Preventing Identity Theft in Your Business

Home > Other > Preventing Identity Theft in Your Business > Page 21
Preventing Identity Theft in Your Business Page 21

by Judith M. Collins


  The team is to emphasize that the focus is on the job and not the person who holds the job; it is the “job process” that eventually is to be secured, using the information elicited in this group interview.

  The moderator may use the following open-ended questions: “What is the job’s specific purpose?”

  “Is personal information required to perform the job?”

  “What types of personal information are used to perform job tasks?”

  Encourage participation by all focus group employees.

  The recorder uses a flip chart to list job positions as identified by the focus group members.

  Conduct the focus group interview in one hour or less.

  APPENDIX F

  THE SECURITY JOB DESCRIPTION

  THE INFORMATION SECURITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE, LLC

  Job Title COMPUTER FORENSIC ANALYST

  Department Business Information Security

  Reports To Director

  Grade 10

  Exempt ___Yes ___No

  Pay Range 12

  Date December 18, 2004

  __________________________________________________

  THIS JOB POSITION IS SECURITY-SENSITIVE ______YES ______NO

  Purpose of the Job

  Describe why this job exists.

  Plan, coordinate, and implement security measures for the Business Information Security Program’s four assets—(1) people, (2) processes, (3) proprietary information, and (4) property—to prevent unauthorized access, modification, destruction, theft, and disclosure of employee, customer, or business identifying information.

  Essential Functions

  List the essential duties required for this job as identified in the job analysis.

  Secure computer databases.

  Detect security intrusions.

  Perform process risk assessments.

  Analyze security requirements.

  Regulate access to proprietary information.

  Monitor use of information files.

  Security-Related Essential Functions

  Secure computer databases.

  Detect security intrusions.

  Regulate access to proprietary information.

  Monitor use of information files.

  Other Duties

  What other important duties are performed occasionally, as identified in the job analysis?

  Conceal confidential information using encryption technology.

  Modify security procedures to incorporate new methods.

  Review violations of security procedures.

  Coordinate the Business Information Security Program with outside vendors.

  THE SECURITY JOB DESCRIPTION

  Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities

  List the knowledge, skills, and abilities identified in the job analysis and any licenses or certifications required to perform the job tasks.

  Computer hardware and software certification: knowledge of circuit boards, processors, chips, electronic equipment, and hardware and software applications

  Knowledge of identity theft and identity crimes, and network modus operandi

  Knowledge of relevant security equipment and strategies to protect people, processes, proprietary information, and property

  Ability to communicate effectively

  Ability to analyze security requirements

  Ability to install security programs to meet specifications

  Ability to determine what kinds of equipment are needed for security

  Knowledge of quality management problem-solving tools

  Knowledge of information process risk assessment procedures

  Knowledge of personnel selection for security practices

  Work Context

  Here describe the working conditions of the job.

  This job requires working indoors in environmentally controlled conditions; requires sitting, standing, and reaching and the use of hands to handle and control tools and equipment. The job requires the worker to coordinate or lead others in implementing security precautions and safeguards. The job tasks require high accuracy and exactness and the confidentiality of security-integrated mechanisms.

  Work Values

  What work values are required for this job?

  The job position requires honesty, trustworthiness, confidentiality, interpersonal skills, and self-motivated initiative to perform independent or team-related job tasks that involve confidential personal and business identifying information. This job is results-oriented and allows employees to use their strongest abilities, giving them a feeling of achievement.

  APPENDIX G

  INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL SPECIALISTS IN TEST DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION

  Dr. Herman Aquinis

  University of Colorado Business School

  CB 165

  PO Box 173364

  Denver, Colorado 80217-3364

  Dr. José Cortina

  George Mason University

  MSN 3F5

  4400 University Drive

  Fairfax, VA 22030-1182

  Drs. Joyce & Robert Hogan

  Hogan Assessment Systems

  2622 E. 21st Street

  Tulsa, OK 74114

  Dr. Michael McDaniel

  Virginia Commonwealth University

  School of Business

  12305 Collinstone Place

  Glen Allen, VA 23059-7121

  Dr. Paul Muchinsky

  University of North Carolina—Greensboro

  Business Administration

  PO Box 26165

  Greensboro, NC 27402-6165

  Dr. Frank Schmidt

  Tippie College of Business

  University of Iowa

  Iowa City, IA 52242

  Dr. Neal Schmitt

  Department of Psychology

  Michigan State University

  East Lansing, MI 48824-1117

  Dr. Robert Tett

  University of Tulsa

  600 South College Avenue

  Tulsa, OK 74104-3126

  Dr. Judith Collins

  School of Criminal Justice

  Michigan State University

  East Lansing, MI 48824-1118

  APPENDIX H

  ONE COMPANY’S SHORT- AND LONG-TERM STRATEGIC PLAN

  The following example is a strategic plan developed by employees in one department of a large automobile manufacturing corporation. The team used the cause-and-effect analysis fishbone four-M model to identify the incoming sources into the department of both employee and customer Social Security numbers.

  Strategic Timeline for Securing the Four M’s

  Short versus Long Term Target Date for Completion

  Machines/Equipment

  1. Move printer to inner office. short immediate

  2. Move fax to inner office. short immediate

  3. Retrieve faxes when received. short immediate

  4. Wait at fax until document has been sent. short immediate

  5. Do not leave originals in fax machine. short immediate

  6. Lock computer screen when leaving desk. short immediate

  7. Lock file cabinets at all times. short immediate

  8. Make sure documents are shredded before walking away from shredder. short immediate

  Materials

  9. Produce only necessary documents. short immediate

  10. Do not leave documents on desktop. short immediate

  Methods

  11. Do not leave identifying information on voice mail messages. short immediate

  12. Change password often. short immediate

  Manpower

  13. Train all employees on above procedures. short week 1

  14. Evaluate performance on above procedures. short/long month 1, 2 annual reviews

  APPENDIX I

  THE INFORMATION PROCESS: DEFINITION, DESCRIPTION, AND ILLUSTRATION

  DEFINING THE INFORMATION PROCESS

  Processes refer to the input-throughput-output of information that identifies employees or c
ustomers as this information is processed in a department, that is, the sequential job tasks processed while performing a job. Customer and employee information, or personal identities, are assets that can be secured by securing the information processes—the sequence of job tasks performed on the information (identities).

  A process, for example, may be the sequence of tasks required to fill work orders or medical prescriptions, to conduct financial audits, to prepare employee payroll checks, to process credit card applications, or to open retail accounts for on-credit purchases. In each of these instances, the job tasks require names, addresses, Social Security numbers, and other personal information. Without these items of identifying information, there would be no job tasks to perform: The jobs exist to process them.

  DESCRIBING AN INFORMATION PROCESS

  This example (taken in part from Chapter 8) of an automobile leasing process is taken from an actual case in which corporate managers in a large automobile manufacturing plant lease automobiles for their own personal use. In this international corporation with hundreds of thousands of employees worldwide, as many as 100 or more of these and similar applications are processed daily.

  The process begins when an application from a manager for the lease of an automobile comes into the leasing department through company mail, U.S. mail, e-mail, fax, or telephone; sometimes the application is personally hand delivered by the manager. The information on the application is then verified against company records to confirm that the applicant is indeed a company manager. A third step requires the verification of information (the identities) against the state’s driver’s license records to rule out disqualifying driving violations, which would stop the processing of the application. Subsequent job tasks related to the leasing of the auto are performed in different job positions. Finally, when all information is verified, the document continues to the last job tasks leading to the approval of the leased automobile to the manager.

  Throughout the process, the identifying information of the manager seeking the automobile lease is handled in a series of sequentially ordered tasks linked to one another to form the work process. The application eventually is filed for renewal, and the process repeats, or discontinues—the name, Social Security number, and all other pieces of identifying information have been verified, acted on, and completed.

  Throughout the many steps in this process, information can be compromised, either internally, by the relatively few dishonest employees who steal from the majority of upstanding employees and company customers, or externally, by company contractors, service providers, or others, such as, in the example, the state driver’s license bureau. However, information work processes can be secured. To illustrate, the example continues (below) the case involving the automobile leasing department in which a team of managers and volunteer employees conducted an information process risk analysis. The solutions from this analysis were subsequently implemented and enforced by all of the employees in the leasing department.

  ILLUSTRATING THE INFORMATION PROCESS RISK ASSESSMENT

  Here is the background on how the team secured the leasing process. A manager wishing to lease an auto submits to the leasing department an application containing the following information: Social Security number (to verify employment), driver’s license number (to verify driving record), date of birth (to verify the applicant), and home address (for verification and future correspondence). The manager submits the application to the leasing department through company mail, U.S. mail, e-mail, fax, telephone, or by personal delivery. The process itself—the sequence of job tasks—begins with the receipt of the application into the department. The information process risk assessment follows these job tasks.

  Threats to security could come from each of the incoming sources. The manager-employee team first conducted brainstorming and cause-and-effect analysis to identify all of the potential incoming sources; they then used flow-charting to visually trace the flow of personal information through the department, following the job tasks—the standard, sequentially ordered tasks that are performed using the application. This flow of information can be thought of as the input-throughput-output of a document containing personal identities (or any other proprietary document, application, or other paper or digital form containing information). See Exhibit I.1 for common flow chart symbols. Exhibit I.2 shows the flow of information that routinely comes into the Leasing Department’s Vehicle Inventory Unit. Note the key the team created to interpret the flow chart.

  After the information process was visually charted, the project team analyzed each step in the process beginning at the point at which applications (information) arrive into the department. At each point on the flow chart, the team conducted brainstorming to generate all possible ways that identities could be comprised at that location or job position. (Recall here the importance of maintaining the focus on the process, not the person performing the process.) The team was seeking to identify any possible weak linkages in the application process where an identity theft could occur. After the team members identified all possible susceptibilities to threat at each point in the information process, they again used brainstorming together with cause-and-effect analysis to generate a large number of options for management consideration to secure the weak points in the information process.

  EXHIBIT I.1 Common Flow Chart Symbols

  Here are some of the things the team recommended to management to secure the first point in the information process, the entry of information into the department. For the mailroom, the recommended security solutions were to (a) secure from passersby the otherwise relatively open mailroom by simply closing the door, (b) require the use of access keys by departmental employees, (c) route (address) mail deliveries of lease applications to specific mailboxes for (d) routine retrieval by specified job positions. These simple and inexpensive security precautions served dual purposes: They tightened the perimeter of the mailroom, thereby securing it from outside access, and they limited access to managers’ identifying information to specific job positions of security.

  EXHIBIT I.2 Flow Chart Tracing the Route of a Fax Document through a Department—Each Location and Transfer Path Can Be Secured

  Source: Fax

  Dept: Vehicle Inventory

  Team Members: Frank, Martin, Janet, Marilyn, Peggy, Marlin

  Desks: 1 = Manager/Supervisor

  2 = CVMS Coordinator

  3 = D&B Coordinator

  4 = Authorization Code Coordinator

  Additionally, the fax machine was relocated to a more secure area, and incoming fax applications were assigned to specific job positions designated as position of security. E-mail lease applications were secured by simple policies to change the positions of desks or of computers on the desks, to protect the privacy of the screens showing confidential information, and the usual computer security mechanisms (e.g., virus protection, firewalls, spyware controls) were installed and routinely updated by the computer department. Using the quality-to-security tools, the project team conducted this information process risk assessment at each step of lease application and subsequently secured the entire process.

  A KEY POINT

  This actual case illustrates how important it is that the project team be composed of a cross-section of employees holding different job positions within the department: A single process, such as the above processing of an application through the leasing application department, may cut across several job positions. The key point is that employees closest to this process are those who perform the job tasks and therefore are also the employees who are the most knowledgeable about the sequence of tasks. These individuals also are in the best positions to identify weaknesses in the process and solutions to correct them.

  APPENDIX J

  THE PARETO ANALYSIS: DEFINITION, DESCRIPTION, AND ILLUSTRATION

  DEFINING PARETO ANALYSIS

  Pareto analysis is a problem-solving method developed in 1986 by Taguchi, a pioneer in the quality control movement, and adapte
d by the Business Information Security Program (BISP) for controlling security. Pareto analysis prioritizes problems identified in cause-and-effect analysis in their order of importance. The Pareto diagram is a simple bar chart that lists the frequencies of potential threats of a problem. For purposes of information process security, the place in the process having the most potential threats is also the most important problem and the first in order of priority to be secured.

  DESCRIBING PARETO ANALYSIS

  Consider a document that arrives at a company by the U.S. mail. The document is (1) delivered to the company mailroom, (2) sorted, (3) picked up by a mail clerk, (4) delivered to a departmental mailbox, and (5) retrieved by an employee or delivered to some job position where one or more job tasks are performed on the document. Examples of such tasks may be entering information into a company database or verifying information on the document. Typically, several job positions may perform several job tasks involving either paper or digital processing of incoming financial and other applications and documents. In this brief scenario, there are at least four susceptible points where the identity of an employee or customer could be compromised: (1) from the incoming company mailbox by anyone passing by, (2) by a mail clerk or someone impersonating a mail clerk, (3) by anyone who might see the document lying on a desk or displayed on a computer screen, or (4) by someone in the input-throughput-output chain of job positions where sequential tasks are performed on the document. This information process has, in great part, already been secured by securing the people front. However, to secure the process, information security requires a two-pronged approach—people and process security.

 

‹ Prev