The Nephilim Chronicles Fallen Angels in the Ohio Valley
Fritz Zimmerman
The Nephilim Chronicles
Fallen Angels in the Ohio Valley
Copyright © 2010, by Fritz Zimmerman
ISBN-10: 145158-126-2 ISBN-13: 978-1-45158-126-3
All Rights Reserved.
No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means.
Cover Illustration from, 12th Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, 1890-1891
Contents
Origins of the Nephilim
The Paleolithic 2,000,000 - 6,800 B.C
Cro-Magnon in the Boreal and Atlantic Periods 6800-2250 B.C.
Migrations of the Cro-Magnon, Hunters and Fishers to the North American, Pacific coast
Migrations of the Cro-Magnon, Hunters and Fishers to the North American, Atlantic Coast
Maritime Origins of the Hopewell Sioux and Cherokee Mound Builders
Maritime Origins of the Iroquois
The Sons of God and the Nephilim
Amorites
Amorites in England 133
Amorite Beaker People
Giant's Remains in the British Isles
Prehistoric Mining in North America
North American Megaliths
The Sacred Marriage of Opposites
The Etymology of Og and Awa 185
The Sacred Marriage of the Earth and Sky; Symbolism in Earthworks and Burial Mounds
Gematria and the Babylonian and Biblical Codex 215
Allegewi-Hopewell Numerology and Gematria
Serpents
Tablets
The Allegewi Giants
The End of the Allegewi Hopewell Migrations of the Hopewell Sioux 355 Origins of the Nephilim The Paleolithic 2,000,000 - 6,800 B.C.
The time period “Paleolithic” begins 2 million years ago with what is considered the first tool
making and ends at the end of the Ice Age, about 68000 B.C. It is by far the longest time period that
includes in the view of evolutionist, a period of transformation of primates from ape-like creatures to
the more gracile and fully erect modern humans. Theoretically, each of these more “evolved” orders,
spread out across the globe, replacing the more primitive species. However, in reality, species that have
been around a million years or so, do not disappear as quickly as scientist would like us to believe.
This is their story. A species of man, defined as “archaic,” characterized by the following physical
traits, a receding lower jaw, projecting upper jaw, prominent brow ridge with a receding forehead,
massive jaws and thick skulls walls. Many of the “archaic” men grew to an unusual stature, by even
today's standards, with some as large as nine feet in height. Their remains have been found across the
globe, but in no more greater density than in the Ohio Valley and associated with the Allegewi
Hopewell mound builders.
The accepted progression of evolution, by academia, goes from Homo afrensis, H. habilis, H.
erectus, H. sapiens (Archaic) that included Homo antecesser and H. Heidelbergensis, Neanderthal and
then to the final sub species of modern man Cro-Magnon. It has been professed by anthropologist that a
more modern, elegant variant of modern man interbred with this last “archaic” sub species of Cro
Magnon, resulting in todays populations. The last of the Cro-Magnon are said to have disappeared at
the end of the Ice Age around 10,000 B.C. And yet, within the later Mesolithic, Neolithic and Atlantic
periods (6,800-2250 B.C.) skeletal remains are still consistent with what would be considered Ice Age
“archaic” or Cro-Magnon populations. The distinctness of an archaic type of skull, compared to that of
a modern man being bigger teeth, projecting upper jaw, called prognathism, a massive lower jaw, a pronounced brow ridge, a receding forehead, and thick skull walls. The size of the skeletal remains in
of itself is not an attribute of an archaic human, but the immense size of the Cro-Magnon has to be part
of the gene pool that survives into the “Hunter and Fishers,” the Amorites or Nephilim, the Beaker
People and eventually within the Allegewi and Hopewell populations in the Ohio Valley. So, unless we
surmise that de-evolution has taken place then the only explanation can be that what appears to be
“archaic” peoples survived much longer than scientist admit in the circumpolar regions extending
across the North American continent. The other population center of the Cro-Magnon was found in the
easter Mediterranean lands of present day Israel, Palestine and Syria. Legends of the last remnants of
these giants would be immortalized in the Bible, Eddas, Vedas and Greek mythology.
Before exploring the geographic extent of the Cro-Magnons, we will examine their “evolutionary” or
“created” predecessors. This establishes the long duration of what has been classified as “archaic”
skull types. The discovery of skeletons of these early men also shows that heights exceeding six feet
was established early and continued into the Cro-Magnon era.
It is the belief of evolutionist that Homo sapien's lineage started with Australopithicus afarenis, 4 to
2.7 million years ago and whose discovery, near Hadar, Ethiopia was nicknamed “Lucy.”
Australopithicus head and brain were small, resembling the ancient
apes, but walked upright and had a skeletons similar to humans. The
next species in the evolutionary line was Australopithecus robustus who
lived from 2.2 to 1.6 million years ago and was similar in body size to
afrensis but was distinguished with a massive skull and teeth. They were
much like afrensis in that their face was flat very ape-like with noAustralopithecus
forehead. Contemporary to robustus around 2.5 to 1.6million years ago was Homo habilas,(“Skillful
or Handy Man”) who had a larger brain that allowed him to develop limited speech and make some
tools. However, Homo habilas, never improved the few tools he had and lived a life of a scavenger. Habilis's face protrudes less than the earlier hominids, but was still very ape-like with a sagital crest or
bony ridge that was evident on the top of the skull. This crest is where muscles were attached to their
massive jaw that was used to crush their hard to chew and rough diet.
Sometime around 2 million B.C. the first true hunter-gatherer evolves or was “created” with Homo
ergaster; what is considered by many scientists and creationists to be the first humans. The discovery
was found in West Turkana, Kenya, when a complete skeleton of a young Homo ergaster male between
9 and 12 years old was uncovered. He was 5 feet four inches tall and it is estimated he would have been
over 6 foot in height as an adult. His remains were dated at 1.7 million years old.
Primates had progressed from herds of herbivores and scavengers to hunters and warriors. It was
originally believed that around 1.8 million years ago a number of H. ergasters migrated from Africa
into Asia and gave rise to Homo erectus. Recent finds in China of Homo-erectus fossils have been
dated to 1.9 million years. Another early Homo erectus skeleton was found by a German-Georgian
archaeological team
in Dmanisi, Georgia that dated to 1.7 million years, described as “tall and fully
erect.” These new finds led anthropologist to push Homo-ergasters emergence in Africa to 2.5 million
years; being contemporaneous with Homo habilas and proof that habilas was an evolutionary “dead
end.”
Homo-erectus is believed to have lived between 1.9 million years to 300,000 years ago. Their brain,
in the beginning was about 25 percent smaller than modern mans, but was soon equal in size. Homo
erectus developed speech and language, their tool and weapon kits became more specialized and they
learned to make fire. With these new technologies they were able to migrate north out of Africa and
Southeast Asia into the colder European continent.
In 1994 Italian scientist uncovered a skull dating 900,000 year old in Caprina that resembled H.
erectus. Their report was published in the October 2000 Journal of Human Evolution. The skull was
described as having a massive brow ridge and a sharply angled occipital bone at the back of the skull. In this time span of a million years Homo erectus changed very little.
This fact was pointed out by A.W. (Bill) Mehlert, in 1994 “Homo
erectus ‘to’ Modern Man: Evolution or Human Variability” “From an
evolutionary viewpoint the small degree of change in erectus
populations over an alleged period of one and a quarter million years
must be disappointing, especially if the cranial capacities of the Homo erectus
earliest and latest examples all lie within modern range of humans.”
Another apparent H. erectus skull was found in 1994 by a Spanish anthropologist in the Grand Dolina
beds at Atapuerca, dating to 600,000 years old. Printed in the March 2001 edition of Science Magazine,
The Gran Dolina frontal bone and parts of upper jaw and mid-face had a strange resemblance to
modern humans. This resulted in the Dolina skull being called a new species called Homo antecessor
or Archaic Homo sapiens. Another Archaic Homo sapien skull was discovered in Petralona, Greece
that was dated between 250,000-500,000 years. Another new discovery found near Mauer Germany,
was given to professor Otto Schoetensack from the University of Heidelberg, so naming this new
contemporaneous species, called Homo heidelbergensis. Both H.
antecessor and H. heidelbergensis are believed to have descended
from the morphologically similar Homo ergaster. H. heidelbergensis
had a larger brain and more developed tools, than its predecessors.
More importantly is that H. ergaster, H. heidelbergensis were tall
with average height being around 6 feet. These species was larger Homo heidelbergensis and more muscular than modern humans.
This divergence of species is split within the Asian and European Heidelbergensis populations
around 200,000 years ago giving rise to two separate species, the Neanderthals and a more evolved
“archaic” homo sapiens. The Neanderthals lived in central Asia and Western Europe between 200,000 and 25,000 years ago. They were short, heavy-boned, with a low forehead, double arched brow ridge,
large nasal opening and a weak chin. An occipital bun or bony area is the back of the head is present as
in erectus.
Several skeletons discovered have had both “archaic” and
“modern” features that are called Homo Sapiens (archaic). Homo
sapiens (archaic) are supposed to be the evolutionary link between
Erectus and Modern Homo-sapiens sapiens. They had more modern
features with a less prominent brow ridge and a more rounded skull.
While these features were softened a bit from the more pronounced
Spy Neanderthal Homo erectus they still had all the features that is used to define an
“archaic” skull. A receding chin, larger teeth for a rough diet, a pronounced brow-ridge with a receding
forehead, a flattened top of the skull and a thick muscular neck.
What has been scientifically defined as modern Homo sapiens sapiens have been dated as early as
195,000 years. Some scientist believe that early modern man originated in East Africa and expanded
into South Africa and Southwest Asia by 100,000 B.C. At the Omo site in Ethiopia, one skeleton was
modern looking, the one next to it had more “archaic” type features. Modern humans are identified as
having a more rounded skull with a less prominent brow-ridge and a projecting chin. These early finds
still retained the prominent brow-ridge.
European and Asian Archaic Homo Sapiens are said to have disappeared by 28,00 B.C., with
Neanderthal vanishing a little later at 25,000 B.C . The inexplicable time frame are those years between
40,000 and 25,000 BC when modern humans, Neanderthals and Archaic sapiens shared the territory we
now know as northern Europe. While it is believed that the populations of Archaic Homo sapiens and
Neanderthal were vanishing, their physical traits are visible within the Cro-magnon populations.
The interaction between Modern man and the Archaic forms of Homo sapiens is still being debated by scientist. The most accepted anthropological theory of the evolution of modern man is called the
“Replacement model” which proposes that modern human evolved from archaic Homo sapiens
200,000 – 150,000 years ago only in Africa. Some of them migrated north into Asia and Europe
replacing all Neanderthals and other late Archaic Homo sapiens around 100,000 BC. This theory
proposes that all modern humans share a common ancestral link to Africa. This idea also suggests that
all of the regional anatomical differences that we see amongst modern humans are the result of
evolution in the last 40,000 years. This theory discounts any interbreeding between modern humans
and Archaic Homo sapiens or Neanderthals
In the 1940s the “Multi-Regional Theory” was proposed, that emphasized, that the regional
variations of modern humans (races) originated in geographically separated Homo erectus populations.
Theoretically, Homo erectus had spread across the Old World, developing separately in to modern
humans. This allowed for unique features to develop in humans in each geographic area; with
considerable interbreeding and therefore genetic exchange between the various regional groups.
The newest theory and least accepted is the “Assimilation model.” This model contends that human
developed out of Africa and moved north and in some cases replaced archaic Homo-sapiens and
Neanderthals but others interbred with the Archaic homo sapiens resulting in hybrid populations. This
theory best explains the abrupt emergence of Cro-Magnon around 40,000 BC. Cro-Magnon shared
Europe with Neanderthal for nearly 12,000 years. It is argued that these two people interbred creating
a partial hybridized Cro-Magnon population.
There is mounting evidence that a hybrid Cro-Magnon-Neanderthal or Archaic hybrid did exist.
Evidenced has been found within skeletons that display more “archaic” features than “modern.” In
“The Archaeology of the U.S.S.R” by Alexander Mongait writing for the Academy of Sciences of the
U.S.S.R., 1959, “In 1953 science was presented with a new, important discovery. In Statoselye Cave
near Bakhehisarai, A. A. Formozov found the burial of a one or two year old child of the Mousterain epoch. In direct proximity to the skeleton, he uncovered a hand-axe; scrapers, a
point and the bones of a wild ass, an ox and a bear.
The skeleton was studied by anthropologist and it was established that it belongs
to the modern type but has many features th
at approximate it to the Neanderthal
type: large teeth, heavy cheekbones, ect. The Statoselye skeleton is one of the few
finds of the remains of representatives of ancient man who occupies an
intermediary position between the Neanderthal man and Cro-Magnon man.”
A recent find in Lapedo Portugal was found that also shows traits of modern
man, including the jaw and teeth and Neanderthal features, like the size of the
femur and tibia. Carbon dating showed the skeleton to be 25,000 years old.
In a Neanderthal blog by Hohn Hawks he cites a recent paper about a skeletal
Statoselye
skeleton
find in Pestera Romania by Andrei Soficaru, Adrian Dobos and Erick Trinkaus, 2006. the following is
from the abstract by Soficaru.
“The early human remains from the Petera Muierii, Romania have been directly dated to 30,000
radiocarbon years before present. The Muierii fossils exhibit a suite of derived modern human
features, including reduced maxillae with pronounced canine fossae, a narrow nasal aperture, small
supercilliary arches, an arched parietal curve, zygomatic arch above the auditory porous, laterally
bulbous mastoid, narrow mandibular corpus, reduced anterior dentition […] However, these traits co
occur with contextually Archaic and or Neanderthal features, including a moderately low frontal arc, a
large occipital bun, a high coronoid process and a asymmetrical notch. As with other early modern
humans, the mosaic of modern human and Archaic/Neanderthal features, relative to their potential
Middle Paleolithic ancestral populations indicates considerable modern human admixture.”
At Mount Qafzeh in Israel, within a cave the remains of eleven individuals were discovered between
1933 and 1977, that date to 100,000 years old. The remains of what was designated as Skhul 9 was intriguing in that was a modern looking skull with Neanderthal features of prognathism and a
prominent brow ridge. Some researches thought that these physical traits were the result of
interbreeding between Neanderthals and a more modern form while others called the Skhul skull a
forerunner of the Western European Cro-Magnons and proposed the term “proto-Cro Magnon” It is of
interest to note that these skulls were described as “extremely large,” with a height of five feet, nine
The Nephilim Chronicles: Fallen Angels in the Ohio Valley Page 1
