Lawrence Krauss - The Greatest Story Ever Told--So Far

Home > Other > Lawrence Krauss - The Greatest Story Ever Told--So Far > Page 5
Lawrence Krauss - The Greatest Story Ever Told--So Far Page 5

by Why Are We Here (pdf)

on his greatest work, a complete theory of electricity and magnetism.

  To do this, Maxwell used Faraday’s discovery as the key to

  revealing that the relationship between electricity and magnetism is

  ͠͡

  symmetrical. Oersted’s and Faraday’s experiments had shown,

  simply, that a current of moving charges produces a magnetic field;

  and that a changing magnetic field (produced by moving a magnet

  or simply turning on a current to produce a magnet) produces an

  electric field.

  Maxwell first expressed these results mathematically in 1861, but

  soon realized that his equations were incomplete. Magnetism

  appeared to be different from electricity. Moving charges create a

  magnetic field, but a magnetic field can create an electric field even

  without moving—just by changing. As Faraday discovered, turning

  on a current, which produces a changing magnetic field as the

  current ramps up, produces an electric force that causes a current to

  flow in another nearby wire.

  Maxwell recognized that to make a complete and consistent set of

  equations for electricity and magnetism he had to add an extra term

  to the equations, representing what he called a “displacement

  current.” He reasoned that moving charges, namely a current,

  produce a magnetic field, and moving charges represent one way to

  produce a changing electric field (since the field from each charge

  changes in space as the charge moves along). So, maybe, a changing

  electric field—one that gets stronger or weaker—in a region with no

  charges in motion, could produce a magnetic field.

  Maxwell envisioned that if he hooked up two parallel plates to

  opposite poles of a battery, each plate would get charged with an

  opposite charge as current flowed from the battery. This would

  produce a growing electric field between the plates and would also

  produce a magnetic field around the wires connected to the plates.

  For his equations to be completely consistent, Maxwell realized, the

  increasing electric field between the plates should also produce a

  magnetic field in that empty space between the plates. And that field

  ͢͠

  would be the same as any magnetic field produced by a real current

  flowing through that space between the plates.

  So Maxwell altered his equations by adding a new term

  (displacement current) to produce mathematical consistency. This

  term effectively behaved like an imaginary current, flowing between

  the plates producing a changing electric field identical in magnitude

  to the actual changing electric field in the empty space between the

  plates. It also was the same as the magnetic field that a real current

  would produce if it flowed between the plates. Such a magnetic field

  does in fact arise when you perform the experiment with parallel

  plates, as undergraduates demonstrate every day in physics

  laboratories around the world.

  Mathematical consistency and sound physical intuition generally

  pay off in physics. This subtle change in the equations may not seem

  like much, but its physical impact is profound. Once you remove real

  electric charges from the picture, it means that you can describe

  everything about electricity and magnetism entirely in terms of the

  hypothetical “fields” that Faraday had relied upon purely as a mental

  crutch. The connections between electricity and magnetism can thus

  be simply stated: A changing electric field produces a magnetic field.

  A changing magnetic field produces an electric field.

  Suddenly the fields appear in the equations as real physical objects

  in their own right and not merely as a way to quantify the force

  between charges. Electricity and magnetism became inseparable. It is

  impossible to talk about electrical forces alone because, as I will

  shortly show, one person’s electric force is another person’s

  magnetic force, depending on the circumstances of the observer, and

  whether the field is changing in his frame of reference.

  We now refer to electromagnetism to describe these phenomena,

  for a good reason. After Maxwell, electricity and magnetism were no

  ͣ͠

  longer viewed as separate forces of nature. They were different

  manifestations of one and the same force.

  Maxwell published his complete set of equations in 1865 and later

  simplified them in his textbook of 1873. These would become

  famous as the four Maxwell’s Equations, which (admittedly rewritten

  in modern mathematical language) adorn the T-shirts of physics

  undergraduates around the world today. We can thus label 1873 as

  establishing the second great unification in physics, the first being

  Newton’s recognition that the same force governed the motion of

  celestial bodies as governed falling apples on Earth. Begun with

  Oersted’s and Faraday’s experimental discoveries, this towering

  achievement of the human intellect was completed by Maxwell, a

  mild-mannered young theoretical physicist from Scotland, exiled to

  England by the vicissitudes of academia.

  Gaining a new perspective on the cosmos is always—or should be

  —immensely satisfying. But science adds an additional and powerful

  benefit. New understanding also breeds tangible and testable

  consequences, and often immediately.

  So it was with Maxwell’s unification, which now made Faraday’s

  hypothetical fields literally as real as the nose on your face. Literally,

  because it turns out you couldn’t see the nose on your face without

  them.

  Maxwell’s genius didn’t end just with codifying the principles of

  electromagnetism in elegant mathematical form. He used the

  mathematics to unravel the hidden nature of that most fundamental

  of all physical quantities—which had eluded the great natural

  philosophers from Plato to Newton. The most observable thing in

  nature: light.

  Consider the following thought experiment. Take an electrically

  charged object and jiggle it up and down. What happens as you do

  this?

  ͤ͠

  Well, an electric field surrounds the charge, and when you move

  the charge, the position of the field lines changes. But, according to

  Maxwell, this changing electric field will produce a magnetic field,

  which will point in and out of the paper as shown below:

  Here the field line pointing into the paper has a cross (the back of

  an arrow), and that pointing out of the paper has a dot (the tip of an

  arrow). This field will flip direction as the charge changes the

  direction of its motion from upward to downward.

  But we should not stop there. If I keep jiggling the charged object,

  the electric field will keep changing, and so will the induced

  magnetic field. But a changing magnetic field will produce an

  electric field. Thus there are new induced electric field lines, which

  point vertically, changing from up to down as the magnetic field

  reverses its sign. I display the electric field line to the right only for

  lack of space, but the mirror image will be induced on the left-hand

  side.

  ͥ͠

/>   But that changing electric field will in turn produce a changing

  magnetic field, which would exist farther out to the right and left of

  the diagram, and so on.

  Jiggling a charge produces a succession of disturbances in both

  electric and magnetic fields that propagate outward, with the change

  in each field acting as a source for the other, due to the rules of

  electromagnetism as Maxwell defined them. We can extend the

  picture shown above to a 3-D image that captures the full nature of

  the changing as shown below:

  We see a wave of electric and magnetic disturbances, namely an

  electromagnetic wave moving outward, with electric and magnetic

  fields oscillating in space, and time, and with the two fields

  oscillating in directions that are perpendicular to each other and also

  the direction of the wave.

  Even before Maxwell had written down the final form of his

  equations, he showed that oscillating charges would produce an

  electromagnetic wave. But he did something far more significant. He

  calculated the speed of that wave, in a beautiful and simple

  ͜͡

  calculation that is probably my favorite derivation to show

  undergraduates. Here it is:

  We can quantify the strength of an electric force by measuring its

  magnitude between two charges whose magnitude we already know.

  The force is proportional to the product of the charges. Let’s call the

  constant of proportionality A.

  Similarly we can quantify the strength of the magnetic force

  between two electromagnets, each with a current of known

  magnitude. This force is proportional to the product of the currents.

  Let’s call the constant of proportionality in this case B.

  Maxwell showed that the speed of an electromagnetic disturbance

  that emanates from an oscillating charge can be rendered precisely

  in terms of the measured strength of electricity and the measured

  strength of magnetism, which are determined by measuring the

  constants A and B in the laboratory. When he used the data then

  available for the measured strength of electricity and the measured

  strength of magnetism and plugged in the numbers, he derived:

  Speed of electromagnetic waves ≈ 311,000,000 meters per second

  A famous story claims that when Albert Einstein finished his

  General Theory of Relativity and compared its predictions for the

  orbit of Mercury to the measured numbers, he had heart

  palpitations. One can only imagine, then, the excitement that

  Maxwell must have had when he performed his calculation. For this

  number, which may seem arbitrary, was well known to him as the

  speed of light. In 1849, the French physicist Fizeau had measured the

  speed of light, an extremely difficult measurement back then, and

  had obtained:

  Speed of light ≈ 313,000,000 meters per second

  ͡͝

  Given the accuracy available at the time, these two numbers are

  identical. (We now know this number far more precisely as

  299,792,458 meters per second, which is a key part of the modern

  definition of the meter.)

  In his typical understated tone, Maxwell noted in 1862, when he

  first performed the calculation, “We can scarcely avoid the

  conclusion that light consists in the transverse undulations of the

  same medium which is the cause of electric and magnetic

  phenomena.”

  In other words, light is an electromagnetic wave.

  Two years later, when he finally wrote his classic paper on

  electromagnetism, he added somewhat more confidently, “Light is

  an electromagnetic disturbance propagated through the field

  according to electromagnetic laws.”

  With these words, Maxwell appeared to have finally put to rest

  the two-thousand-year-old mystery regarding the nature and origin

  of light. His result came, as great insights often do, as an unintended

  by-product of other fundamental investigations. In this case, it was a

  by-product of one of the most important theoretical advances in

  history, the unification of electricity and magnetism into a single

  beautiful mathematical theory.

  • • •

  Before Maxwell, the chief source of wisdom came from a faith in

  divinity via Genesis. Even Newton relied upon this source for

  understanding the origin of light. After 1862, however, everything

  changed.

  James Clerk Maxwell was deeply religious, and like Newton

  before him, his faith sometimes led him to make strange assertions

  about nature. Nevertheless, like the mythical character Prometheus

  before him, who stole fire from the gods and gave it to humans to

  ͡͞

  use as a tool to forever change their civilization, so too Maxwell stole

  fire from the Judeo-Christian God’s first words and forever changed

  their meaning. Since 1873, generations of physics students have

  proudly proclaimed:

  “Maxwell wrote down his four equations and said, Let there be

  light!”

  ͟͡

  C h a p t e r 4

  T H E R E , A N D B A C K A G A I N

  He set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved.

  —PSALMS 104:5

  When Galileo Galilei was being tried in 1633 for heresy for

  “holding as true the false doctrine taught by some that the Sun is the

  center of the world,” he allegedly muttered under his breath in front

  of his Church inquisitors, “And yet it moves.” With these words, his

  revolutionary nature once again sprang forth, in spite of his having

  been forced to publicly adhere to the archaic position that the Earth

  was fixed.

  While the Vatican eventually capitulated on Earth’s motion, the

  poor God of the Psalms never got the news. This is somewhat

  perplexing since, as Galileo showed a year before the trial, a state of

  absolute rest is impossible to verify experimentally. Any experiment

  that you perform at rest, such as throwing a ball up in the air and

  catching it, will have an identical result if performed while moving at

  a constant speed, as, say, might happen while riding on an airplane

  in the absence of turbulence. No experiment you can perform on the

  plane, if its windows are closed, will tell you whether the plane is

  moving or standing still.

  While Galileo started the ball rolling, both literally and

  metaphorically, in 1632, it took another 273 years to fully lay to rest

  this issue (issues, unlike objects, can be laid to rest). It would take

  Albert Einstein to do so.

  ͡͠

  Einstein was not a revolutionary in the same sense as Galileo, if by

  this term one describes those who tear down the dictates of the

  authorities who came before, as Galileo had done for Aristotle.

  Einstein did just the opposite. He knew that rules that had been

  established on the basis of experiment could not easily be tossed

  aside, and it was a mark of his genius that he didn’t.

  This is so important I want to repeat it for the benefit of those

  people who write to me every week or so telling me that they have

  discovered a new theory that demonstrates everything we now think />
  we know about the universe is wrong—and using Einstein as their

  exemplar to justify this possibility. Not only is your theory wrong,

  but you are doing Einstein a huge disservice: rules that have been

  established on the basis of experiment cannot easily be tossed aside.

  • • •

  Albert Einstein was born in 1879, the same year that James Clerk

  Maxwell died. It is tempting to suggest that their combined

  brilliance was too much for one simple planet to house at the same

  time. But it was just a coincidence, albeit a fortuitous one. If Maxwell

  hadn’t preceded him, Einstein couldn’t have been Einstein. He came

  from the first generation of young scientists who grew up wrestling

  with the new knowledge about light and electromagnetism that

  Faraday and Maxwell had generated. This was the true forefront of

  physics for young Turks such as Einstein near the end of the

  nineteenth century. Light was on everyone’s mind.

  Even as a teenager, Einstein was astute enough to realize that

  Maxwell’s

  beautiful

  results

  regarding

  the

  existence

  of

  electromagnetic waves presented a fundamental problem: they were

  inconsistent with the equally beautiful and well-established results of

  Galileo regarding the basic properties of motion, produced three

  centuries earlier.

  ͡͡

  Even before his epic battle with the Catholic Church over the

  motion of Earth, Galileo had argued that no experiment exists that

  can be performed by anyone to determine whether he or she is

  moving uniformly or standing still. But up until Galileo, a state of

  absolute rest was considered special. Aristotle had decided that all

  objects sought out the state of rest, and the Church decided that rest

  was so special that it should be the state of the center of the universe,

  namely the planet on which God had placed us.

  Like a number of Aristotle’s assertions, although by no means all,

  this notion that a state of rest is special is quite intuitive. (For those

  who like to quote Aristotle’s wisdom when appealing to his “Prime

  Mover” argument for the existence of God, let us remember that he

  also claimed that women had a different number of teeth than men,

  presumably without bothering to check.)

 

‹ Prev