by Dick Morris
23. “take measures”: Ibid.
24. “as yet undetermined”: Ibid.
25. “if any”: Ibid.
26. “who would do”: Ibid.
27. “all the more”: Ibid.
28. “nations cannot”: Ibid.
29. “why risk sacrificing”: Edwin Meese III, “Still lost on the Law of the Sea Treaty,” http://www.latimes.com/, June 5, 2012, http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-meese-law-of-the-sea-20120605,0,6473043.story.
30. “based in ideology”: Matt Cover, “Hillary Clinton: Opposition to Sea Treaty Based on ‘Mythology,’ ” cnsnews.com, May 23, 2012, http://cnsnews.com/news/article/hillary-clinton-opposition-sea-treaty-based-mythology.
31. “of course”: Nicole Gaouette, “Clinton Hits ‘Black Helicopters’ Crowd To Push Sea Treaty,” Bloomberg.com, May 24, 2012, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-05-24/clinton-hits-black-helicopters-crowd-to-push-sea-treaty.html.
32. “proponents say”: Senator Jim Inhofe, Senator Roger Wicker, and Senator Jeff Sessions, “Law of the Sea would usurp U.S. Navy’s authority,” politico.com, May 22, 2012, http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0512/76627_Page2.html.
33. “offering a new”: Wayne Ma and James Hookway, “Vietnam Spars With China Over Oil Plans,” wsj.com, June 27, 2012, http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303649504577491823837421842.html.
34. “China, a LOST”: Peter Brookes, “A pathetic pact for safety on the seas,” nypost.com, May 22, 2012, http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/pathetic_pact_for_safety_on_the_JRYvyyY47FPjx0pJOjzI0K.
35. “although Beijing ratified”: Gordon G. Chang, “Should the US Ratify the UN Sea Treaty Because of China?,” worldaffairsjournal.org, May 21, 2012, http://www.worldaffairsjournal.org/blog/gordon-g-chang/should-us-ratify-un-sea-treaty-because-china.
36. “supposedly need to”: Peter Brookes, “A pathetic pact for safety on the seas,” nypost.com, May 22, 2012, http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/pathetic_pact_for_safety_on_the_JRYvyyY47FPjx0pJOjzI0K.
37. it is a lot: Frank Gaffney, “Common Sense on LOST,” townhall.com, June 5, 2012, http://townhall.com/columnists/frankgaffney/2012/06/05/common_sense_on_lost/page/full/.
38. “by moving off”: Gordon G. Chang, “Should the US Ratify the UN Sea Treaty Because of China?,” worldaffairsjournal.org, May 21, 2012, http://www.worldaffairsjournal.org/blog/gordon-g-chang/should-us-ratify-un-sea-treaty-because-china.
39. “This is simply”: Frank Gaffney, “Law of the Sea Treaty Is Wrong for US,” newsmax.com, June 5, 2012, http://www.newsmax.com/FrankGaffney/Law-Sea-Treaty-Senate/2012/06/05/id/441292.
40. “In fact”: Ibid.
41. “codifies navigational rights”: Senator Jim Inhofe, Senator Roger Wicker, and Senator Jeff Sessions, “Hillary Tries To Neuter US Navy,” foxnews.com, May 23, 2012, http://nation.foxnews.com/us-navy/2012/05/23/hillary-tries-neuter-us-navy.
42. “The most persuasive”: Donald Rumsfeld, “Why the U.N. Shouldn’t Own the Seas,” http://online.wsj.com/home-page, June 12, 2012 http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303768104577460890850883780.html.
43. “ceding any authority”: Senator Jim Inhofe, Senator Roger Wicker, and Senator Jeff Sessions, “Law of the Sea would usurp U.S. Navy’s authority,” politico.com, May 22, 2012, http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0512/76627_Page2.html.
44. “some fear the Navy”: Ibid.
45. “could it be that”: Ibid.
46. “outsourcing national security”: Peter Brookes, “A pathetic pact for safety on the seas,” nypost.com, May 22, 2012, http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/pathetic_pact_for_safety_on_the_JRYvyyY47FPjx0pJOjzI0K.
47. “Does failure to ratify”: Edwin Meese III, “Still lost on the Law of the Sea Treaty,” http://www.latimes.com/, June 5, 2012, http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-meese-law-of-the-sea-20120605,0,6473043.story.
48. “Our ability to”: Ibid.
49. “States shall adopt”: David A. Ridenour, “Ratification of the Law of the Sea Treaty: A Not-So-Innocent Passage,” nationalcenter.org, August 2006, http://www.nationalcenter.org/NPA542LawoftheSeaTreaty.html.
50. “look upstream”: Sheril Kirshenbaum, “Sea Grant Fellows Forum,” realoceans.wordpress.com, June 24, 2008, http://realoceans.wordpress.com/2008/06/page/3/.
51. Already, environmentalists have: David A. Ridenour, “Ratification of the Law of the Sea Treaty,” www.nationalcenter.org, August 2006, http://www.nationalcenter.org/NPA542LawoftheSeaTreaty.html.
52. “LOST is a sweeping”: Ibid.
53. “If Americans have”: Michelle Malkin, “The push for the Law of the Sea Treaty,” www.michellemalkin.com, October 2 2007, http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/02/the-push-for-the-law-of-the-sea-treaty/.
54. “So why on earth”: Ibid.
55. “the UN administered”: Ibid.
56. “the predictable effect”: Ibid.
57. “We are writing”: Julian Pecquet, “Opposition to Law of the Sea Treaty heats up,” www.thehill.com, May 25, 2012, http://thehill.com/blogs/global-affairs/un-treaties/229637-opposition-to-law-of-the-sea-treaty-heats-up.
58. “by its current”: Ibid.
59. “To effect the”: Ibid.
60. “If this treaty”: Ibid.
61. Here’s the list: Ibid.
PART FOUR
1. “has developed the”: David Rohde, “China’s New Export: Internet censorship,” www.reuters.com, November 7, 2011, http://blogs.reuters.com/david-rohde/2011/11/17/chinas-newest-export-internet-censorship/.
2. “the Chinese model”: Ibid.
3. “Putin commended”: Josh Peterson, “Lawmakers move to reject proposals for U.N. Internet regulation, www.dailycaller.com, May 31, 2012, http://test.dailycaller.com/2012/05/31/lawmakers-move-to-reject-proposals-for-u-n-internet-regulation/.
4. “if we are going”: Patrick Goodenough, “Internet Regulation Returns to the International Agenda, www.cnsnews.com, May 29, 2012, http://cnsnews.com/news/article/internet-regulation-returns-international-agenda.
5. Touré, a native: “Hamadoun Touré,” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamadoun_Touré%C3%A9.
6. “while many US”: Josh Peterson, “Lawmakers move to reject proposals for U.N. Internet regulation,” www.dailycaller.com, May 31, 2012, http://test.dailycaller.com/2012/05/31/lawmakers-move-to-reject-proposals-for-u-n-internet-regulation/.
7. “could use the”: Gordon Crovitz, “The U.N.’s Internet Power Grab,” www.online.wsj.com, June 17, 2012, http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303822204577470532859210296.html.
8. “It may be hard”: Ibid.
9. “Brazil and India”: Liza Porteus Viana, “US: New Battle Brewing At ITU Will ‘Determine The Future Of The Internet,” www.ip-watch.com, June 1, 2012, http://www.ip-watch.org/2012/06/01/us-new-battle-brewing-at-itu-will-determine-the-future-of-the-internet/.
10. “who are threatened”: Ibid.
11. “the open Internet”: Ibid.
12. “If all of us”: Matthew Ingram, “Is the UN the next big threat to Internet freedom?,” www.gigaom.com, May 31, 2012, http://gigaom.com/2012/05/31/is-the-un-the-next-big-threat-to-internet-freedom/.
13. “potentially dangerous”: Liza Porteus Viana, “US: New Battle Brewing At ITU Will ‘Determine The Future Of The Internet,” www.ip-watch.com, June 1, 2012, http://www.ip-watch.org/2012/06/01/us-new-battle-brewing-at-itu-will-determine-the-future-of-the-internet/.
14. “having the UN”: Nina Easton, “Where’s the outcry on the U.N. push to regulate the Internet?,” www.cnn.com, May 30, 2012, http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/05/30/united-nations-internet-regulation/.
15. “to foster greater”: Cale Guthrie Weissman, “Documents Leaked Detailing Proposals for UN Telecommunications Summit,” www.opennet.net, June 21, 2012, http://opennet.net/blog/2012/06/documents-leaked-detailing-proposals-un-telecommunications-summit.
16. “these proposals show”: Carl Franzen, “U.N. Proposals To Regulate
Internet Are ‘Troubling,’ Leaked Documents Reveal,” idealab.talkingpointsmemo.com, June 16, 2012, http://idealab.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/06/un-proposals-to-regulate-internet-are-troubling-leaked-documents-reveal.php.
17. “the broadcast proposal”: Ibid.
18. “would require member states”: Ibid.
19. “other proposals”: Ibid.
20. “[i]t must be”: Congressional Cyber Security Caucus, http://congressionalcybersecuritycaucus.langevin.house.gov/index.shtml, http://congressionalcybersecuritycaucus.langevin.house.gov/news/press-releases/2012/03/mccaul-langevin-lead-bipartisan-effort-to-prevent-international-internet-regulations.shtml.
21. “The principals stipulate”: Sorcha Faal, “U.N. Move to Make Weapon of War Sparks Global Fears,” http://www.envirosagainstwar.org/index.php, June 3, 2012, http://www.envirosagainstwar.org/know/read.php?&itemid=12262.
22. “politely”: “The U.N.’s Internet Power Grab,” wsj.com, June 17, 2012, http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303822204577470532859210296.html.
23. “both unnecessary”: Ibid.
24. “weak responses”: Ibid.
25. “Could limit”: Doug Halonen, “House Takes First Steps to Block U.N. Regulation of Internet,” yahoo.com, May 31, 2012, http://tv.yahoo.com/news/house-takes-first-steps-block-u-n-regulation-183411710.html.
26. “direct Internet”: Ibid.
27. “Centralized control would”: Lawrence Strickling, Philip Verveer, and Daniel Weitzner, “Ensuring an Open Internet,” whitehouse.gov, May 2, 2012, http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/05/02/ensuring-open-internet.
28. “promote a global”: Ibid.
29. “[t]his year, we’re”: Press Release, Bipartisan Leaders of the Committee Introduce Resolution to Preserve and Protect a Global Internet Free from Government Control, May 30, 2012, energycommerce.house.gov, http://energycommerce.house.gov/news/PRArticle.aspx?NewsID=9554.
30. “If this power grab”: Ibid.
31. “this resolution”: Ibid.
32. “Does anyone here”: Andrew Couts, “US gov’t, Web titans go to battle against UN Internet power grab: Everything you need to know,” digitaltrends.com, May 31, 2012, http://www.digitaltrends.com/web/us-govt-web-titans-go-to-battle-against-un-internet-power-grab-everything-you-need-to-know/.
33. “international regulatory intrusion”: Press Release, Bipartisan Leaders of the Committee Introduce Resolution to Preserve and Protect a Global Internet Free from Government Control, May 30, 2012, energycommerce.house.gov, http://energycommerce.house.gov/news/PRArticle.aspx?NewsID=9554.
34. “I think a”: John Peterson, “Lawmakers move to reject proposals for U.N. Internet Regulation,” yahoo.com, May 31, 2012, http://news.yahoo.com/lawmakers-move-reject-proposals-u-n-internet-regulation-142206238.html.
35. “business leaders beyond”: Nina Easton, “Where’s the outcry on the U.N. push to regulate the Internet?,” cnn.com, May 30, 2012, http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/05/30/united-nations-internet-regulation/.
36. “swallow the Internet’s”: Associations, “A Battle for Internet Freedom as UN Meeting Nears,” abc.com, June 22, 2012, http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory/battle-internet-freedom-meeting-nears-16625777?page=3#.T_XnNmA2rKx .
PART FIVE
1. “green economy in”: UNEP, “Toward a Green Economy—Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication,” grida.no, 2011, http://www.grida.no/publications/green-economy/.
2. “world leaders and”: Watts and Ford, “Rio+20 Earth Summit: campaigners decry final document,” guardian.co.uk, June 22, 2012, http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/jun/23/rio-20-earth-summit-document.
3. “agreed that such”: UNEP, “Toward a Green Economy—Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication,” grida.no, 2011, http://www.grida.no/publications/green-economy/.
4. “decision supports”: Ibid.
5. “decent employment and”: UNEP, “Inclusive Green Economy Given Go Ahead by Heads of State at Rio+20,” UNEP.org, June 2012, http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?DocumentID=2688&ArticleID=9195&l=en.
6. “reality that a”: “Rio+20: Green Economy, SDGs, UNEP upgrade approved,” Daily Independent, http://dailyindependentnig.com/2012/07/rio20-green-economy-sdgs-unep-upgrade-approved/.
7. “the Summit also”: Ibid.
8. “mitigate the effects”: Associated Press, “Clinton urges cooperation in resource-rich Arctic,” usatoday.com, June 2, 2012, http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/story/2012-06-02/clinton-arctic-circle-cooperation/55344172/1.
9. “in climate aid”: James Kanter, “A Pledge That Didn’t Meet Its Potential,” nytimes.com, November 27, 2011, http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/28/business/global/28iht-RBOG-COP28.html.
10. “from its inception”: Ibid.
11. “for people focused” Ibid.
12. “the administration of”: Ibid.
13. “because wealthy countries”: Jonathan Watts, “Rio+20 Earth summit: Walkout at ‘green economy’ talks,” guardian.co.uk, June 14, 2012, http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/jun/15/rio-earth-summit-walkout-economy?newsfeed=true.
14. “amid a global”: Ibid.
15. “We cannot be”: Ibid.
16. “immune from legal”: George Russell, “Mammoth new green climate fund wants United Nations–style diplomatic immunity, even though it’s not part of the UN,” foxnews.com, March 22, 2012, http://www.foxnews.com/world/2012/03/22/mammoth-new-green-climate-fund-wants-un-style-diplomatic-immunity-even-though/.
17. “possible conflicts of”: George Russell, “U.N. Climate Organization Wants Immunities Against Charges of Conflict of Interest, Exceeding Mandate, Among Others,” foxnews.com, June 12, 2012, http://www.foxnews.com/world/2012/06/12/un-climate-organization-wants-immunities-against-charges-conflict-interest/.
18. “lack of transparency”: Ibid.
19. “the move to”: Ibid.
20. “1.9 trillion per”: James Helser, “Green Climate Fund Demands Diplomatic Immunity,” thenewamerican.com, March 26, 2012, http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/7052-green-climate-funddemands-diplomatic-immunity.
21. “to use international”: “Rio+20: Green Economy, SDGs, UNEP upgrade approved,” Daily Independent, July 2, 2012, http://dailyindependentnig.com/2012/07/rio20-green-economy-sdgs-unep-upgrade-approved/.
22. “scaled-up and”: George Russell, “The tab for U.N.’s Rio summit: Trillions per year in taxes, transfers and price hikes,” foxnews.com, April 20, 2012, http://www.foxnews.com/world/2012/04/20/tab-for-uns-rio-summit-trillions-per-year-in-taxes-transfers-and-price-hikes/#ixzz1xzbVB8uS.
23. “Scaled-up”: Ibid.
24. “there is currently”: Felix Dodds and Michael Strauss, Only One Earth: The Long Road via Rio to Sustainable Development (London: Routledge, 2012), p. 169.
25. “help to clarify”: Ibid.
26. “an estimated 25 percent”: UNEP, “Inclusive Green Economy Given Go Ahead by Heads of State at Rio+20,” UNEP.org, June 22, 2012, http://www.unep.org/GreenEconomy/InformationMaterials/News/PressRelease/tabid/4612/language/en-US/Default.aspx?DocumentId=2688&ArticleId=9195.
27. “pension funds to”: Ibid.
28. “encourage governments to”: Ibid.
29. “so few specifics”: Mark McDonald, “U.N. Report from Rio on Environment a ‘Suicide Note,’ ” nytimes.com, June 24, 2012, http://rendezvous.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/06/24/u-n-report-from-rio-on-environment-a-suicide-note/?emc=eta1.
30. “a failure of epic”: Ibid.
31. “sophisticated UN”: Ibid.
32. “affirm, recognize, underscore”: Ibid.
33. “To be sure”: Ibid.
34. “some of the”: Bradley Brooks, “Rio+20, the unhappy environmental summit,” AP/The Jakarta Post, June 23, 2012, http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2012/06/23/rio20-unhappy-environmental-summit.html.
35. “[W]e saw anything”: Ibid.
PART SIX
1. “After 12 years”: AMICC, “Chro
nology of US Actions Related to the International Criminal Court,” amicc.org, http://www.amicc.org/docs/US%20Chronology.pdf.
2. “the use of armed force”: “Delivering on the promise of a fair, effective and independent court > than the crime of aggression,” Iccnow.org, http://www,iccnow.org/?mod=aggression.
3. “Pressure [was] building”: Reuters, “Bush Cancels Visit To Switzerland Due To Threat Of Torture Prosecution, Rights Groups Say,” huffingtonpost.com, May 25, 2011, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/05/bush-switzerland-torture_n_819175.html.
4. “shall satisfy itself”: Marion Smith, “An Inconvenient Founding: America’s Principles Applied to the ICC,” Heritage Foundation, February 18, 2010, http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2010/02/an-inconvenient-founding-americas-principles-applied-to-the-icc.
5. “our government has”: BBC News, “US to Resume Engagement with ICC,” bbc.com, November 16, 2009, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8363282.stm.
6. “so far completed”: Eric Posner, “The Absurd International Criminal Court,” wsj.com, June 12, 2012, http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303753904577452122153205162.html.
7. “includes few authoritarian”: Ibid.
8. “Now . . . it is”: Ibid.
PART SEVEN
1. “orbital debris and”: Rose Gottemoeller, “A Code for Outer Space, as Seen From the State Dept.,” nytimes.com, March 15, 2012, http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/16/opinion/a-code-for-outer-space-as-seen-from-the-state-dept.html.
2. “What the code would”: Taylor Dinerman, “America’s Suicidal Space Diplomacy,” Gatestone Institute, January 12, 2012, http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/2751/america-suicidal-space-diplomacy.
3. “Outer space has”: John Bolton and John C. Yoo, “Hands off the Heavens,” nytimes.com, March 8, 2012, http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/09/opinion/hands-off-the-heavens.html.
4. “a transparent”: Ibid.
5. “Obama is eroding”: Ibid.
6. “term [is] often”: Ibid.
7. “in a war”: Ibid.
8. “if the United States”: Ibid.
9. “the administration asserts”: Michael Listner, “Congressional opposition to a Code of Conduct for space,” thespacereview.com, February 6, 2012, http://www.thespacereview.com/article/2018/1.
