The Quran has no unified message about the treatment of unbelievers, whether they were pagans or dhimmis. Muhammad emerged as a fighting prophet from the persecutions he and his followers suffered in Mecca, battling for the life of his community against his Meccan opponents and against the Byzantine Christians who came belatedly to recognise the challenge Islam presented to them. In the Quran he is consoled with the example of Moses who fought external enemies more powerful than he was, repressed idolaters among his followers, was protected by God and is mentioned more frequently in the text than any other personality from the Hebrew Scriptures. On the other hand, there is a bewildering variety of views expressed on jihad. In the Sword text – sura 9, 15, much cited by militarists – the Quran, after citing repeated breaches of agreements by pagans, goes on: ‘When the sacred months have lapsed, then slay the polytheists [...] seize them and encircle them.’ Exasperated by this abuse of agreements, it is proclaimed that the tradition in the pre-Islamic world of the last of the four months being kept free from warfare should in this instance be ignored and war declared. Nevertheless, there is provision for a withdrawal by the polytheists. The text goes on: ‘But if they repent, then let them go on their way.’
The Quran provides for asylum to be given to polytheists who ask for it, even if they decline to come over to the Faith (sura 9, 6). They are treated as ignorant, not able fully to understand and needing protection from attack by their fellow polytheists. Muhammad had a paternalist concern for dhimmis. Sura 22, 39–40, gives permission for believers to fight when they have been expelled from their homes solely because of their monotheist Muslim beliefs, but goes on to note that resistance to such oppressors should not mean that they attack dhimmis as well and expresses concern for their welfare and their places of worship, ‘monasteries, churches, synagogues’; and another sura is concerned that Jews follow the requirements of the Torah and Christians the Gospels. He was not an uninhibited warrior: sura 2, 216, prescribes fighting and speaks of a ‘dislike’ for it, and jihad in other passages speaks of a patient forbearance under oppression as worthy of praise. A recent authoritative analysis of the Quran has concluded that under the heading of jihad, literally ‘striving’, there are more references to peaceful striving (against evil passions) than there are to armed combat!†
Calm confidence and trust in God’s power and the forces of angels He commands in the face of hostile unbelievers is enjoined in sura 8 of the Quran and no doubt reflects Muhammad’s injunctions to his followers at Medina. Booty was the gift of God and the sign of favour, but there should be no excessive plundering and no self-enriching: the austerity of the desert should prevail, and the needs of the poor and the common cause should be paramount.
The victory for Medina and the faith at the battle of the Trench created an impasse. The Quraysh of Mecca could not eliminate the menace of Medina and its Muslim focus, and their trade was being damaged. On the other hand, Muhammad needed the support of the powerful men of Mecca if he was to make his universal appeal to all humanity. He set about making a deal with Mecca and at the well of Hudaybiyya in 628 achieved a compromise peace, with Ali acting as his secretary. There was to be a truce for ten years, and Muhammad with a small body of followers was to make a mini-pilgrimage, an umra, to the sacred enclosure at Mecca. Idols indeed were still there, but Muhammad understood that its sacredness sprang from Abraham and Ishmael, believers in one God, and only subsequently had been polluted by idol worshippers, who could not wholly remove its sacredness. So he was allowed to go on pilgrimage, and it was agreed that for three days Meccans would withdraw and leave him and his followers to enter the city.
Muhammad’s mixture of diplomacy and war against the Quraysh of Mecca brought its fruit. In much of Arabia victories and conversions brought submission or alliance to the new Islamic power. The Yemen, which by a quirk of climate had its own agriculture and had been controlled by a Persian governor and garrison, suddenly found its troops withdrawn because of an emergency in the Persian heartland and thought it wise to listen to Muslim missionaries and accept Islam. A similar situation prevailed in Oman and Bahrain.
There was a clash with the Christian power of Byzantium in 629 as Muhammad’s adopted son, the freed slave Zayd ibn Haritha, was dispatched to raid well beyond Arabia following the murder of a Muslim envoy in Syria. Zayd had reckoned with hostile tribesmen, whom he could expect to beat, but the Emperor Heraclius had got wind of the new power of Islam and sent his own professional troops to stiffen the tribesmen. At Mutah, at the southern end of the Dead Sea, Zayd’s forces suffered a heavy defeat and he was killed. It was a blow, albeit mitigated by a second expedition, which was not targeted by Byzantine troops and which restored an Islamic claim on the edge of Syria.
Some Quraysh were not satisfied with the deal at Hudaybiyya and conspired against it. The Prophet took military action, heading an army of 10,000 that seemingly took Mecca by surprise; resisting calls for vengeance, he contented himself with a few executions of apostates and of singers who had satirised him. A high point of his life was his entry with Ali to the sacred enclosure in January 630, breaking the idols, leaving the Black Stone, the volcanic rock associated with Abraham, as a sacred object to be acknowledged on the hajj as pilgrims circled the Kaba (plate 2). Townspeople now abandoned their idols and Mecca became a stronghold of Islamic belief. Almost at once Muhammad’s new supremacy was challenged by a multitude of Bedouin tribes led by men from Taif, the wealthy resort to which Muhammad had come during the Meccan years to spread his message, only to find himself contemptuously rejected. They were said to be 30,000 strong. At Hunayn he defeated them, immensely raising his prestige in Mecca and forcing the submission of Taif. They too had their idols broken and some of their inhabitants, the Thagafi, turned into valuable supporters of Islam. He continued to spread Islamic belief and influence, leading an expedition to Tabuk, 350 miles north-west of Medina, and taking the opportunity to make alliances with tribes near the gulf of Aqaba. Not all were willing to follow him, and a sura of the Quran refers to those who put comfort before their obligations, calling them hypocrites who profess belief but avoid actions.
As Muhammad made his pilgrimage to Mecca in the last year of his life with his wives and leading supporters, questions arose for his followers: how was the Muslim community, the umma, to be kept in being when Muhammad was gone? He had conveyed the voice of God to his world; was this prophetic power to be continued after death? As a leader, he had been a diplomat, statesman and commander in war, and had begun to transform the Arabian peninsula. How was his legacy in practical matters to be carried on?
It was clear that Muhammad was ill. He was about sixty-two and was no longer able to walk, so he was forced to ride round the sites on a camel instead, acting ritually to remove from each one all of its pagan associations. The modern hajj follows Muhammad’s movements on this Last Pilgrimage in a stylised manner. The prescribed white clothing worn by men as the pilgrims circle seven times anti-clockwise round the Kaba and carry out the rest of the ritual duties, fulfils the Prophet’s wish for austerity and eliminates all distinctions of wealth or class made manifest by clothing. The women circle round with the men on equal terms, totally covered but with face and hands exposed.
In a dialogue with the crowed accompanying him Muhammad gave what came to be remembered as his Farewell Sermon, believed to have been delivered on the Plain of Arafat. In it he stressed the need for fidelity to his message, the ethical requirements of belief, the rejection of usury, the proper relations of husband and wife, the treatment of slaves and the universal character of Islam with the words ‘An Arab is superior to a non-Arab in nothing but devotion!’ His position at the end of the pilgrimage was unassailable and unique. But what was to be done when he died?
On his way back to Medina there was a long pause at the oasis Ghadir Khumm, the pool in the Ghadir valley, as the caravan rested and took in water. The company swept a place for Muhammad under two palm trees from which he led prayers, entered into a dia
logue with the people, then took Ali by the hand and conferred authority on him. It is not clear exactly what this authority was. Some sources do not mention Ghadir Khumm at all, while others suggest that Muhammad was conferring authority solely over Ali’s own clan within the Quraysh. Another view that has been held by the Sunnis is that Ali had made an error of judgement over booty on the expedition which had created indignation among men who felt they had been cheated. Muhammad in this interpretation was using his authority to support Ali against these dissenters. The partisans (Shia) of Ali came to believe, by contrast, that the Prophet was conferring all his own authority on Ali.
The company moved on to end the journey at Medina in March. As he was weak, Muhammad asked Abu Bakr to take his place and lead prayers, and for some this was the sign that he wished Abu Bakr to be his successor. But the fact that anxieties over the succession were moving his followers in his last days is shown in the Episode of Pen and Paper, in which he called for writing materials, saying, ‘I may write for you something after which you will not be led into error’. Confusion ensued. In the end nothing was written down, but many accepted a point forcibly made by Umar (also known as Omar), that Muhammad had already given his Revelations in the Quran. Umar had been an early Companion, close to the Prophet; an ex-wrestler, he was marked by strength and great powers of decision, and became the second caliph after the Prophet’s death.
Muhammad ended his life in Aisha’s hut in Medina. Partisans of Ali believed that the most intimate links between the two men were demonstrated when Ali washed the Prophet’s body and wrapped it for burial in the hut where he died. However, it is perhaps significant that Muhammad’s body remained in Aisha’s hut for several days, quite against the conventions of burial away from habitation. It is not clear why this happened: did the Prophet’s followers expect some miraculous event, a final judgement or a Resurrection? There is good reason to suppose that Muhammad’s belief in an imminent Last Judgement gave an urgency to his preaching and military activities designed to bring the benefits of true monotheism to as many as possible before the End came. Aisha had evidently moved away to sleep with another of the wives. Three days later she was astonished to hear the noise of picks as a night-time burial took place under the floor of her hut. The Prophet lies there to this day, the site now enclosed in a mosque.
The Caliphate
Elsewhere in Medina a committee mainly of Emigrants from Mecca (that is, former Companions) assembled. Their prime concern was for the military and organisational tasks necessary to ensure the continuance of the developing Islamic state at Medina. The successor came from their own number rather than from the Helpers – those followers from Medina who had backed Muhammad inside his adopted place of residence – who had also put forward a candidate. They all needed a man of action but did not rule out a spiritual role for a successor, or khalifa (hence the term ‘caliph’).
Abu Bakr was a natural choice, with his great knowledge of the tribes and leaders of the Arabian peninsula through his experience of camel caravans (which could only be cost-effective if there was agreement with local powers along the route); and to end any dispute he was forcefully supported by Umar. In the interests of unity, the Medinan clans fell in with the decision, and on the morning following Muhammad’s death, while Ali was tending to the Prophet’s body, Abu Bakr climbed into the minbar, the pulpit in the mosque, and led the prayers. Reared in the tradition of personal austerity and accessibility of the Prophet, he then spoke to emphasise the duty he had undertaken to do justice, to secure the rights of the weak and to demand obedience only so long as he obeyed God and His messenger. He adopted the title Commander of the Faithful, emphasising the military side of the caliphate.
For the sake of the unity and the continuance of Islam, everyone acquiesced in Abu Bakr’s elevation. Ali did not congratulate him, but neither did he press his case for recognition. Dissent slumbered.
Abu Bakr’s Caliphate (632–4)
Abu Bakr was a man of action. Against some opposition he laid down that steps should be taken against tribal leaders who had stopped paying the charitable tax after the death of the Prophet, arguing that the contract was with Muhammad personally and that on his death the tax had lapsed. It was not, they argued, that they were abandoning the faith of the Prophet, but the tax should be given up. Abu Bakr knew the fissiparous nature of Arab tribal society and that, if he allowed this, the confederation in Arabia built up by Muhammad would at once unravel. He insisted that in all matters the Prophet’s wishes must be fulfilled and, against some opposition, that Syria should continue to be a target for attack.
Abu Bakr set about harnessing the energies of the desert warriors. The peoples of the Arabian desert, who scratched a bare living from their flocks and herds, saw raiding and fighting rival tribes as a vital part of their lives and an essential remedy against the boredom of pastoral life. Jihad, understood as fighting, gave them action in an honourable cause – spreading the faith. Abu Bakr used his knowledge of the tribes of the peninsula to play one group off against another and avoid a battle when possible, but for major action he used Khalid ibn al-Walid, a latecomer to the faith who had fought against the Prophet at the battle of Uhud in 625 and who was regarded in some quarters as an opportunist. He turned out to be an inspired military leader. To him Abu Bakr entrusted the hard task of subduing the Beni Hanifa of the Yamamah lands east of Medina. They had a prophet of their own, who, in Arabic tradition, suggested that he would accept Muhammad as a prophet in Mecca and Medina, provided he was left as a prophet for the Beni Hanifa. But in Islam there could only be one Prophet and one Revelation. The slaughter of Companions and new Muslims as well as the Beni Hanifa that took place in the orchards known as the ‘garden of death’ was terrible, but Islam prevailed. It was a key action in what became known as the apostasy (ridda) campaigns of Abu Bakr.
Muhammad and Abu Bakr were heirs to the decline of two empires – that of Iran, based on the fertile lands of the Tigris and Euphrates, and that of Byzantium. The Persians in Iran were deadly enemies of Byzantium and had driven into Palestine to attack and capture Jerusalem in 614 and seize the True Cross. This was one of the greatest of all Christian relics, recovered by St Helena in the fourth century. With skill and energy the Byzantine emperor Heraclius (610–41) overcame the Sassanian dynasty and destroyed Iran’s empire. He returned in triumph to Jerusalem bearing the True Cross, which he had taken from the Persians in a series of battles, and after entering the city in March 630 returned the relic to the Sepulchre, an event still commemorated in the liturgy of the Greek Orthodox Church. The triumph was the prelude to disaster, however, as the two major powers had exhausted themselves, creating a power vacuum and unwittingly opening the way to the new power of Muhammad and his followers.
Abu Bakr allowed his commanders to gain vital military experience as his expeditions pressed on to gain the wine, oil and grain of fertile lands known to him from his camel caravan days. Early in 634 one of those commanders, the wily Amr ibn al-As, defeated a small Byzantine force at Dathin, near Gaza. This alerted Byzantium to the arrival of a new enemy, confirmed as Abu Bakr’s men captured Bostra, in southern Syria, south of Hauran, and laid siege to Damascus. To his successor Abu Bakr left the task of meeting the Byzantine backlash and carrying conquest farther north and west.
Abu Bakr’s achievements were considerable, as he prevented the Islamic empire created by the Prophet from disintegrating, kept armies in being, sustained the attack on Syria and made Arabia a Muslim peninsula. His death took place in Medina in the summer of 634; he was buried with the Prophet. The designation of Umar as his successor was a formality and raised no controversy.
Caliph Umar (634–44)
Under Umar, who directed campaigns from Medina or a nearby training camp and did not move except to participate in the hajj, the full use of the dynamic driving force of the jihad made immense inroads into Palestine and Syria, leading city after city which had been Byzantine to accept a Muslim takeover. They preferred be
ing compelled to pay the jizya rather than continue meeting the heavy burdens of taxation from the distant Byzantine government; moreover, doctrinal pressure from Constantinople to accept the Byzantine Trinitarian doctrine was particularly hard for the Coptic Monophysites, with their dissident views on the nature of Christ. Chronicles of the Empire, written in Syriac and Aramaic, give us clues to the reasons for Byzantine failure and Islamic success. They see the conquests as punishment for their sins, only to be overcome by prayers and good conduct. They had no will to fight.
Realising the threat now presented to his rule by the Muslims, Heraclius took station in Antioch in 636 and in southern Syria assembled a large army which was supplemented by many Arab forces – including, for example, the Ghazznavid dynasty, who had long been committed allies – in order to crush the new power once and for all.
Umar kept cool and assembled the largest Muslim army he could muster, denuding other danger points of men and pressing into service even the shakiest and least trained. Muslims came out of the cities so as to meet battle on terrain where they could best use their cavalry and, under Khalid’s fine leadership, dashed in and out from the desert to the Byzantine position, harassing the enemy by the Yarmuk, a tributary of the River Jordan off the Sea of Tiberias which ran through deep ravines in the area of the Golan Heights. The Byzantines faced supply difficulties; their commander had expected the Arabs facing him to fade away in time or that he would be able to bribe them into submission, but what he actually faced was a new unity of faith. When battle was joined in October, it was hard fought for six days until Khalid manoeuvred his opponents on to a mass of ravines and skilfully pressed them towards a bottleneck over a Roman bridge. It was a rare event, in which the new resolution of Islamic warriors, battlefield manoeuvring by them to avoid the counter-skills of the Byzantine cavalry and a rumour of defection by Christian Arabs all played a part in producing utter and complete catastrophe for the Byzantines. Hardly any prisoners were taken, and Heraclius in Antioch, hearing of the disaster, recognised that his position was irremediable. He retreated to Anatolia and thence home to Constantinople.
God's Armies Page 2
