternoon, Judge Ponsor held a hearing without the jury present regarding whether a convicted drug dealer, Khalil “O-Dog” White, would be allowed to testify that Bonnie Bledsoe and John Wall stole a bag of medication from the VAMC so they could use it to barter for street drugs. White, himself in the middle of an eighteen-month sentence for marijuana possession, said he met Wall one day, and Wall had a paper bag full of medicines he had apparently taken from the VAMC.
Hoose theorized that the bag was full of epinephrine. But White admitted he didn’t know what was in the bag, because he never looked inside of it.
After listening to White testify, Ponsor said he would “review case law” before making a decision whether the jury should hear the testimony.
When the trial resumed on Monday, Dell Levy was followed by David Rejniak, Gilbert’s former friend and colleague.
As Rejniak made his way to the witness stand, Gilbert seemed to perk up a bit, as if she were happy to see him.
Rejniak testified that Gilbert had summoned him to the ICU on Feb. 2, 1996, mainly because Kenny Cutting wasn’t looking so good. Then he said, “She seemed a little bit upset. She didn’t want to be alone with him when he died.”
Under cross-examination, however, Welch got Rejniak to admit that Cutting had been stable when Rejniak relieved Gilbert, and that he didn’t expect Cutting to die less than an hour after Gilbert took her break.
Dr. Graham R. Jones, the director of a toxicology lab in Edmonton, Alberta, told the jury on February 13 that tests by National Medical Services showing that ketamine was found in one of the victims should be considered “inconsistent and unreliable.”
Jones, the sixth witness for the defense, said that because NMS had made mistakes in its epinephrine tests, it shouldn’t be trusted to test for ketamine.
When Vuono got a crack at the doctor, she asked him several questions about his qualifications, then whether he had ever tested tissue samples from embalmed and exhumed bodies for the presence of metanephrine or norepinepherine, breakdown products of epinephrine.
“No, I have not,” Jones said.
It was easy to tell by the fourth day of defense testimony that the Government vs. Kristen Gilbert was turning into Kristen Gilbert vs. Bonnie Bledsoe and John Wall. Just about every witness Hoose, Miles and Weinberg had put on the stand so far had something to offer that would give the jury a reason to believe the missing ampoules of epinephrine had been stolen by John Wall and Bonnie Bledsoe.
Maybe Hoose saw it as his only option?
Nevertheless, when respiratory therapists James Kolodziej and William Gibb took the stand on February 13, they testified that medicine cabinets on Ward C where ampoules of epinephrine were kept had sometimes been left wide open and unattended. Anyone, from the janitor to the director of the VAMC, could walk up and grab an ampoule of epinephrine.
But by the end of the day, Judge Ponsor had heard enough.
During a hearing, Ponsor said he wasn’t sure he was going to let the defense continue asking witnesses about Bonnie Bledsoe’s life. It was, as he had earlier suspected, getting out hand.
“I’m concerned about to what extent this should become a trial of ‘Is Bonnie Bledsoe a good nurse?’ ” Ponsor said.
He had a point.
Hoose said the government had put a bull’s-eye on Gilbert’s back from day one, pinning the missing ampoules of epinephrine on her, and refused to look at any other suspects.
Also a good point.
“What we’ve attempted to do is demonstrate
that there was an opportunity to steal medications available not only to nurses but to respiratory therapists.”
Hoose paused.
Then, loudly, he said, “Bonnie Bledsoe [had] a motive.”
Later during the same hearing, Ponsor ruled that the defense could not call convicted drug dealer O-Dog White to testify that Bledsoe and Wall wanted to trade hospital drugs for crack cocaine. There just wasn’t enough evidence to the fact.
Vuono, at one point, argued that White’s testimony was just another attempt to disgrace Wall and Bledsoe.
“They’ve had their shot at Bonnie Bledsoe and Mr. Wall,” Vuono shouted.
Judge Ponsor ultimately agreed.
Dr. William Boutelle, chief of the medical staff at the VAMC, testified on Wednesday, February 14 that, at first, the allegations brought by John Wall, Kathy Rix and Renee Walsh contained no evidence of any crimes. Boutelle had come under fire for not closing Ward C after the nurses had come forward. Many said he should have immediately closed the ward and started a thorough investigation that day. But on the stand, he said that his staff’s initial findings—made in early March 1996—indicated there wasn’t a pressing need to relocate staff and lock up the ward.
At one point during his testimony, Boutelle, perhaps unknowingly, tightened the noose around Gilbert’s neck by suggesting that since the spike in medical emergencies and deaths dramatically declined after February 17—the day Gilbert left—there was no need, after that, to look any further.
Ignoring Judge Ponsor’s suggestion, thus continuing with its bashing of Bonnie Bledsoe, the defense called George Ponte, who, in 1995 and 1996, supervised respiratory therapists at the VAMC.
Ponte, a short man, balding on top with a ponytail snaking down his back, had been a professor at Springfield Technical Community College when he met Bonnie Bledsoe in the late eighties.
In March 1991, when Ponte was hired by the VAMC, he was disappointed to learn that Bledsoe was also working there. They hadn’t really parted on good terms back at STCC, and Ponte testified that he and Bledsoe carried that animosity into their new relationship at the VAMC.
Ponte told the jury he had heard that John Wall had given Bledsoe a shot of epinephrine as late as the spring of 1995.
After telling jurors that Bledsoe deliberately began to avoid him when the two began working together, he said he found out in February 1995 that she and Wall had been using heroin and crack, and, by late October, initiated steps to terminate her employment because of that discovery.
Paul Weinberg wanted to know how Ponte knew they were abusing drugs.
“She told me she had snorted heroin and smoked crack at work.”
Ending his direct examination, Weinberg asked, “Finally, Mr. Ponte, what is your opinion of the reputation of Bonnie Bledsoe for truthfulness?”
“I think she was a liar. I think that was a known fact amongst the people that she worked with. She was a manipulatative person. . . .”
“Thank you.”
On cross-examination, Ariane Vuono had Ponte establish right away that Bledsoe was only eighteen or nineteen years old at the time they had met at STCC. Then she had him describe Bledsoe’s asthmatic condition, how it was treated with shots of epinephrine, and that it was no secret.
Using a report filed on May 1, 1996, only months after the investigation had started, Vuono pointed out that Ponte didn’t know Bledsoe had a drug problem years before, as he had claimed on direct examination, because there simply wasn’t any documentation of it. Since he was her boss, part of Ponte’s job would have been to write her up if he suspected drug use, Vuono suggested. But he waited. Vuono wanted to know why.
Ponte admitted that although he suspected her of abusing drugs as early as the fall of 1994, he had indeed waited until the spring of 1996 to write a “Medical Certification alert” about it. But he gave no specific reason for his decision to wait.
At 11:30, Ponsor recessed for a much-needed break.
Back in court twenty minutes later, Vuono grilled Ponte about the relationship he’d had with Bledsoe prior to the time they had begun working together, and asked him if he had a “history” with Bledsoe?
“Could you define ‘history’?”
“Well, you had been her professor at STCC, is that right?”
“That’s correct.”
“She was eighteen or nineteen at the time?”
“That’s correct.”
“And it was also during that time when you had a sexual encounter with Ms. Bledsoe, didn’t you?”
“No . . .”
“Did you have sexual intercourse with Ms. Bledsoe?”
“No!”
“You were Ms. Bledsoe’s professor when she was a student at STCC, is that right?”
“That’s correct.”
“And are you telling this court and jury that during the time that you were her professor and she was your student, you didn’t have sexual intercourse with her?”
“That’s right.”
“Object, Your Honor,” Weinberg shouted. “It’s been asked already.”
“I’m going to overrule.... The answer is in evidence.”
Vuono was confused. She knew Ponte had slept with Bledsoe.
“Did the event happen shortly after her graduation?”
“Maybe a year or more.”
“So she was maybe nineteen or twenty years old at the time?”
Ponte then made a point to say that he wasn’t married at the time, and that the relationship between him and Bledsoe “wasn’t serious.”
“In fact, it was a one-time encounter, wasn’t it?” Vuono wanted to know.
“Exactly!”
“And was in your car?”
“I believe it was.”
By the end of his testimony, Ponte admitted that Bledsoe had filed a sexual harassment suit against him while they were working at the VAMC, and that she had expressed her concern over the harassment to fellow employees, but the suit was later dropped.
Vuono then wanted to bring Ponte (and the jury) up to date on Bledsoe’s new life.
“Did you know that she has been sober for the past year and that she was back to working as a respiratory therapist again?”
Ponte said he did not.
Ann French, Gilbert’s former coworker and new friend, testified next that Gilbert had been shaken over the deaths at the VAMC and that, in her opinion, some of the patients in question could have died of natural causes.
Regarding Ed Skwira, French said, “I didn’t expect him to survive the evening—never mind the night,” adding that “his color was terrible. He just didn’t look good. He was gray, almost like cement color.”
CHAPTER 92
First thing the next morning, Dr. James Kirchhoffer, chief cardiologist at Baystate Medical Center, began painting a significantly different picture of how Kenny Cutting, Stanley Jagodowski, Henry Hudon and Ed Skwira died. The government had already put on its expert, Dr. Thomas Rocco, who had, some said, given a very convincing argument as to how the men had died of sudden cardiac death. But now it was Gilbert’s defense team’s turn at presenting its version of the deaths, using its own cardiology expert.
After going through his extensive list of credentials, Kirchhoffer, who had acquired his degree in medicine during the late seventies, told the jury that his specialty included cardiac eletrophysiology, which is “the study of abnormal heart rhythms and diagnosis and treatment of patients who have abnormal heart rhythms and symptoms that go along with that.”
Then he broke into his theories about epinephrine, which contradicted completely Dr. Rocco’s, Dr. Grayboys’s and Dr. Baden’s previous opinions.
“Have you . . . become familiar with the literature on epinephrine and its effects on the human body?” David Hoose asked the doctor.
“Yes.”
“We’ve been through this with other physicians. So . . . based on your experience, what is the normal time that it takes for epinephrine to have an effect on the body when it’s inj
ected intravenously?”
“It depends on how close the IV line is to the heart. But generally, if it’s a central IV, close—where the veins are actually close to the heart—you can see epinephrine effect within fifteen or thirty seconds. If it’s a vein that’s . . . in the arm someplace, it may take thirty to forty-five seconds, even a minute, before you can start to see the epinephrine effect.”
“And how long does the epinephrine effect last?”
“Epinephrine effect usually lasts—it peaks at two to three minutes and lasts around five minutes.”
Kirchhoffer, who sat in the courtroom’s front row and took notes while Dr. Rocco testified nearly three months before, explained to the jury that he believed the cause of death of the patients in question had nothing to do with epinephrine, but was more of a combination of the ailments each victim had suffered from and the drugs each had been on while at the VAMC.
By the end of the morning, after Kirchhoffer made a compelling argument as to how Stanley Jagodowski had died of natural causes, Hoose got to the core of why he had the doctor on the stand.
“Let me ask you one final set of questions with regard to Mr. Jagodowski, doctor, and I’m going to put it in the form of a hypothetical. Let’s assume . . . that an LPN saw someone, an RN, go into Jagodowski’s room with a needle and syringe, that the LPN said that she heard Mr. Jagodowski say, ‘Ow, you’re hurting me,’ or, ‘You’re killing me,’ that immediately thereafter . . . the LPN went into the room, asked Mr. Jagodowski if he was all right, that she spent four to five minutes with him, that she left the room and that fifteen minutes later . . . a code was called as a result of Mr. Jagodowski’s cardiac arrest.... [D]o you have an opinion as to whether epinephrine could have caused that event?”
“Yes.”
“And what is that opinion?”
“That’s not something that epinephrine would do. Epinephrine is a rapidly acting and rapidly disappearing medication. I would expect its effect to be gone within five minutes. This time course is much too long for epinephrine.”
Perfect Poison Page 40
