In Defense of Food

Home > Nonfiction > In Defense of Food > Page 21
In Defense of Food Page 21

by Michael Pollan


  Glas­sner, Barry. The Gos­pel of Fo­od (New York: Har­per­Col­lins Pub­lis­hers, 2007).

  Kant­ro­witz, Bar­ba­ra, and Cla­udia Kalb. “Fo­od News Blu­es.” New­s­we­ek (March 13, 2006).

  Le­vens­te­in, Har­vey. Pa­ra­dox of Plenty (Ber­ke­ley: Uni­ver­sity of Ca­li­for­nia Press, 2003).

  --. Re­vo­lu­ti­on at the Tab­le: The Trans­for­ma­ti­on of the Ame­ri­can Di­et (Ber­ke­ley: Uni­ver­sity of Ca­li­for­nia Press, 2003). Inc­lu­des an ex­cel­lent ac­co­unt of fo­od fad­dism in Ame­ri­ca.

  Mel­ton, Li­sa. “The An­ti­oxi­dant Myth.” New Sci­en­tist (August 5-11, 2006).

  Planck, Ni­na. Re­al Fo­od: What to Eat and Why (New York: Blo­oms­bury, 2006).

  Scri­nis, Gyorgy. “Sorry Mar­ge.” Me­anj­in. 61.4 (2002): 108-16.

  Sha­pi­ro, La­ura. Per­fec­ti­on Sa­lad: Wo­men and Co­oking at the Turn of the Cen­tury (New York: Ran­dom Ho­use, 2001).

  Ta­ubes, Gary. Go­od Ca­lo­ri­es, Bad Ca­lo­ri­es (New York: Knopf, 2007).

  --. “The Soft Sci­en­ce of Di­etary Fat.” Sci­en­ce. 291.30 (March 2001).

  --. “What if It’s All Be­en a Big Fat Lie?” New York Ti­mes (July 7, 2002).

  Tri­ve­di, Bi­j­al. “The Go­od, the Fad, and the Un­he­althy.” New Sci­en­tist (Sep­tem­ber 23, 2006).

  U.S. De­part­ment of He­alth and Hu­man Ser­vi­ces. The Sur­ge­on Ge­ne­ral’s Re­port on Nut­ri­ti­on and He­alth (Was­hing­ton, D.C., 1988).

  U.S. Se­na­te Se­lect Com­mit­tee on Nut­ri­ti­on and Hu­man Ne­eds. Di­etary Go­als for the Uni­ted Sta­tes (Was­hing­ton, D.C., 1977).

  On the con­tem­po­rary fo­od en­vi­ron­ment and fo­od mar­ke­ting:

  Hart­man, Har­vey, and Jar­rett Pasc­hel. “Unders­tan­ding Obe­sity: Prac­ti­cal Sug­ges­ti­ons for the Obe­sity Cri­sis” (Bel­le­vue: The Hart­man Gro­up, Inc., 2006). In­te­res­ting anth­ro­po­lo­gi­cal analy­sis of how Ame­ri­can eating ha­bits cont­ri­bu­te to obe­sity.

  Lofs­tock, John. “Bo­os­ting Im­pul­se Sa­les at the Chec­ko­ut Co­un­ter.” Con­ve­ni­en­ce Sto­re De­ci­si­ons (Janu­ary 11, 2006).

  Mar­tin, And­rew. “Ma­kers of So­das Try a New Pitch: They’re He­althy.” New York Ti­mes (March 7, 2007).

  Me­rill, Ric­hard A., et al. “Li­ke Mot­her Used to Ma­ke: An Analy­sis of FDA Stan­dards of Iden­tity.” Co­lum­bia Law Re­vi­ew. 74.4 (May 1974). Con­ta­ins a go­od ac­co­unt of the FDA’s 1973 de­ci­si­on to re­pe­al its imi­ta­ti­on ru­le.

  Nest­le, Ma­ri­on. Fo­od Po­li­tics (Ber­ke­ley: Uni­ver­sity of Ca­li­for­nia Press, 2002).

  --. What to Eat (New York: North Po­int Press, 2006).

  Si­mon, Mic­he­le. Ap­pe­ti­te for Pro­fit (New York: Na­ti­on Bo­oks, 2006).

  On the cont­ro­ver­si­es sur­ro­un­ding mo­dern nut­ri­ti­on sci­en­ce and its met­hods, the li­te­ra­tu­re is end­less. A go­od pla­ce to start ap­pre­ci­ating the comp­le­xi­ti­es, if not im­pos­si­bi­li­ti­es, of the fi­eld is Ma­ri­on Nest­le’s ex­cel­lent epi­lo­gue to Fo­od Po­li­tics. Gary Ta­ubes of­fers a tho­ro­ugh cri­ti­que of both epi­de­mi­olo­gi­cal and cli­ni­cal nut­ri­ti­on re­se­arch in Go­od Ca­lo­ri­es, Bad Ca­lo­ri­es. For mo­re on the met­ho­do­logy of nut­ri­ti­on sci­en­ce:

  Be­lan­ger, C.F., C.H. Hen­ne­kens, B. Ros­ner et al. “The Nur­ses’ He­alth Study.” Ame­ri­can Jo­ur­nal of Nur­sing. (1978): 1039-40.

  Camp­bell, T. Co­lin. “Let­ters to the Edi­tor: Ani­mal Pro­te­in and Isc­he­mic He­art Di­se­ase.” Ame­ri­can Jo­ur­nal of Cli­ni­cal Nut­ri­ti­on. 71.3 (2000): 849-50.

  Fre­uden­he­im, Jo L. “Study De­sign and Hypot­he­sis Tes­ting: Is­su­es in the Eva­lu­ati­on of Evi­den­ce from Re­se­arch in Nut­ri­ti­onal Epi­de­mi­ology.” Ame­ri­can Jo­ur­nal of Cli­ni­cal Nut­ri­ti­on. 69 suppl (1999): 1315S-21S.

  Gi­ovan­nuc­ci, Ed­ward, et al. “A Com­pa­ri­son of Pros­pec­ti­ve and Ret­ros­pec­ti­ve As­ses­sments of Di­et in the Study of Bre­ast Can­cer.” Ame­ri­can Jo­ur­nal of Epi­de­mi­ology. 137.5 (1993): 502-11.

  Hor­ner, Ne­ilann K. “Par­ti­ci­pant Cha­rac­te­ris­tics As­so­ci­ated with Er­rors in Self-Re­por­ted Energy In­ta­ke from the Wo­men’s He­alth Ini­ti­ati­ve Fo­od-Fre­qu­ency Qu­es­ti­on­na­ire.” Ame­ri­can Jo­ur­nal of Cli­ni­cal Nut­ri­ti­on. 76 (2002): 766-73.

  Hu, Frank B., and Wal­ter Wil­lett. “Let­ters to the Edi­tor: Reply to TC Camp­bell.” Ame­ri­can Jo­ur­nal of Cli­ni­cal Nut­ri­ti­on. 71.3 (2000): 850-51.

  Hu, Frank B., et al. “Rep­ro­du­ci­bi­lity and Va­li­dity of Di­etary Pat­terns As­ses­sed with a Fo­od-Fre­qu­ency Qu­es­ti­on­na­ire.” Ame­ri­can Jo­ur­nal of Cli­ni­cal Nut­ri­ti­on. 69 (1999): 243-49.

  Kris­tal, Alan R., et al. “Is It Ti­me to Aban­don the Fo­od Fre­qu­ency Qu­es­ti­on­na­ire?” Can­cer Epi­de­mi­ology Bi­omar­kers Pre­ven­ti­on. 14.12 (2005): 2826-28.

  Liu, Si­min, et al. “Fru­it and Ve­ge­tab­le In­ta­ke and Risk of Car­di­ovas­cu­lar Di­se­ase: The Wo­men’s He­alth Study.” Ame­ri­can Jo­ur­nal of Cli­ni­cal Nut­ri­ti­on. 72 (2000): 922-28.

  Na­po­li, Mar­yann. “Pre­ven­ti­on Ad­vi­ce to Wo­men Do­esn’t Hold Up.” Cen­ter for Me­di­cal Con­su­mers Web si­te (March 2006). Ava­ilab­le on­li­ne at www.me­di­cal­con­su­mers.org.

  Ostrzens­ki, Adam, and Ka­tarzy­na M. Ostr­zens­ka. “WHI Cli­ni­cal Tri­al Re­vi­sit: Imp­re­ci­se Sci­en­ti­fic Met­ho­do­logy Dis­qu­ali­fi­es the Study’s Out­co­mes.” Ame­ri­can Jo­ur­nal of Obs­tet­rics and Gyne­co­logy. 193 (2005): 1599-1604.

  Ros­ner, B., W. C. Wil­lett, et al. “Cor­rec­ti­on of Lo­gis­tic Reg­res­si­on Re­la­ti­ve Risk Es­ti­ma­tes and Con­fi­den­ce In­ter­vals for Syste­ma­tic Wit­hin-Per­son Me­asu­re­ment Er­ror.” Sta­tis­tics in Me­di­ci­ne. 8 (1989): 1051-69.

  Ste­in, Ka­ren. “After the Me­dia Fe­eding Frenzy: Whit­her the Wo­men’s He­alth Ini­ti­ati­ve Di­etary Mo­di­fi­ca­ti­on Tri­al?” Jo­ur­nal of the Ame­ri­can Di­ete­tic As­so­ci­ati­on. (2006): 794-800.

  Ta­ubes, Gary. “Epi­de­mi­ology Fa­ces Its Li­mits.” Sci­en­ce. 269.5221 (1995): 164-69.

  --. Go­od Ca­lo­ri­es, Bad Ca­lo­ri­es (New York: Knopf, 2007).

  Twombly, Re­nee. “Ne­ga­ti­ve Wo­men’s He­alth Ini­ti­ati­ve Fin­dings Stir Cons­ter­na­ti­on, De­ba­te Among Re­se­arc­hers.” Jo­ur­nal of the Na­ti­onal Can­cer In­s­ti­tu­te. 98.8 (April 19, 2006).

  Wil­lett, Wal­ter C. “Invi­ted Com­men­tary: A Furt­her Lo­ok at Di­etary Qu­es­ti­on­na­ire Va­li­da­ti­on.” Ame­ri­can Jo­ur­nal of Epi­de­mi­ology. 154.12 (2001): 1100-1102.

  --, and Frank B. Hu. “Not the Ti­me to Aban­don the Fo­od Fre­qu­ency Qu­es­ti­on­na­ire: Po­int.” Can­cer Epi­de­mi­ology Bi­omar­kers Pre­ven­ti­on. 15.10 (2006): 1757-58.

  On the su­bj­ect of di­etary fat and he­alth:

  Be­res­ford, Shir­ley A. “Low-Fat Di­etary Pat­tern and Risk of Co­lo­rec­tal Can­cer: The Wo­men’s He­alth Ini­ti­ati­ve Ran­do­mi­zed Cont­rol­led Di­etary Mo­di­fi­ca­ti­on Tri­al.” Jo­ur­nal of the Ame­ri­can Me­di­cal As­so­ci­ati­on. 295.6 (2006): 643-654.

  Di­etary Fats and He­alth. Edi­ted by E. G. Per­kins and W. J. Vi­sek (Cham­pa­ign, IL: Ame­ri­can Oil Che­mists’ So­ci­ety, 1983). This bo­ok inc­lu­des (from the Hars­haw Che­mi­cal Com­pany) Ro­bert C. Has­tert’s ar­tic­le “Hydro­ge­na­ti­on-A To­ol, Not an Epit­het,” on pa­ges 53-69.

  Enig, Mary G. Know Yo­ur Fats: The Comp­le­te Pri­mer for Un­ders­tan­ding the Nut­ri­ti­on of Fats, Oils, and Cho­les­te­rol (Sil­ver Spring, MD: Bet­hes­da Press, 2000). Enig is hardly ma­inst­re­am, but she was one of
the first sci­en­tists to ra­ise qu­es­ti­ons abo­ut the li­pid hypot­he­sis and so­und the alarm abo­ut trans fats.

  -, and Sally Fal­lon. “The Oiling of Ame­ri­ca” (The Wes­ton A. Pri­ce Fo­un­da­ti­on, 2000). Ava­ilab­le on­li­ne at http://www.wes­to­nap­ri­ce.org/know­yo­ur­fats/oiling.html.

  Ho­ward, Bar­ba­ra V., et al. “Low-Fat Di­etary Pat­tern and Risk of Car­di­ovas­cu­lar Di­se­ase: The Wo­men’s He­alth Ini­ti­ati­ve Ran­do­mi­zed Cont­rol­led Di­etary Mo­di­fi­ca­ti­on Tri­al.” Jo­ur­nal of the Ame­ri­can Me­di­cal As­so­ci­ati­on. 295.6 (2006): 655-66.

  Hu, Frank B., et al. “Types of Di­etary Fat and Risk of Co­ro­nary He­art Di­se­ase: A Cri­ti­cal Re­vi­ew.” Jo­ur­nal of the Ame­ri­can Col­le­ge of Nut­ri­ti­on. 20.1 (2001): 5-19.

  Lud­wig, Da­vid S. “Cli­ni­cal Up­da­te: The Low-Glyce­mic-Index Di­et.” The Lan­cet. 369.9565 (2007): 890-92.

  Pren­ti­ce, Ross L. “Low-Fat Di­etary Pat­tern and Risk of In­va­si­ve Bre­ast Can­cer: The Wo­men’s He­alth Ini­ti­ati­ve Ran­do­mi­zed Cont­rol­led Di­etary Mo­di­fi­ca­ti­on Tri­al.” Jo­ur­nal of the Ame­ri­can Me­di­cal As­so­ci­ati­on. 295.6 (2006): 629-42.

  Ta­ubes, Gary. Go­od Ca­lo­ri­es, Bad Ca­lo­ri­es (New York: Knopf, 2007). Ta­ubes’s re­por­ting on and analy­sis of the li­pid hypot­he­sis is gro­undb­re­aking.

  --. “The Soft Sci­en­ce of Di­etary Fat.” Sci­en­ce. 291.30 (March 2001).

  --. “What if It’s All Be­en a Big Fat Lie?” New York Ti­mes Ma­ga­zi­ne (July 7, 2002). This ar­tic­le al­most sing­le-han­dedly la­unc­hed the se­cond At­kins cra­ze and the gre­at car­bop­ho­bia of 2002-2003.

  On the links bet­we­en di­et and di­se­ases:

  Camp­bell, T. Co­lin, and Tho­mas M. Camp­bell II. The Chi­na Study (Dal­las: Ben­Bel­la Bo­oks, Inc., 2006).

  Ford, Earl S., et al. “Expla­ining the Dec­re­ase in U.S. De­aths from Co­ro­nary Di­se­ase, 1980-2000.” New Eng­land Jo­ur­nal of Me­di­ci­ne. 356.23 (2007): 2388-98.

  Key, Ti­mothy J., et al. “Di­et, Nut­ri­ti­on and the Pre­ven­ti­on of Can­cer.” Pub­lic He­alth Nut­ri­ti­on. 7.1A (2004): 187-200.

  Na­ti­onal Re­se­arch Co­un­cil. Di­et, Nut­ri­ti­on and Can­cer (Was­hing­ton, D.C.: Na­ti­onal Aca­demy Press, 1982).

  Nest­le, Ma­ri­on. Fo­od Po­li­tics (Ber­ke­ley: Uni­ver­sity of Ca­li­for­nia Press, 2002).

  Nut­ri­ti­onal Ge­no­mics: Dis­co­ve­ring the Path to Per­so­na­li­zed Nut­ri­ti­on. Edi­ted by Jim Ka­put and Ray­mond L. Rod­ri­gu­ez (Ho­bo­ken, NJ: John Wi­ley & Sons, Inc., 2006). This vo­lu­me inc­lu­des Wal­ter Wil­lett’s ar­tic­le “The Pur­su­it of Op­ti­mal Di­ets: A Prog­ress Re­port.” Nut­ri­ti­onal He­alth: Stra­te­gi­es for Di­se­ase Pre­ven­ti­on. Edi­ted by Ted Wil­son and Nor­man J. Temp­le (To­to­wa, NJ: Hu­ma­na Press, Inc., 2001).

  Ro­sa­mond, Way­ne D., et al. “Trends in the In­ci­den­ce of Myo­car­di­al In­farc­ti­on and in Mor­ta­lity Due to Co­ro­nary He­art Di­se­ase, 1987 to 1994.” New Eng­land Jo­ur­nal of Me­di­ci­ne. 339.13 (1998): 861-67.

  Wil­lett, Wal­ter C. “Di­et and Can­cer: One Vi­ew at the Start of the Mil­len­ni­um.” Can­cer Epi­de­mi­ology, Bi­omar­kers & Pre­ven­ti­on. 10 (2001): 3-8.

  --. “Di­et and He­alth: What Sho­uld We Eat?” Sci­en­ce. 264.5158 (1994): 532-37.

  --. Eat, Drink, and Be He­althy: The Har­vard Me­di­cal Scho­ol Gu­ide to He­althy Eating (New York: Free Press, 2001).

  World Can­cer Re­se­arch Fund. Fo­od, Nut­ri­ti­on and the Pre­ven­ti­on of Can­cer: A Glo­bal Per­s­pec­ti­ve. (Was­hing­ton, D.C.: Ame­ri­can Ins­ti­tu­te for Can­cer Re­se­arch, 1997).

  On nut­ri­ti­onism and its so­ci­al and psycho­lo­gi­cal ef­fects:

  Ro­berts, Pa­ul. “The New Fo­od An­xi­ety.” Psycho­logy To­day. (March/April, 1998).

  Ro­zin, Pa­ul, et al. “Fo­od and Li­fe, Ple­asu­re and Worry, Among Ame­ri­can Col­le­ge Stu­dents: Gen­der Dif­fe­ren­ces and Re­gi­onal Si­mi­la­ri­ti­es.” Jo­ur­nal of Per­so­na­lity and So­ci­al Psycho­logy. 85.1 (2003): 132-41.

  Ro­zin, Pa­ul. “Hu­man Fo­od In­ta­ke and Cho­ice: Bi­olo­gi­cal, Psycho­lo­gi­cal and Cul­tu­ral Pers­pec­ti­ves.” (Phi­la­delp­hia: Uni­ver­sity of Pen­nsyl­va­nia, 2002). Ava­ilab­le on­li­ne at http://www.da­no­ne-insti­tu­te. com/pub­li­ca­ti­ons/bo­ok/pdf/fo­od__se­lec­ti­on__01__ro­zin.pdf.

  Ro­zin, Pa­ul, et al. “Lay Ame­ri­can Con­cep­ti­ons of Nut­ri­ti­on: Do­se In­sen­si­ti­vity, Ca­te­go­ri­cal Thin­king, Con­ta­gi­on, and the Mo­no­to­nic Mind.” He­alth Psycho­logy. 15.6 (1996): 438-47.

  Ro­zin, Pa­ul, et al. “The Eco­logy of Eating: Smal­ler Por­ti­on Si­zes in Fran­ce Than in the Uni­ted Sta­tes Help Exp­la­in the French Pa­ra­dox.” Psycho­lo­gi­cal Sci­en­ce. 14.5 (2003): 450-54.

  Scri­nis, Gyorgy, and Ro­se­mary Stan­ton. “A Di­et Thin on Sci­en­ce.” The Age (August 29, 2005).

  Scri­nis, Gyorgy. “Engi­ne­ering the Fo­od Cha­in.” Are­na Ma­ga­zi­ne. 77 (2005): 37-39.

  --. “High in Pro­te­in, Low in Fat and Too Go­od to Be True.” Sydney Mor­ning He­rald (April 7, 2006).

  --. “La­bels: An Un­he­althy Trend.” The Age (De­cem­ber 30, 2005).

  --. “Sorry Mar­ge.” Me­anj­in. 61.4 (2002): 108-16.

  PART TWO: THE WESTERN DIET AND THE DISEASES OF CIVILIZATION

  On the Wes­tern di­et and its links to the Wes­tern di­se­ases:

  Di­amond, Jared. Guns, Germs, and Ste­el (New York: W. W. Nor­ton & Com­pany, 1999).

  Di­et of Man: Ne­eds and Wants. Edi­ted by John Yud­kin (Lon­don: Ap­pli­ed Sci­en­ce Pub­lis­hers Ltd., 1978).

  Drum­mond, J.C., and An­ne Wilb­ra­ham. The Eng­lish­man’s Fo­od: A His­tory of Fi­ve Cen­tu­ri­es of Eng­lish Di­et (Oxford: Al­den Press, 1939).

  Mil­burn, Mic­ha­el P. “Indi­ge­no­us Nut­ri­ti­on.” Ame­ri­can In­di­an Qu­ar­terly. 28.3 (2004): 411-34.

  Nab­han, Gary Pa­ul. Why So­me Li­ke It Hot: Fo­od, Ge­nes, and Cul­tu­ral Di­ver­sity (Was­hing­ton, D.C.: Is­land Press, 2004).

  North­bo­ur­ne, Chris­top­her James (5th Lord North­bo­ur­ne). Lo­ok to the Land (Lon­don: J. M. Dent & Sons, 1940). New edi­ti­on: (Hil­lsda­le, NY: Sop­hia Pe­ren­nis, 2003).

  O’Dea, Ke­rin. “Mar­ked Imp­ro­ve­ment in Car­bohyd­ra­te and Li­pid Me­ta­bo­lism in Di­abe­tic Aust­ra­li­an Abo­ri­gi­nes Af­ter Tem­po­rary Re­ver­si­on to Tra­di­ti­onal Li­festy­le.” Di­abe­tes. 33 (1984): 596-603. This is the re­se­arch re­fer­red to at the be­gin­ning of Part II. It is furt­her ela­bo­ra­ted on in:

  --. “The The­ra­pe­utic and Pre­ven­ti­ve Po­ten­ti­al of the Hun­ter-Gat­he­rer Li­festy­le: In­sights from Aust­ra­li­an Abo­ri­gi­nes.” From Wes­tern Di­se­ases. Edi­ted by N. J. Temp­le and D. P. Bur­kitt (To­to­wa, NJ: Hu­ma­na Press, 1994).

  Perry, Ge­or­ge H., et al. “Di­et and the Evo­lu­ti­on of Hu­man Amy­la­se Ge­ne Copy Num­ber Va­ri­ati­on.” Na­tu­re Ge­ne­tics. doi:10.1038/ng2123 (Sep­tem­ber 9, 2007).

  Pri­ce, Wes­ton A. Nut­ri­ti­on and Physi­cal De­ge­ne­ra­ti­on, 7th edi­ti­on (La­Me­sa: Pri­ce-Pot­ten­ger Nut­ri­ti­on Fo­un­da­ti­on, Inc., 2006).

  Ren­ner, Mar­tin. “Mo­dern Ci­vi­li­za­ti­on, Nut­ri­ti­onal Dark Age: Wes­ton A. Pri­ce’s Eco­lo­gi­cal Cri­ti­que of the In­dust­ri­al Fo­od System” (UC San­ta Cruz mas­ter’s the­sis, 2005).

  Schmid, Ro­nald F. Tra­di­ti­onal Fo­ods Are Yo­ur Best Me­di­ci­ne: Imp­ro­ving He­alth and Lon­ge­vity with Na­ti­ve Nut­ri­ti­on (Roc­hes­ter, NY: He­aling Arts Press, 1987).

  Ta­ubes, Gary. Go­od Ca­lo­ri­es, Bad Ca­lo­ri­es (New York: Knopf, 2007)
. See Chap­ter 5, “The Di­se­ases of Ci­vi­li­za­ti­on.”

  Wes­tern Di­se­ases. Edi­ted by Nor­man J. Temp­le and De­nis P. Bur­kitt (To­to­wa, NJ: Hu­ma­na Press Inc., 1994).

  On the in­dust­ri­ali­za­ti­on of ag­ri­cul­tu­re and the links bet­we­en so­il and he­alth:

  Asa­mi, Danny K., et al. “Com­pa­ri­son of the To­tal Phe­no­lic and As­cor­bic Acid Con­tent of Free-Dri­ed and Air-Dri­ed Ma­ri­on­ber­ry, Straw­ber­ry, and Corn Using Con­ven­ti­onal, Or­ga­nic, and Sus­ta­inab­le Ag­ri­cul­tu­ral Prac­ti­ces.” Jo­ur­nal of Ag­ri­cul­tu­ral and Fo­od Che­mistry. 51 (2003): 1237-41.

  Benb­ro­ok, Char­les M. “Ele­va­ting An­ti­oxi­dant Le­vels in Fo­od Thro­ugh Or­ga­nic Far­ming and Fo­od Pro­ces­sing: An Or­ga­nic Cen­ter Sta­te of Sci­en­ce Re­vi­ew” (Fos­ter, RI: Or­ga­nic Cen­ter, 2005).

  Berry, Wen­dell. The Un­set­tling of Ame­ri­ca: Cul­tu­re and Ag­ri­cul­tu­re (San Fran­cis­co: Si­er­ra Club Bo­oks, 1977).

  Brandt, Kirs­ten, and Jens Pe­ter Mшlga­ard. “Orga­nic Ag­ri­cul­tu­re: Do­es It En­han­ce or Re­du­ce the Nut­ri­ti­onal Va­lue of Plant Fo­ods?” Jo­ur­nal of the Sci­en­ce of Fo­od and Ag­ri­cul­tu­re. 81.9 (2001): 924-31.

  Car­bo­na­ro, Ma­ri­na, and Ma­ria Mat­te­ra. “Polyp­he­no­lo­xi­da­se Ac­ti­vity and Polyp­he­nol Le­vels in Or­ga­ni­cal­ly and Con­ven­ti­onal­ly Grown Pe­ac­hes.” Fo­od Che­mistry. 72 (2001): 419-24.

  Da­vis, Do­nald R., et al. “Chan­ges in US­DA Fo­od Com­po­si­ti­on Da­ta for 43 Gar­den Crops, 1950 to 1999.” Jo­ur­nal of the Ame­ri­can Col­le­ge of Nut­ri­ti­on. 23.6 (2004): 669-82.

  --. “Tra­de-Offs in Ag­ri­cul­tu­re and Nut­ri­ti­on.” Fo­od Tec­h­no­logy. 59.3 (2005).

  Fox, Jen­ni­fer E., et al. “Pes­ti­ci­des Re­du­ce Symbi­otic Ef­fi­ci­ency of Nit­ro­gen-Fi­xing Rhi­zo­bia and Host Plants.” Pro­ce­edings of the Na­ti­onal Aca­demy of Sci­en­ces. 104.24 (2007).

 

‹ Prev