The Mammoth Encyclopedia of Extraterrestrial Encounters

Home > Other > The Mammoth Encyclopedia of Extraterrestrial Encounters > Page 111
The Mammoth Encyclopedia of Extraterrestrial Encounters Page 111

by Story, Ronald

POLITICAL TRANSFORMATION

  If God wanted to get something done, like transform Earth to a 4th-density planet, how would he do it? He does it through individual human beings: through Zetas and Pleiadians, and through our guides—angels and archangels. God also works through those who have the resources to bring about world change. The primary resources are money and influence. Many of these people are part of the not-so-secret world government.

  God’s helpers from various levels of “reality” have assisted and influenced human evolution since its beginnings. (Newbrough, 1882) They influenced the ancient mystery religions of Babylon, Egypt, India, Persia, and Greece with various forms of pantheism. These wise spirits from “above” have throughout many centuries influenced our thought and action through Kabbalism, Gnosticism, the Knights Templars, the Rosicrucians, Freemasonry/Illuminati, and more recent spiritually-oriented groups like the Theosophical Society, all culminating in what many call the New Age movement.

  The rate of interaction may have increased since World War II to keep our technological development from getting too far ahead of our spiritual development. I have seen various signs that one primary purpose of Freemasonry is to build a widespread mindset that will make a world government possible. A democratically-elected world government seems to be a prerequisite to the people of Earth joining the Galactic Society.

  The not-so-secret world government: Though not an expert on world government, I have focused my attention on it since January 1994. We have been living with a world government for seventy-nine years. I found an important book that seems to have greatly influenced the not-so-secret world government in 1972: The Limits of Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. (Meadows, et al., 1972)

  I view the Club of Rome (COR) as a think-tank for the not-so-secret world government, much like the expertise of the Rand Corporation is used to provide guidance for the U.S. Air Force on complicated issues. The COR used the world’s best system modelers and the big computer at MIT to model growth in the world system from 1900 to 2100. All relevant data collected from 1900 to 1970 was used, and the computer was asked what happens if we keep doing what we have been doing? Parameters plotted included birth and death rates, natural resources, capitol, population, food per capita, industrial output per capita, and pollution. The curves showed many peaks in the first half of the next century, and by 2050 the death rate was nearly vertical. Population growth is finally halted by death due to decreased food and medical services. If many stabilizing policies were implemented in 1975, including an average of two children per family, the charts were less scary, and a stabilized society was nearly reached by 2050. However, if these policies were delayed until the year 2000, the decline continued through the end of this century without stabilization.

  There is a 13-page commentary at the end of The Limits of Growth by The Executive Committee of the Club of Rome: Alexander King, Saburo Okita, Aureilo Peccei, Eduard Pestel, Hugo Thiemann, and Carroll Wilson. The commentary is concluded with the following paragraphs:

  “The concept of a society in a steady state of economic and ecological equilibrium may appear easy to grasp, although the reality is so distant from our experience as to require a Copernican revolution of the mind. Translating the idea into deed, though, is a task filled with overwhelming difficulties and complexities. We can talk seriously about where to start only when the message of The Limits of Growth, and its sense of extreme urgency, are accepted by a large body of scientific, political, and popular opinion in many countries. The transition in any case is likely to be painful, and it will make extreme demands on human ingenuity and determination. As we have mentioned, only the conviction that there is no other avenue to survival can liberate the moral, intellectual, and creative forces required to initiate this unprecedented human undertaking.

  “But we wish to underscore the challenge rather than the difficulty of mapping out the road to a stable state society. We believe that an unexpectedly large number of men and women of all ages and conditions will readily respond to the challenge and will be eager to discuss not if but how we can create this new future.

  “The Club of Rome plans to support such activity in many ways. The substantive research begun at MIT on world dynamics will be continued both at MIT and through studies conducted in Europe, Latin America, the Soviet Union, and Japan. And, since intellectual enlightenment is without effect if it is not also political, The Club of Rome also will encourage the creation of a world forum where statesmen, policy-makers, and scientists can discuss the dangers and hopes for the future global system without the constraints of formal intergovernmental negotiation.

  “The last thought we wish to offer is that man must explore himself—his goals and values—as much as the world he seeks to change. The dedication to both tasks must be unending. The crux of the matter is not only whether the human species will survive, but even more whether it can survive without failing into a worthless state of existence.”

  These words must have had a profound effect on the three branches of the world government: the Council on Foreign Relations, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, and the Institute of Pacific Relations founded in 1921. I suspect that The Limits of Growth influenced the formation of a unifying organization, the Trilateral Commission, in 1973.

  CONCLUSIONS

  There is much evidence that aliens and angels are working with humans to transform this planet. In 1959 Pope John XXIII, political head of the Roman Catholic Church, wrote in his diary that he had visits by both Jesus and Mary. Now there are Marian apparitions, often associated with UFOs, in many parts of the, world. During one of these Giorgio Bongiovanni was stigmatized, and he was told to tell the world about the transformation. I was told by a retired CIA agent that in 1985 Gorbachev had a visit by two Ascended Masters. That visit is still changing the world.

  I have recently heard evidence that suggests the public is being deceived about the A-10 that mysteriously went to Colorado on April 2, 1997. It was apparently briefly captured by aliens as a way to get the attention of authorities. Captain Buttons is reported to have been removed from the plane to openly join the Galactic Society. U.S. proliferation of sophisticated weapons of war may have been an issue there. Perhaps the people in our Space Command headquarters know. Human-alien liaison is real, and I think many of us are now ready to know what’s going on. Greater knowledge of joint human-alien efforts to transform this planet should not cause too much stress for those who don’t care much about the broader issues facing humanity, but it can give much-needed hope to the unknowing participants.

  —DONALD M. WARE

  References

  Elkins, Don, and Carla Rueckert. The RA Material (L/L Research, 1982).

  Dennis, Caryl, with Parker Whitman. The Millennium Children (Rainbows Unlimited, 1997).

  “The Fellowship.” The Urantia Book: A Revelation for Humanity (Uversa Press, 1996).

  Human Potential Foundation. When Cosmic Cultures Meet, The Proceedings (1997).

  Meadows, Donella and Dennis, et al. The Limis to Growth (Signet/NAL, 1972).

  Newbrough, John Ballou. Ohaspe: A New Bible (Kosmon Press, 1944).

  Walters, Ed. The Gulf Breeze Sightings (Avon, 1990). Walters, Ed and Frances. UFO Abductions in Gulf Breeze (Avon, 1994).

  Walters, Ed and Bruce Maccabee. UFOs are Real! Here is the Proof (1997).

  Woodhouse, Mark B. Paradigm Wars: Guidelines for a New Age (1996).

  Tremonton (Utah) movie On July 2, 1952, Navy Warrant Officer Delbert C. Newhouse was driving toward a new duty station with his wife and two children. Just after eleven in the morning, his wife noticed a group of bright objects that she couldn’t easily identify. Newhouse, a trained Navy photographer, stopped the car to retrieve his 16 mm camera from the trunk.

  By the time he got his camera out, the objects had moved away from the car. Newhouse said later that when one object broke from the formation, he tracked it so that analysts would have something to work wit
h. He let it fly across the field of view. He did that two or three times. When he turned back, the whole formation was gone.

  The details of the story vary, depending on the source. Air Force files, based on the information supplied by others, show that Newhouse and his wife saw the objects at close range. By the time he got the car stopped and the camera out of the trunk, the objects had moved to a longer range. In an interview conducted by UFO investigators in 1976, Newhouse confirmed he had seen the objects at close range. He said they were large, disk-shaped, and brightly lighted. Major Dewey Fournet, once a member of the Pentagon’s UFO office, said Newhouse had said the same thing to him.

  After filming the objects, Newhouse stored his camera, got back into the car and drove on to his new duty station. Once there, he had the film processed and sent a copy to the Air Force suggesting they might find it interesting.

  The Air Force investigation lasted for months, including analysis of the film. They tried everything to identify the objects but failed. When coupled to the report and the reliability of the photographer, the Air Force was stuck. They had no explanation When the Air Force finished, the Navy asked for it. They made a frame-by-frame analysis that took more than a thousand man-hours. They studied the motion of the objects, their relation to one another in the formation, the lighting of the objects, and every other piece of data they could find on the film. In the end, like their Air Force counterparts, they were left with no explanation.

  But, unlike their Air Force counterparts, the Navy experts were not restricted in their praise of the film. Their report said that the objects were internally lighted spheres that were not reflecting sunlight. They also estimated the speed at 3,780 miles per hour, if the spheres were five miles away. At twice the distance, they would have been moving twice as fast. At half the distance, half the speed. If the objects were just under a mile distant, they were traveling at 472 miles an hour.

  When the Robertson Panel reviewed the film, Dr. Luis Alverez, a physicist and winner of the Nobel prize, said that they might be birds (specifically, seagulls which are known to be in the area). Fournet said, “Dr. Alverez suggested that as a possible solution to that Tremonton movie.”

  Computer enhancement of the Tremonton, Utah, UFOs

  In the years that followed, the Tremonton movie’s suggested explanation became a solid explanation. Donald H. Menzel and L.G. Boyd, in their book, The World of Flying Saucers, wrote of the Tremonton film: “The pictures are of such poor quality and show so little that even the most enthusiastic home-movie fan today would hesitate to show them to his friends. Only a stimulated imagination could suggest that the moving objects are anything but very badly photographed birds.” (Menzel and Boyd, 1963)

  The Condon Committee investigator on the case, Dr. William K. Hartmann, reexamined the film. After reviewing the evidence, Hartmann concluded: “These observations give strong evidence that the Tremonton films do show birds, as hypothesized above, and I now regard the objects as so identified.” (Gillmor, 1969)

  So a possible answer, suggested by the Robertson Panel became the final explanation for the Newhouse film. However, in the analysis that appeared after the Robertson Panel, one fact was left out. Newhouse saw the objects at close range. Fournet said, “…when you look at what Newhouse said when he was interviewed after that…when you put all that together, the seagull hypothesis becomes flimsier and flimsier.” As with most others, this case stands or falls with the credibility of the witnesses.

  —KEVIN D. RANDLE

  References

  Gillmor, Daniel S. and Condon, Edward U., eds. Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects (E. P. Dutton/Bantam Books, 1969).

  Menzel, Donald and Boyd, Lyle G. The World of Flying Saucers (Doubleday, 1963).

  Randle, Kevin D. “Tremonton (Utah) movie” in Story, Ronald D., ed. The Encyclopedia of UFOs (Doubleday/New English Library, 1980).

  _________________. Conspiracy of Silence (Avon Books, 1997).

  _________________. Scientific UFOlogy (Avon Books, 1999). Ruppelt, Edward J. The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects (Doubleday, 1956).

  Truth About Flying Saucers, The (S.G. Phillips, 1956). French mathematician Aimé Michel examines the observed characteristics of UFOs and various theories about their propulsion systems. He searches for patterns in UFO sightings and finds a tendency in European records for reports to be clustered during periods when Mars is aligned to the Sun and in areas where military bases were located.

  —RANDALL FITZGERALD

  Truth About The UFO Crash At Roswell, The (Avon Books, 1994). Kevin Randle and Donald Schmitt claim to have three hundred witnesses attesting to a military recovery of an extraterrestrial spacecraft and alien bodies near Roswell in 1947. This book was written, they say, to “correct errors” and add data collected since the 1991 publication of their first book on the subject, UFO Crash at Roswell. Several chapters of this book debunk the credibility of MJ-12 documents dealing with Roswell and challenge the veracity of Stanton Friedman’s principal source for his book claiming a second spacecraft also crashed to the west of Roswell.

  —RANDALL FITZGERALD

  Tujunga Canyon Contacts, The (Prentice-Hall, 1980). Ann Druffel and D. Scott Rogo investigate in this book a contagion of alien abductions which spread over a period of decades between five Los Angeles women who were involved with each other as friends and lovers. The authors speculate that since all of the women were interested in metaphysical subjects, or displayed psychic talents, and all were lesbians, the “UFO entities” may have been intrigued about their reproductive habits and the effect on human evolution.

  —RANDALL FITZGERALD

  Tujunga Canyon contacts In 1975, a group of five young women came to the attention of the NICAP (National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena) investigative subcommittee in Los Angeles. All had lived or were still living in the area of the Tujunga Canyons, which wind up into the San Gabriel Mountains in Southern California. The first case documented was that of Sara Shaw and Jan Whitley, who had been awakened one night in 1953 by a bright light outside their isolated cabin. An unexplained two-hour lapse of time occurred, after which the two young women fled down the mountain. The episode remained a mystery for twenty years, but when “missing time” experiences began to receive publicity, Sara Shaw sought our advice. After months of investigation, the two witnesses were hypnotically regressed separately by a clinical hypnotist, Bill McCall, M.D.

  Sara recalled several thin humanoids in black garments coming through the closed window of their bedroom. They transported the two women onto a Saturn-shaped UFO hovering over a nearby stream. Jan was taken away, protesting violently, but Sara cooperated with the creatures as they examined her with an X-ray type device. Afterwards, they held a “conference” with her, telling her about a “cancer cure.” Afterwards, the two women were ushered from the “craft” down a beam of light.

  Later, Jan was repeatedly harassed by invisible “presences” in houses where she lived alone. The presences invariably urged her to “come with them” but Jan struggled mentally each time with them until they vanished.

  At the last encounter they became visible as disembodied heads surrounding her bed. She resisted verbally, insisting they leave her alone. They never returned.

  Unlike Sara, Jan was unable to recover visual memories of her 1953 encounter, but under hypnosis she experienced a certainty that the creatures were essentially invisible to her. She recalled being terrorized, a “crunching pain” in her head and a feeling that “the atmospheric pressure had changed.” Although she was convinced that the intruders were essentially invisible to her, she conceded other witnesses might see them in a visible form.

  A separate encounter involved Jan and a third Tujunga witness, Emily Cronin. (All five witnesses preferred to be given pseudonyms to protect their identity.) In 1956, the two young women were driving home late at night along a mountain road but pulled over because of heavy truck traffic. Sleeping in a wayside rest stop, they we
re suddenly awakened by a bright light. Both felt completely paralyzed. For a few minutes Emily struggled against the paralysis and eventually was able to move one finger, breaking her entire paralysis. Jan also abruptly came out of her paralyzed state. She had been unable to resist by herself, but apparently Emily broke the paralyzed state for both. The two sped down the mountain, not speaking a word until they came to a cafe where they shared their impressions of what had happened. They remembered terror, paralysis, and the unexplained light but could not recover more details. When regressed by Dr. McCall, Emily remembered two entities clad in black emerging from a brightly-lit landed “craft” nearby. The creatures circled their car, apparently curious about Emily’s small son who was sleeping on the back seat. The entities were tall with elongated, thin heads. She had the impression that the creatures had “made a mistake” because a third entity in the craft was urging the others to return to the “UFO.” The “craft” departed about the time Emily broke though her paralysis.

  Later, Emily repeatedly perceived whitish entities which urged her to come with them but succeeded in breaking the altered state each time with a mental struggle. Subsequently, her roommate, Toni Fox, was able to help her by becoming aware she was “struggling” and gently waking her. Toni never saw the entities or experienced any paralysis.

  In 1975, two other young women contacted Emily late one night in 1975, frightened and puzzled. Lori Briggs and Jo Maine, living in a nearby town, had experienced a terrorizing event involving paralysis and vague perception of small white-skinned entities. They were as rational and honest as the other three women and were eventually hypnotically regressed. Lori remembered being abducted by several thin, small creatures into a room with strange machines. She was examined by an X-ray type of equipment.

  When the creatures suggested she come with them to an unexplained destination, Lori used a metaphysical technique, “internal sound,” which she instinctively employed for meditation, protection and relaxation. The creatures seemed surprised at her resistance and quickly transported her back to her own apartment, Jo at her side. Jo retrieved memories only of lying on a platform and of seeing “lights” and a dim “dome-shape.” Throughout the ensuing years, after she moved to Tujunga, Lori at times became aware that the creatures were trying to re-contact her. She would hear a loud, piercing noise the creatures made during the first encounter. When she promptly used her “own sound” against theirs, the entities left each time.

 

‹ Prev