by D. W. Buffa
We were at the door. “Judge Jeffries had him sent to the state hospital?”
“He didn’t do it himself,” she said as she opened the door. “But he made sure it was done.”
I said goodbye and turned to go. “It didn’t do any good, though,”
she said. “Elliott still hates me and he’s still insane. If I didn’t know he was locked up in that place I’d swear he killed Calvin just to get even with me.”
“They have the killer, Mrs. Jeffries,” I said, looking back.
She nodded twice. “The one who killed himself? Are you sure, Mr. Antonelli? Are you sure someone like that murdered my husband?”
Fourteen
_______
Iread it in the newspaper the next morning, a front-page story under the byline of Harper Bryce. Another judge had been murdered. While I had been talking to the widow of Calvin Jeffries, Quincy Griswald, the new presiding circuit court judge, had been killed in a murder that was in all important respects virtually identical to the one before. Like Jeffries, Griswald had been stabbed to death, and, like Jeffries, Griswald had been killed in the parking structure where both of them had kept their cars. Jeffries had managed to crawl back to his office; Griswald had been found dead in the garage, slumped down next to the door of his late-model Buick.
I took the paper with me when I went into the office later that morning. Saturdays were the days I tried to get caught up with my cases. As I drove past the courthouse on my way in, I noticed that the flag had again been lowered to half-mast. No judge had ever been murdered in Oregon and now, in the space of little more than two months, two had been killed, both of them the presiding circuit court judge at the time of their death.
I remembered what Jeffries’s widow had said, the doubt that someone like her husband’s confessed killer could really have done it.
If he had not been found, and if he had not confessed, the immediate assumption would have been that both judges, Jeffries and Griswald, had been killed by the same person. But the killer of Calvin Jeffries had been found, and he had confessed, and then, as if that was not sufficient to prove his guilt, he had taken his own life. Yet I still could not get out of my mind the thought that this had to be more than sheer coincidence.
I reached Howard Flynn at home. “You’re not calling me from a bar, are you?” he asked in his usual gruff manner.
“Do you know if the police have gotten the DNA results yet?”
“From the knife the guy used to kill Jeffries? No, I haven’t heard. It’ll be a match, though. It’ll be Jeffries’s blood.” There was a brief silence and at the other end of the line I could hear Flynn’s labored breath. “You must have read the paper this morning. The guy that killed Jeffries is dead. This is someone else.”
I stared out the window, watching the leaden gray sky grow darker. “What if it isn’t a match?”
Flynn preferred to deal with tangible facts. “Then you have an interesting situation. But the Griswald killing sounds like a copycat to me. Some guy has a grudge because Griswald sent him away. He heard about what someone did to Jeffries and he figures he’ll do the same thing. These aren’t original thinkers we’re dealing with here.”
“What did they ever find out about him, the one who confessed to the Jeffries murder? Did Jeffries send him to prison?”
“I don’t know,” Flynn replied. “Do you want me to find out?”
None of it had anything to do with me. I was not defending anyone who had any connection with either the murder of Calvin Jeffries or the killing of Quincy Griswald. Besides, I had asked Flynn for quite enough already. Still, there was something missing in all this and I wanted to know what it was.
“If you can do it without too much trouble, then yes, I’d like to know what you can find out.”
After I hung up, I tried to reach Harper Bryce. He was not at the paper, and he was not at home. I left a message on his voice mail and turned my attention to the cases on which I was supposed to be working.
I began reviewing the police reports in an armed robbery case set for trial the next week. Three lines after I started, I found myself searching my memory for anything that would tie the two murders together. They were both presiding circuit court judges at the time of their death. If someone were trying to make a statement about the judiciary, or about the legal system altogether, killing two chief judges would certainly be one way to do it.
With a conscious effort I went back to the reports. Then I remembered, what after all was only obvious, that Jeffries and Griswald were both trial court judges who regularly imposed punishment on violent offenders. But every trial court judge did that, and none of the others had been killed. I looked down and found the place where I had left off, read a few words more, and looked up. There was a difference. Jeffries, because he thought he was so much smarter than everyone else, Griswald, because he was afraid he was not, would go out of their way to let a prisoner know how much they thought he deserved what he was going to get and how much they were going to enjoy giving it to him.
They were both easy to hate.
I shook my head in a futile attempt to clear it, read down to the end of the first page of the report, and then turned to the next. The words went out of focus. One murder might be explained because of a sentence one of them had given, but what were the odds that the same man would be sentenced to two different terms in prison, one by Jeffries, one by Griswald, and only decide after he had served the second one that both judges deserved to die. And even if it were possible, there was no way to explain the confession. Flynn had to be right. The only conceivable connection between the two crimes was that the first had inspired someone else to commit the second.
I put it all out of mind, at least long enough to finish reading the police reports. There was more work to be done after that, but I could not concentrate on anything for more than a few minutes at a time. I got up from the desk, told myself that it was almost time for lunch anyway, and headed out the door.
The zinc-colored sky was crisscrossed with turbulent black clouds and there was a hush in the clean damp springtime air. I felt a light sprinkle on my face and quickened my step. I was only a few blocks from where I wanted to go, but then, a moment later, the rain began to pound down, beating on the pavement in hard fast bursts, like shrapnel from an exploding shell.
People with umbrellas struggled to get them open. A woman, one hand holding down her skirt, whirled past me. I fell into the open doorway of a small corner grocery and waited for the rain to let up. The worst of it passed in a few minutes, and, staying close to the buildings, I moved on.
I spotted the bookstore on the other side of the street half a block away. Dodging the traffic, I jogged across and spent a moment in front of the window examining the sets of used books on display. In front of a clothbound set of the collected works of Pushkin, a place card listed a price which no longer seemed quite as expensive as when it had first been posted several years before. A bell rang when I opened the framed glass door.
Anatoly Chicherin was sitting on a plain wooden chair behind the front counter. Long rows of unpainted bookshelves stretched down both sides of three narrow passageways that led toward the back. The air was stagnant, heavy with the stale dust of books that had been left to molder nearly as long as the dead bones of their mainly forgotten authors.
Five foot six, with an owlish full face and a small flabby mouth, Anatoly Chicherin wore glasses so thick that, seen through their distorted refraction, his eyes seemed to bulge right out of his head.
He looked up at the sound of the bell with a smile on his face.
With surprising agility for someone his age, he leaped to his feet and came around the counter to greet me.
“You’re a little early,” he said in a voice that when you first heard it made you think it must have come from someone else.
It was resonant, rich, a voice that seemed to come from somewhere deep inside the earth.
Chicherin turned the sign that hung in the
glass door so it read CLOSED instead of OPEN, and then pulled down a shade smudged with hundreds of his own fingerprints.
“This will give us a little longer for the game,” he said. “I have the board all set up.”
He led me past two rows of Russian-titled volumes toward the dimly lit storage room in back. The Cyrillic script on the spines looked to my ignorant eye like English letters seen backward through a mirror.
Two straight-back wooden chairs faced each other across a small square wooden table with a chessboard in the middle. Flecked with the minuscule remains of a dozen dead insects, a single light bulb, suspended by a cloth-covered cord, hung down from the grease-covered ceiling. When Chicherin shut the door, shadows like black curtains fell over the walls.
On the front corner of an unremarkable metal desk, next to a pile of dog-eared journals, was a dented electric teakettle, which Chicherin proceeded to plug into the wall.
“It will just take a few minutes,” he said as he sat down opposite me. Rubbing his hands together, he glanced avidly at the chess pieces. “Shall we start, or shall we wait for the tea?”
“Let’s wait for the tea,” I replied, barely suppressing a grin. “I like to delay defeat as long as I can.”
“We’ve only been playing for six months. Did you expect to win so soon?”
“I lose every time we play, and we’ve played enough that I know we could keep playing for years and I’d never be able to beat you.”
With a laborious groan, as if something dead were being forced against its will to come back to life, the teakettle began to sizzle and then, a moment later, began to boil.
“You shouldn’t think like that,” he said while he poured the boiling water into a porcelain teapot. “You’re much better now than when we started.” He put the teapot on the side of the table and then brought us each a cup and saucer. “It needs to steep for a few minutes,” he said as he sat down.
Magnified out of all proportion by the thick-lens glasses perched on the bridge of his small snub nose, his eyes seemed to draw me toward him.
“You just need to slow down a little. You see a move and you take it. But sometimes, when you focus in like that, when you concentrate on what seems to be the main line of attack, you fail to see what is coming at you from the side, so to speak. Now,”
he said as he poured the tea, “let’s begin.”
It was over almost before the tea was cool enough to drink, another in my unbroken string of defeats.
“Much better,” he remarked as he swept the remaining pieces into a cigar box and folded up the board. Reaching for the teapot, he filled my cup and then his own. Holding the saucer in his hand, he sipped the tea, his eyes focused on me. “Now, tell me, what do you think about this business of a second judge being murdered? Is there perhaps a connection?”
My own suspicions suddenly seemed groundless and I found myself telling Chicherin what Flynn had told me. “The first one may have given the idea to someone else to do the second. Beyond that, no. The man who murdered Judge Jeffries confessed and then killed himself, so it can’t be the same person responsible for both.”
I said it as if it was simply self-evident, but his instincts were too good: He detected my doubt. “You’re not completely convinced that the man who confessed was telling the truth?”
“I’m not sure,” I admitted. “There’s no reason to doubt it. He didn’t just confess, he committed suicide. Why would he have done that if he had confessed to something he had not done?”
His eyes on me, Chicherin ran his finger back and forth over his lower lip. “My father could have given you an answer to that,”
he said presently. “He once confessed to a crime he didn’t commit.”
“In Russia?” I asked, meeting his gaze. “What was the crime?”
A faraway look came into his eyes and his mouth twisted to the side. His head began slowly to move from side to side, and I was left with the feeling that there was not much in the past that he wanted to remember. “Treason,” he replied, as he sipped more tea. “Treason against the Revolution. My father was part of the generation that came of age during the October Revolution of 1917, the generation that believed in Lenin and thought the Communist Party was history’s chosen instrument.” A shrewd smile crossed Chicherin’s small moist mouth. “Communism was the religion of the intellectuals. They believed in it the way a true Catholic believes in the Church, without question or condition.
“The problem, of course, was that when Lenin died, Stalin took over, and Stalin was interested only in people who were loyal to him. He got rid of everyone who had come into positions of power under Lenin. Stalin was very shrewd. Instead of having them shot, which might have made martyrs of them, he accused them of crimes against the Soviet Union; he said they had spied for the capitalist powers that had sent troops to defeat the Red Army after the October Revolution. The charges were false, but most of the people accused, confessed, including Bukharin, the most famous of those put on trial. In open court Bukharin confessed to things he had never done.”
Bending forward, Chicherin looked at me intently and struck the table three times with his knuckles. “He didn’t confess to avoid his own death. He knew that once he made that confession, the only thing left was his execution. His confession was suicide. He didn’t do it to save his life. He did it because he believed that without that confession his life would have no meaning.
“Bukharin believed—they all believed—in the infallibility of the Communist Party. The party was in the service of history, and history,” Chicherin said with a rueful look, “was the one true God. If they denied the party, they would be denying the only God they had. Bukharin was put in the following position: He believed in the party, but the party insisted on his guilt. The only way he could deny his guilt was to deny that the party was right.
But how could the party—how could God—be wrong? Bukharin chose to remain a believer. He confessed and he was sentenced to death.”
Chicherin leaned against the back of the armless chair and folded his arms across his chest. He lowered his eyes, and placed one hand on the back of his neck. For a long time he stared down at the floor, a brooding look on his mouth. Finally, he tilted his head to the side far enough to cast a sideways glance at me.
“Have you never represented someone who confessed to something he did not do because of something he believed in?” he asked.
“I’ve had a few cases where someone made a false confession, but it was always to protect someone else. I’ve never had one where someone did it because of something they believed in.”
Removing his glasses, Chicherin closed his eyes and grasped the bridge of his nose. “I’m sorry,” he said when he opened his eyes. There was a trace of weariness in his voice. “What you said made me think of how the world has changed. You find it perfectly reasonable that someone would be willing to take the blame for something they didn’t do to protect someone they loved. I remember the time when millions of people were in love with an idea, a cause, and were willing to die for it, Communism, democ-racy, Fascism, whatever it was, that was larger than themselves.
First God died, then Fascism, then Communism, and now what is there left to die for? Has the world become less insane, or perhaps more so?”
He pursed his lips and nodded slowly. Then he sat straight up and put on his glasses.
“The people who prosecuted my father were able to use both of these things, the cause he believed in and the people he loved.”
“What happened to him?” I asked after Chicherin fell into another long silence.
He turned up the palms of his hands. “He confessed to everything; he would have confessed to anything. He had a wife and a child. It was the only way to protect my mother and me from Siberia or worse.”
“I’m sorry,” I said sympathetically.
Chicherin smiled. “It was a long time ago. I was a small boy.
I didn’t know what happened until years later. My mother never told me. She
said he had been killed in an accident.”
Finishing his tea, Chicherin sprang to his feet. “There’s something I should give you, something I think you should read.”
When he opened the door, the dim light from the shop dissolved the shadows that had draped the walls. I followed him as he moved briskly through the stacks. He lifted the shade on the front door and turned the sign around to announce that he was once again open for business.
With his back to me, he searched the shelves of a bookcase behind the counter. Most of the books had slips of paper sticking out the top, the name of the buyers who had ordered them or, sometimes, the address where they were to be sent. On more than one occasion he had explained to me that most of the money he made came from the rare or out-of-print books for which col-lectors were willing to pay substantial amounts. His own specialty was Russian-language first editions.
“Here it is,” he announced, tapping with his outstretched finger the spine of a small volume on the shelf second from the top.
He moved the stepladder into position and pulled it out. “The Possessed, by Dostoyevsky. Have you read it?” he asked as he handed it to me across the counter.
“I’ve read The Brothers Karamazov and Crime and Punishment, but no, I haven’t read this. I may have started it once.”
As if seized by a sudden impulse, his head gave a slight jerk.
A moment later, a thin smile dashed across his mouth.
“In a certain way,” he said, “this is a companion to Crime and Punishment. Raskolnikov kills the old woman with an axe because he wants her money and because he believes in nothing that would stop him. He has rejected all morality, all religion; he is a nihilist, someone for whom nothing can be more important than himself. The Possessed, on the other hand, is an account of what can happen when people like this band together, and decide to destroy not just one human being, but everything, because they believe in nothing except the supreme importance of replacing everything with something of their own creation. They believe they can create a better world, because they don’t believe in the one that exists.”
