Collected Works of Booth Tarkington
Page 543
There are, indeed, Parliaments in Prussia and in the German Empire, but they are weak bodies, being little more than debating societies. German writers have called the Reichstag, the most powerful assembly in Germany, a “Hall of Echoes.” Even this body can do little except to register its assent or disapproval of plans presented to it by the Emperor’s ministers. These ministers can, and on occasion do, defy the representatives of the German people and taunt them with their powerlessness to oppose the wishes of the Emperor. There is no democracy in the German Government, nor any safety for democracy in any land while the despotism of Prussia exists. This power, resting upon a large structure of militarism which has sacrificed everything to make the nation efficient in war, is the power which has attacked the United States. It can be resisted only by force of arms, because that is the argument to which it has appealed. This means that unless this war is won by the forces which are fighting in defence of democracy, we must prepare ourselves to undergo a discipline as rigorous and to support a burden as heavy as that now borne by the German people. A standing army of tremendous size, supported by huge expenditures for the latest and best equipment, would be forced upon this nation as a permanent institution, so long as the menace of Prussian military power remained. There is not only mighty force in Germany, but the determination to use that force in aggression against the rest of the world. The declarations of the Emperor to Ambassador Gerard show that Germany was planning to strike at the United States when she had finished the present conflict. Already official German press dispatches talk of “the next war” which shall give Germany the world dominion she so much covets. The chief benefit of a victory for the opponents of such aggression would be greater safety for democracy, which is but another way of saying greater freedom and opportunity for the common man in every nation.
This, and other gains from this war belongs to the rich man and the poor man alike. This war, which secures such benefits, is indeed everybody’s war.
The costs of this great struggle are tremendous and they are to be borne by those to whom the benefits shall come. As all the people gain, so all contribute of their services and powers to the support of the government in its prosecution of the war. The Selective Service Law has given us a truly democratic army into which we have called all our young men, without distinction between rich and poor. In calling for contributions of money, also, the Government has not laid upon the poor burdens greater than they ought to be called upon to bear in this hour of great danger to the nation. The charge that this war was undertaken at the behest of the rich men of the country finds strong refutation in the distribution of taxes in all war revenue bills passed by the last Congress. In this law the heaviest contributions are laid upon large incomes and profits from great business. A Congress which made war upon the order of the wealthy would hardly have dared to treat its masters so. The taxes which would most directly affect the great mass of the people, such as those on tea, coffee and sugar were not accepted by the lawmakers, though urged upon their attention. It cannot, however, be argued that the rich man is only paying for special advantages he will gain from the war. There are no gains which will come to the rich in which all the people will not share. The advantages of living in a world freed from the menace of Prussian Militarism are of greater value to the poor man than to the rich. In a state where there is no democracy the advantages of the rich man over the poor are greatly increased. The security won by this war is valuable to all Americans, without respect to wealth. In no sense can this be called a rich man’s war.
A further burden now being borne by the property owners of this country arises from the depreciation in the value of their investments in stocks and bonds. Many of the most reliable issues have suffered a serious decline in price. The underlying cause is not to be found in the activities of speculators and jugglers of the stock market. Many factors combine to produce this result, among which should certainly be named the heavy taxes which have been found necessary in order to support this war. The United States Government, further, has come into the financial field offering bonds at an unusually high rate of interest and this has had the effect of making other investments less attractive and hence of lowering their price. It is idle to argue that these losses are only on paper. They are real losses in value, since they are based on the decreases in the income yielded by the securities. Nor can it be argued that the rich get a return for the burden thus borne, since they gain nothing from this war which is not shared by everyone in the country, whether or not he owns a single bond or share of stock.
In particular it can be shown clearly and briefly that the American participation in this war does not benefit the makers of munitions in any such degree as the public has been led to believe. The first false impression to be overcome is the notion that the making of munitions during the present war has been uniformly profitable at a fabulous rate. The fact is quite the contrary.
Figures compiled by the United States Treasury Department reveal that only about half the munition makers of the country earned enough to make them taxable under the special taxes imposed by Congress. These figures relate to the period prior to the declaration of war by the United States, the time when the profits in this particular business were at their greatest. Figures produced in Congress during the debates on the subject of special taxation of profits from munition making proved clearly, that, while a few concerns had made large amounts of money, the general run of concerns in this business had not earned a rate of profit upon their investments equal to that obtained in the field of ordinary business. To use a business phrase, the making of munitions has been a particularly “spotty” sort of enterprise. It is notable that one of the concerns whose aggregate gains have reached the highest figure has actually earned a rate of profit less than that prevailing in the general run of industrial undertakings. Bankruptcy has been the fate of many an enterprise in this field. This experience, it should be added, has not been confined to the United States, but has been duplicated in all the belligerent countries. Abroad most of the war taxation of excess profits was at first aimed solely at the munition manufacturers, because it was thought that they would be most likely to reap unusual gains from the war situation. In all these countries the event proved this to be a false assumption, and the taxes have therefore been broadened to include other lines of enterprise. The fact of the matter is that those who reap the greatest gains from their nation’s participation in war are the producers of the fundamental raw materials upon which the structure of industry rests. The list of such producers includes the miner and the farmer, but not the maker of shrapnel.
The entry of the United States into the war has, moreover, hurt, rather than helped the munition makers. Their taxes have been increased, until they now bear a burden heavier than that laid upon similar industries in Great Britain. Though the rate of the American tax is lower, the basis upon which excess profits are computed in such less favorable to the corporations than that used in England. In addition to this our munitions manufacturers no longer profit from the advantageous market they formerly enjoyed. Their dealings with our own Government are on the basis of fixed prices which cut the margin of profit to a small figure. As the buying of the Allies becomes centralized the possibility of getting a higher price from foreign governments also disappears. Without mentioning increasing costs due to labor conditions consequent upon the entry of this country into the war the situation of the maker of munitions is worse than it was before the United States joined the ranks of Germany’s foes. The munition makers were in a position to know these things before our Government declared war. They can hardly be thought to have urged such a step.
The war cannot be called a “rich man’s war,” for it is everybody’s war. The benefits to be gained belong to everyone in the nation. In particular, it is fallacy to hold that the rich man, or any fragment of them, such as the munition makers, urged the war for their own gains. They now bear a heavy burden, it is true, but they will derive no benefits other than those shar
ed by all the people when the world shall have been made safe for all the people.
The Delphi Classics Catalogue
We are proud to present a listing of our complete catalogue of English titles, with new titles being added every month. Buying direct from our website means you can make great savings and take advantage of our instant Updates service. You can even purchase an entire series (Super Set) at a special discounted price.
Only from our website can readers purchase a complete Parts Edition of our titles. When you buy a Parts Edition, you will receive a folder of your chosen author’s works, with each novel, play, poetry collection, non-fiction book and more divided into its own special volume. This allows you to read individual novels etc. and to know precisely where you are in an eBook. For more information, please visit our Parts Edition page.
Series Contents
Series One
Anton Chekhov
Charles Dickens
D.H. Lawrence
Dickensiana Volume I
Edgar Allan Poe
Elizabeth Gaskell
Fyodor Dostoyevsky
George Eliot
H. G. Wells
Henry James
Ivan Turgenev
Jack London
James Joyce
Jane Austen
Joseph Conrad
Leo Tolstoy
Louisa May Alcott
Mark Twain
Oscar Wilde
Robert Louis Stevenson
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
Sir Walter Scott
The Brontës
Thomas Hardy
Virginia Woolf
Wilkie Collins
William Makepeace Thackeray
Series Two
Alexander Pushkin
Alexandre Dumas (English)
Andrew Lang
Anthony Trollope
Bram Stoker
Christopher Marlowe
Daniel Defoe
Edith Wharton
F. Scott Fitzgerald
G. K. Chesterton
Gustave Flaubert (English)
H. Rider Haggard
Herman Melville
Honoré de Balzac (English)
J. W. von Goethe (English)
Jules Verne
L. Frank Baum
Lewis Carroll
Marcel Proust (English)
Nathaniel Hawthorne
Nikolai Gogol
O. Henry
Rudyard Kipling
Tobias Smollett
Victor Hugo
William Shakespeare
Series Three
Ambrose Bierce
Ann Radcliffe
Ben Jonson
Charles Lever
Émile Zola
Ford Madox Ford
Geoffrey Chaucer
George Gissing
George Orwell
Guy de Maupassant
H. P. Lovecraft
Henrik Ibsen
Henry David Thoreau
Henry Fielding
J. M. Barrie
James Fenimore Cooper
John Buchan
John Galsworthy
Jonathan Swift
Kate Chopin
Katherine Mansfield
L. M. Montgomery
Laurence Sterne
Mary Shelley
Sheridan Le Fanu
Washington Irving
Series Four
Arnold Bennett
Arthur Machen
Beatrix Potter
Bret Harte
Captain Frederick Marryat
Charles Kingsley
Charles Reade
G. A. Henty
Edgar Rice Burroughs
Edgar Wallace
E. M. Forster
E. Nesbit
George Meredith
Harriet Beecher Stowe
Jerome K. Jerome
John Ruskin
Maria Edgeworth
M. E. Braddon
Miguel de Cervantes
M. R. James
R. M. Ballantyne
Robert E. Howard
Samuel Johnson
Stendhal
Stephen Crane
Zane Grey
Series Five
Algernon Blackwood
Anatole France
Beaumont and Fletcher
Charles Darwin
Edward Bulwer-Lytton
Edward Gibbon
E. F. Benson
Frances Hodgson Burnett
Friedrich Nietzsche
George Bernard Shaw
George MacDonald
Hilaire Belloc
John Bunyan
John Webster
Margaret Oliphant
Maxim Gorky
Oliver Goldsmith
Radclyffe Hall
Robert W. Chambers
Samuel Butler
Samuel Richardson
Sir Thomas Malory
Thomas Carlyle
William Harrison Ainsworth
William Dean Howells
William Morris
Series Six
Anthony Hope
Aphra Behn
Arthur Morrison
Baroness Emma Orczy
Captain Mayne Reid
Charlotte M. Yonge
Charlotte Perkins Gilman
E. W. Hornung
Ellen Wood
Frances Burney
Frank Norris
Frank R. Stockton
Hall Caine
Horace Walpole
One Thousand and One Nights
R. Austin Freeman
Rafael Sabatini
Saki
Samuel Pepys
Sir Issac Newton
Stanley J. Weyman
Thomas De Quincey
Thomas Middleton
Voltaire
William Hazlitt
William Hope Hodgson
Series Seven
Adam Smith
Benjamin Disraeli
Confucius
David Hume
E. M. Delafield
E. Phillips Oppenheim
Edmund Burke
Ernest Hemingway
Frances Trollope
Galileo Galilei
Guy Boothby
Hans Christian Andersen
Ian Fleming
Immanuel Kant
Karl Marx
Kenneth Grahame
Lytton Strachey
Mary Wollstonecraft
Michel de Montaigne
René Descartes
Richard Marsh
Sax Rohmer
Sir Richard Burton
Talbot Mundy
Thomas Babington Macaulay
W. W. Jacobs
Series Eight
Anna Katharine Green
Arthur Schopenhauer
The Brothers Grimm
C. S. Lewis
Charles and Mary Lamb
Elizabeth von Arnim
Ernest Bramah
Francis Bacon
Gilbert and Sullivan
Grant Allen
Henryk Sienkiewicz
Hugh Walpole
Jean-Jacques Rousseau
John Locke
John Muir
Joseph Addison
Lafcadio Hearn
Lord Dunsany
Marie Corelli
Niccolò Machiavelli
Ouida
Richard Brinsley Sheridan
Sigmund Freud
Theodore Dreiser
Walter Pater
W. Somerset Maugham
Series Nine
Aldous Huxley
August Strindberg
Booth Tarkington
C. S. Forester
Erasmus
Eugene Sue
Fergus Hume
George Moore
Gertrude Stein
Giovanni Boccaccio
Izaak Walton
J. M. Synge
Johanna Spyri
>
John Galt
Maurice Leblanc
Max Brand
Molière
Norse Sagas
R. D. Blackmore
R. S. Surtees
Sir Thomas More
Stephen Leacock
The Harvard Classics
Thomas Love Peacock
Thomas Paine
William James
Series Ten
A. E. W. Mason
Abraham Lincoln
Baruch Spinoza
Carolyn Wells
Charles Brockden Brown
Earl Derr Biggers
Evelyn Waugh
Fred M. White
Frederick Douglass
Gaston Leroux
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel
George Berkeley
Howard Pyle
John Kendrick Bangs
John Steinbeck
John Stuart Mill
Marion Crawford
Martin Luther
Penny Dreadfuls Collection
Sherwood Anderson
Thomas Dekker
Thomas Hobbes
Thomas Jefferson
Willa Cather
William Faulkner
William Le Queux
Ancient Classics
Achilles Tatius
Aeschines
Aeschylus
Ammianus Marcellinus
Apollodorus
Appian
Apuleius
Apollonius of Rhodes
Aristophanes
Aristotle
Arrian
Athenaeus
Augustine
Aulus Gellius
Bede
Callimachus
Cassius Dio
Cato
Catullus
Cicero
Claudian
Clement of Alexandria
Cornelius Nepos
Demosthenes
Dio Chrysostom
Diodorus Siculus
Dionysius of Halicarnassus
Diogenes Laërtius
Ennius
Epictetus
Euripides
Florus
Frontius
Fronto
Herodotus
Hesiod
Hippocrates
Homer
Horace
Isocrates
Josephus
Julian
Julius Caesar
Juvenal