Buffy the Vampire Slayer: Myth, Metaphor & Morality

Home > Other > Buffy the Vampire Slayer: Myth, Metaphor & Morality > Page 38
Buffy the Vampire Slayer: Myth, Metaphor & Morality Page 38

by Field, Mark


  Season Five

  Buffy v. Dracula

  It obviously helps, in watching Buffy v. Dracula, if you’re familiar with the Dracula story, beginning with Bram Stoker’s novel Dracula, because this episode contains a great many references to its various versions over the years. I’ll note the ones which aren’t explained (more or less) in the episode.

  Xander becomes Dracula’s servant like the character Renfield in Stoker’s novel and later works. Xander’s actions after coming under Dracula’s thrall generally follow those of Renfield. We can also see, very roughly, Riley as Jonathan Harker, Giles as perhaps Van Helsing, and Buffy as Mina Murray. The plot of the episode is consistent with the book and movies, though with necessary adaptations.

  In the novel, Dracula serves as a metaphor for unrestrained sexual desire. The book was written in the Victorian Age, so that was the supposed temptation for young women. That’s where the biting = sex metaphor took hold, and we see this focus throughout the episode.

  However, sex isn’t really the same issue today that it was in the late 1800s, so the key point had to be changed. What Dracula offers Buffy here (in addition to sex) is knowledge. Knowledge about herself. The episode brings up a point which will become increasingly important over the remaining 3 seasons, namely what it means to be the Slayer. Being the Slayer is indispensably necessary to Buffy’s journey to adulthood. It’s that which allows her to slay the demons which are metaphors for the challenges we face in life.

  That doesn’t mean that being the Slayer is an unalloyed good, however. As we’ve seen repeatedly in S1-4, and as I’ve mentioned along the way, being the Slayer imposes severe personal costs on Buffy. If you think about it, there’s something inherently problematic in using one part of “you” to challenge (or “slay”) other parts. Necessary, yes, but not without consequences.

  As with so many things, we saw this issue foreshadowed in Restless. Adam questioned whether Buffy is, as she might say, of the good:

  OTHER GUY (unnamed, but the same actor who played Adam): Aggression is a natural human tendency. (Looks at Buffy) Though you and me come by it another way.

  BUFFY: We're not demons.

  OTHER GUY (Adam): Is that a fact?

  Now, in the episode which directly follows this, we see Buffy lying restless (intended) in bed next to Riley. When she leaves him to go out and hunt – a bit like Spike, really – Dracula poses a direct challenge to her:

  BUFFY: Do you know what a Slayer is?

  DRACULA: Do you?...

  DRACULA: I came to meet the renowned ... killer.

  BUFFY: Yeah, I prefer the term slayer. You know, killer just sounds so...

  DRACULA: Naked?

  BUFFY: Like I ... paint clowns or something. I'm the good guy, remember?

  DRACULA: Perhaps, but your power is rooted in darkness. You must feel it.

  Remember that Riley called her “killer” in her dream in Restless. Then later,

  DRACULA: No, you are different. Kindred….

  DRACULA: …I have yearned for you. (Sits on the bed next to her) For a creature whose darkness rivals my own….

  DRACULA: All those years fighting us. Your power so near to our own...

  Then he tempts her with the same words Tara used in Buffy’s dream in Restless (the fact that they’re the same will be more obvious if you’re watching on DVD than it was to those of us who had to wait 4 months between the two episodes):

  DRACULA: (whispering) You think you know ... what you are ... what's to come. You haven't even begun.

  Buffy looks at his arm, at his face. Takes his hand in both of hers and puts her mouth on the bloody wrist.

  DRACULA: Find it. The darkness. Find your true nature.

  I’ll talk more about Drac’s claim later on. For now you might want to think about whether his claim is true and, if so, what that might mean in light of him using Tara’s words. He is the bad guy, after all.

  For the moment, it’s Buffy’s reaction I want to focus on. At the end of the episode Buffy rejects Drac’s offer to join him in darkness:

  BUFFY: You know, I really think the thrall has gone out of our relationship. But I want to thank you for opening up my eyes a little.

  DRACULA: What is this?

  BUFFY: My true nature.

  Using the Slayer power is good; completely giving in to it is not. I’m speculating a bit here, but Joss is a known fan of Westerns, especially those of John Ford. Dracula’s challenge to Buffy reminds me of the great John Ford film The Searchers. The film provokes the question: at what point do I become what it is I fight? I think Joss may have drawn on it – The Searchers certainly inspired his show Firefly – for this episode (see trivia note 5 for more). Here’s an edited summary of the plot from Wikipedia, my emphasis added:

  “The year is 1868. Ethan Edwards returns from the Civil War, in which he fought for the Confederacy, to the home of his brother Aaron in rural northern Texas. Despite hints and supposition that Ethan has been up to no good, the movie's early scenes never explicitly frame Ethan for wrongdoing. … Shortly after his arrival, a Comanche raid leaves his brother and sister-in-law Martha, his nephew, Ben, all dead, and his two nieces, Lucy and Debbie, abducted, and the family homestead burned down.

  After the funeral, a group led by Captain Clayton goes in search of the raiding party. When they discover the location of the encampment, Ethan wants to attack immediately, before daylight. Clayton points out to Ethan that the Comanche generally kill their hostages at the first notice of a raid, which is something that Ethan already knows. This is the first sign that Ethan is willing not to bring the girls back alive. …

  One of the group, Brad Jorgensen, also Lucy's fiancé, says that someone will have to kill him to make him stop looking for Lucy. Aaron's adopted son, Martin Pawley, who is 1⁄8 Cherokee, feels the same way, and with the two of them, Ethan continues to pursue the Comanche. The three of them find where the main trail goes one way and four horses take off to the right, into a tight canyon pass. Ethan tells them that he will follow the small trail and that the two of them should stay on the main trail. When Ethan returns he is distracted and seemingly upset, but doesn't say anything. He also seems to have lost his Confederate Army long coat. Later Brad is out on scout duty on foot and returns to Ethan and Martin saying that he has found the Comanche camp, and has seen Lucy. At this point Ethan tells Brad and Martin that it wasn't Lucy, that he had already found the murdered body of Lucy in the canyon. He had wrapped her body in his coat, and buried her with his bare hands. Brad, enraged, mounts his horse and charges into the encampment alone, dying in a fruitless, suicidal attempt to avenge Lucy.

  Ethan and Martin lose the trail when the winter blizzards come. … Ethan and Martin continue to search for Debbie, a search that goes on for five years. During that time, she grows into adolescence and is taken as mate by Scar, the chief of the Nawyecka band of Comanche. Scar is presented as the cultural mirror image of Ethan. He hates whites every bit as much as Ethan hates Indians. Once Ethan realizes that Debbie has been mated to Scar, he undergoes a change. He no longer wants to rescue Debbie; he wants her dead, believing that a white woman being a Comanche's "squaw" is worse than death. Martin follows in hopes of stopping Ethan from killing the girl. When Ethan and Martin are alone with Debbie the first time, Ethan draws his pistol to murder his niece but Martin shields her with his own body. Ethan fires the pistol to kill Martin in order to get a clear shot at Debbie but his aim is ruined when he is struck by an Indian's arrow just as he pulls the trigger. Ethan and Martin have to run for cover and Debbie escapes execution by her uncle.

  Eventually Ethan, Martin, and the Texas Rangers find Debbie again…. Martin kills Scar and Ethan scalps the dead chief. Martin tries to prevent Ethan from killing Debbie, but it is Ethan himself who realizes how close he has come to destroying the last link to his family and how, in the act of scalping Scar, he himself has become what he hated so much. Instead of killing Debbie, he lifts her in his arms just as he did when she was
a child. Ethan brings Debbie to the safety of friends and then walks away. The film, which opened with a near-identical shot of another doorway, slowly revealing the film's landscape, finishes with a reversal: the film's players enter the darkness within the doorway, and the door closes, just before the end title, leaving Ethan isolated outside where he turns and wanders away into the wilderness.”

  Ethan’s fate is what Buffy seems to fear in her conversation with Giles after she dispatched Dracula. My friend Rahael from AtPO described it perfectly: “Buffy fears that she is more monstrous than anything she slays.” That’s the theme of the season.

  Here’s Marti Noxon describing the episode on the DVD commentary:

  “Thematically, what we were going for was that Dracula represents a kind of dark side that Buffy feels she has in her. …

  The scene in which Dracula makes Buffy bite him continues to explore the theme we had explored in season four, which was how much of her power comes from inside her that is a killer. And we went as far as to have her actually take blood from Dracula because, in a way, we were saying it’s already there.

  This is the side of the Slayer she has to make peace with. Either she’s gonna go all the way and embrace the darkness or she’s going to find a way to live with it.

  Those are constant themes in our show, which is about how you deal with power, and how you deal with your own darker impulses without becoming self-destructive or destructive to other people.”

  Understanding what her power means – that is, understanding herself – may help her avoid Ethan’s fate:

  BUFFY: (after a moment, softly) You haven't been my Watcher for a while. (Giles stops pouring) I haven't been training ... and I haven't really needed to come to you for help.

  GILES: (sadly) I agree. (sets down the teapot)

  BUFFY: (gestures helplessly, gets up to pace) And then this whole thing with Dracula ... it made me face up to some stuff. (Giles looks concerned) Ever since we did that spell where we called on the First Slayer ... I've been going out a lot. (Giles looks surprised) Every night.

  GILES: Patrolling?

  BUFFY: Hunting. That's ... what Dracula called it. (pacing) And he was right. He understood my power better than I do. He saw darkness in it.

  Shot of Giles looking very concerned.

  BUFFY: (sits down again) I need to know more. About where I come from, about the other slayers. I mean, maybe ... maybe if I could learn to control this thing, I could be stronger, I could be better. But ... I'm scared. I know it's gonna be hard. And I can't do it ... without you. I need your help. (pause) I need you to be my Watcher again.

  If you’re watching for the first time, the ending must be a WTF moment. Trust me, it was for all of us. You can’t say you weren’t warned, though. Two prophetic dreams foretold it. In the opening dream in This Year’s Girl, Faith told Buffy “Little sis coming. I know. So much to do before she gets here.” Then, in Restless, when Buffy left Tara to look for her friends, Tara called after her, “Be back before dawn.” We won’t learn it until the next episode, but her name is Dawn.

  Trivia notes: (1) Buffy’s “witch-fu” is a play on kung-fu, which actually refers “to any study, learning, or practice that requires patience, energy, and time to complete”. (2) Dracula arrives in a storm at night, just as he does in the novel. (3) Willow calls herself the “computer whisperer”, playing on the movie and book The Horse Whisperer. (4) Lestat, whom Buffy mentions to Dracula, is the lead character in a series of novels by Anne Rice (who was herself mentioned in the S2 episode School Hard). (5) When Buffy tells Dracula that calling her a killer makes it sounds like she “paints clowns”, that’s a reference to mass murderer John Wayne Gacy. John Wayne was the star of The Searchers, and I’m inclined to see the reference to his namesake as supporting my speculation. A later episode in S5 will also be based on a John Ford Western starring John Wayne. In addition, there is the fact that Spike refers to Riley as “cowboy” – it can’t be a reference to Riley’s role as “cowboy guy” in Willow’s dream in Restless because Spike had no way to know of that. It seems like Joss or writer Marti Noxon just had westerns on the brain. (6) Xander’s reference to Sesame Street is to the puppet Count von Count, who is modeled after Dracula. (7) Vlad the Impaler, the historical source for the Dracula legend, was a Prince of Wallachia (Romania) in the late 1400s. (8) Buffy has been bitten twice in the same place, once by the Master and once by Angel. It’s the scar there which Dracula sees. However, the dialogue seems to refer only to Angel. (9) The three sisters Giles encounters are the brides of Dracula. (10) Xander got the funny syphilis in Pangs.

  Real Me

  I like Real Me quite a bit, but I’m kind of trapped by my no spoilers policy when it comes to writing about it. The episode is telling us so much about the rest of the season that anything I say might give away key details of plot or metaphor.

  We know from experience with previous years that the first 3 episodes of each season set the stage for events to come. Real Me foreshadows the plot of the season finale, which I won’t spoil, but it also introduces us to Dawn. Early on we get a clue that Dawn’s arrival was foreshadowed. From Buffy’s dream in Graduation Day 2:

  Buffy looking down: "There's something I'm supposed to be doing."

  Faith: "Oh yeah. - Miles to go - Little Ms. Muffet counting down from 7-3-0."

  In the scene outside the Magic Box, the crazy man tells Dawn “I know you. Curds and whey.” That’s an explicit reference back to the “Little Miss Muffet” line (“Little Miss Muffet sat on her tuffet/eating her curds and whey”). This is in addition to the prophetic dreams from This Year’s Girl and Restless which I discussed in my Buffy v. Dracula post. The crazy man then tells her what we in the audience know but those inside the show don’t: “You don’t belong here.”

  If Dawn’s arrival was foreshadowed so often and so long before, we know she must be important. Indeed she is. But since I can’t talk about the details yet, I want to emphasize one aspect of Dawn’s role in S5. I’ve argued repeatedly that other characters can serve as metaphors as well as being characters in their own right; the events of Primeval and Restless made this explicit. It won’t surprise you, then, to learn that I think Dawn plays a metaphorical role as well as being a character. I’m not going to say, yet, what she stands for, but Buffy will eventually tell us in the season finale. If Dawn is here to teach us something about Buffy – and that’s the whole point of the entire show in my reading – then Dawn’s metaphorical role ought to lead us to wonder about the title of this episode and who it refers to.

  For discussion later, I want to list some of Dawn’s characteristics which we see in Real Me. She keeps a diary. She loves Willow, she loves Xander, she loves her mother. She thinks Giles might not like her because he’s so old, she finds Buffy’s training boring, and she resents the fact that Buffy is always telling her what to do even if, in some sense, she idolizes her sister. She likes Tara, she’s not so sure about Anya. Interestingly, she expresses no opinion about Riley. She feels isolated at times, and she gets to be the child of the family in a way that Buffy wishes she could. I’ll come back to these in the finale.

  The teaser shows us Buffy starting her journey of self-exploration with Giles, the one she said she wanted to make at the end of Buffy v. Dracula: “GILES VOICEOVER: Focus inward. Let the world fall away….” At this point, Dawn interrupts the session. That’s not merely the kind of thing a younger sister would do, it’s directly related to Dawn’s role this season.

  Some of what happens in this episode is very subtle. There are looks, for example, which will become meaningful only in hindsight. The fact that they’re here demonstrates how far in advance certain stories were planned.

  Trivia notes: (1) Riley’s mention of “the invasion of Normandy” refers to the D-Day landings in World War II. (2) Giles lost his last car when Spike crashed it in A New Man. He hasn’t driven one since. (3) Willow’s intent to take drama class was mentioned in The Yoko Factor and became part of her drea
m in Restless. (4) The name of the dead shopkeeper, Mr. Bogarty, was a joke based on Angelus calling the Magic Shop “the local boogedy-boogedy store” in Passion. (5) Buffy refers to the Magic Shop as a deathtrap because previous owners were killed in Passion and Lovers Walk. (6) For non-native-English speakers, this dialogue contains a pun: “WILLOW: You're on Dawn duty. (Buffy looks annoyed.) BUFFY: Oh, duty.” The word “dooty” (pronounced like “duty”) is slang for “feces”. It’s a way for Buffy to say “Oh shit” without being censored. (7) Harmony’s love of unicorns was, believe it or not, shown when we saw her hanging a unicorn poster in The Initiative. (8) When Xander greets Dawn with “Dawn patrol”, that’s a reference to a 1930 movie of that name. (9) Xander’s “Here comes the judge” quotes a famous line from the 1960s comedy show Rowan & Martin’s Laugh-In. (10) Xander tells Harmony that he doesn’t want to get into a hair pulling contest with her because they previously did that in The Initiative. (11) Xander’s “Ruffles have ridges” refers to the old advertising slogan for the potato chip company. (12) Xander’s mention of the Fortress of Solitude refers to Superman’s fortress. (13) Buffy’s mention of “the life expectancy of a Spinal Tap drummer” refers to the movie This Is Spinal Tap. (14) Giles watched Passions with Spike because, as we learned in Something Blue, that’s Spike’s favorite show.

 

‹ Prev