I was amazed when I saw pages 34 and 35, as Martineau shows that the relationships between the spacing of Venus, Earth and Mars are all perfectly defined by the icosahedron and dodecahedron. In this case, Martineau directly names and illustrates these two geometries. Mars is obviously the farthest away of these three planets, and if you make that orbit into a perfect sphere, you can then put the sphere of Venus’s orbit inside of it. The distance between the sphere of Venus and the sphere of Mars is precisely defined by the dodecahedron—with 99.98-percent perfection. Then, if you flip this same dodecahedron inside out to get the icosahedron, you can fit a larger sphere inside of it—and that happens to be the exact distance of Earth’s orbit, within 99.9-percent accuracy. If the details seem confusing, you can go read the book and get into all the specifics—but these are very clear geometric relationships between the planets, just like the geometry we see in quantum mechanics and the global grid.
The magic continues to happen as we go farther out. When we draw a circle for the orbit of Mars, we can then put it in the middle of a group of four larger circles that touch each other perfectly. Each of these four larger circles is precisely the size of Jupiter’s average orbit, with 99.98-percent perfection. This obviously forms a square, which becomes a cube—so there appears to be a hidden, cubical energy field between these two planets, determining the exact distance and timing of their orbits from each other. Martineau also shows a beautiful cubical relationship between Jupiter’s two largest moons, Ganymede and Callisto—and also reveals a perfect cubical relationship (within 99.9 percent) by comparing the orbit of Earth and Mars.
One of the biggest dead giveaways that there is geometry in the solar system is in the Trojans, which are clusters of asteroids that orbit in front of and behind Jupiter in the same loop. One cluster is always precisely sixty degrees ahead of Jupiter, and the other cluster is always sixty degrees behind Jupiter. There has never been a compelling scientific explanation of why this is happening. Obviously, this sixty-degree spacing allows you to start drawing geometric patterns if you represent Jupiter’s orbit as a perfect sphere. I was stunned to see that if you take the sphere of Jupiter’s orbit and nest three cubes, three octahedrons or any other combination of these two shapes together, one inside the other, you get a sphere in the center that is exactly the size of earth’s orbit—with 99.8 percent perfection.
Then, Jupiter and Saturn have a very close five-to-two relationship between their orbital periods. They make a conjunction every twenty years, but each conjunction appears at a new point within the great circle of their shared orbits. If you plot out six of these conjunctions within that shared circle and connect the dots, you get a perfect Star of David. This is the geometry of the star tetrahedron or merkabah—where you have one tetrahedron pointing up and another one pointing down, blended together. Again, the Platonic solids are working their magic.
Lastly, on pages 48 and 49, we find another triangle, or tetrahedron, in the relationship between the orbit of Uranus and Saturn. I was also intrigued that the radius of Saturn’s orbit is equal to the circumference of Mars’s orbit, to 99.9-percent accuracy—and the circumference of Saturn’s orbit is the same as the diameter of Neptune’s orbit. Just so Pluto doesn’t feel left out, we discover on page 50 that “Neptune’s orbital period is twice that of Uranus, and Uranus’s is two-thirds that of Pluto.” That means our entire solar system is being governed by a series of absolutely perfect geometric relationships, many of which can be directly associated with the Platonic solids. As Prince Charles said, “This may, of course, all be a coincidence, but such is their precision it does begin to challenge the popular notion that we live in an accidental universe. . . .” 5
I was absolutely stunned. I had felt for fifteen years that this must be the answer, but other books I’d read on sacred geometry seemed to suggest that Kepler’s dream was ultimately a failure. Now I realized they simply hadn’t worked hard enough to see the truth—but John Martineau had done his homework and figured everything out. I did already know that galaxies gathered into massive superclusters, and those superclusters mysteriously arrange into gigantic, diamond-shaped octahedrons. 6 The octahedrons form a matrix—repeating over and over again across vast distances.7 -8 -9
The background dust and gas at the farthest reaches of the Universe also clusters into the shape of an octahedron.10 Further analysis revealed a dodecahedron pattern in the dust as well.11 These laws truly do extend throughout the entire Universe, at all levels of size.
If you’re scratching your head at this point and wondering why I even bothered to mention all this, let me make myself clear. We’ve already seen evidence that Sanderson’s twelve main vortex points create direct gateways into time-space. A huge number of ships and planes have seen strange lights appear in the sea or in the sky, had bizarre equipment malfunctions, spontaneously moved forward or backward in time, warped through space from one place to another, or simply dematerialized entirely—making a complete crossover into time-space. The key, as the ancients obviously knew, is in the geometry. Or, as the old saying goes, “X marks the spot.”
Conjunctions Become Stargate Portals
I now had the proof that these same three-dimensional geometric relationships existed in the planetary orbits. This meant planetary conjunctions were much more interesting than just dates on a calendar. During these alignments, gigantic interplanetary geometry is lining up as well—creating greater coherence here on earth as all that energy multiplies. The more of an alignment you have between these hidden geometric energy patterns in the solar system, the more coherence you have—and the more likely you are to be able to directly travel through time-space.
The ancients may have been very aware that at certain times, a particular geometric node on earth would come into alignment with other geometry in the solar system—and this is when the magic happens. Then, if you’ve built a pyramid, or even a stone circle, you can generate even more coherence—as we saw with the Russian pyramid experiments. (Don’t forget that when the Russians charged rocks in the pyramid, and then arranged them around a growing crop, they got much more coherence in the area inside the rocks. So if you charged up the rocks that made Stonehenge, you now would get the same effect. And even if you didn’t charge them up first, simply arranging them in a circle should be enough to harness and concentrate the earth’s energy—by creating a circular vortex pattern.) I’ve also heard from insider sources that these alignments are the secret to alchemy. Lead will turn into gold in certain methods, but you have to know when to do it. Only when the earth and solar system produces the proper coherence will this ancient science of Al-Kemit—literally “the Science of Egypt”—actually work.
A New View of the Maya Calendar
The Maya were obviously a pyramid-building culture, or at least inherited all their traditions from a pyramid-building culture. I do not believe that human sacrifice had anything to do with the original founding of the Maya civilization—this represented the end result of a long period of decay, moving ever-increasingly farther away from where it once started. It may well be that the ancient founders of the Maya civilization were, in fact, aware that you could levitate large stone blocks, teleport through space, and even travel through time when the geometry of the earth lined up with the geometry of the solar system. It is very likely that one of the main reasons they built the pyramids was to have a coherence generator—so that when these special alignments opened up, they could harness them. Obviously, if this were true, they would be very interested in tracking the orbits of the planets—with great precision.
I’ve seen many, many skeptics stridently attack the Maya calendar as if it were a bunch of meaningless nonsense. And even when people write about it in a favorable way, suggesting that the end date of 2012 is truly a significant event, hardly anyone actually crunches the numbers within the calendar to see if they mean something. More specifically, why were the Maya counting all these different cycles that mesh together with each other so perfectly
? Why not just count earth days, lunar months and earth years, and leave it at that? I suspected that if I actually did the homework, I might find that the Maya were counting these cycles for a reason—and I struck gold.
The Maya, and many other indigenous Mesoamerican cultures, gave every day a name—for a total of twenty days. This twenty-day period was called a veintena in many pre-Columbian Mesoamerican cultures. It was also referred to as a winal in the Maya calendar, as well as in the Zapotec and Mixtec cultures. It seemed to serve the same basic function as a month does in our own calendar system. Eighteen winals of twenty days each were counted up to get 360 days, or a tun. Then an additional five “nameless days,” called nemontemi in many cultures and wayeb in the Maya calendar, were added in to get our typical 365-day earth year—so you had eighteen twenty-day months in a year, plus the five nameless days added in.12 This whole system of counting the earth year was collectively known as the Haab. Interestingly, the nameless days were considered to be a dangerous time, where the boundaries between the mortal realm and the underworld dissolved. Allegedly, rambunctious spirits could get through during this time and cause disasters to occur.13 This might be the result of a thinning of the veil between space-time and time-space—given a more supernatural explanation. It is also interesting that if the 360 days represent a perfect sphere—a harmonic geometry—then perhaps those five days are where we lose symmetry . . . and the coherence is broken.
The twenty-day cycle was considered to be an astrology system, where each of these days had a particular character or quality to it. Their counting system also went one through twenty—unlike our own, which only goes one through ten. And despite their meticulous tracking of the Haab, or solar year, they also followed other cycles at the same time. Even though they counted twenty days as the veintena or winal, they also gave each day a number, which they called the trecena cycle. Strangely, these numbers only count up to thirteen—and then on the fourteenth day you start on the number one again. That means that the twenty-day and thirteen-day cycles don’t line up until 260 days—or thirteen times twenty. This 260-day cycle was known as the tzolkin— and it is considered the oldest and most important timing system throughout all Mesoamerican regions, appearing earlier than the very first Maya inscriptions that ever featured it.14
Decoding the 260-Day Tzolkin Cycle
It took years of detective work for me to track down the answer of why the ancients were so interested in these cycles—and I only found the answer late in 2009, while I was putting the research together for this book. Professor Robert Peden, from Deakin University’s School of Sciences in Australia, crunched the numbers and wrote up his discoveries in 1981—but never published the results. It didn’t actually appear online until 2004—but it answered all my questions beautifully.15 In short, the tzolkin is nothing less than the ultimate cycle that links all the planetary orbits, and their geometry, together with one single common denominator—or at the very least Venus, earth, the Moon, Mars and Jupiter. Furthermore, it is the only cycle that is under a hundred years in length that can do this—with an accuracy better than one day in one hundred years.
If this sounds confusing, let me explain how it works. Take fifty-nine tzolkin cycles and add them up. This is almost exactly the same length of time as forty earth years, with 99.6 percent precision. Forty-six tzolkins equals 405 lunar months, at 99.7 percent accuracy. Sixty-one Venus years is 137 tzolkins, with 99.2 percent precision. Three tzolkins give you one Mars year—at 97.2 percent accuracy. And lastly, 135 tzolkins add up to eighty-eight Jupiter years—with 99.7 percent perfection. I was really blown away when I saw this—and hardly anyone who writes and lectures about the Maya calendar knows about it. In regards to this counting system, Peden quotes Coe in 1966.
How such a period of time ever came into being remains an enigma, but the use to which it was put is clear. Every single day had its own omens and associations, and the inexorable march of the twenty days acted as a kind of fortunetelling machine, guiding the destinies of the Maya and all peoples of Mexico.16
Peden explains this further in his own words.
Two hundred sixty was more accurate than 360 days in tracking the moon. [It] was able to satisfactorily track Venus and Mars. [It] is the best choice to track Jupiter and is the only choice that can simultaneously track all five cycles . . . these factual astronomical derivations are ipso facto sufficient to demonstrate the astronomical base for the Mesoamerican calendrical system.17
The Twenty-Year Katun Cycle
The next cycle the Maya tracked was called the katun, made up of twenty 360-day tuns, for a total of 7,200 days. This is a little less than twenty years in length—and only fifty-four days less than a Jupiter-Saturn conjunction. One of the first books I read about ancient mysteries was Our Ancestors Came from Outer Space by Maurice Chatelain18—and he found that the Jupiter-Saturn conjunction also tied in with a variety of cycles in our solar system. He felt that the correct katun should be 7,254 days, to match the Jupiter-Saturn conjunction perfectly, which I do not think is true—but it doesn’t appear to be an accident that they are so close. There is a definite resonance there. When you consider that earth’s orbit is only a little over five days away from being a perfect 360 days per year, the precession of the equinoxes is a little less than the ideal harmonic value of 25,920 years, and the Jupiter-Saturn conjunction is only fifty-four days away from being a perfect 7,200 earth days, this may all be the result of a catastrophic planetary explosion in what is now the Asteroid Belt—as Dr. Tom Van Flandren has compellingly argued.19 The solar system would still be harmonic in the aftermath of such an event, but perhaps not as perfect as it once was. It may be that all these cycles are ultimately being driven by galactic energy fields, as we will see—and the solar system may have fallen a bit out of sync with the galaxy . . . at least for now.
Here’s what Chatelain had to say about this cycle.
For the Mayas the katun of 7,254 days was not only a measure of time but also an astronomical unit to express the synodic periods of revolution of planets—or the count of days needed for each planet to be realigned with the Sun and Earth. For example, 5 katuns were equal to 313 revolutions of Mercury, 13 katuns were equal to 121 revolutions of Mars, or 27 katuns were equal to 7 returns of Halley’s comet.20
Notice that Mercury was not present in Peden’s analysis, and Mars was the weakest of the cycle connections—but here Chatelain found very nice alignments. It’s important to point out that Chatelain was director of communications for NASA’s Apollo program, and very familiar with complex calculations like this. I should also mention that at least three different insiders I spoke to—each of whom made a compelling case that he had worked in classified top-secret projects—told me earth has a natural twenty-year cycle that forms a direct conduit between different periods of time.
The Four-Hundred-Year Baktun Cycle
Next we take twenty katuns of 7,200 days to get the baktun, which weighs in at 144,000 days—or 394.3 years. In Beyond 2012, Geoff Stray pointed out that this is very close to the time it takes earth’s inner core to make one complete rotation. Let’s not forget that earth’s core appears to be a dodecahedron, based on the most accurate modeling we now have available. In modern times, it wasn’t until 1996 that we found out the core is rotating slightly faster than the rest of earth—and takes about four hundred years to complete one cycle.21 Specifically, Drs. Xiaodong Song and Paul G. Richards, from Lamont-Doherty, the earth sciences division of Columbia University, discovered there was a nearly vertical line in earth’s core—where seismic waves moved faster through this area than anywhere else. The line was tilted about ten degrees off of earth’s rotational axis—which led them to conclude earth’s core was actually on a slightly different axis than the exterior. After studying thirty-eight earthquakes between 1967 and 1995, as well as other seismic data, Columbia made its official press release.
Dr. Song and Dr. Richards calculated that over a year, the inner core rotates about one long
itudinal degree more than the Earth’s mantle and crust. The inner core makes a complete revolution inside the Earth in about 400 years.22
Could this be what the Maya calendar was tracking? Think about it—the core is a dodecahedron. It’s three-quarters the size of the Moon, and is almost thirteen times denser than water—meaning it has 30 percent more mass than the Moon.23 When we think about how much of an effect the Moon has on our oceans, creating the tides, it’s clear that the core exerts a powerful force. And since the core is a perfect dodecahedron, that means it may also be creating its own time portals. “Natural stargates” may be more likely to occur when geometric vortex points on earth’s surface line up with this geometry in the core. If it takes four hundred years for this geometry to make a full circuit inside earth, then every day within that four-hundred-year cycle will be different in terms of the alignments. That may be why the Maya used the baktun as their largest cycle—other than the full calendar itself. It is a compelling idea—but if it’s really true, then I would also expect this four-hundred-year cycle should be doing something else that we can measure. Then we could make an even greater case for why the ancients would be so interested in tracking this cycle. I found a study by Takesi Yukutake, from 1971, that clearly spelled it out.
Periods of Earth warming and cooling occur in cycles. This is well understood, as is the fact that small-scale cycles of about 40 years exist within larger-scale cycles of 400 years, which in turn exist inside still larger scale cycles of twenty thousand years, and so on.24
The Source Field Investigations Page 37
