The Bully Pulpit: Theodore Roosevelt, William Howard Taft, and the Golden Age of Journalism

Home > Other > The Bully Pulpit: Theodore Roosevelt, William Howard Taft, and the Golden Age of Journalism > Page 133
The Bully Pulpit: Theodore Roosevelt, William Howard Taft, and the Golden Age of Journalism Page 133

by Doris Kearns Goodwin


  “is the steward”: TR, An Autobiography, p. 464.

  Within three weeks . . . to the public domain: Salt Lake Herald, April 22, 1909.

  the previous administration had acted illegally: Washington Times, April 27, 1909.

  Once the proper surveys . . . the Far West: Times-Herald (Burns, OR), April 3, 1909.

  threat to “traditional western individualism”: Mowry, The Era of Theodore Roosevelt, p. 251.

  “that a man could ride”: Times-Herald, April 3, 1909.

  “on the basis of law”: WHT to William Kent, June 29, 1909, in Pringle, Life and Times, Vol. 1, p. 480.

  “the end justified the means”: Springfield [MA] Daily Republican, April 30, 1909.

  “sweeping declaration”: Knute Nelson, Louis R. Glavis, et al., Investigation of the Department of the Interior and of the Bureau of Forestry [hereafter Investigation] (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1911), Vol. 7, p. 4203.

  “It is . . . not the Executive”: WHT to William Kent, June 29, 1909, in Pringle, Life and Times, Vol. 1, p. 481.

  “further along . . . a different way”: Ibid., p. 476.

  “Stop Ballinger”: Des Moines Daily News, May 2, 1909.

  “cowboy methods”: Current Literature (December 1909), p. 592.

  progressives, educated by . . . treachery of monopoly: Times-Herald, April 3, 1909.

  “Attention! Land Thieves . . . predatory interests”: Tacoma [WA] Times, May 4, 1909.

  “what was going on”: Pinchot, Breaking New Ground, p. 409.

  Taft regarded Pinchot . . . a fanatical strain: WHT to Lawrence F. Abbott, Aug. 31, 1909, WHTP.

  all too ready to attribute: WHT to HHT, Oct. 3, 1909, WHTP.

  “protested as vigorously . . . water-power purposes”: Pinchot, Breaking New Ground, p. 409.

  Greatly relieved, Garfield maintained: James R. Garfield, Diary, May 8, 1909, Garfield Papers.

  “Everything is not . . . golden opportunities”: Springfield Daily Republican, April 30, 1909.

  “five million acres”: Stephen Ponder, “ ‘Nonpublicity’ and the Unmaking of a President: William Howard Taft and the Ballinger-Pinchot Controversy of 1909–1910,” Journalism History (Winter 1994), p. 114.

  “Was Conservation . . . the Old Guard?”: Pinchot, Breaking New Ground, p. 417.

  “one excuse or another”: Spokane [WA] Press, Aug. 9, 1909.

  enabling General Electric . . . millions of dollars: New York Tribune, Aug. 14, 1909.

  “This is a true story”: Spokane [WA] Press, Aug. 9, 1909.

  “Richard Achilles Ballinger . . . about it now”: Spokane [WA] Press, Aug. 10, 1909.

  Pinchot’s speech . . . on the embattled secretary: NYT, Aug. 12, 1909.

  “The purpose of . . . the gauntlet”: Pinchot, Breaking New Ground, p. 417.

  “unequivocally . . . in process of formation”: The North American (Philadelphia), Aug. 11, 1909.

  “strict construction . . . the many”: Pinchot, Breaking New Ground, p. 418.

  “a storm of applause . . . wildest reception”: The North American, Aug. 11, 1909.

  “deplorable fact . . . the second withdrawal”: Gifford Pinchot to WHT, Aug. 10, 1909, in Investigation, Vol. 2, p. 63.

  “breathless interest . . . never been born”: Pinchot, Breaking New Ground, p. 419.

  “He picked up his hat”: Spokane [WA] Press, Aug. 14, 1909.

  “I have been in”: Seattle Star, Aug. 12, 1909.

  “Hit ’em again . . . no conference with you”: Spokane [WA] Press, Aug. 14, 1909.

  “questioned and quizzed . . . of the West”: Washington Post, Nov. 18, 1909.

  “Mr. Ballinger’s silence”: San Francisco Call, Aug. 31, 1909.

  “Gross misrepresentations”: The Ranch (Seattle, WA), Sept. 1, 1909.

  “always believed . . . results accomplished”: Richard Ballinger to William Cowles, Dec. 9, 1909, in Ponder, “ ‘Nonpublicity’ and the Unmaking of a President,” Journalism History (Winter 1994), p. 117.

  misplaced the decimal point: New York Tribune, Aug. 14, 1909.

  “did not touch . . . its extreme corner”: Investigation, Vol. 2, p. 719.

  “monopolists had grabbed off”: National Tribune (Washington, DC), Mar. 10, 1909.

  “assumed a certain”: Chester Rowell to WHT, Aug. 27, 1909, WHTP.

  “completely overshadowed”: Washington Times, Aug. 25, 1909.

  “taken for granted . . . make good”: Washington Post, Aug. 26, 1909.

  “the driving wedge . . . chasm”: Mowry, The Era of Theodore Roosevelt, p. 258.

  “a slumbering volcano”: Tacoma [WA] Times, Aug. 24, 1909.

  in desperation: L. R. Glavis to WHT, Aug. 11, 1909, in Investigation, Vol. 2, pp. 4–23.

  acting “in good faith”: Gifford Pinchot to WHT, Nov. 4, 1909, in Vol. 4, p. 1224.

  “into one property . . . benefit of all”: NYT, Jan. 2, 1911.

  to give a Morgan-Guggenheim company . . . coal property: John Lathrop and George Kibbe Turner, “Billions of Treasure: Should the Mineral Wealth of Alaska Enrich the Guggenheim Trust or the U.S. Treasury?,” McClure’s (January 1910), p. 347.

  “closely identified” with the members: Washington Times, Aug. 22, 1909.

  “legal representative”: L. R. Glavis to WHT, Aug. 11, 1909, in Investigation, Vol. 2, p. 10.

  “act as counsel”: Louis R. Glavis, “The Whitewashing of Ballinger,” Collier’s, Nov. 13, 1909, p. 16.

  “I advised him . . . becoming public”: Gifford Pinchot to WHT, Aug. 10, 1909, in Investigation, Vol. 2, p. 63.

  “Ballinger Mixed . . . evidence”: Salt Lake Tribune, Aug. 14, 1909.

  would lead to the indictment of Ballinger: Washington Post, Aug. 26, 1909.

  It was later revealed: Overton W. Price and A. C. Shaw to Gifford Pinchot, Jan. 5, 1910, in Investigation, Vol. 4, p. 1275.

  “made notes upon his reading”: Titusville [PA] Herald, May 16, 1910.

  “especially concerning . . . professional relation”: WHT to Richard Ballinger, Aug. 22, 1909, in Investigation, Vol. 2, p. 64.

  he remembered little else: Gustav J. Karger, “Conversation with William Howard Taft, March 12, 1910,” Taft-Karger MSS, CMC.

  “as full as possible”: WHT to Richard Ballinger, Aug. 22, 1909, in Investigation, Vol. 2, p. 64.

  “has had nothing to do”: Frank Pierce to WHT, Sept. 1, 1909, in ibid., p. 188.

  “issuance of patents”: H. H. Schwartz to WHT, Sept. 1, 1909, in ibid., p. 218.

  “to kill some snakes”: Washington Post, Sept. 4, 1909.

  On September 4 . . . left the land commissionership: Richard Ballinger to WHT, Sept. 4, 1909, in Investigation, Vol. 2, pp. 66–75.

  in the summer of 1908 . . . “legal representative”: Richard Ballinger to WHT, Sept. 4, 9, & 10, 1909, in ibid., Vol. 2, pp. 68–70, 97, 100.

  “several satchels”: Oakland [CA] Tribune, Sept. 6, 1909.

  Myopia Hunt Club: Indiana [PA] Evening Gazette, Sept. 6, 1909.

  “reading the answers”: Titusville [PA] Herald, May 16, 1910.

  “The cruel injustice”: WHT to Horace Taft, Sept. 11, 1909, WHTP.

  “was very anxious . . . the evidence and his conclusions”: Titusville Herald, May 16, 1910.

  “only shreds of . . . making false charges against them”: WHT to Richard Ballinger, Sept. 13, 1909, WHTP.

  “misrepresentation . . . in his own defense”: These arguments were later made by Louis D. Brandeis on May 5, 1910, in Investigation, Vol. 7, pp. 3872–3874.

  “The Ballinger adherents”: New York Tribune, Sept. 17, 1909.

  “hasty action . . . of governmental discipline”: WHT to Gifford Pinchot, Sept. 13, 1909, WHTP.

  “in holding Ballinger up”: WHT to Charles Nagel, Sept. 24, 1909, WHTP.

  “Never at any . . . greatest losses”: Nevada State Journal, Sept. 26, 1909.

  “as fanatical . . . after Ballinger”: WHT to George Wickersham, Oct. 7, 1909, WHTP.

  “a
state of . . . a break”: WHT to Charles Nagel, Sept. 24, 1909, WHTP.

  “He is looking”: WHT to George Wickersham, Oct. 7, 1909, WHTP.

  “I have been thinking”: Overton W. Price to Gifford Pinchot, Sept. 16, 1909, Pinchot Papers.

  In the weeks . . . publicize his allegations: James R. Garfield, Diary, Sept. 21, 1909, Garfield Papers.

  “as employees . . . immediate danger”: Overton W. Price and A. C. Shaw to Gifford Pinchot, Jan. 5, 1910, in Investigation, Vol. 4, p. 1279.

  “going over in detail”: James R. Garfield, Diary, Sept. 21, 1909, Garfield Papers.

  Shaw then aided Glavis: Norman Hapgood, The Changing Years, Reminiscences of Norman Hapgood (New York: Farrar & Rinehart, 1930), p. 182.

  “Pinchot has spread”: WHT to HHT, Oct. 15, 1909, WHTP.

  “read the article”: Hapgood, The Changing Years, p. 182.

  No attempt was ever made: Pringle, Life and Times, Vol. 1, p. 498.

  “the newspaper frenzy”: Ponder, “ ‘Nonpublicity’ and the Unmaking of a President,” Journalism History (Winter 1994), p. 116.

  “The Whitewashing . . . in Ballinger’s Hands”: Glavis, “The Whitewashing of Ballinger,” Collier’s, Nov. 13, 1909, pp. 16–18.

  The potential purchase of coal lands . . . railroads in the West: James L. Penick, Progressive Politics and Conservation: The Ballinger-Pinchot Affair (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968), pp. 82–83.

  “the natural resources of Alaska”: Pinchot, Breaking New Ground, p. 427.

  “the muckrake periodical”: Mowry, The Era of Theodore Roosevelt, p. 257.

  Glavis was likened to Ida Tarbell: Fairbanks [AK] Daily News-Miner, Dec. 17, 1909.

  “a party to the conspiracy”: Filler, The Muckrakers, p. 333.

  “circumstantial evidence . . . Alaska coal grants”: John Matthews to Gifford Pinchot, Jan. 8, 1910, Pinchot Papers.

  Ballinger refused to give a detailed statement: Washington Post, Nov. 18, 1909.

  “literary apostles . . . so asinine”: Richard Ballinger, “Press Release, Nov. 20, 1909,” Pinchot Papers.

  “I have felt so thoroughly”: Richard Ballinger to William Cowles, Dec. 9, 1909, in Ponder, “ ‘Nonpublicity’ and the Unmaking of a President,” Journalism History (Winter 1994), p. 117.

  “in favor of all”: James R. Garfield, Diary, Nov. 30, 1909, Garfield Papers.

  “the goodness of a bad”: Gifford Pinchot to James R. Garfield, Dec. 4, 1909, Pinchot Papers.

  “the whole controversy”: Gifford Pinchot to Charles R. Crane, Nov. 29, 1909, Pinchot Papers.

  “that the situation had become”: Washington Post, Dec. 21, 1909.

  “a coward . . . an honest man”: WHT to Reuben Melville, Dec. 24, 1909, WHTP.

  “the whole affair”: Washington Post, Aug. 30, 1909.

  Faced with Ballinger’s ultimatum: Washington Times, Dec. 22, 1909.

  “any investigation . . . papers, or documents”: Pinchot, Breaking New Ground, p. 443.

  “all the power . . . before the people”: Phillip Wells to William Kent, Dec. 22, 1909, WHTP.

  A Washington “insider . . . to conduct the defense”: Filler, The Muckrakers, pp. 334–35.

  “between special . . . at their expense?”: Pinchot, Breaking New Ground, pp. 444–45.

  “out again defying . . . Let us see”: WHT to Horace Taft, Dec. 27, 1909, WHTP.

  “the Ballingerites . . . old political time”: National Tribune (Washington, DC), Dec. 30, 1909.

  “It remains true”: Current Literature (June 1910), p. 588.

  “bring out . . . worst possible light”: Washington Times, Jan. 7, 1910.

  the Forest Bureau’s involvement: Gifford Pinchot to Jonathan P. Dolliver, Jan. 5, 1910, in Investigation, Vol. 4, pp. 1283–85.

  “to lay our hand”: Gifford Pinchot to W. K. Kavanaugh, Jan. 20, 1910, Pinchot Papers.

  “official information . . . of public property”: Gifford Pinchot to Jonathan P. Dolliver, Jan. 5, 1910, in Investigation, Vol. 4, pp. 1283–84.

  “One trouble . . . within him now”: AB to Clara, Jan. 7, 1910, in AB, Taft and Roosevelt, Vol. 1, pp. 253–54.

  “had distressed him as much”: AB to Clara, Jan. 9, 1910, in ibid., p. 256.

  “like a man almost ill”: AB to Clara, Jan. 7, 1910, in ibid., p. 254.

  “There is only one”: AB to Clara, Jan. 9, 1910, in ibid., p. 256.

  Taft directed Wilson to fire: El Paso [TX] Herald, Jan. 8, 1910.

  “The plain intimations . . . a helpful subordinate”: WHT to Gifford Pinchot, Jan. 7, 1910, WHTP.

  “looked refreshed”: AB to Clara, Jan. 9, 1910, in AB, Taft and Roosevelt, Vol. 1, p. 255.

  “could have followed . . . to be overlooked”: La Crosse [WI] Tribune, Jan. 8, 1910.

  “suffering from the same”: Post-Standard (Syracuse, NY), Jan. 8, 1910.

  “Quite as admirable . . . public lands”: Literary Digest, Jan. 22, 1910, p. 128.

  “the Roosevelt policies . . . friend of Mr. Pinchot”: Outlook, Jan. 22, 1910, p. 141.

  “I cannot believe it”: TR to Gifford Pinchot, Jan. 17, 1910, Pinchot Papers.

  “The appointment . . . meeting me in Europe?”: TR to Gifford Pinchot, Mar. 1, 1910, Pinchot Papers.

  “The people have faith”: Pinchot, Breaking New Ground, p. 457.

  “general-in-command . . . most convincing way”: National Tribune, Feb. 3, 1910.

  “a keen disappointment . . . than a scandal”: Literary Digest, Feb. 12, 1910, p. 269.

  “opened with a heavy volley”: National Tribune, Mar. 3, 1910.

  had “been unfaithful”: Indianapolis Star, Feb. 28, 1910.

  “the public clamor . . . unfaithful public servant”: National Tribune, Mar. 3, 1910.

  “Pinchot has distinctly”: WHT to Horace Taft, Mar. 5, 1910, WHTP.

  “proven nothing at all”: Horace Taft to WHT, Mar. 9, 1910, WHTP.

  “so tedious” . . . Jim Jeffries: Arizona Republican (Phoenix, AZ), April 18, 1910.

  “really decisive . . . he had to prove it”: Gifford Pinchot, “Interview with Louis D. Brandeis, March 3, 1940,” Pinchot Papers.

  he finally discovered . . . after September 11: Frederick Kerby, “The Inside Story of How a Private Secretary Wrecked an Administration,” Unpublished ms [n.d.], enclosed in Frederick Kerby to Gifford Pinchot, Jan. 28, 1941, Pinchot Papers.

  Brandeis revealed his discovery . . . cognizant of his peril: Pinchot, “Interview with Louis D. Brandeis, March 3, 1940,” Pinchot Papers.

  “to make it appear”: New York Sun, April 23, 1910.

  Prevented by the rules . . . leaked the story to the press: Washington Post, April 24, 1910.

  Wickersham initially refused . . . backdated the report: Newport [RI] Daily News, May 12, 1910.

  “there probably would”: National Tribune, May 19, 1910.

  Their failure to do so . . . Congress and the country: Le Mars [IA] Globe-Post, May 16, 1910.

  “an attitude of suspicion”: National Tribune, May 19, 1910.

  “noted the similarities . . . match put to the pile”: Kerby, “The Inside Story,” Pinchot Papers.

  “in his brief case . . . of the Lawler document”: Ibid.

  “the so-called memorandum”: G. W. Wickersham to Knute Nelson, May 14, 1910, in Investigation, Vol. 7, p. 4364.

  “of any material . . . resume of the facts”: Investigation, Vol. 7, pp. 3862, 3865–66.

  “a restless tattoo”: New Castle [PA] News, April 30, 1910.

  “an insult”: Investigation, Vol. 7, p. 3868.

  “exhausted all channels”: Kerby, “The Inside Story,” Pinchot Papers.

  He identified “certain portions”: Washington Times, May 14, 1910.

  “specifically” prepared: Washington Times, May 15, 1910.

  “Ballinger Accused”: Washington Times, May 14, 1910.

  the story broke . . . on the golf course: Kerby, “The Inside Story,” Pinchot Papers.

  suddenly “found . .
. coincidences of all time”: Washington Times, May 16, 1910.

  “treachery . . . unworthy”: Ibid.; Fort Wayne [IN] Weekly Sentinel, May 18, 1910.

  “did not state . . . a written statement”: Titusville [PA] Herald, May 16, 1910.

  “manly” assumption: Waterloo [IA] Evening Courier, May 18, 1910.

  “the sequence of events”: Fort Wayne [IN] Weekly Sentinel, May 18, 1910.

  “unimportant” statements: Washington Herald, May 15, 1910.

  “There was absolutely . . . private offices”: Cited in Waterloo [IA] Evening Courier, May 18, 1910.

  “the people who had”: National Tribune, May 19, 1910.

  “until he was . . . fly into a rage”: Waterloo [IA] Evening Courier, May 18, 1910.

  “came as a startling . . . the good faith”: San Antonio [TX] Light and Gazette, May 16, 1910.

  “the puzzled . . . done nothing illegal”: Stewart Edward White, “The Ballinger Case,” The American Magazine (March 1910), p. 687.

  “not a single fact”: Literary Digest, May 14, 1910.

  “Rightly or wrongly”: Emporia [KS] Gazette, May 26, 1910.

  Reflecting widespread sentiment . . . to resign: Indianapolis Star, June 10, 1910.

  “His presence . . . long and unflinchingly”: Emporia [KS] Gazette, May 26, 1910.

  “be regarded as”: “The Ballinger Case: A Review,” Outlook, June 11, 1910, p. 295.

  “justified in remaining”: Indianapolis Star, June 10, 1910.

  Charley Taft tried . . . the president refused: AB to Clara, May 5, 1910, in AB, Taft and Roosevelt, Vol. 1, p. 347.

  “Life is not worth”: WHT to P. A. Baker, May 21, 1910, in Pringle, Life and Times, Vol. 2, p. 558.

  “unjustly persecuted” a good man: AB to Clara, June 22, 1910, in AB, Taft and Roosevelt, Vol. 1, p. 408.

  “broken” Ballinger’s health: Literary Digest, May 28, 1910, p. 1067.

  “almost equaled”: Paolo E. Coletta, The Presidency of William Howard Taft (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1973), p. 98.

  “His entrance into”: Gifford Pinchot, “Statement, March 7, 1911,” Pinchot Papers.

  “no right . . . the public welfare”: Indianapolis Star, June 10, 1910.

  “Is the Republican Party” . . . occasionally “dragooned”: RSB, “Is the Republican Party Breaking Up? The Story of the Insurgent West,” The American Magazine (February 1910), pp. 435–39.

 

‹ Prev