by C. P. Snow
“Is that you, Eliot?”
“Yes.”
“I have bad news for you, old chap.”
“Yes.”
It did not need saying, but the kind, steady, deliberate voice went on: “Roy Calvert is missing from last night. His wife has just been in. I’ll see that she is properly looked after. She’s taking it very sturdily.”
“Thank you, Arthur.”
“I’m more sorry than I can say. I suppose there is a little hope, but I cannot hold it out to you.”
I did not reply. I could not reply. I had been swept by the first paralysing shock of death.
“If he is dead,” Arthur Brown’s voice came firmly, “we have lost someone who will never be replaced.”
For nights I could not sleep – or when I did, awoke from nightmares that tormented me as Roy’s had once tormented him. I thought of his nightmares, to get away for a second from my own. For mine, in those first nights, were intolerable with the physical imagination of his death. Sleeping or waking, I was lapped by waves of horror. A word would bring him back – “stuffed” or “Welsh” or often one that was not his special use – and I could not shut out the terrifying pictures of the imagination: the darkness, the face in the fire, the moments of unendurable anguish and fear, the face in the fire, the intolerable agony of such a death.
Nothing could guard me from that horror. It was impossible to harden oneself to such a death.
While that physical dread swept over me night and day (sometimes another pain attacked me: the night he died, I was dining happily with friends at Claridges), I could not bear to see anyone who wanted to give me hope. I could not bear to see anyone who knew him. I got through my committees somehow. I did my work. For the rest, I went about alone, or searched for company. Any company that would not bring him back.
This was the second time I had known intense grief through death. I could understand well enough the mad, frantic, obsessed concentration on his grief into which Lord Boscastle threw himself after the death of his son. I could understand well enough how some in grief squandered themselves in orgies.
After a fortnight of those days and nights, the first shock lessened. I had still spoken to no one about him, though I had managed to write a note to Rosalind. I was not ready for it yet. But I found myself searching for recollections of him. Time after time, I went over each detail of that last evening: it had seemed so light and casual when it happened, far less significant than a hundred other times we had talked together. Now I knew it off by heart. I kept asking myself questions to which there could never be an answer: just because of that they were sharp as a wound. What was the book that I should never receive? When he talked of his daughter, was he giving me instructions? Did he fear that this was his last chance to do so? Had he been fey that evening? Was he acting so lightly, to give me peace?
Then came the final news that he was dead. It was not an added shock. It meant only that I could indulge myself no longer. It was time to see others who were stricken. I would have avoided it if there had been a way: there was nothing for it but to go among them, and listen.
I sat through a night in Curzon Street with Lady Muriel and Joan. Joan was prostrate and speechless, her face brooding, white, so still that it seemed the muscles were frozen. Of those who loved him, perhaps she suffered most. Lady Muriel was like a rock. In the first shriek of pain, her daughter had told her everything about her love for Roy. Lady Muriel had forgotten propriety, had forgotten control, and had tried to comfort her. Lady Muriel had never been able to speak from her own heart; she had never seen into another’s; but when one of her children came to her in manifest agony, she lavished on them all her dumb, clumsy, overpowering affection. It was better for Joan than any subtler sympathy. For the first time since her childhood, she depended on her mother. She gained a deep, primitive consolation. Like all of us, she had laughed at Lady Muriel; she had produced for Roy’s benefit some of the absurdities, the grotesque snobberies, the feats of misunderstanding, which Lady Muriel incorrigibly perpetrated; but after she was driven to tell her mother how she suffered, Joan felt again that Lady Muriel was larger than life and that her heart was warm.
I thought that, of the two, Lady Muriel would be more crippled. For Joan was very strong; she had not a happy nature, but underneath there was a fierce, tough vitality as unquenchable as her mother’s; and she was still young. She would never be quite the same through knowing Roy – but I believed she was resilient enough to love again with all her heart.
It would not be so for Lady Muriel. It had taken an unusual man to tease her, to see that she was not formidable, to make her crow with delight. To find a friend like Roy – so clear-sighted, so utterly undeceived by exterior harshness – was a chance which would not come again. With age, disaster and loss, she was becoming on the outside more gruff and unbending. She would put everyone off, more completely than in the past. It would only be Joan who came close to her. Yet that night, her neck was stiff, her head upright, as she said goodbye in the old formula.
“Good evening, Mr – Lewis. It was good of you to come and see us.”
I went to see Rosalind in Cambridge. She had hoped right up to the end. She had seemed callous and thoughtless to many people; but I noticed that, in a few weeks, the hair on her temples had gone grey. I mentioned it.
“It doesn’t matter,” she cried. “He won’t see it, will he?”
She sobbed most of the time I was with her. She was trying to recapture every physical memory of him. She wanted to think of him, feature, skin and muscle, until she could recreate him in the flesh.
It was pagan. It was what all human beings felt, I thought, when someone dies whom they have loved in the body. Above all with sexual love – but also with the love one bears a son or anyone who is physically dear. If one has been truly bereaved, all resignation is driven away. Whatever one’s mind says, one craves that they may live again. One cannot help but crave for resurrection and a life to come. But it would all be meaningless, a ghastly joke, without the resurrection of the body. One craves for that above all. Anything else would be a parody of the life we cry out to have restored. Rosalind did not believe in an afterlife, did not believe in resurrection, either of the body or anything else; she believed that Roy had gone into annihilation. Yet with every atom of her whole existence, she begged that he might come to her again in the flesh.
We all found a kind of comfort in anything to do with his memory: as though by putting ourselves out, by being busy, by talking of him and making arrangements, we were prolonging his life. So Arthur Brown spent days organising the memorial service; and I occupied myself with the obituaries. It seemed to push back the emptiness – and I became obsessed, beyond any realism, beyond any importance that they could possibly carry, that the notices should praise his work and should not lie. I wanted them to say that he was a great scholar, and try to explain his achievement. For the rest, let them say as little as could be. It was hard to tell the truth about any man; the conventional phrases, the habits of thought which came so glibly, masked all that men were like. For Roy to be written about in the “stuffed” terms which he had spent so much of his life mocking – that I found painful out of proportion. He had spoken of himself with nothing but candour: with none of the alleviating lies which helped the rest of us to fancy ourselves at times: with a candour that was clear, light, naked and terrible. It would be a bitter irony to have that tone silenced, and hear the public voices boom out about his virtues and his sacrifice.
I broke my silence about my own feelings in order to get Arthur Brown’s help. He saw the point; he saw also that I was desperately moved, and exerted himself for my sake as well as Roy’s. The chief obituaries finally appeared as curiously technical, bare, and devoid of human touches; they puzzled and disappointed many people.
Perhaps because I was silent about Roy’s death, I did not receive much sympathy myself. One or two near to me were able to intrude – and I was grateful. Otherwise, I would rather have t
hings as they were, and hear nothing.
Lady Boscastle wrote to me delicately and gracefully. And, to my astonishment, I had a note from her husband. It was short:
“My dear Eliot, They tell me that Roy Calvert is dead too. When last I saw you, those young men were alive. I had my son, and you your friend. I have no comfort to offer you. It is only left for us to throw away the fooleries of consolation, and curse into the silly face of fate until our own time comes.
B.”
I was given one other unexpected sign of feeling. One night I was sitting in my office; the memorial service was taking place next morning, and I was just about to leave for Cambridge. The attendant opened the door, and Francis Getliffe came in.
“I’m very sorry about Calvert,” he said without any introduction, curtly and with embarrassment.
“Thank you, Francis,” I said.
“The memorial service is tomorrow, isn’t it?”
I was surprised at the question, for Francis was rigid in never going inside the chapel. He and Winslow were the only unbelievers in the college who made it a matter of principle.
“Yes.”
“I’d come,” he said. “But I’ve got this meeting. I daren’t leave it.”
Francis had been found unimportant jobs, had been kept off committees, since he opposed the bombing campaign. He was just forcing his way back.
“No, you mustn’t,” I said. “It’s good of you to tell me, though.”
“I didn’t understand him,” said Francis. “I’m sorry we didn’t get on.”
He looked at me with a frown of distress.
“He must have been a very brave man,” he went on. He added, with difficult, friendly concern: “I’m sorry for you personally, Lewis.”
40: Memorial Service
I was lying awake the next morning when Bidwell pulled up the blind. The room filled with the bright May sunlight; above the college roofs, the sky was a milky blue.
“It’s a sad old day, sir,” said Bidwell.
I muttered.
“I wish I was bringing you his compliments, sir, and one of his messages.”
Bidwell came to the side of the bed, and gazed down at me. His small cunning eyes were round and open with trouble.
“Why did he do it, sir? I know you’ve got ways of thinking it out that we haven’t. But I’ve been thinking it out my own way, and I don’t feel right about it now. He’d got everything he could wish for, hadn’t he, sir? He wasn’t what you’d call properly happy, though he’d always got a joke for any of us. I don’t see why he did it. There’s something wrong about it. I don’t claim to know where. It won’t be the same place for me now, sir. Though he did give me a lot of trouble sometimes. He was a very particular gentleman, was Mr Calvert. But I should feel a bit easy if I knew why he did it.”
When I went out into the court, the smell of wistaria – with pitiless intensity – brought back other mornings in May. The servants were walking about with brushes and pans; one or two young men were sitting in their windows. For a second, I felt it incredible that Roy should be dead; it was so incredible that I felt a mirage-like relief; he was so full of life, he would soon be there.
Then in reaction I was gripped by savage resentment – resentment that these people were walking heedlessly through the court, resentment that all was going on as before. Their lives were unchanged, they carried no mark, they were calling casually to each other. I felt, with a sudden chill, the irrevocability of death.
The bell began to toll at a quarter to eleven. Soon the paths in the court were busy with groups of people moving to the chapel. From my window, I saw the senior fellow, Gay, who was eighty-six, hobbling his way there with minute steps. Lady Muriel and Joan followed him, both in black; as at the old Master’s funeral, they walked with their backs stiff and their mouths firm.
I took my place in the fellows’ stall. The chapel was full, as full as it had been for the funeral of Vernon Royce. Roy had been a figure in the town, and there were many visitors from other colleges. There was also Foulkes, in uniform, and a knot of other orientalists, sitting together. All the fellows had come except Getliffe, Luke (who was in Canada) – and old Winslow. Stubborn to the last, he had decided he would not set foot in the chapel – even to honour the memory of a young man he liked. It was like his old proud, cross-grained self.
There were many women in the chapel. Rosalind was given a stall by the Master’s; she was veiled and weeping. Lady Muriel and Joan sat just under her. Mrs Seymour was placed near the undergraduates. There were other, younger women, some of whom I knew slightly or had heard of from Roy. One or two I did not know at all – one struck me in particular, for she was beautiful.
“There seem to be several widows,” I heard someone in front of me whisper. He came from another college. I did not mind. I was ready for them to know him as he was.
For days past there had been a hidden bitter dispute in the college about who should officiate at the service. By all tradition, convention, and precedent, Despard-Smith had an unshakable claim. He was the only fellow in orders; he had taken every memorial service for the last thirty years; he assumed that as of right he would preside at this one, as he had done at the old Master’s.
But Arthur Brown did not like it. He had heard that last conflict between the old man and Roy. He knew, and so did most of the fellows, that Despard-Smith had been an enemy of Roy’s, throughout his time there. Brown also knew that Despard-Smith was one of the few people alive who did not come within Roy’s charity.
Brown was the last man in the college to make an unnecessary disturbance; he was willing to put up with a great many nuisances for the sake of a decent and clubbable life; and no one had more respect for precedent. But he could not let this pass. It was not fitting for Despard-Smith to speak in memory of Roy. Brown used all his expertness, all his experience of managing awkward situations, all his ability to get hints dropped and friendly representations made: but nothing came of it. Despard-Smith took it for granted that he would celebrate the service. Brown caused it to be suggested by other fellows that Calvert had intimate friends, such as Udal, in the church. It would give great pleasure if one of those officiated. Despard-Smith said that it would be reprehensible on his part to forsake his duty.
At last Brown fell back on the extreme obstinacy which he always held in reserve. He decided to “have it out” with the old man. For Brown, who disliked any unpleasant scene, it was an ordeal. But I had no doubt that he spoke his mind with absolute firmness. Even then Despard-Smith would not give way. He could not abrogate his moral responsibility, he said. If his taking the service gave too much offence, then there should be no service at all.
All that Brown could secure was a compromise about the actual oration. Despard-Smith was willing to be guided by Calvert’s friends upon what should be said. He would not pledge himself to use any specific form of words. But, if Brown gave him the notes for an address, he would use them so far as he felt justified.
So that morning Despard-Smith took the service. He looked younger than usual, buoyed up like other old men when a young one died – as though full of triumph that he was living on.
He did his office with dignity. At his age he was still spare, bleak, and erect. He viewed the crowded chapel severely: his voice had not lost its resonance. Some of the women cried as he spoke of Roy. Lady Muriel and Joan were dry-eyed, just as they had been at the old Master’s funeral. Just as at that service, Despard-Smith got through his work. Brown frowned; heavy-faced, his high colour darkened, throughout the address.
I was glad when it was over. The old clergyman told us, as he had told us before at other memorial services, that there was no sorrow in death for him who had passed over. “He has gone in great joy to meet his God. There should be no sorrow for the sake of our dear colleague. It is we who loved him who feel the sorrow. It is our lives which are darker, not his. We must try to conquer our deprivation in the thought of his exceeding joy.”
That was com
mon form. So was much of what he said about Roy’s life in college – “very quiet in all his good actions, never seeking power or fame or worldly pleasures, never entertaining an unkind thought, never saying an unkind word”.
He had said almost exactly the same of Vernon Royce: I remembered catching a flash in Roy’s eye as he heard that last astonishing encomium.
Then Despard-Smith put in something new.
“Our dear colleague was young. Perhaps he had not yet come to his full wisdom. If he had a fault, perhaps it was to be impatient of the experience that the years bring to us. Perhaps he had not yet learned all that the years must tell us of the tears of things. Lachrymae rerum. The tears of things. But how fortunate he was, our dear colleague, to pass over in the glory of his youth, before he tasted the tears of things. There is no sorrow in such a death. To have known only the glory and happiness of youth, and then to cast away life for one’s country. ‘Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori’.”
The old man realised he had departed from his brief. He was a man who stuck to his contract; he adjusted his spectacles, fumbled with his notes, and began to read Arthur Brown’s version. It was clear and simple. Despard-Smith read it monotonously, without much meaning or inflection until the end. Brown had put down Roy’s great successes. And he had written: “He could have stayed in safety. But he chose otherwise. The heart knows its own bitterness.” Brown meant it as a comment on Roy’s whole experience, but Despard-Smith read it as mechanically as the rest.
The service ended. The fellows filed out first. Arthur Brown pressed my hand without a word. I wanted to escape before the others came into the court. I went across quickly to my rooms in the bright sunlight. The cold wind was getting up.
I had a few last things to do. Our belongings in college had been mixed up together. I happened to have a safe in my room, and there he had stored some of his manuscripts. I unlocked it, took out one or two of his papers, read through them, considered how they should be disposed of. Then I went down to the college cellar, under the kitchen. For years we had shared a section of the cellar together; we did not buy much wine, but there were a few dozen bottles of mine on the top racks, a rather less number of his below. His racks were labelled in his own hand.
