The Cosmic War: Interplanetary Warfare, Modern Physics and Ancient Texts

Home > Other > The Cosmic War: Interplanetary Warfare, Modern Physics and Ancient Texts > Page 1
The Cosmic War: Interplanetary Warfare, Modern Physics and Ancient Texts Page 1

by Joseph P. Farrell




  Table of Contents

  Dedication

  Title Page

  Copyright Page

  Introduction

  PART ONE: THE BACKGROUND LIGHTNING, STONES, AND WHIRLPOOLS

  Chapter 1. - MODERN ARMAGEDDON, ANCIENT CATASTROPHE: CATASTROPHE CONFRONTS ...

  A. Killer Asteroids and the Exploded Planet Hypothesis

  Chapter 2. - THE THUNDERBOLTS OF THE GODS: PLASMA COSMOLOGY, PLANETARY ...

  A. Plasma Cosmology and Ancient Mythology

  B. Petroglyphs and Anthony Peratt: Plasma Paleophysics

  C. The Divine Weapon

  D. Evidence of Planetary Sized Discharges in the Solar System

  E. Conclusions

  Chapter 3. - THE CATASTROPHE OF CATASTROPHISM

  A. The Catastrophist Problematic

  B. A Return to the Catastrophist Problematic

  Chapter 4. - TIAMAT’S GIANTS AND EARTH’S SKELETONS

  A. Ancient Testimony to the Existence of Giants

  B. Strange Legends and Chronological Clues

  C. Curious Coincidences and Connections

  D. Conclusions

  Chapter 5. - PROMETHEUS PULSES THE PULSARS AND GRINDS HAMLET’S MILL: THE ...

  A. Hamlet’s Mill: Another Mythological Background

  B. Tossing Comets at the Sun: McCanney’s Version

  C. Pulsing the Pulsars: Physicist Paul LaViolette’s Promethean Star- and ...

  Chapter 6. - CONCLUSIONS TO PART ONE

  PART TWO: - THE QUESTIONS: WHO FOUGHT? WHY WERE THEY FIGHTING? WHO WON? WHO ...

  Chapter 7. - REVOLT AND WAR IN THE PANTHEON: A LOT OF WHO, A LITTLE WHY, SOME ...

  A. The Sumerian Version

  B. The Egyptian Version

  C. The Human Version: the Ullikummi Text

  D. When It Happened: Further Indications

  Chapter 8. - THE STORY OF THE STONES: A LITTLE MORE WHY

  A. The Technological Motivation

  B. The Immediate Aftermath: The Technological Inventory

  C. The Immediate Legacy: Conclusions

  Chapter 9. - THE ENIGMA OF THE TABLETS: WHAT WERE THE “TABLETS OF DESTINIES”?

  A. The Mythological Components and The Possessors of The Tablets

  B. A Summary Thus Far

  C. The Mythological Component and the Meaning of “Destinies” in “The Tablets of Destinies”

  C. The Quantum Potential or Scalar Physics Basis of the Four Associations of ...

  Chapter 10. - ME‘S, MER’S, AND MARS: MORE WHO’S AND WHAT’S, AND (AT LAST) SOME WHERE’S

  A. Introductory Pemarks

  B. MEs, MERs, and Mars

  Chapter 11. - THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE NEPHILIM

  A. General Observations and Cautionary Notes on Sumerian and Biblical Parallels

  B. Sir Laurence Gardner’s Genealogical Tables

  C. Ninurta-Nimrod and the Tower of Babel Moment

  Chapter 12. - A CATALOGUE OF CLUES: A REVIEW OF THE WAR

  A. Primordial Revolts and Wars: Sumer, Edfu, and the Genesis “Gap” Theory

  B. More Miscellaneous Clues:

  C. Summary: A Catalogue of Clues

  PART THREE: - EXTERNAL EVIDENCES: THE EARTH, THE MOON, MARS, AND SATURN

  Chapter 13. - THE MYSTERIOUS MOON

  A. How Did It Get There?

  B. Apollo Anomalies

  C. LTPs: Lunar Transient Phenomena and the Pre-Apollo Top Secret Telescope Program

  D. Shards, Octagons, Craters, and Towers versus “Incessant Meteoric Bombardment”

  E. It Rings, Too!

  F. Apollo 12 and 13 and Other Moon Miscellanies

  Chapter 14. - MARS, AND THE FEAR OF MARS

  A. Mars Surface Anomalies

  B. The “Fear” of Mars: the Moonlet Phobos and its Monolith

  C. The Two Space Programs Hypothesis

  Chapter 15. - THE LORD OF THE RINGS OF SATURN

  A. Saturn in Greek Mythology: The War With the Titans

  B. The Anomalous Orbital Mechanics of Iapetus

  C. Anomalous Surface Features of lapetus

  D. Hoagland’s Three Hypotheses For Explaining lapetus

  Chapter 16. - THE ANTIQUITY OF MAN...OR OF WHOMEVER

  A. A Brief Review of Cremo and Thompson’s Critique of Evolutionary Theory

  B. Anomalous Finds of Great Antiquity Indicating the Existence of Technology

  C. Some Radical Speculations Courtesy of the Cooper-Cantwheeel MAJIC-12 Documents

  Chapter 17. - SUMMARIES AND FINAL SPECULATIONS

  BIBLIOGRAPHY

  For my good friends, the “Extended Inklings”:

  Dennis, David, Brad, Susan, Steve, Scott, Bill, Tracy,

  Walter, and Kate:

  All friends who remained true during a storm,

  and in fulfillment of discussions held long ago;

  For my good friend Ann, who listened and encouraged;

  And for my mom, Dorothy F. Farrell,

  who fought her part in this cosmic war so heroically,

  and went to be with the Lord Whose love she so well exemplified

  as this book was being finished.

  Benedicite Deo omnipotente, Patri et Filii et Spiritui Sancto

  descendat et maniat super te in aeternum.

  The Cosmic War:

  Interplanetary Warfare, Modern Physics, and Ancient Texts (A Study in Non-Catastrophist Interpretations of Ancient Legends)

  Copyright 2007 by Joseph P. Farrell

  All rights reserved

  ISBN: 978-1-931882-75-0

  Printed in the United States of America

  Published by Adventures Unlimited Press

  Kempton, Illinois 60946 USA

  10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2

  Other books by Joseph P. Farrell:

  The Giza Death Star

  The Giza Death Star Deployed

  The Giza Death Star Destroyed

  Reich of the Black Sun

  SS Brotherhood of the Bell

  “Newton was not the first of the Age of Reason. He was the last of the magicians, the last of the Babylonians and Sumerians, the last great mind which looked out on the visible and intellectual world with the same eyes as those who began to build our intellectual world rather less than 10,000 years ago... Why do I call him a magician? Because he looked on the whole universe and all that is in it as a riddle, as a secret which could be read by applying pure thought to certain evidence, certain mystic clues... He believed these clues were to be found partly... in certain papers and traditions handed down by the brethren in an unbroken chain back to the original cryptic revelation in Babylon. ”

  The economist John Maynard Keynes, “Newton the Man,” The Royal Society. Newton Tercentenary Celebrations (1947), p. 29, cited in Giorgio de Santillana and Hertha Von Dechind, Hamlet’s Mill: An Essay on Myth and the Frame of Time, p. 9, emphasis in the original.

  INTRODUCTION:

  APPROACHES TO A PROBLEM

  “This weapon can slay any being within the three worlds, including Indra and Rudra. ”

  The Mahabharata1

  Giants. Nephilim. Annunaki. Colliding planets and the Exploding Planet Hypothesis. Cosmic catastrophe. Comets. Angels. Demons. War in Heaven. The Fall of Lucifer. Wars of the Gods. Ancient epics. Ancient advanced technology. Artificial moons. Miscegenation, genetic engineering, and chimeras. The Face on Mars. Out of place artifacts. And last but surely not least... ...Atlantis.

  For most people, these things are unrelated. But for me, the sense has always lingered in the corners of my mind that they were and are someh
ow all connected, that they are all somehow part of one “something,” components of one all-encompassing scenario, a scenario of epic historical and indeed cosmic proportions.

  Readers of my Giza Death Star trilogy will already be familiar with my weapons hypothesis for the Great Pyramid, and be aware as well of the scenario advanced there that some very ancient and sophisticated weapon of mass destruction might have been used to explode the now missing planet(s) of the solar system where the asteroid belt now orbits our sun, grim remnants and reminders of some ancient planet “Krypton.” And most readers of that trilogy will likewise be aware of the fact that I believe the Great Pyramid - or something similar and based upon similar “scalar” physics conceptions - might have been the weapon deployed to do it.

  But it is to be emphasized that there are massive problems with this all-encompassing and highly speculative scenario, and readers of that trilogy will be aware of some of them. Needless to say, many of these problems are chronological in nature. But there are other equally weighty problems, and I deliberately left these unexplored in the Giza Death Star trilogy, leaving them for another book: this one.

  My reason for doing so was rather simple: I thought that to burden those already technical books with a lengthy examination of the scenario of an ancient interplanetary war and its ongoing consequences would detract from the main emphasis of those books, since such a scenario, while pertinent to the Weapon Hypothesis of the Great Pyramid, is not necessary to it. The Giza Death Star books focused on the type of weaponry used to fight the war, and secondarily on the war itself as corroboration that such weaponry once existed. Here the situation is the converse. Here the focus is on the war itself, and secondarily on the type of weaponry used to fight it as corroboration that such cosmic wars in local space were once fought.

  But what are those “other problems”?

  These may be understood by asking a very simple set of questions: Who fought this alleged war? Why were they fighting? What weapons did they use? What were their effects? Who won? Who lost? Who survived? What was their legacy? And perhaps most importantly, who were the “good guys,” the “bad guys,” and why were they “good” or “evil”?

  Thus, unlike in my Giza Death Star trilogy of books, the emphasis here is on the scenario itself, on the scenario of an ancient interplanetary war in our own solar system and on its prolonged perhaps even contemporary consequences. There are, of course, implications for the hypothesis explored and outlined in the Giza Death Star trilogy, and accordingly, some of the material of those books is reprised and expanded upon here, but only insofar as it is necessary to explore the scenario itself. Therefore, the reader should bear in mind throughout the following pages that the two hypotheses

  - that of an Ancient Interplanetary War and that of Great Pyramid as a Weapon of Mass Destruction — remain separate hypotheses. They dovetail, to be sure, but they do not stand or fall together. Indeed, as the reader will eventually learn in the main body of this work, there is some textual evidence to suggest that whatever weaponry was once associated with Giza may in fact lie in an older stratum beneath the current structures at Giza, and that the present Great Pyramid may be an attempt to reconstruct a much older weapons technology of hegemony. It will also be apparent that other types of weaponry than scalar weaponry, or other modes of deployment of scalar weaponry — which is my preferred view - may have been used, not only to blow up planets and other celestial bodies, but to leave fantastic searing scars on others, to manipulate weather, and even to manipulate consciousness itself.

  Readers of the Giza Death Star books will likewise recall that the hypothesis of a Very High Civilization in “extremely ancient times” - named “paleoancient” in the Giza Death Star trilogy by my intentionally redundant term — was a broad component of the scenario outlined in those three books. In this book, my occasional use of the term “Atlantis” is to be understood as a symbol for that Very High and paleoancient Civilization. Accordingly, I do not intend on entering into lengthy discussions of the location of the celebrated “lost continent” other than in those instances where the topic is germane to the subject under discussion. As has been seen in The Giza Death Star trilogy, there are significant reasons to take Plato’s story of a “lost continent” in an “allegorical” sense, in the sense of a “myth” with multiple layers of meaning, from the prosaic literal sense to carefully crafted “paleophysical” ones.

  Thus, inevitably, we are led back to the subject of “paleophysics.” The Giza Death Star trilogy contained much discussion of the speculative possibility that there once existed a sophisticated “paleophysics” in that paleoancient Very High Civilization, a physics as sophisticated, if not more so, than our own theoretical and practical edifice of quantum mechanics, relativity, string and membrane theory, or alternatively, loop quantum gravity, plasma cosmology, and so on. Such a view had to be advanced if one was to seriously entertain what the ancient texts themselves suggested, namely, that such weapons of mass destruction existed in very ancient times, and that they were associated simultaneously with the destruction of planets on the one hand, and with the capabilities of pyramids in general and the Great Pyramid in particular.

  Here the discussion of an ancient paleophysics is renewed and expanded upon. Readers of the first book of that trilogy, The Giza Death Star, will find here an expansion on the plasma physics and cosmology of Swedish physicist and Nobel laureate Hannes Alfvén. Additionally, readers will also find additional material on Tom Bearden’s “scalar” or “quantum potential” physics as well, conceptions which were discussed in The Giza Death Star Deployed, The Giza Death Star Destroyed, and most recently in my book on the Nazi secret weapon project known as “the Bell”, The SS Brotherhood of the Bell.

  With all this being said, a further cautionary note is also necessary. In order to tie together all the disparate pieces that I believe may form components of this gigantic scenario of cosmic war and catastrophe, of giants and chimeras, of “gods” and men and Nephilim, it is essential to paint in very broad strokes. While I do entertain discussion of broad chronological and other scientific and archaeological considerations, I do not enter into lengthy examinations of disciplines related to and affected by the Cosmic War hypothesis, such as evolutionary biology, anthropology, or even theology, philosophy, comparative religion, and esoteric or occult history. That such fields are affected by this hypothesis should be obvious. But to discuss each of these implications in detail would not only require several lengthy tomes in their own right, it would also distract attention from the main themes of the scenario as exhibited by the above questions. To ignore them altogether, however, would be equally precarious. Accordingly, I have only sparingly indicated such implications in synoptic form either in the main text or in footnotes, when I think it is appropriate to do so.

  Similarly, I do not attempt to reconstruct a whole detailed chronology of an alternative “pre-history” of extraterrestrial contact, intervention, war, and so on, as does Zechariah Sitchin in his Earth Chronicles series, for a very simple reason. The Cosmic War hypothesis has not hitherto been adequately advanced or explored in its own right, so it would seem best to ascertain its very broad outlines and progression and to put them forward here as a kind of prima facie case, and then to work out the detailed chronology at some later point. It may indeed be the case that eventually chronological data, once the frame into which they may be set has been erected, may be easily placed into it. Or it may likewise be the case that such data may completely overturn the framework proposed here. Similarly they may suggest an entirely different framework of the broad progression of the war than the one I suggest here. In any case, the emphasis here is to outline the Cosmic War Hypothesis and its supporting textual, physics, and archaeological evidences in as broad a fashion as possible.

  Consequently, the Cosmic War scenario as outlined here remains, like the Giza Death Star weapon hypothesis, a hugely speculative hypothesis. It is most decidedly not a theory. If it is at all
true as a theory, then its predictive power must lie in the fact that it will predict the occurrence of distinctly artificial artifacts on nearby planetary bodies in our own solar system, and perhaps of very ancient artificial satellites of planets as well. Additionally, it will “predict” the occurrence of evidence indicating deliberate targeting and destruction of these artifacts and satellites. And finally, it will “predict” the necessity of observers to record this information in the various forms that have come down to us, albeit in garbled form. But history, much less reconstructions of paleoancient history based on mythological texts, is not science for the very obvious reason that its “predictions” are always of an a posteriori nature, and thus the cosmic war hypothesis can remain only a hypothesis. Corroboration can only come in the total context of external evidence adduced to support it.

 

‹ Prev