A Special Relationship

Home > Other > A Special Relationship > Page 32
A Special Relationship Page 32

by Douglas Kennedy


  I thought: if I am permanently kept from him, will this ever stop? Will I ever come to terms with it?

  The next six days were bleak. My sleep was broken – despite the ongoing use of knock-out pills. I had little appetite. I left the house for the occasional foray to the corner shop or Marks and Spencer. I found myself devoid of energy – so much so that, when I did go down to St Martin’s Hospital for a consultation with Dr Rodale, she immediately commented on my wan appearance.

  ‘Well, it’s not been an easy few weeks,’ I said.

  ‘Yes,’ she said, ‘I did hear about the court order. I’m very sorry.’

  ‘Thank you,’ I said – though I was silently angry at her for her professional reserve, her refusal to tell me I had been so desperately wronged, especially when she knew that I was incapable of physically harming my child, and that I had been in the grip of a monstrous ailment over which …

  No, no. I wasn’t going to play the don’t blame me card again. I was simply going to face the reality of the situation and …

  … but why the hell couldn’t Dr Rodale tell me what she must know: that the court decision was so manifestly unfair?

  ‘And how do you feel in yourself right now?’

  She had quickly moved us back into the realm of pharmacological questioning. All right then: you want straight answers, you’ll get straight answers. So I met her gaze and said, ‘I cry a lot. I find myself angry a great deal of the time. I think what’s happened to me is completely unjust and underhand.’

  ‘And those “downward spirals” you used to describe?’

  ‘They’re not so frequent. It’s not that I don’t get low – I do all the time – it’s just that I seem to be able to dodge the black swamp. But that doesn’t mean I’m exactly happy …’

  Dr Rodale’s lips contorted into a dry smile.

  ‘Who is?’ she said quietly.

  At the end of our interview, she announced herself once again pleased with my progress, and appeared even more gratified by the knowledge that the anti-depressants had proved so effective.

  ‘As I told you from the outset, these sorts of drugs take time to build up in the system – and to demonstrate their efficacy. But the fact that you seem to be avoiding the “black swamp” shows that they have made considerable positive impact. You may not be happy, but at least you’re functioning again. Which is good news. So I see no need to alter the dosage for the time being. But on the unhappiness front … have you been in touch with Ellen Cartwright?’

  Actually, she called me the day after I saw Dr Rodale, apologizing profusely for being incommunicado when my solicitor’s assistant came chasing her for a witness statement.

  ‘The message on my answerphone was a bit garbled,’ she said, ‘so I didn’t exactly understand why she needed this statement from me. Something about a court proceeding …’

  I informed her about that proceeding, and its outcome. She sounded appalled.

  ‘But that’s scandalous,’ she said. ‘Especially as I could have told them … Oh God, now I feel dreadful. But how are you feeling?’

  ‘Horrible.’

  ‘Would you like to start our sessions again?’

  ‘I think that would be a good idea.’

  ‘Fine then. One thing, though – you know that I just do NHS locums at St Martin’s – and only for anyone who’s resident in the unit. So if you want to see me, it will have to be on a private basis.’

  ‘And what’s the charge?’

  ‘It’s £70 per hour, I’m afraid. But if you have private health care …’

  ‘We were with BUPA, but I’m pretty sure I’ve been taken off the policy.’

  ‘Well you should still give them a call, and if you’re still covered they will tell you how many weekly sessions they’re willing to cover – and for how long. You’ll also need a reference from Dr Rodale – but that will be no problem.’

  I did call BUPA as soon as I finished speaking to Ellen. The ‘customer service representative’ on the other end of the line asked me for my name, my address and my policy number. Then, after a moment, she confirmed what I already suspected: ‘I’m afraid your policy has been cancelled. You were insured under your husband’s policy – which, in turn, is part of a group company policy. However, he left his job and the policy was cancelled. Sorry.’

  I did some math. Even if I restricted myself to a session a week between now and the full hearing in six months’ time, I would still end up paying £1680 for Ellen’s therapeutic service – an impossible sum, given that I didn’t have a job. So it looked like I would simply have to make do with my anti-depressants and my extended transatlantic phone calls with Sandy.

  ‘You have to find a new lawyer,’ she said the night I discovered I had been dropped from our private health scheme. ‘Especially as you’re going to have to deal with the house thing very soon.’

  ‘Maybe I should just accept his offer.’

  ‘No way …’

  ‘But it’s a no-win situation, no matter what I do. Tony knows this too. And he’s got that woman behind him – with all the money they need to break me. Which is what they’re certainly trying to do. As much as I’d like to say climb-every-mountain stuff like, “They won’t bring me down,” the fact is they can, and they will.’

  ‘Whatever you do, don’t agree to anything until you get yourself another attorney.’

  ‘I can’t afford another attorney right now.’

  ‘You’re going to have to go back to work, aren’t you?’

  ‘I want to go back to work. I need to go back to work. Before I go completely crazy.’

  I articulated the same sentiment to a Ms Jessica Law, the CAFCASS reporter, who visited me at home for what she described as a preliminary interview. She was around my age, wearing subdued clothes, wire-rimmed glasses, and a sensibly direct manner. From the moment I opened the door, I could see that she was sizing me up, trying to work me out, and see whether all the reports she had undoubtedly read about me tallied with how she herself perceived me. Her early enforced pleasantness – a tone of voice which said, ‘Let’s try to get through this uncomfortable business as reasonably as possible’ — hinted that she was expecting a harridan, still in the throes of a major psychological rupture. I could also tell that she was taking in everything about my bearing, my manners, my dress sense (well-pressed jeans, a black turtleneck, black loafers), and my material circumstances. She noticed my collection of books and classical CDs, and the fact that I served her real cafetiére coffee.

  She then quickly let it be known that this was business.

  ‘Now I know this can’t be the easiest of situations for you …’ she said, sugaring her coffee.

  ‘No, it isn’t,’ I said, thinking: just about everyone I’ve met in the social services have used that expression – ‘this can’t be easy for you’. Is that an acknowledgment of my so-called ‘pain’, or their way of informing me: but there’s even more discomfort to come?

  ‘I plan to see you two or three times in all before I submit my report. I would normally see you on the first occasion with your husband, but given the sensitivity of the situation, I decided against that in your case. I will see him separately. What I would like to point out is that, in no way should our conversations be considered as cross-examinations. You’re not on trial here. My goal is simply to give the court an overall picture of your circumstances.’

  You’re not on trial here … it’s just a little chat. How wonderfully English. I was, without question, on trial here – and we both knew it.

  ‘I understand,’ I said.

  ‘Very good,’ she said. She bit into a Stem Ginger biscuit, contemplated it for a moment before swallowing, then asked, ‘Marks and Spencer?’

  ‘That’s right,’ I said.

  ‘I thought so. Delicious. Now then ... I note from your file that you moved to London just under a year ago. So I suppose a reasonable first question might be: how are you finding life in England?’

  When I reco
unted this question to Sandy later that night, she said, ‘You’ve got to be kidding me? She actually asked you that?’

  ‘And they say Americans are deficient in the irony department.’

  ‘Well, did you furnish her with the appropriate ironic answer?’

  ‘Hardly. I was very polite, and moderately truthful – saying that it hadn’t been the easiest of adjustments, but that I had also been ill for the past few months and therefore couldn’t really judge the place from the standpoint of someone who wasn’t yet a functioning part of it. Which is when she asked me if it was my intention to become “a functioning part of England” to which I said, “Absolutely” – reminding her that I had been a journalist before coming to England, and had also been a correspondent here until my high blood pressure bumped me out of my job.’

  ‘I should be able to find work here,’ I said. ‘Because there’s so much journalistic work in London.’

  ‘So, should you regain residence of your son,’ she asked, ‘or should the court agree to shared residence, you would plan to raise him in England?’

  ‘Yes,’ I said, ‘that would be the plan – because he would then have access to both parents.’

  ‘Smart answer,’ Sandy said. ‘Did your interrogator approve?’

  ‘I think so. Just as I also think she doesn’t disapprove of me. Which is something of a start. Still, the critical thing now is to find work – and show that I can once again be a functioning member of society.’

  ‘But do you think you’re actually ready for work? I mean—’

  ‘I know what you’re about to say. And the answer is: I have no choice. I need the money, and I also need to show the powers-that-be that I can work.’

  But finding a job proved to be a complex task. To begin with, my professional contacts in London were nominal – two or three newspaper editors whom I’d met during my short stint as correspondent here, and a CNN producer guy named Jason Farrelly, with whom I had become moderately friendly when he did a four-month stint in Cairo around two years ago. He had since been downgraded to the Business News ghetto in the London bureau. But he was the senior producer of CNN Business News Europe – which meant that making telephonic contact with him wasn’t easy as all senior news producers in big bureaus make it a point to be too busy to return your calls. So after leaving five messages, I decided to try my luck with one of the newspaper editors I’d met a few months earlier. Her name was Isobel Walcott. She was the deputy features editor of the Daily Mail. I’d taken her out to lunch when I was working on a piece about the decline and fall of London manners, as she had written a jokey little book on the subject. I remembered her as someone who combined a cut-glass accent with a propensity for dropping the word ‘fuck’ into casual conversation; who drank about five glasses of Sauvignon Blanc too many, but who also told me towards the end of the lunch, ‘If you ever have a feature idea that might work for the Mail, do give me a bell.’

  Which is what I decided to do now. I even managed to dig out the business card she’d given me, and found her direct number. But when she answered and heard my name, she asked curtly, ‘Have we met?’

  ‘I was the Boston Post correspondent who took you out to lunch a couple of months ago, remember?’

  Suddenly, her tone went from abrupt to dismissive.

  ‘Oh, yes, right. Can’t really talk now …’

  ‘Well, could I call you later? I have an idea or two for a feature, and as you did say that if I ever wanted to write for the Mail . . .’

  ‘I’m afraid we’re rather top-heavy with features right now. But tell you what … email me the ideas and we’ll see. All right? Must dash now. Bye.’

  I did email her the two ideas, not expecting to hear from her.

  I expected right.

  I also tried phoning someone who worked on the Sunday Telegraph magazine – a guy named Edward Jensen, whom I remembered as friendly – and had known Tony when they were both doing journalistic stints in Frankfurt. Once again, I had his direct number. Once again, I wasn’t received well. Only unlike Walcott, he wasn’t curt – rather, somewhat nervous.

  ‘You’ve caught me at a bad time, I’m afraid,’ he said. ‘How’s Tony?’

  ‘Well …’

  ‘Oh, God, how foolish of me. I had heard …’

  ‘You’d heard what?’

  ‘That the two of you … uh … dreadfully sorry. And I gather you’ve been unwell.’

  ‘I’m better now.’

  ‘Good, good. But, uh, I’m due in conference any moment. Could I call you back?’

  I gave him the number, knowing he wouldn’t call me back.

  And he didn’t.

  Judging from his embarrassed tone, it was clear that word had spread through Media London about our breakup. As Tony was the man with all the connections, the world was hearing his side of the story. Which meant that Edward Jensen had evidently been informed that I had gone ga-ga and threatened the life of my child … and should therefore be dodged at all costs.

  At least, Jason Farrelly finally returned my calls. And, at least, he was outwardly friendly … though he made it known pretty damn fast that (a) he was super-busy, and (b) there was absolutely no hope of any work at Cable News Network right now.

  ‘You know the cutbacks we’ve suffered since the merger. Hell, I’m lucky to be still in a job … and, believe me, Business News is not my idea of a good time. Still, so great to hear from you. Enjoying London?’

  This was the American approach to the dissemination of bad news: be ultra-friendly, ultra-enthusiastic, ultra-positive … even though what you were actually communicating was ultra-negative. Whereas the English approach to giving inauspicious tidings was either bumbling mortification or sheer rudeness. Somehow I preferred the latter approach. At least you knew what you were getting – and your expectations weren’t raised by a surfeit of false bonhomie … like the sort that Jason Farrelly practised.

  ‘But hey, it would be great to see you, Sally. And you never know, maybe, I don’t know, maybe we can find something for you here.’

  I was suspicious about this last comment, but as it was about the first halfway positive thing that anyone had said to me for a while, I wanted to believe that, perhaps, he could help me out.

  ‘Well, that would be just terrific, Jason.’

  ‘One problem,’ he said. ‘I’m being dispatched to run the Paris bureau for the next three weeks … our head guy there had to rush back to the States after a death in the family ... so I’m only here for another two days. And my schedule’s completely full.’

  ‘Well, mine’s pretty empty – so if you could just find a half-hour …’

  ‘Would nine-fifteen tomorrow morning work?’

  ‘Whereabouts?’

  ‘You know a restaurant in the Aldwych called Bank? They do breakfast. I won’t have much time. Half-an-hour max.’

  I got my one decent black suit dry-cleaned, and dropped £30 I couldn’t really afford to spend on a cut and a wash at a hairdresser’s on Putney High Street, and showed up fifteen minutes early at Bank. It was one of those ultra-chic foody emporiums – all chrome and glass and sleek lines and braying well-dressed clients, talking loudly over the din of the action, even at breakfast time. Jason had reserved a table in his name. I was shown to it, and ordered a cappuccino, and read the Independent, and waited.

  Nine-fifteen came and went. Nine-thirty came and went ... by which point I was genuinely anxious as I had to be back in Wandsworth at eleven for my weekly supervised visit with Jack. Which meant I simply had to leave the restaurant by nine forty-five. I kept asking the waitress if she’d received a message from him. Sorry, nothing at all.

  And then, just as I was calling for the bill, he showed up. It was nine forty-three. He looked a little frazzled, explaining that the Hang Seng had done this fantastic out-of-nowhere rally first thing this morning, it was a big deal story, and, well, you know how it is, don’t you?

  I did – but I also knew that I couldn’t stay. At the same
time, though, I didn’t want to explain to him why I was leaving – and how I was now only allowed supervised contact with my son. I knew this was the one chance I’d have to pitch myself to him, and hopefully garner some sort of employment which, in turn, was crucial both in terms of earning a living and proving to the Wandsworth social services that I was a responsible person who could be trusted to bring up her son and attend to his needs.

  So I decided to take a risk and splurge on a fast taxi directly to Garratt Lane after the meeting. And I explained to Jason that I really had to leave by ten-fifteen, no later. He ordered coffee, I joined him for a second cappuccino. For the first twenty minutes of our time together, he talked non-stop, telling me about the horrendous internal politics of CNN since the merger, and the number of lay-offs, and how nobody who had been made redundant in Atlanta was finding jobs in the ‘news information sector’, and how his ex-boss was now selling books at a local branch of Borders, work was so tight. The situation at CNN Europe, however, was a little better – because all their bureaus were streamlined operations, giving them room to hire freelancers on a short-contract basis.

  I breathed a sigh of relief, thinking: he’s going to offer me something. But then, suddenly, he changed the subject and said, ‘You know, Janie and I are separating.’

  Janie was his wife of four years. Like Jason, she was just thirty. Blonde, pert, aggressive, and (when I met her in Cairo) already voicing frustration that journalists made such dismal money (she had been a realtor in Atlanta before her marriage).

  ‘When she met me, she was in her mid-twenties, a Georgia girl who thought it was dead glamorous to have an Ivy League boyfriend who was already a CNN journalist at twenty-five. But she hated the moving around – you remember how she complained all the time in Cairo and then she truly loathed the French when we were in Paris … but hey, I can say this now, she’s the sort of American who always hates the French. And when London came up, I figured getting her back into the Anglophone world might help the marriage. Boy, was I wrong. The French were like fellow Confederates compared to the Brits. “The most depressing, ill-mannered, stenchful people I have ever had the misfortune to meet” and please excuse the Scarlett O’Hara accent.’

 

‹ Prev