Two ravens rolling in the snow.
EIGHT
To Catch and Track a Raven
IN THE LITERATURE OF RAVENS AS well as in common usage, a group of ravens feeding together is almost invariably referred to as a “flock.” Unfortunately, this is an assumption. A flock is a group that has a membership. The term “flock” could apply to a group of geese, starlings, crows, or ravens that flies together toward a common destination or that stays together for some other common purpose. Many birds stay in cohesive flocks for long portions of their lives, feeding together, flying together, and sleeping together. Their behavior contrasts hugely from that of others who may be found in equally large numbers at a certain time in a certain place. For example, hundreds of ravens could be at a carcass because that is the only one around. Do all the individuals come and go independently? After watching marked individual ravens at baits in crowds I have the impression that they are no more flock members than diners in a city restaurant are necessarily members of a cohesive group. Nevertheless, raven individuals might possibly maintain a group membership in some way that was invisible to me. There was only one way to find out: track them.
I had a second reason for wanting to track ravens from one feeding crowd. Early in my raven studies, I noted that many birds in a feeding crowd would remove great quantities of meat from a carcass to hide it at a distance in the snow, as if for later use. Yet, as soon as a carcass was stripped of meat, all the birds seemed to vanish. Did they leave the area because their memory was so poor that they could not remember where they had hidden their stash? Did they stay to feed on hidden caches, but remain hidden so that I missed them? Tracking several birds from a feeding crowd would help answer these questions as well.
Kristin Schaumburg, a student at Sterling College, had come to me earlier in the winter wanting to work on ravens for college credit, since each student at the college was required to do a project “in the field.” She was willing to work for free, she had a car, and the thought of radio-tracking ravens appealed to her.
Delia Kaye and Ted Knight, two former University of Vermont students, were also interested in the outdoors and wanted to take a break from making a living. That was enough person-power to do a project. I had secured time off by doubling my teaching duties for a semester, and so our merry crew of four gathered at the cabin. Our plan was to capture and radio-tag ten ravens from one feeding crowd on a carcass. The birds would then be released back into the remainder of the feeding group at the same carcass. About two days later, we would remove the food. Might all the birds then soar off together and stay together as a group?
First, we had to capture the ravens. The event was scheduled for Sunday morning, January 6. All day January 5, we worked to get ready for the big raven roundup. Wolfe Wagman, another friend and former University of Vermont student, worked with us to fix holes in the big chicken-wire raven trap. I tested the door of the trap by pulling the wire from the newly renovated and camouflaged spruce blind nearby. In the previous weeks, I had already lured a big group of ravens to feed inside the open trap. Four carcasses still remained inside to be eaten, and we added some fresh pork lung for a final irresistible inducement. We were ready! We finished the preparations as it was just getting dark, and went back to the cabin. Ten more student reinforcements came that evening from the University of Vermont to join us. All were ready for a big capture.
The alarm clock rudely clanged next to my ear at 6 A.M. in the darkness. A heavy rain pummeled the roof, but there was nothing else to do except hang tough. Four of us rolled out of our beds, stumbled down the trail, and dove into the dark spruce blind. There, lying on our backs, we felt the drops of ice-cold, snow-filtered water dripping off the soaked fir boughs—splat, splat, splat—onto our faces. We lasted for two hours.
Only two birds showed. One perched for a while directly over us, giving voice to a repertoire of sounds that reminded me of gurgling-dripping water. Later, another flew over. Its wing-beats were irregular, not the usual slow, steady, businesslike swish, swish, swish. What had happened to the crowd? The raven crowds’ sudden absence continued for the next week, the week after that, and still two more weeks.
Ravens again came into the trap on February 4 after a fresh snowstorm. In preparation for another roundup attempt, we built a large fire under the stars, slapped big steaks stuffed with garlic onto the grill, and put our arms around each other. The snow had come! Everything was right. This time we would catch all the ravens we wanted, and all we needed was ten. We would then get answers to our questions.
The capture was not successful until February 10, 1992. We caught ten birds, and using Superglue and dental floss, attached a radio to the tail-feathers of each one. We released them at the bait close to the capture site where a large crowd had continued to feed. We then removed the bait, and soon had results from the radio-tracking coming in. No birds were hanging about in the woods near the bait. Nor did they gather up to leave all together as a group. Two birds apparently left the county immediately. As we found over the next three months, none of the ten were regularly sleeping or foraging together. They dispersed all over the place.
We worked in shifts. One of us drove at night, taking radio bearings trying to detect birds at sleeping roosts. Another drove daily along one of three fifty- to sixty-mile road loops, stopping about every two miles to see if we could get any radio signals. Usually, we got none. It was tedious work. To find any birds, we had to enlarge our search far beyond the local area. We were searching over a 1,500-square-mile area, driving more than a hundred miles per day.
One night around 9:00 P.M., Ted came back with word that he’d again got a radio fix on Number 9680 roosting down near the lake. She was not sleeping with any of our other marked birds. It was a beautiful cold clear night, with the moon glow making the snow a milky bluish white—a good night to take a hike to find out if she was with the others or alone. Snow crystals crunched underfoot as we descended the trail from the cabin. We soon entered a thick, dark spruce bog where the wires from the earphones and the rods of the antenna kept snagging on branches. We lost our sense of direction, but whenever we put on the earphones, we could reconnect using the loud metronomic click, click, click of the birds’ radio. We went ever onward into the swamp, toward a dense stand of white pine trees. We approached the likely spot cautiously, stopped, looked up, and suddenly heard a wild clatter of powerful wing-beats crashing through the branches. More than twenty huge black shapes scattered in all directions, vanishing into the night. We had our answer: Number 9680 did not sleep alone, even though she was not with any of the ten other ravens with which she had been feeding when we caught her.
The next day, February 11, Kristin, who tracked over toward Augusta, got no signals all the way there; but while coming through the Belgrade Lakes region on the way back, she got Number 9680 again—the very same bird we had traced near Webb Lake the previous night. Before breakfast that morning, 9680 had also circled over us at a bait that we inspected some thirty miles from where Kristin later found her. She had traveled all that distance, despite the plentiful food that was locally available. Number 8510 was also near Belgrade along with 9680, then he flew on to the Dryden dump, where Number 8300 had been all day.
It was my turn for the night run that evening. It was snowing when I started out in my four-wheel drive. The snow was falling so thickly that my headlights shone up against an almost solid wall of white. I could just barely make out the white lines—the snowbanks on each side—with my peripheral vision. I tried to take readings from all the high elevations, which meant driving on narrow logging roads at times. They all had solid walls of dark forest on both sides, but they were well plowed to allow for the passage of trucks in the daytime.
My first contact was with bird Number 8510, at McGrath Hill Road near Wilton. We had routinely found this bird at this spot at night. Some birds had roosted in one location only for two or three days, then were gone. This bird came back to the same spot each night for weeks. As
we would later discover, it had taken a mate, and it stayed in the area at least until spring but did not nest there. It slept there only with its mate. Going on to East Dixfield and past Carthage, I found nothing. At one spot along the lake near Weld, I picked up a weak signal from Number 9239 that I later localized to Center Hill: I’d located my second bird, and my loop of fifty-nine miles was nearly complete. It had been a good night. I had collected two data points to plug into the graphs, ultimately showing these birds were apparently not organized into groups, at this time, under these conditions.
Two years later, in 1994, I organized the next obvious project with Ted, Delia, and a new recruit, Eileen Connor. We would tackle the challenge of studying the “territorial” residents. I had again taken on a double teaching load the fall semester in order to have the winter semester off for this project. As before, the first priority was to catch the birds—this time the territorial adults. We could not use our walk-in trap because by now the territorial birds were all wise to it. We had to capture individual birds that I knew. The rub was that they probably knew me.
The walk-in trap being useless, we had to use leg-hold traps, a task I didn’t relish. From a local trapper, I got a large selection of them. I judged a Number 1 would be small enough not to injure a raven’s leg, but to be safe I hacksawed off one of the two springs, halving the power. I weakened the remaining spring by heating the trap in the woodstove among red-hot coals. We then duct-taped pipe insulation around each of the two jaws of the trap. When the trap was not in use, the jaws were held slightly open with a laundry pin to prevent the insulation from gradually depressing and losing its cushioning effect. I tested one of our altered traps by snapping it shut onto my fingers. It caused no undue damage. I hoped the traps would still be strong enough to hold a raven by a leg or foot.
Setting a trap presumes you know how to depress the spring. As you bend the jaws over to engage the trigger on the pan, you’ve got to bend the metal tag holding the trigger just right so that the added pipe insulation that you’ve got to press down does not cause too much tension on the trigger. You’ve got to be able to set it so that a light tread will trip it. Setting your trap this way in the cabin is one thing. Out in the field, it’s quite something else. It has to be set in the snow. In the field, the sun causes melt in the day, which then freezes at night. Once ice gets on the trap, it becomes inoperative, so when a trap is set in open snow, as ours would be, the metal had to be kept free of snow. There can be nothing under the pan, a place where snow could lodge easily. To mitigate against that happening, I put wax paper over the pan in a shape that just fit in the opened jaws. I tried to keep the wax paper dry by sprinkling barley chaff over it and the trap. I then sprinkled snow to hide the dry chaff. The chain attaching the trap to a small tree was also hidden under the snow. Setting the trap was still the easiest part. The next step for ensuring trapping success was knowing where to put down the set.
During the previous ten years, we had found seven adjacent nests of ravens. This was an ideal situation, because we could now distinguish, at least in theory, if the birds defended a large territory or only their nest site itself. If the latter was true, then several pairs might show up at a single large food bonanza like a large cow carcass. But providing a large bait could attract hundreds of birds and was not the way to go. We’d catch mostly vagrants, and vagrants in a trap at any one site would tip off residents to stay clear of that site. To increase the chances of catching only territorial birds, we had to discourage vagrants. The best solution might be to use very small baits, and place them with a trap very close to nest sites. Therefore, we had provided no baits all winter long, so that few vagrants would be in the vicinity when we started trying to trap residents.
I set out baits one weekend in late February, just before the nesting season began, when both members of the resident pair should be near the nest site. The female, who after the eggs are laid is fed entirely by the male, might still be captured because she would still be feeding herself. I hoped to get both members of each pair gradually used to feeding at one spot, then set the trap there. But first I had to find an irresistible bait. I had located a dead horse at a local farm and provided chunks of horse meat half-buried in the snow. Then I added peanuts, bits of leftover pancake, and corn chips.
After the first week, there had been raven tracks at only four of the dozen baits I put out. I learned that details matter. At one bait, a raven had fed on a piece of meat sticking out of the snow. I then strewed a handful of peanuts all around. Two days later, there were again raven tracks all around—but the raven no longer went to the meat it had fed on previously. The tracks showed that the bird had paced about a good deal, and it had taken all but two of the peanuts—and the two it had left were those that I had placed onto the meat that it had fed from previously! I obliterated the raven’s tracks every day, to see where new tracks might be put down, to determine what the bird might be up to next.
On March 2, six days into the raven-catching project, it was still not yet time to set the first trap. Increasingly, I’d started to consider my study of the ravens to be a miniature military campaign. I was the general, plotting strategy. The ravens were the wily foe. The situation resembled what the Chinese philosopher Lao-tzu in the text of Tao Te Ching described more than 2,500 years ago. He said that the best athlete wants his opponent at his best, and the best general enters the mind of his enemy.
For a practice-capture, I had set a trap just outside the aviary, where a small crowd of ravens had been attracted by my four tame birds at their food. First I covered the trap with a thin sheet of cellophane that fit just inside the opened jaws. I set it on dry wood duff on top of the snow, sprinkled more wood duff all over the trap, then sifted snow over the whole lot to camouflage it all. I placed a small piece of horse meat in the snow—small enough, I thought, that the birds wouldn’t get suspicious.
The ravens came to the aviary first thing in the morning, as expected. From a corner of the cabin window, I watched them by the baited trap. Nothing seemed to be happening. After an hour, I knew something was wrong, and I went out to see what it might be. There were many raven tracks by the meat, all right, but none were on the trap. The birds must have noticed that the sifted snow over the trap was different than the rest of the snow, but that was not all that was wrong with this trap set.
Temperatures had been near zero degrees Fahrenheit in the night, and I had not expected any melting and refreezing. Recalling Murphy’s Law—if anything can go wrong, it will—I gently poked the top of the snow I had sprinkled over the trap. It was congealed into a crust, so that even if a raven had walked across the trap, it would not have sprung.
The next step was to make false trap sets near the baits to get the residents used to sifted snow and other unfamiliar telltale marks that might make them suspicious. Delia and I set off down the hill under a dark gray morning sky. I didn’t like the looks of that sky. If it snowed for only a half hour, we’d have to pull up all our traps. We set them nevertheless. Then it snowed for a half hour, then twenty-four more hours. The blizzard raged for days.
Meanwhile, for three days in a row, one of the traps alongside the aviary had sprung without catching anything. One morning, while I was a half mile away by Alder Stream, I heard a commotion from near the aviary up on the hill. Hearing alarm calls, I rushed back. One of the traps had indeed been sprung. The raven had pulled out. Conclusion? Number I traps were too small. I’d have to get all new traps.
As expected, no ravens came by for the next few days, and I feared they would not allow us any more mistakes. While I was practicing with the new traps I had procured, we also felt ever more the pinch of the weather. We had a series of warm, clear days, and that meant the snow was no longer powdery and easy to sprinkle for camouflaging. The soggy snow could be put on only in thick wads, which melted in the sun in the daytime, then froze rock solid at night.
By March 10, we still had not retained a single raven in a trap, not even just for pra
ctice near the aviary at the cabin. But the time had come, if not gone, to try to go for the real thing, one of the territorial pairs. In the cool rain, the crust on the deep, soggy snow no longer supported our weight, and we plunged down with each step, even while wearing snowshoes. Nevertheless, Delia and I built two blinds of spruce and fir branches about one hundred yards from each of two bait sites by two nest sites. Here, we’d watch our captures the next day.
We started at 5:00 A.M., ready in the dark for the big event. We had learned a lot in the previous two weeks about what not to do. We figured that we’d finally get it right. By dawn, we were snowshoeing to the first blind, where Delia would take her stand to watch a set of four traps ringed around a piece of meat that had had fresh raven tracks around it the previous afternoon. We put each trap in a scrape in the frost-hardened snow, using dry potting soil as a foundation. Then we sprinkled more dry soil onto the trap itself and put a piece of wax paper over the pan to cover the surface between the open padded jaws. We camouflaged the traps with a dusting of snow dug out from under the crust, and we put snow dusting even where there were no traps. We also hid the chains under snow. We did everything just right.
I wished her good luck and trotted back down the trail to go to my stand at the Weld nest. There, I also found frost-hardened raven tracks from the day before near the piece of meat. A very good sign! The birds had been back, even though we had dug up the meat, disturbed the snow all around, and moved the meat to a small hillock where it was now visible from the blind. The bad sign was that one of the birds flew over making alarm cries just before I finished setting the traps. Knowing the bird would now be suspicious, I aimed to distract it from the traps around the bait by putting two big bright orange cheese puffs onto the snow. When the raven came back, it would see these strange things. Knowing I had come to do something, this raven would associate the orange puffs with me, then avoid them. It then might think I hadn’t come to the meat, and would then not be alarmed by the meat, since that had not been changed. Although I then had suspicions how raven might size up a potential meal, I still did not know that their knowledge and expectation of whether friends or enemies had been associated with that food can have a tremendous bearing on whether or not they eat it.
Mind of the Raven: Investigations and Adventures With Wolf-Birds Page 12
