Smith, Culver H. The Press, Politics, and Patronage: The American Government’s Use of Newspapers, 1789–1875. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1977.
Smith, Elbert B. Magnificent Missourian: The Life of Thomas Hart Benton. New York: J. B. Lippincott, 1958.
Snay, Mitchell. Gospel of Disunion: Religion and Separatism in the Antebellum South. Chapel Hill: UNC Press, 1997.
Spangler, Michael. “Benjamin Brown French in the Lincoln Period,” White House History 8 (Fall 2000), 4–17.
Spofford, Harriet Prescott. “The Messenger Boys at the Capitol,” Harper’s Young People 63 (January 11, 1881).
Springer, Keith L. “Cold Water Congressmen: The Congressional Temperance Society Before the Civil War,” Historian 27, no. 4 (1965): 498–515.
Stahr, Walter. Seward: Lincoln’s Indispensable Man. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2012.
Stegmaier, Mark J. Texas, New Mexico, and the Compromise of 1850: Boundary Dispute and Sectional Crisis. Kent, Ohio: Kent State University Press, 1996.
Steward, Dick. Duels and the Roots of Violence in Missouri. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2000.
Stewart, James Brewer. “Christian Statesmanship, Codes of Honor, and Congressional Violence: The Antislavery Travails and Triumphs of Joshua Giddings,” in Paul Finkelman and Donald R. Kennon, eds., In the Shadow of Freedom: The Politics of Slavery in the National Capital. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2011.
________. Joshua R. Giddings and the Tactics of Radical Politics. Cleveland: Press of Case Western Reserve University, 1970.
Stott, Richard. Jolly Fellows: Male Milieus in Nineteenth-Century America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins, 2009.
Strange, Carolyn, Robert Cribb, and Christopher E. Forth, eds. Honour, Violence and Emotions in History. London: Bloomsbury, 2014.
Struble, Robert Struble, Jr. “House Turnover and the Principle of Rotation,” Political Science Quarterly 4 (Winter 1979–80): 649–67.
Summers, Mark W. The Press Gang: Newspapers and Politics, 1865–1878. Chapel Hill: UNC Press, 1994.
Sundquist, James L. Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute, 1983.
Swift, Elaine K. The Making of an American Senate: Reconstitutive Change in Congress, 1787–1841. East Lansing: University of Michigan Press, 2002.
Tatham, David. “Winslow Homer’s ‘Arguments of the Chivalry,’” American Art Journal 5 (May 1973): 86–89.
Thayer, Shelly A. “The Delegate and the Duel: The Early Political Career of George Wallace Jones,” Palimpsest 5 (September–October 1984): 178–88.
Theriault, Sean M., and Barry R. Weingast. “Agenda Manipulation, Strategic Voting, and Legislative Details in the Compromise of 1850,” in Party, Process, and Political Change in Congress, ed. David Brady and Matthew McCubbins, 2 vols. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2002.
Thompson, Margaret Susan. The “Spider Web”: Congress and Lobbying in the Age of Grant. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985.
Thomsen, Jacqueline. “GOP Lawmaker Once Held a Knife to Boehner’s Throat,” The Hill, October 29, 2017, thehill.com/blogs/in-the-know/in-the-know/357743-gop-lawmaker-once-held-a-knife-to-boehners-throat.
Tilly, Charles. The Politics of Collective Violence. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Tomich, Dale W., ed. The Politics of the Second Slavery. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2016.
________. Through the Prism of Slavery: Labor, Capital, and World Economy. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004.
Trachtenberg, Alan. Lincoln’s Smile and Other Enigmas. New York: Hill and Wang, 2007.
Trefousse, Hans L. Andrew Johnson: A Biography. New York: Norton, 1989.
________. The Radical Republicans: Lincoln’s Vanguard for Racial Justice. New York: Knopf, 1969.
________. Thaddeus Stevens: Nineteenth-Century Egalitarian. Chapel Hill: UNC Press, 1997.
Tyrell, Ian R. Sobering Up: From Temperance to Prohibition in Antebellum America, 1800–1860. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1979.
Uslaner, Eric M. “Comity in Context: Confrontation in Historical Perspective,” British Journal of Political Science 21 (1991): 45–77.
________. The Decline of Comity in Congress. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1993.
________. “Is the Senate More Civil Than the House?” in Esteemed Colleagues: Civility and Deliberation in the U.S. Senate, ed. Burdett A. Loomis. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 2000, 32–55.
Van Cleve, George William. A Slaveholders’ Union: Slavery, Politics, and the Constitution in the Early Republic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.
Varon, Elizabeth R. We Mean to Be Counted: White Women and Politics in Antebellum Virginia. Chapel Hill: UNC Press, 1998.
Vollweiler, Albert T. “The Nature of Life in Congress (1850–1861),” Quarterly Journal of the University of North Dakota 6, no. 1 (October 1915): 145–58.
Wakelyn, Jon L. “Disloyalty in the Confederate Congress: The Character of Henry Stuart Foote,” in Confederates Against the Confederacy: Essays on Leadership and Loyalty, ed. Jon L. Wakelyn. Westport, Conn.: Praeger, 2002.
Wallner, Peter A. Franklin Pierce: Martyr for the Union. Concord, N.H.: Plaidswede, 2007.
________. Franklin Pierce: New Hampshire’s Favorite Son. Concord, N.H.: Plaidswede, 2004.
Walther, Eric H. The Fire-Eaters. Baton Rouge: LSU Press, 1992.
________. The Shattering of the Union: America in the 1850s. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004.
Ward, John William. Andrew Jackson: Symbol for an Age. New York: Oxford University Press, 1955.
Wawro, Gregory J., and Eric Schickler. Filibuster: Obstruction and Lawmaking in the U.S. Senate. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2006.
Weinbaum, Paul O. “Mobs and Demagogues: The New York Response to Collective Violence in the Early Nineteenth Century.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Rochester, 1974.
Wells, Harwell. “The End of the Affair? Anti-Dueling Laws and Social Norms in Antebellum America,” Vanderbilt Law Review 54: 1805–47.
Widmer, Edward L. Young America: The Flowering of Democracy in New York City. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Wilentz, Sean. The Rise of American Democracy: Jefferson to Lincoln. New York: Norton, 2005.
Williams, Robert Chadwell. Horace Greeley: Champion of American Freedom. New York: NYU Press, 2006.
Winkle, Kenneth J. Lincoln’s Citadel: The Civil War in Washington, D.C. New York: Norton, 2013.
Wirls, Daniel. “The ‘Golden Age’ Senate and Floor Debate in the Antebellum Congress,” Legislative Studies Quarterly 2 (May 2007): 193–222.
________. “‘The Only Mode of Avoiding Everlasting Debate’: The Overlooked Senate Gag Rule for Antislavery Petitions,” JER (Spring 2007): 115–38.
Wongsrichanalai, Kanisom. Northern Character: College-Educated New Englanders, Honor, Nationalism, and Leadership in the Civil War. New York: Fordham University Press, 2016.
Wood, Nicholas. “John Randolph of Roanoke and the Politics of Slavery in the Early Republic,” Virginia Magazine of History and Biography 2 (Summer 2012): 106–43.
Woods, Michael E. Emotional and Sectional Conflict in the Antebellum United States. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
________. “‘The Indignation of Freedom-Loving People’: The Caning of Charles Sumner and Emotion in Antebellum Politics,” Journal of Social History 44 (Spring 2011): 689–705.
________. “Tracing the ‘Sacred Relics’: The Strange Career of Preston Brooks’s Cane,” Civil War History (June 2017): 113–32.
________. “What Twenty-First-Century Historians Have Said About the Causes of Disunion: A Civil War Sesquicentennial Review of the Recent Literature,” JAH (September 2012): 415–39.
Wunder, John R., and Joann M. Ross., eds. The Nebraska-Kansas Act of 1854. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2008.
Wyatt-Brown, Ber
tram. “The Abolitionists’ Postal Campaign of 1835,” Journal of Negro History 50 (October 1965): 227–38.
________. “Andrew Jackson’s Honor.” Journal of the Early Republic 17 (Spring 1997): 1–35.
________. “Honor, Humiliation, and the American Civil War,” in A Warring Nation: Honor, Race, and Humiliation in America and Abroad, ed. Bertram Wyatt-Brown. Charlottesville: UVA Press, 2014.
________. The Shaping of Southern Culture: Honor, Grace, and War, 1760s–1880s. Chapel Hill: UNC Press, 2001.
________. Southern Honor: Ethics and Behavior in the Old South. New York: Oxford University Press, 1982.
________. Yankee Saints and Southern Sinners. Baton Rouge: LSU Press, 1985.
Wyly-Jones, Susan. “The 1835 Anti-Abolition Meetings in the South: A New Look at the Controversy over the Abolition Postal Campaign,” Civil War History 47 (2001): 289–309.
Yacovone, Donald. “Abolitionists and the ‘Language of Fraternal Love,’” in Meanings for Manhood, ed. Mark C. Carnes and Clyde Griffen. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990, 85–95.
Yarwood, Dean L. When Congress Makes a Joke: Congressional Humor Then and Now. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004.
Yearns, Wilfred. The Confederate Congress. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1960.
Young, James Sterling. The Washington Community, 1800–1828. New York: Harcourt, 1966.
Zaeske, Susan. Signatures of Citizenship: Petitioning, Antislavery, and Women’s Political Identity. Chapel Hill: UNC Press, 2003.
________. “‘The South Arose as One Man’: Gender and Sectionalism in Antislavery Petition Debates, 1835–1845,” Rhetoric & Public Affairs 12 (2009).
Zagarri, Rosemarie. “The Family Factor: Congressmen, Turnover, and the Burden of Public Service in the Early American Republic,” JER 2 (Summer 2013): 283–316.
Zalimas, Robert J., Jr. “‘Contest MY Seat Sir!’: Lewis D. Campbell, Clement L. Vallandigham, and the Election of 1856,” Ohio History Journal (Winter–Spring 1997): 5–30.
Zelizer, Julian, ed. The American Congress: The Building of Democracy. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2004.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The biggest disjuncture in writing this book was the network of support and friendship that bolstered my study of violence and nastiness. From start to finish, friends, family, and colleagues unselfishly gave their support, counsel, and wisdom. The thanks offered here can’t begin to do them justice.
When I was first seeking (and finding) my topic, the J. Franklin Jameson fellowship from the American Historical Association and the Library of Congress was essential; the ability to spend several months at the Library rummaging through the papers of congressmen revealed and fleshed out the trail of violence at the heart of this book. For that early support, I am eternally grateful. The Dirksen Congressional Center also provided funding at an early crucial point. And the American Council of Learned Societies and the Dorothy and Lewis B. Cullman Center for Scholars and Writers at the New York Public Library offered support that was transformative, not only funding and guiding a year of research and writing, but also introducing me to a cohort of warm and wonderful writers and scholars, some of them now dear friends. Adrien LeBlanc and Joel Kaye offered sage advice and cheered from the sidelines for years; Mark Stevens was a wonderful partner in intellectual crime at the center, as were Jennifer Vanderbes and Han Ong, and I had several idea-shaping lunches with Jim Oakes. Our fearless leader Jean Strouse was wise, encouraging, nurturing, and writing-savvy all in one. My thanks to all for their generous intellectual and emotional support (and the scotch-filled end-of-writing-day confabs as well).
Many librarians and curators were exceedingly generous with their time and wisdom, particularly in Washington, this book’s ground zero. In the Manuscript Division at the Library of Congress, the Civil War and Reconstruction specialist Michelle Krowl helped me access and use French’s writings (and seemed to enjoy getting to know French almost as much as I did). The reference librarian Bruce Kirby not only helped me with my research, but also gave me a copy of his fine master’s thesis on the Cilley-Graves duel and accompanied me to the “mountaintop” (the Smithsonian gun storage room) to see the Cilley-Graves rifles. The man who showed us those rifles—David Miller, Curator of Armed Forces History at the National Museum of American History—went out of his way to display and decode an array of weapons that were popular with congressmen; many years later, he stepped forward again to provide photographs of a few of those weapons for use as illustrations. Senate Historian Emeritus Don Ritchie toured me around the Capitol’s open and closed spaces as I chatted about who hit whom in what corner for what reason. From the U.S. Senate Commission on Art, Curator Diane Skvarla offered visual fodder, and Scott Strong generously sent me an ongoing stream of materials on congressional set-tos. From the Office of the House Historian, Associate Historian Kenneth Kato, Historian Matthew Wasniewski, and Historian Emeritus Ray Smock were wonderfully hospitable as I rummaged through their files. Without these wonderful Washington folk, I couldn’t have found the ground-level reality of the antebellum Congress.
The Library of Congress’s invaluable abridged edition of French’s diary—Witness to the Young Republic: A Yankee’s Journal, 1828–1870, edited by Donald B. Cole and John J. McDonough—led me to another person who helped me envision French’s world. Peter S. French, the great-great-grandson of the man at the heart of this book, not only answered my questions, but welcomed me into his home, showed me some of French’s belongings, and provided me with a family tree. Great thanks are also due to Peter for giving French’s writings to the Library of Congress many years ago. When we first met, he couldn’t believe that anyone would read them. Hopefully, this book will show him the benefits when someone does. Thanks also to Roger Ginn, who sent me a copy of his study of Jonathan Cilley.
Many others stepped forward at key moments to solve mysteries and answer questions. Dayle Dooley at the Congressional Cemetery was kind enough to photograph French’s grave so I could see its wording. Long after I had left the New Hampshire Historical Society, the librarian William Copeley helped me decode a letter from afar. The librarian Elizabeth Dunn at the David M. Rubenstein Rare Book and Manuscript Library at Duke University helped me track down some details in Lawrence Keitt’s life. Heartfelt thanks are also due to the folks at the Massachusetts Historical Society, the Rauner Special Collections Library at Dartmouth College, the National Archives, the Southern Historical Collection at UNC Chapel Hill, the British Library, the Special Collections and Archives at Bowdoin College Library, and the Huntington Library. In this digitized age, these archives and libraries are irreplaceable centers of study staffed by expert librarians and archivists and containing invaluable holdings that often can’t be found in any database. For those reasons and more, they deserve applause. Former Clerk of the House of Commons Sir Malcolm Jack discussed clerkiness with me over a wonderfully informative lunch. Kathy White was host extraordinaire during my extended research trip to North Carolina, showing me the sights and pointing me to much good food. Michael Donaldson, the general manager of the Franklin Hotel in Chapel Hill, did me a great kindness in facilitating my stay. To all of these people, I offer my heartfelt thanks.
I’m also in the debt of the many historians and scholars who provided insights over the years. Michael Les Benedict, Dan Feller, Michael Grow, Pauline Maier, Joseph Meisel, Randy Roth, Tony Rotundo, Walter Stahr, and Julian Zelizer were exceedingly generous with their time and knowledge. (Dan generously advanced me information about Henry Wise, and was my partner in crime in poking fun at him.) I’m particularly indebted to Peter Onuf, Edward Ayers, John Demos, James Brewer Stewart, Frank Cogliano, and R. B. Bernstein for reading the manuscript and providing essential and deeply appreciated feedback. Peter read it more than once, offering his crystallizing-as-always feedback as well as ongoing encouragement. He has shaped my work and thinking in more ways than he can ever know. Ed kept me on an even keel between North and South while being wonderfully s
upportive. John—enthusiastic from the start—supported this project in countless ways and coached me on the fine art of storytelling. Jim couldn’t have been more supportive not only of the project, but of what he called my “anthropological” approach to political history; his enthusiasm was—and is—gratefully appreciated. Frank offered to read the book years ago, and generously did so at the last minute, when I was almost done. And Richard listened to me talk (and occasionally panic) about this book for many years, an eternally calm and soothing voice as well as a source of sage advice and counsel. I’m more grateful than I can say for the support of these friends and colleagues. They represent the best of what the profession of history has to offer, as well as the best of friends.
My colleagues at Yale have been unfailingly interested and encouraging. In the History Department, Dan Kevles, David Blight, Ed Rugemer, and Naomi Lamoreaux cheered me on; Alejandra Dubcovsky and Joanne Meyerowitz provided vital moral support (plus, as a fellow early Americanist, Alejandra offered great feedback, as did Ed). David Mayhew and I had some informative Congress lunches. Akhil Amar asked some key questions. The Legal Theory Colloquium, the Yale Early American Historians Colloquium (YEAH), the Race and Slavery Working Group, and the Gilder Lehrman Center workshopped parts of this book (YEAH more than once), and the book is much the better for it. In addition, three American history librarians lent a helping hand: Greg Eow and David Gary were invaluable in tracking down obscure materials, and James Kessenides, along with Research Data Support Specialist Joshua Dull, took the time to show me how to use the ICPSR database.
This brings me to the remarkable students at Yale. How can I thank them? They were more important to this project than they know. Undergraduates and graduate students have heard material from this book for many years, and have offered wonderful insights along the way. When my momentum slowed or my energy flagged, their interest urged me on. Graduate students Michael Blaakman, Zach Conn, and James Shinn deserve special notice. Skilled historians of early and antebellum America who have a way with a pen, they read an early version of this book and offered extensive feedback (over New Haven pizza, of course). James went the extra mile, doing a second reading toward the end of the project. I can’t thank them enough for their input as well as their support. Working with people like M1, Zach, and James makes teaching at Yale the joy that it is.
The Field of Blood Page 58
