“Come on, come one. Let’s just run a few test cases.” He glanced down at the top questionnaire in his hand. “Okay, this guy drives a big black pickup with a bumper sticker that reads: IMPEACH CLINTON AND HER HUSBAND. DO you want him on your jury?”
Ben shrugged. “I’d have to know more about him.”
“Wrong. You know you don’t want him just from the fact that he has a pickup with an obnoxious bumper sticker.”
“Half the people in Tulsa have pickups with obnoxious bumper stickers.”
“Then that’s the half we don’t want.” Sacks flipped to the next questionnaire. “What about this guy? He’s white and in his mid-fifties, he’s a pediatrician, he wears a Mickey Mouse watch with diamond studs, and he has a backyard swimming pool. Do you want him on your jury?”
Ben tried to play along. “Doctor, huh? Well, then he’s probably intelligent.”
Sacks threw the questionaire at him, laughing. “Give me a break. As if intelligence is a quality you want in a juror. You’re on the defense, remember?”
“That doesn’t mean—”
“You’re going to claim that Barrett was framed, aren’t you?”
“Well, sort of …”
“That it was all a big conspiracy? That people were out to get him?”
“That’s true.”
Sacks jabbed Ben again and winked. “Trust me. You don’t want intelligent jurors.”
“But the truth—”
“And what’s more, he’s a rich white doctor. You know who they really hate?”
“Lawyers?”
“Yeah. But you know who rich white guys hate even more than lawyers? Rich black guys. Guys who had the audacity to crawl out of the ghetto where they belong.”
Ben stared at him in disgust. “This is scientific analysis? It’s nothing more than a bunch of stereotypes and bigotries cobbled together and sold as science for sixty thousand dollars!”
“Kincaid, there’s a reason why stereotypes become stereotypes. It’s because they’re true!”
“Sometimes, yes. But sometimes not. That’s why we have voir dire. And that’s why all this pseudoscientific hugger-mugger is a waste of time. When all is said and done, you don’t know who will be chosen tomorrow. You can’t read their minds. You can’t see inside their hearts. All we can do is ask them the right questions, look them in the eyes, and take our best guess.”
“Kincaid, you go in there tomorrow and … guess”—he spat out the word—“and you might as well buy your client a one-way ticket to death row.”
“I’d rather do that than face a panel of prospective jurors and assume that they’re all disgusting, close-minded bigots!”
It went downhill from there. Technically, they were still speaking, but relations were strained to say the least. Messages to and fro were couriered by Jones. Separate cars were taken to the courthouse.
The marshals ushered Barrett to the defendant’s table before the jury arrived. He seemed impressively calm and collected, given what was about to begin. Ben knew he had to be tearing himself apart inside.
Once the bailiff had called all the names, the prosecution, a team of three headed by Jack Bullock, would have a chance to address the jurors directly. And after him, Ben. And then it would be time to pick.
Thank goodness Christina was here, Ben thought. Her instincts he trusted. He could only hope to keep Sacks at bay, to keep his statistics and studies from tainting her.
The bailiff had called the last name, but no one moved. All eyes scanned the courtroom.
“Are you here?” the bailiff asked.
Ben spotted a woman in the front row of the gallery—slender, mid-forties, with a look of great deliberation on her face. Something was going on in her head. Whatever it was, she couldn’t make up her mind.
“Let me try it again,” the bailiff said. He glanced down at the slip of paper in his hand. “The last juror is Deanna Meanders.”
Chapter 34
DEANNA REALIZED SHE NEEDED to do something, and quickly, but for some strange reason she couldn’t get her feet to move. What was she doing here? She should never have come; she should’ve gotten her boss to say she was indispensible or pleaded dependent children or something. Stupid or not, though, she was here now, and the man was calling her name, and she needed to get off her butt and move.
She pushed herself to her feet and took her seat in the jury box. Well, surely she wouldn’t actually be selected for the jury. What were the odds? She knew scores of jurors were excused in these big capital murder cases. They would find some reason to boot her. Especially after she told them …
Ah, there’s the rub. Would she tell them? She knew she should, knew she was morally obligated to tell them.
But would she?
Well, she told herself, she wouldn’t volunteer anything, but if they asked the right questions, she would answer honestly.
Right. She almost laughed out loud. What could they possibly ask that would unravel her secret? Excuse me, ma’am, but by any chance is your daughter involved with a man who you think may actually have been responsible for the slaughter of the defendant’s family? Somehow she just didn’t think that one was going to come up.
Did she think she could consider the evidence presented, forgoing all outside knowledge she might have, and reach a fair verdict? No way in hell.
The question then was, would she keep quiet about it, or would she do the right thing?
And the problem was, if she did the right thing, what would happen to Martha?
She couldn’t believe that Martha had knowingly played a part in the murders. Despite all the heartache they’d shared these past few years, she knew Martha was fundamentally a generous, caring person.
But the district attorney, of course, did not know Martha. If Barrett was acquitted and the DA had to find another suspect, he might just stumble onto Buck. And from Buck, it would be a short hop to Martha.
Would he go after Martha as an accessory? Of course he would. He would have no choice. The public would demand it. The media would cry for it. They much preferred conspiracies to lone gunmen, after all. Conspiracies were so much sexier, so much more intriguing.
Martha would go to prison. Maybe not forever, but long enough to irreparably ruin her life. Scars like that you didn’t bounce back from.
So would Deanna do the right thing?
How could she? She was a mother, for God’s sake. Her whole life was based on the premise that she must take care of her daughter, protect her, shepherd her, help her find a happy and productive life. She couldn’t let this tragedy happen. She just couldn’t. Even if …
She turned her head slightly and gazed at ex-mayor Wallace Barrett sitting next to his attorney at the defense table. He was trying to be strong, she could tell, but he was worried. She could see it in his face. Who wouldn’t be? With what he was going through. What, in part, she was putting him through.
She looked away and stared at her hands.
Yeah. Even if.
Chapter 35
BULLOCK, AS LEAD ATTORNEY for the prosecution, got the first shot at the panel of prospective jurors. He approached them with his usual calm demeanor. He was very good in front of juries, as Ben well knew. He was also smart, knowledgeable, and determined, but most of all, he had that special quality that evoked a positive response from the jury. A certain confidence, perhaps, or an air of truthfulness. Whatever it was, it was something that couldn’t be learned or taught. You either had it or you didn’t.
Bullock did. Ben didn’t.
Many times Ben had tried to emulate the man’s bearing, his approach, but it never worked. In fact, it was futile to try. All he could do was be himself, and hope for the best.
The usual problem with voir dire was that it was tedious and time-consuming—a too-long prologue before the main event. The jurors were ready to get on with it; but instead, they had to sit through hours of questioning. It was immediately apparent that this would not be a problem today, however. This case w
as anything but dull, after all, and the jurors were all bright-eyed and bushy-tailed and eager. They wanted to be on this jury. Who wouldn’t? It was the trial of the century.
Bullock looked the jurors square in the eye and began. “You know why you’re here,” he said.
He paused, allowing the words to sink in. “Personally, I wish you didn’t. It would make this business of choosing a jury much simpler. But I know you do know. You know what case this jury will hear. And you know … the importance of what we are trying to do. The importance of seeing that justice is done.”
Ben had to marvel at Bullock’s cleverness. He was not making an argument—well, not exactly, your honor—and he was not urging them to convict—well, not exactly, your honor. But close. Close enough that they couldn’t possibly miss the point.
“The defendant in this case is a man named Wallace Barrett.” He gestured toward the defendant. “Is there anyone here who does not know Mr. Barrett?”
No hands rose.
“Now, that’s a problem. We prosecutors always worry about trying celebrities. When people see a man on television or in some sporting event, they start to feel like they know him. They don’t, of course. They don’t know anything about what he’s really like. But they think they do. He’s that smiling face on the television screen in their living room. They like him. And that makes it a lot harder to convince them that he may have done something wrong.” His voice slowed and dropped an octave. “Even when the crime committed is as hideous as the one in the present case.”
Bullock strolled confidently to the opposite end of the jury box. “So I have to ask you this question. Is there anyone who feels that what they already know about Mr. Barrett—or what they think they know—would prevent them from judging the facts and evidence of this case with an open mind? Anyone? Please be honest. I won’t put you on the spot. I just want to know.”
An older woman in the back row, Marilyn McKensie, hesitantly raised her hand.
“Mrs. McKensie. You think you might have a hard time giving us a fair shake?”
She pursed her lips together, speaking slowly. “No. I’m just afraid … Well, I’ve heard so much about all the awful things he did to his family, I just don’t know if I could believe anything he or his lawyer had to say.”
A loud buzz rose from the press section. Ben jumped to his feet. “Your honor—”
Judge Hart nodded. She knew very well the prejudicial nature of the remarks the woman had just made in the earshot of every prospective juror. Remarks like that could end the trial before it had begun.
Judge Hart leaned toward the jury box. “Mrs. McKensie, you must realize that no one has proven that the defendant has done anything. He is presumed to be innocent.”
“Oh, right. But everyone knows—”
“Mrs. McKensie,” the judge continued firmly, “in this state, defendants are innocent until proven guilty. No evidence has yet been adduced against the defendant. That means that at this point in time he is innocent and you must be able to consider him as such. Do you understand?”
“Yes, I know the rules, but—”
“There are no buts. That’s the way it is.”
Mrs. McKensie licked her lips, fell back into her chair, and didn’t say anything more.
The judge addressed the jury at large. “I will admonish the jury—that is, all the prospective jurors—that they should not discuss or draw any conclusions until the evidentiary part of the trial is over, and furthermore, what conclusions you do draw should be based upon the evidence presented at trial and nothing else. Mrs. McKensie’s remarks should be disregarded in their entirety.” She turned back to Ben, a weary expression on her face. “All right, counsel?”
Ben nodded. “Thank you, your honor.” He could read what was in her eyes quite clearly; he was thinking the same thing himself. If they couldn’t get past the first voir dire question without a prejudicial incident, what hope did they have of actually completing a fair and unbiased trial?
Mrs. McKensie was excused and replaced, and Bullock continued with his questions, carefully but systematically probing the venirepersons about their jobs, their significant others, their habits and hobbies. Most of his questions did not bear a direct relationship to the case. Many followed up on seemingly trivial matters that had been mentioned in answers to the written interrogatories. Most were easily answered questions. Bullock never pressed anyone or embarrassed them.
And Ben knew why, too. He could still remember the advice Bullock had given him so many years ago. “People think the main point of voir dire is to find out about the jury,” he had said, “but they’re wrong. That’s okay if you happen to be able to read minds. But the realistic best thing you can do during voir dire is let the jury find out about you. Let them learn to like you, to trust you. If you can get that, then later in your closing argument when you tell them to convict, they will. They’ll do whatever you want. Fact is, trials are long and complicated, and the jurors have a hard time following everything. Most of their decisions are based principally on who the jurors think they can trust, not on the evidence. Once they figure out who they can trust, they do whatever that person tells them to do.”
And Bullock was a master at earning jurors’ trust. Ben knew that by the time Bullock was done, the jurors would have nothing but respect for the assistant district attorney. Ben would have to be just as good, and to have better evidence, if he expected to win them over.
As he watched Bullock examine the jury, Ben made two distinct observations, both disturbing. First, he noticed that the jury seemed uncommonly cooperative, even eager. Jurors were usually indifferent as to whether they were chosen. These people, however, seemed to want to be chosen. Ben supposed that was only natural. It was a big trial; it was something you could tell your grandchildren about.
The other thing Ben noticed was the serious, probing, nonhyperbolic nature of the questions Bullock was asking. The prosecutor seemed to want a smart jury.
Now that was a frightening thought.
Ben’s opportunity to examine the jurors did not arrive until mid-afternoon. He straightened his tie, put on his most earnest expression, approached the jury box and introduced himself.
“All we are interested in is fairness,” Ben told them, and he hoped they believed it. “As I’m sure you’ve gathered from Mr. Bullock’s remarks, the charges against my client, Wallace Barrett, are very serious, so we want him to have the most fair hearing possible.”
He glanced back at Barrett and smiled. “That’s why I’ll be asking you these questions. Please don’t feel like I’m trying to pry into your personal life. I’m not. I’m just trying to learn as much as possible so that we can choose the fairest jury possible.”
With that, Ben launched into a harmless series of questions designed to elicit the most obvious kinds of bias. Do you know the mayor personally? Did you ever work for him or his staff? Were you involved in the mayoral campaign? Ben knew the answers would be no, but he needed something safe and nonconfrontational to get the ball rolling.
The next level of scrutiny was considerably more complicated. Normally Ben would begin by asking if anyone knew the defendant. The problem here was everyone knew the defendant. Everyone had seen him on television. Everyone had voted for or against him. And everyone knew what he was accused of doing.
“I know you all know who Mr. Barrett is. You’ve already told Mr. Bullock about that. But are there any of you who have some personal or private information that might affect your deliberations?”
A middle-aged man on the second row raised his hand.
“Mr. Torres,” Ben asked, “do you think you might have some preconceptions or ideas that might affect your serving on this jury?”
“I do,” the man said firmly. “I don’t like what he done. Not one bit.”
Ben proceeded cautiously. “You must realize, sir, that we are gathered here to determine what, if anything, he has done.”
“I ain’t talkin’ about no murder. I’m talk
in’ about that pension plan for sanitation workers.”
Ben did a double take. “That what?”
“The pension plan. He cut back the pension plan. Said he had to cut the sales tax. Fools like me that’s worked for the city for twenty years, we were depending on that money.”
“Sir, you must realize that that is not what this trial is about.”
“I know that. I ain’t no fool. Jus’ the same, I’m gonna have a hard time forgettin’ that he’s the man who screwed up my retirement. I bet a lot of other folks feel the same way.”
Ben took a deep breath. This was a wrinkle he had not anticipated. Barrett had told Ben he tried to get raises for city employees; he hadn’t said anything about cutting the pension plan. At least four of the jurors worked for the city in one capacity or another, as well as two of the jurors’ spouses. “Sir, this trial is being convened to consider whether Mr. Barrett has committed a crime. It is not a referendum on his political positions.”
“That may be, Mr. Defense Attorney,” Torres snapped back. “But I still don’t have my pension plan.”
Ben glanced back at Barrett. He was tugging his left earlobe, their prearranged signal for “get this man off the jury!” Unfortunately, Torres had said nothing that would absolutely indicate that he was unable to evaluate innocence or guilt and thus would mandate dismissal for cause. Ben would have to wait and use one of his preemptories.
“Is there anyone else who feels that their political differences might make it difficult to consider the accusations against Mr. Barrett fairly?”
Ben detected a few tiny movements, but no hands rose. But of course not. He had asked the question wrong, had asked them to draw the conclusion.
“Well, is there anyone in the jury who particularly dislikes a political decision my client has made?”
Six hands shot into the air. Add that to the six jurors connected to city employees, and Ben realized he was going to be discussing this subject for a good long time.
Two hours later, Ben decided that he had learned all he could possibly know, and far more than he had wanted to know. The truth was, his client was a celebrity, and whether anyone cared to admit it or not, celebrities were treated differently in this country, including in the justice system. The idea that he could select a panel of jurors who would not bring any preconceived notions to the trial was laughable.
Naked Justice Page 24
