by C. P. Snow
Copyright & Information
The Malcontents
First published in 1972
© Philip Snow; House of Stratus 1972-2010
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form, or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise), without the prior permission of the publisher. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages.
The right of C.P. Snow to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted.
This edition published in 2010 by House of Stratus, an imprint of
Stratus Books Ltd., Lisandra House, Fore Street, Looe,
Cornwall, PL13 1AD, UK.
Typeset by House of Stratus.
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library and the Library of Congress.
ISBN: 0755120159 EAN 9780755120154
Note for Readers
Reader preferences vary, as do eReaders.
This eBook is designed to be read by any eReading device or software that is capable of reading ePub files. Readers may decide to adjust the text within the capability of their eReader. However, style, paragraph indentation, line spacing etc. is optimised to produce a near equivalent reflowable version of the printed edition of the title when read with Adobe® Digital Editions. Other eReaders may vary from this standard and be subject to the nuances of design and implementation. Further, not all simulators on computers and tablets behave exactly as their equivalent eReader. Wherever possible it is recommended the following eReader settings, or their equivalent (if available), be used:
Clear Local Data – off; Local Styling – off; Text Alignment – Publisher Default.
This is a fictional work and all characters are drawn from the author's imagination.
Any resemblance or similarities to persons either living or dead are entirely coincidental.
www.houseofstratus.com
About the Author
Charles Percy Snow was born in Leicester, on 15 October 1905. He was educated from age eleven at Alderman Newton's School for boys where he excelled in most subjects, enjoying a reputation for an astounding memory and also developed a lifelong love of cricket. In 1923 he became an external student in science of London University, as the local college he attended in Leicester had no science department. At the same time he read widely and gained practical experience by working as a laboratory assistant at Newton’s to gain the necessary practical experience needed.
Having achieved a first class degree, followed by a Master of Science he won a studentship in 1928 which he used to research at the famous Cavendish Laboratory in Cambridge. There, he went on to become a Fellow of Christ's College, Cambridge, in 1930 where he also served as a tutor, but his position became increasingly titular as he branched into other areas of activity. In 1934, he began to publish scientific articles in Nature, and then The Spectator before becoming editor of the journal Discovery in 1937. However, he was also writing fiction during this period, with his first novel Death Under Sail published in 1932, and in 1940 'Strangers and Brothers' was published. This was the first of eleven novels in the series and was later renamed 'George Passant' when 'Strangers and Brothers' was used to denote the series itself.
Discovery became a casualty of the war, closing in 1940. However, by this time Snow was already involved with the Royal Society, who had organised a group to specifically use British scientific talent operating under the auspices of the Ministry of Labour. He served as the Ministry’s technical director from 1940 to 1944. After the war, he became a civil service commissioner responsible for recruiting scientists to work for the government. He also returned to writing, continuing the Strangers and Brothers series of novels. 'The Light and the Dark' was published in 1947, followed by 'Time of Hope' in 1949, and perhaps the most famous and popular of them all, 'The Masters', in 1951. He planned to finish the cycle within five years, but the final novel 'Last Things' wasn’t published until 1970.
He married the novelist Pamela Hansford Johnson in 1950 and they had one son, Philip, in 1952. Snow was knighted in 1957 and became a life peer in 1964, taking the title Baron Snow of the City Leicester. He also joined Harold Wilson’s first government as Parliamentary Secretary to the new Minister of Technology. When the department ceased to exist in 1966 he became a vociferous back-bencher in the House of Lords.
After finishing the Strangers and Brothers series, Snow continued writing both fiction and non-fiction. His last work of fiction was 'A Coat of Vanish', published in 1978. His non-fiction included a short life of Trollope published in 1974 and another, published posthumously in 1981, 'The Physicists: a Generation that Changed the World'. He was also inundated with lecturing requests and offers of honorary doctorates. In 1961, he became Rector of St. Andrews University and for ten years also wrote influential weekly reviews for the Financial Times.
In these later years, Snow suffered from poor health although he continued to travel and lecture. He also remained active as a writer and critic until hospitalized on 1 July 1980. He died later that day of a perforated ulcer.
'Mr Snow has established himself, on his own chosen ground, in an eminent and conspicuous position among contemporary English novelists' - New Statesman
1
In the mild January night, a young man was waiting outside his father’s house. A single bell rang, and kept on ringing, from the cathedral tower. The young man, whose name was Stephen Freer, was used to bells, having lived since he was a child in that house close by. Six fifteen on a Saturday evening: the spoken evensong without a choir: not paying attention, concentrated on his own thoughts, he watched a couple of figures, and then another, move towards the radiant porch.
Stephen moved down the lane and stopped at the bollards at the end. The lane, cut off from traffic, Georgian houses on the further side, was as near a precinct as the cathedral could provide: but in fact the cathedral had until recently been only a parish church, promoted when the town itself was promoted, and the lane was a relic, piously preserved by local antiquarians, Stephen’s father among them, of the old eighteenth-century town.
Stephen rested against one of the bollards and gazed up at the sky. It had been a warm and gusty day, but now the wind had dropped. The spire, elegant and high, a piece of Victorian reconstruction, stood out against some early stars. Stephen knew something about the cathedral, and a good deal about the stars: but he paid no attention to either, no more than he had to the sprinkling of old people going in to the evening service. He was not given to thinking of two things at once. He was waiting for a friend and ally. He was in a state, almost pleasurable to him, though he might not have recognized it as such, not so much anxious as keyed tight; a state in which he wanted to decide and act.
The cathedral clock had struck the half-hour. Minutes of absorption. The street outside empty in the evening. No noise from this part of the town. Then quick, familiar steps.
‘Hallo,’ called Stephen.
‘Hallo,’ said Mark Robinson.
An Englishman would have guessed at once, listening to their tone, that they came from privileged homes.
‘I wanted to catch you,’ said Stephen.
‘What’s on?’
‘Something’s come a bit unstuck.’
‘Oh hell.’ In the dim light, Mark’s expression wasn’t any more anxious than his companion’s, but eager, enthusiastic, pure. ‘What is it?’
‘There’s been a leak.’
‘Hell. Now that we didn’t want. Serious?’
‘Difficult to say.’
The two young men walked back up the lane together. As they came under the
first of the eighteenth-century iron lanterns (gift of Thomas Freer), they made a physiognomic contrast. Both were tall, both looked active and intelligent. They were dressed alike, in polo-neck sweaters and corduroy trousers, and their hair, Mark’s shiningly fair, Stephen’s darker, was thick at the nape of their necks. But Mark, six months younger than his friend, who was nearly twenty-two, had a face without much written on it – with the kind of handsomeness, luminous-eyed, which is also innocent. Stephen had none of that. He was long-headed, with features clear and aquiline, already set and unlikely to alter until he was old. His glance was very sharp. Often, as now, he appeared brooding, except when he broke into a sarcastic smile which, surprisingly, gave his face warmth and made it younger.
It was that smile which Mark expected, didn’t need to look for, when he heard Stephen’s answer about his father. The young men had known each other since they were children: they had been at school together: they talked with most of the explanations left out. How they felt about the ‘leak’ didn’t require saying: the action to be taken, they argued about without fuss. Mark, however, was curious as to when and how Stephen had heard. That afternoon, after tea, said Stephen, actually only an hour or so ago – and from his father.
‘Who it came from I don’t know, one of his lawyer friends, I fancy.’
‘How much have they got?’
‘Anything they’ve got, it would be better if they hadn’t.’
Thomas Freer hadn’t said much, there wasn’t enough to go on. Mark asked how had he taken it, what had his attitude been?
‘Semi-detached,’ said Stephen.
As for immediate action, they couldn’t do it all that Saturday night. They would have to stay at the Freer’s dinner party until ten o’clock, for decency’s sake or rather to seem unaffected: afterwards, they could talk to Neil in the pub.
Mark would go off at once and ring him up: he wouldn’t have time to collect the ‘core’ that night, he had better be told to arrange a full meeting for tomorrow.
‘Don’t explain why over the telephone,’ said Stephen.
Mark smiled. That wasn’t necessary. In spite of all his openness, he had learned discretion, or at least the rules of secrecy. Saying that he would be back in time for dinner, he was leaving Stephen, when he suddenly thought to ask whether they could get everything in order by Monday. He had planned to return to Cambridge then.
‘Your guess is as good as mine,’ said Stephen. ‘It might be rather a long weekend.’
They were at the top end of the lane, where it was crossed by another silent and empty street. Mark gave a wave of the hand as he plunged off, leaning forward in his eager walk.
2
The drawing-room in Thomas Freer’s house was entirely in his taste. That wasn’t because his wife was negligible; there she was, sitting among her guests, all present except Mark Robinson, who, she remarked equably, was not often late. She was a big strong-muscled woman, whose forehead, deeply lined, seemed out of harmony with the heavy body: it was easy to believe, if one looked only at the fine and delicate features, that she had once been beautiful. Now, despite the harassed skin, she seemed content, able to absent herself from trouble, amused by what had happened to her.
Her husband was the same age within a year and they had had Stephen, their only child, when they were in their thirties. But Thomas Freer looked younger than she did, and did not absent himself at all. In this company he was in command. It was a bourgeois gathering, and he liked it: the Bishop and his wife and daughter, his own wife and son and his son’s cultivated friend, just arrived, with polite apologies. That was all, and as it should be. Thomas Freer was himself a bourgeois, but of an unusual kind: to himself he might have smothered the word patrician. His grandfather had been a prosperous solicitor in this town, and his father, and now himself. He could afford to let his partners do most of the firm’s practice, and indulge himself as Registrar, the layman responsible for the cathedral’s legal business. Like others of the few remaining old families in the town, his had started as Unitarians, but his father had moved into the Anglican church. That suited Thomas very well. He enjoyed a small society, he would have detested being taken out of it, he liked his own position. He liked being able to devote himself to causes already lost, such as Union Now and the local Liberal Party.
He had a good deal of taste, and all of it was good. He would have thought it vulgar, and certainly unhistorical, to envisage this fine Georgian drawing-room of his furnished only in its own period: that wasn’t how things had gone, or how they ought to look. So, round the walls, there were a couple of Cotmans, a small Boudin, his prize possession, and then, in the same latitudinarian spirit, a William Scott.
It was his own taste to live in the house, in the deserted centre of the old town, which might be picturesque but was also inconvenient. The Provost (who would have been called the Dean if the cathedral had not been a modern creation) lived next door, but then he had to. Otherwise no middle-class family, let alone one as well-off as the Freers, slept at night within the same square mile. That seemed to Thomas Freer appropriate, and gave him a devious, or perhaps an aesthetic, pleasure.
He was a slender man, as tall as his son, though there wasn’t much family resemblance between them. The father was also personable, but in a neat-skulled, small-headed fashion, with the first sign of nutcracker jaw and nose. His manners were easy but sometimes seemed as though he were parodying himself. When he went round the circle and asked, ‘Bishop, may I give you another glass of sherry?’ he might have been a diffident parson addressing a prince of the Church, or alternatively a connoisseur thrusting priceless liquor down an uncomprehending crop. Certainly the Bishop was puzzled, the more so as Thomas Freer often called him Bert.
The Bishop was only just getting used to his Registrar’s dinner parties. In fact, the Bishop, scolded into them by his wife, a woman as large as Kate Freer and many times more dominant, was only just getting used to dinner parties of any kind. He was a small square man with a roseate complexion and a comfortable north-country accent. He had come from a humble family in Lancashire, made his way by scholarships through grammar school and Oxford, and had no social pretensions or pretensions of any kind at all. Despite his rise up the ecclesiastic hierarchy, he was, of the people in that drawing-room, still much the poorest.
The Freers had both inherited money: Mark’s father was a hosiery manufacturer and well-to-do: whereas the Bishop was paid on about the same scale as a university lecturer. He could manage to send his daughter, a short sturdy pretty girl who had been whispering to Stephen, to the local university, and lived not very differently from his own old headmaster in his native town. But it was the Bishop who, during dinner, took it upon himself to change the conversation. The party had moved downstairs, for the dining-room was on the ground floor, smallish after the big room above, another example of Thomas Freer’s carefully anachronistic taste, with Queen Anne chairs older than the house, candles on the rosewood table. The food was fine, though not in large quantities: the wine was good, but didn’t circulate often. What Thomas Freer did circulate was a set of reflections which didn’t seem – except to hypersensitive ears – to be coming to a point.
He was sitting with Mrs Boltwood, the Bishop’s wife, on his right and on his left her daughter Tess. At the other end of the table, the Bishop and Mark were flanking Kate Freer, with Stephen interposed between the Bishop and Tess. Thomas Freer, in his easy modulated tones, appeared to be addressing no one in particular when, after the soup, he set about asking the air at large some questions, as though engaged in a labyrinthine exercise in introspection.
‘I sometimes wonder, don’t you know, what one would do if one could get the faintest glimpse of the consequences. Do you think I’m wrong? Of course, I’m not very clever at foreseeing consequences. But I wonder how many people are? Doesn’t one get into a situation, I’m sure I have, of trying to do good and finding that evil comes of it?’
The three young people were silent. From
the other end of the table, Kate Freer gave a sound which tinkled like a distant chuckle, or even a giggle.
‘Thinking of doctors, don’t you know.’ Thomas was weaving away. ‘I’ve often thought that being a doctor would be a decent way to live. Does that make sense? And they’ve kept children alive, that was a nice thing to do, they’ve kept them alive all over the world. With the consequence that there are going to be more people than the world can cope with, so they tell one. I only wonder, but mightn’t that be a classical case of doing good so that evil might come? One can’t see one’s way–’
‘Of course they’re doing good,’ said Mrs Boltwood, nose protruded in indignation.
‘Maybe. Who is one to judge?’ Thomas was weaving again. ‘Or take the October Revolution. I suppose that, if we’d been Russians in 1917, everyone round this table would have been for it, we should have thought we were doing good, don’t you think we should? But looking back, of course I’m very ignorant about history, should we have been? If the Russians had muddled on without it – one might have saved millions of lives. Looking back, if there hadn’t been the revolution, there wouldn’t have been much chance for Hitler – we could have escaped another war, one might have thought. One hopes so much, don’t you know, but I wonder if we could see the consequences of what we hoped for–’
That was the point when the Bishop broke in. It was not so much that he was out of sympathy with Thomas Freer, though that was true: but more, he was embarrassed that Stephen and the others, not usually inarticulate, had stayed quite mute. There was something behind this allocution, meanings left unspoken: the Bishop liked young people to be carefree, he wanted to take away the strain. Until now, for him it had been an ordinary Saturday night: no, not quite ordinary, what he described to himself as a posh dinner was still an event. Nevertheless, it was a date like other dates. Dinner at the Registrar’s. Saturday, 10 January 1970. Tomorrow, Sunday, first after Epiphany, the quietest period of the Christian year. But now the Bishop felt impelled to exert himself.
